I like how half the comments in this thread are just lame jokes about Henry Waxman’s nostrils.

Really mature and insightful political discussion you got going here.

AJB on October 11, 2007 at 2:22 PM

Shouldn’t you be posting over at dKos?

Really mature and insightful political discussion you got going here.

Where did you find that comment by the former Marine?

He is also a plastic surgeons dream or nightmare depending on their level of experience.

For example, last weekend I watched part of the congressional hearing by Waxman’s committee re: Blackwater. Congressman Darryl Issa (R-CA) asked the head of Blackwater about his sister being a Republican as well as his own political contributions and about his company being labeled as Republican-leaning and said that the Democrats had investigated and alleged all this.

Chairman Waxman chided Rep. Issa for saying this and said he was the only one bringing it up. Then, Rep. Issa revealed that all of the things he asked about had come straight from a document released by Waxman’s own staff.

Perhaps it was a trial balloon?

The nutroots are slobbering and drooling all over themselves hoping that it’s true. And if it were just to win over the nutroots, they’d go for it.

But, in the general election in 2008, the nutroots are really the actual numberical minority in the electorate. Waxman and his gang of thugs have to win over the general public.

So, perhaps as an experiment, he released this trial balloon to see if it would fly with the general public.

They found out that middle America didn’t believe it; that middle America correctly saw through the gambit and doesn’t believe Limbaugh was insulting the military (given his near 20 year open support of the military), but was singling out SPECIFIC individuals who WERE phony soldiers.

This denial is nothing but a retraction of a trial balloon. You can bet, however, that if the public believed the Media Matters’s lie, they would be having the hearings tomorrow.

The American Spectator New Republic should immediately retract its report and apologize for the confusion its fictitious report has caused. Moreover, anyone concerned about the false reporting should contact the American Spectator New Republic to register your views.

Feel free to exchange Newsweek (Koran flushing), but change “confusion” to “deaths.”

Too many examples to list here…

Actually, his statement does sound just like that:

Moreover, anyone concerned about the false reporting should contact the American Spectator at (703)807-2011 to register your views.

Hmmm. Agenda?

[snif, snif]

At 10:21:22 PM on Wednesday, October 10, 2007, Bob Rahm wrote:

Why isn’t this exactly the same as McCarthyism, threatening enemies with the abuse of government power to thwart protestations of abuse? Waxman is McCarthy, and the war on media conservatives is his pinko witch hunt.

And Allah said:

Question: If it’s true, why would Waxman deny it?

Perhaps this is why (what they hope). If that story is absolutely, positvely completely UNtrue, then the targets will stop talking about it and relax their defenses.

Congressman Henry Waxman has denied that he is investigating talk radio. The American Spectator reported this story, so we have conflicting information. If we use liberal standards here, the seriousness of the charge is such that there should be an official investigation into the allegations that Waxman is conducting an investigation.

If our pal Henry is indeed monitoring the program, we direct him to two stories today in particular: House Democrats have put the Iraq debate on the back burner, because they realize that we are winning. And the very same House Democrats are aiding the enemies of America with their attempts to water down of the terrorist surveillance program.

Well, she ain’t ugly.

csdeven on October 10, 2007 at 11:06 PM

Then it has to be a nostril fetish.

“Nostrils”

*snort*

Go here.. for real…

http://www.washingtonlife.com/backissues/archives/99nov/ambassadors_ball2.htm

Waxman’s wife is probably some smokin hot babe.

csdeven on October 10, 2007 at 10:55 PM

A ‘Miss Piggy’ kind of smoking hot babe?