CNN on Swedish artist targeted by jihadis: “[O]ne could argue Vilks should have known better”
posted at 11:49 am on October 16, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Really? I’d love to hear that argument.
Vilks, who has been a controversial artist for more than three decades in Sweden, says his drawing was a calculated move, and he wanted it to elicit a reaction.
“That’s a way of expressing things. If you don’t like it, don’t look at it. And if you look at it, don’t take it too seriously. No harm done, really,” he says.
When it’s suggested that might prove an arrogant — if not insulting — way to engage Muslims, he is unrelenting, even defiant.
“No one actually loves the truth, but someone has to say it,” he says.
Vilks, a self-described atheist, points out he’s an equal opportunity offender who in the past sketched a depiction of Jesus as a pedophile.
Still one could argue Vilks should have known better because of what happened in Denmark in 2005, when a cartoonist’s depictions of the prophet sparked violent protests in the Muslim world and prompted death threats against that cartoonist’s life.
What makes this doubly unbearable is the media’s endless preening self-congratulation about how indispensable they are as a check on power. Vilks is literally facing death over a piece of art, a sentence that would rightly kick up an international storm if it was the Swedish government or a Christian group that was trying to carry it out. Because the Perpetually Aggrieved don’t fit the narrative mold of what constitutes the kind of Power to which Truth should be spoken, though, CNN slides effortlessly into apologizing for violent cretinism. It’s based on a tacit belief that somehow jihadists have been oppressed, that they’re somehow understandably sensitive to “arrogant” provocations by westerners, which warrants a bit more equivocation than the usual “killing people over art is wrong” western line. How easily the guardians of the sacred, magical newsroom lapse into defending fascism when it comes at them with the right profile.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
For every good piece CNN does there are several pieces of garbage like this.
BadgerHawk on October 16, 2007 at 11:52 AM
This is one of the reasons that I refuse to watch anything CNN produces.
doriangrey on October 16, 2007 at 11:52 AM
When will the west stop acting like abused wives and blaming themselves for other people’s actions.
lorien1973 on October 16, 2007 at 11:58 AM
I suppose one could argue, to a point, that yes…Vilks “should have known better”…but CNN certainly knew what they were doing.
This is CNN…
JetBoy on October 16, 2007 at 11:59 AM
Its not just news channels, remember South Park Cartoon Wars?
Bad Candy on October 16, 2007 at 12:08 PM
Yes, we should know that continuing our democracy and lives will continue to anger Islamists, so we really shouldn’t do that either.
/sarcasm
amerpundit on October 16, 2007 at 12:10 PM
In fact, Cartoon Wars pointed this out too, remember al-Qaeda’s retaliation video at the end, with Jesus, Bush and a bunch of other people crapping on each other while standing on an American flag draped on the ground? Comedy Central didn’t make any noise about that.
Bad Candy on October 16, 2007 at 12:12 PM
One could argue that, but if one did, one would be scum of the earth.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on October 16, 2007 at 12:13 PM
Love that use of passive voice:
“When
it’s suggestedwe suggest that might prove an arrogant — if not insulting — way to engage Muslims, he is unrelenting, even defiant….“Still
onewe could argue Vilks should have known better…”“One last question, Mr. Vilks: what are those two round objects you seem to have in your pants?”
“Those are balls, CNN.”
“Interesting…”
saint kansas on October 16, 2007 at 12:14 PM
It’s off-topic, but I can see this being a post in the near future:
http://talkingradio.blogspot.com/2007/10/randi-rhodes-is-victim-of-violent.html
“Randi Rhodes (of Air America radio) was mugged on Sunday night on 39th Street and Park Ave, nearby her Manhattan apartment, while she was walking her dog Simon.
…
Pointing out that Rhodes was wearing a jogging suit and displayed no purse or jewelry, (co-host Jon) Elliott speculated that “this does not appear to me to be a standard grab the money and run mugging.”
“Is this an attempt by the right wing hate machine to silence one of our own,” he asked. “Are we threatening them. Are they afraid that we’re winning. Are they trying to silence intimidate us.”"
There follows a list of violent incidents against left-wing radio hosts, all of which are attributed to right-wingers, even when the attackers are unidentified.
Apeking on October 16, 2007 at 12:15 PM
So when the Gestapo kick in the media’s door the media is going to blame itself?
‘Just pay the bully the money Johnny. You don’t need to eat lunch anyway.’
Limerick on October 16, 2007 at 12:20 PM
Glad to see CNN values other’s freedom of expression as much as they do their own…
MadisonConservative on October 16, 2007 at 12:26 PM
Yeah, and Nicole Brown Simpson should have known better too.
/sarc
CurtZHP on October 16, 2007 at 12:41 PM
Comedy Central did show the initial airing of “Super Best Friends” but not after the Van Gogh assasination. Didn’t their president get some sort of free speech award?
Harpoon on October 16, 2007 at 12:46 PM
I’m guessing this is a purely hypothetical exercise?
TABoLK on October 16, 2007 at 12:59 PM
Super Best Friends was an old episode, it was only after the Dutch cartoons was Mohammed taboo. I think Comedy Central embargoed Super Best Friends from being aired after the whole controversy, though.
Bad Candy on October 16, 2007 at 1:28 PM
He should know from the Dutch example to carry a weapon and be prepared to use it.
mojo on October 16, 2007 at 1:53 PM
So, what’s the deal here, women who wear short skirts in public should know better and not be surprised when they’re raped?
People are insane here.
Esthier on October 16, 2007 at 1:59 PM
Once again, I am so glad I declined a career in journalism for, instead, a career in publishing.
And now web.
I don’t think I’d be able to look at myself in the mirror if I were a reporter these days. But I rock as a Web Manager.
Meryl Yourish on October 16, 2007 at 2:39 PM
I can’t say I really like what he does, but the fact that he does it to everyone, muslims included, somehow makes it ok. We need more of these equal opportunity offenders.
4shoes on October 16, 2007 at 9:59 PM
Comment pages: