The thing about Fred is that he’s REAL.

Satan is REAL too.

BKennedy on October 14, 2007 at 12:19 AM

1. Ergo Fred = Satan??

2. Define REAL. Does your definition of “real” require some kind of religious faith or dogma to believe in, or can the rest of us touch, smell, photograph or otherwise verify Satan’s reality as well??

3. I can see it now: csdeven / BKennedy plying all-new monikers for Fred, now that the Fred?-style question mark has been deprecated:

SatanFred
FraudFred or Fraued
SlimeballFred

Go Phred!

The thing about Fred is that he’s REAL. I’m so sick of hologram candidates and he’s the real deal. Imagine a guy who ONLY serves in the senate twice instead of running over and over and over again. Here’s a guy who does NOT crave power or NEED to be the center of attention. With Fred you have a complete and whole human being who understands that national events dictate that he run. Finally a guy who doesn’t HAVE to be president but WILL become president for the good of all. In this case the times have made the man.

Go Fred.

Mojave Mark on October 13, 2007 at 10:34 PM

The only thing REAL about Fred is he’s a REAL good actor.

He’s a radioactive Fraud who, in my book, is no better than Hillary Clinton. Both of them have the taint of Washington-style corruption. Fred’s commitment to federalism is wafer-thin. He never has anything to say except “I’ll get back to you.”

He’s a liar and a fraud, who has done nothing for conservatives and nothing with conservatives. All he offers is a whole lot of talk off a forked tongue.

Satan is REAL too.

Mojave Mark on October 13, 2007 at 10:34 PM

Right there with ya!

Go Fred.

Gatordoug on October 13, 2007 at 6:32 PM
The fact is that Fred voted no on the perjury charge. Look it up.

csdeven on October 13, 2007 at 7:11 PM

And he voted YES on the other two

Guiliani I disagree with on politics to a large degree.

McCain and Huckabee I disagree with on politics to a much smaller degree.

Romney, Hunter, and Tancredo are mostly in line with my politics.

However, None of these men have the taint of corruption that Fred does. Fred is a corrupt slimeball, he can spout all he wants about southern Christian values, it’s all a farce to get him elected. Fred has no credibility, and everyone should run from him.

Gatordoug on October 13, 2007 at 6:32 PM

The fact is that Fred voted no on the perjury charge. Look it up.

Again! An opinion piece proves nothing about Fred does it?
Gatordoug on October 13, 2007 at 6:21 PM

Point out the lies in the article. Oh, that’s right! You’re one of those who discount any fact from anyone you don’t like so it doesn’t matter what facts are there.

Not only does “What’s a dollar?” have to deal with his scummy past, he has to somehow overcome the better conservative bona fides that this candidate has.

csdeven on October 13, 2007 at 5:33 PM

Again! An opinion piece proves nothing about Fred does it?

Apparently, Fred “what’s a dollar?” Thompson didn’t fool anyone except his terrorist enabling staffer Spencer Abraham. Fred did well in the debate because he didn’t ask to take a nap. It’s crystal clear that his wife is the one prodding him.

csdeven on October 13, 2007 at 5:18 PM

OH BOY!! An commentary in the London Times, hardly anything worth not supporting Fred in there now is there? The clown who wrote that is obviously biased and, completely irrelevant.

Fred “what’s a dollar?” Thompson. More proof he is a loser.

csdeven on October 13, 2007 at 5:11 PM

Ann Coulter thinks Fred is unfit because he voted to impeach Clinton on only TWO counts? He DID vote to impeach Clinton you know?
Try harder, come on, find anything worthwhile

csdeven on October 13, 2007 at 4:50

Good grief

Thanks for proving my point

Gatordoug on October 13, 2007 at 4:25 PM

That’s it? I know you are but what am I?

Grow up and find a new hobby besides stalking me you sissy-mary.

csdeven on October 13, 2007 at 3:13 PM

Thanks for proving my point

Dobson should have kept his focus on the family, and not playing kingmaker.

Harpazo on October 12, 2007 at 9:13 PM

Amen, brother — preach it!

Gatordoug on October 13, 2007 at 1:34 PM

Awwwwwwww. Somebody call the Whaaaaaaaaaambulance.

There were zero facts in that load of tripe you just spewed.

Everyone knows that Fred lobbied for a dictator, lobbied against the victims of asbestos poisoning, lobbied for an abortion group. He also is a main architect of the disgusting attack on free speech called McCain/Feingold AND the scumbag gave legal advice to terrorists helping them to avoid justice for 11 years. He lies to pro-life groups by claiming he has “always been with them” when he is really pro-choice. (Which has been proven by a document he signed himself) Then he had the unmitigated GALL to claim that the pro-life group has ALWAYS been with him! What a scumbag liar. Then he claimed that Ronald Reagan changed his speech because of something Fred told him to say. Really Fred? REALLY? Prove that you lying fake! The guy has no class or shame. He’s proud of his man whore reputation. Yeah, real class Fred.

You can whine and complain and call me names all you like, but those are the facts, you cannot refute them or explain them into disappearing.

Until you can do that, which will never be able to, you and your ilk will always attack the messenger instead of deal with the facts.

Bwahahahahaha!!!

csdeven on October 13, 2007 at 1:28 PM

It has to do with your total lack of substance to support your hatred of Thompson. Just keep repeatiing the same old BS over and again. You sound like a typical Liberal talking head frankly.

You know, I had a parrot once, reminded me of, well, ………..
Gatordoug on October 13, 2007 at 11:06 AM

What does that have to do with the poor quality of Fred as a candidate?

Reagan wasn’t “Christian enough” for many people, Carter was. Keep that in mind.

I have one interest in seeking a President. Will he serve his nation faithfully, and obey his oath of office?

One of the things the MSM does is find “spokesmen” for entire segments of the population, who are really just out there speaking their OWN opinion.

Do all Blacks think like Sharpton and Jackson? No, but the MSM makes them out to do so.

Its much easier to write a story with only one viewpoint, than to tell the truth and really dig for the data on what entire groups of people think.

Cindy Sheehan was a Media CREATED problem… Code Pink? Give them no press and they’d go away.

Notice how the antiwar demonstrations have DECREASED in size with the decrease in their media coverage?

Dobson was potrayed as speaking for an entire segment of the voting population, when he is more the symptom, than the cause.