<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread: The highest, lowest debate expectations evah; Video added: Rudy vs. Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:25:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-733059</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-733059</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2007/10/sc_senator_prai.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jim DeMint endorses Mitt Romney.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2007/10/sc_senator_prai.html" rel="nofollow">Jim DeMint endorses Mitt Romney.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-729616</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-729616</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;sigh … another government educated citizen.

AZ_Redneck on October 10, 2007 at 9:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;



&lt;blockquote&gt;And just so you know:) Constitution wasn’t enacted in 1776. Google it.

Spirit of 1776 on October 10, 2007 at 1:03 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Thanks for the correction.

I knew it wasn&#039;t, I just didn&#039;t take the time to check the actual date, because I was in a hurry to get an appointment and I was ticked off as well.

It was in the spirit of it.

So here&#039;s the corrected cleverness:
&lt;blockquote&gt;In the &lt;strong&gt;Spirit of&lt;/strong&gt; our freedoms enacted in &lt;strong&gt;1776&lt;/strong&gt;, I am flashing three fingers (with the index finger being in the center) at you….can you read between the lines?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I....&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;sure&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; do hope you&#039;re happy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>sigh … another government educated citizen.</p>
<p>AZ_Redneck on October 10, 2007 at 9:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>And just so you know:) Constitution wasn’t enacted in 1776. Google it.</p>
<p>Spirit of 1776 on October 10, 2007 at 1:03 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, yeah, yeah.</p>
<p>Thanks for the correction.</p>
<p>I knew it wasn&#8217;t, I just didn&#8217;t take the time to check the actual date, because I was in a hurry to get an appointment and I was ticked off as well.</p>
<p>It was in the spirit of it.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s the corrected cleverness:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the <strong>Spirit of</strong> our freedoms enacted in <strong>1776</strong>, I am flashing three fingers (with the index finger being in the center) at you….can you read between the lines?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8230;.<em><strong>sure</strong></em> do hope you&#8217;re happy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-729017</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-729017</guid>
		<description>Thx Spirit :-) - I&#039;m having trouble getting the Amazon sample tracks to play on my box, but if they&#039;re as unbelievably bad as I remember, there&#039;s an outside chance this could go viral at some point.

The emphASSis is definitely on the wrong syl-LAB-le in this native German speaker-inspired masterpiece:

&quot;We hold zees truths to be self-evi-DENT!&quot;
&quot;...life, li-ber-ty; and the PURR-sui-t of happiness!&quot;

Not that I&#039;m complaining; at least this guy is pro-American.  Gotta take our friends where we can find &#039;em these days :-)

Over&amp;out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx Spirit :-) &#8211; I&#8217;m having trouble getting the Amazon sample tracks to play on my box, but if they&#8217;re as unbelievably bad as I remember, there&#8217;s an outside chance this could go viral at some point.</p>
<p>The emphASSis is definitely on the wrong syl-LAB-le in this native German speaker-inspired masterpiece:</p>
<p>&#8220;We hold zees truths to be self-evi-DENT!&#8221;<br />
&#8220;&#8230;life, li-ber-ty; and the PURR-sui-t of happiness!&#8221;</p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m complaining; at least this guy is pro-American.  Gotta take our friends where we can find &#8216;em these days :-)</p>
<p>Over&amp;out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-729007</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-729007</guid>
		<description>RD on October 11, 2007 at 1:51 AM

Haha.  That got a good laugh out of me.  Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RD on October 11, 2007 at 1:51 AM</p>
<p>Haha.  That got a good laugh out of me.  Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-729005</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-729005</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Um, RD thanks for that link. I’m not even sure what adjective applies.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Just thank the Lord you didn&#039;t have to perform any part of it!  You can take my word for it, not that it&#039;s needed :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Um, RD thanks for that link. I’m not even sure what adjective applies.</p></blockquote>
<p>Just thank the Lord you didn&#8217;t have to perform any part of it!  You can take my word for it, not that it&#8217;s needed :-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-728997</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-728997</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Or, if you’re real lucky, reminisce back to 1987 when this monstrosity was first performed - at the bicentennial - and subtract 200 years…&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Um, RD thanks for that link.  I&#039;m not even sure what adjective applies.

&lt;blockquote&gt;And really if AP had such a problem with big posts you’d hear it a lot more often, just judging from your insinuation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Mcguyver, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the size, it has something to do with fair use.  I don&#039;t know how it works, I don&#039;t blog, but I know it bugs AP because everytime I&#039;ve seen a full article dropped in comments he&#039;s said something about it - in line with please don&#039;t do that, a cya thing I think.  So wouldn&#039;t surprise me if they somehow tricked up moderation to screen for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Or, if you’re real lucky, reminisce back to 1987 when this monstrosity was first performed &#8211; at the bicentennial &#8211; and subtract 200 years…</p></blockquote>
<p>Um, RD thanks for that link.  I&#8217;m not even sure what adjective applies.</p>
<blockquote><p>And really if AP had such a problem with big posts you’d hear it a lot more often, just judging from your insinuation.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mcguyver, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the size, it has something to do with fair use.  I don&#8217;t know how it works, I don&#8217;t blog, but I know it bugs AP because everytime I&#8217;ve seen a full article dropped in comments he&#8217;s said something about it &#8211; in line with please don&#8217;t do that, a cya thing I think.  So wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if they somehow tricked up moderation to screen for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-728981</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-728981</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And just so you know:) Constitution wasn’t enacted in 1776. Google it.

Spirit of 1776 on October 10, 2007 at 1:03 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or, if you&#039;re real lucky, reminisce back to 1987 when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=alexander+blechinger+song+of+constitution&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this monstrosity&lt;/a&gt; was first performed - at the bicentennial - and subtract 200 years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And just so you know:) Constitution wasn’t enacted in 1776. Google it.</p>
<p>Spirit of 1776 on October 10, 2007 at 1:03 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Or, if you&#8217;re real lucky, reminisce back to 1987 when <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=alexander+blechinger+song+of+constitution" rel="nofollow">this monstrosity</a> was first performed &#8211; at the bicentennial &#8211; and subtract 200 years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-728959</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-728959</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Since you had a problem with your post, I was merely trying to help. You seemed to be asking a question of why you comment didn’t post.
Spirit of 1776 on October 10, 2007 at 1:03 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


I appreciate the help.....

But that was really a very small post in comparison to the average length here.  And really if AP had such a problem with big posts you&#039;d hear it a lot more often, just judging from your insinuation.
So no, I still don&#039;t understand how the moderation works...
....is it certain words...is it when he happens to be watching you or what it is.

But I was clearly a just a little ticked off at the notion that I was posting anything out of the ordinary in terms of size or whatever.

Ultimately kinda ridiculous from any standpoint,IMO.

In other choice words, pure bovine scatology.

It sure shut this hulabaloo Fred shill debate down....probably for good....which really doesn&#039;t shed tears on my part.


And by the way, you are all very welcome....anytime I can be of assistance in any way. 

I&#039;m never far away, just tap me on the shoulder....

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Since you had a problem with your post, I was merely trying to help. You seemed to be asking a question of why you comment didn’t post.<br />
Spirit of 1776 on October 10, 2007 at 1:03 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I appreciate the help&#8230;..</p>
<p>But that was really a very small post in comparison to the average length here.  And really if AP had such a problem with big posts you&#8217;d hear it a lot more often, just judging from your insinuation.<br />
So no, I still don&#8217;t understand how the moderation works&#8230;<br />
&#8230;.is it certain words&#8230;is it when he happens to be watching you or what it is.</p>
<p>But I was clearly a just a little ticked off at the notion that I was posting anything out of the ordinary in terms of size or whatever.</p>
<p>Ultimately kinda ridiculous from any standpoint,IMO.</p>
<p>In other choice words, pure bovine scatology.</p>
<p>It sure shut this hulabaloo Fred shill debate down&#8230;.probably for good&#8230;.which really doesn&#8217;t shed tears on my part.</p>
<p>And by the way, you are all very welcome&#8230;.anytime I can be of assistance in any way. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m never far away, just tap me on the shoulder&#8230;.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ_Redneck</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-728810</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ_Redneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-728810</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 11:38 AM 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

sigh ... another government educated citizen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 11:38 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>sigh &#8230; another government educated citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollowpoint</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727913</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollowpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727913</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Everybody please go…no you MUST go over to Debbie Schlussel’s website…or else I’ll duct tape you to the wall.

Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 12:02 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No.  I&#039;ve already had my daily dose of crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Everybody please go…no you MUST go over to Debbie Schlussel’s website…or else I’ll duct tape you to the wall.</p>
<p>Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 12:02 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>No.  I&#8217;ve already had my daily dose of crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727869</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727869</guid>
		<description>And just so you know:) Constitution wasn&#039;t enacted in 1776.  Google it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just so you know:) Constitution wasn&#8217;t enacted in 1776.  Google it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727868</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727868</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In the Spirit of the Constitution enacted in 1776, I am flashing three fingers (with the index finger being in the center) at you….can you read between the lines?

Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 11:38 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Hey, pat yourself on the back for your cleverness.  I was merely trying to help.  AP has made an issue of it before, clearly expressing his disapproval.  Since you had a problem with your post, I was merely trying to help.  You seemed to be asking a question of why you comment didn&#039;t post.

Trust me, if I had anticipated your response I would have left you to yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In the Spirit of the Constitution enacted in 1776, I am flashing three fingers (with the index finger being in the center) at you….can you read between the lines?</p>
<p>Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 11:38 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, pat yourself on the back for your cleverness.  I was merely trying to help.  AP has made an issue of it before, clearly expressing his disapproval.  Since you had a problem with your post, I was merely trying to help.  You seemed to be asking a question of why you comment didn&#8217;t post.</p>
<p>Trust me, if I had anticipated your response I would have left you to yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727804</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727804</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As Bush said, you are either with us or with the terrorists. It seems Fred picked the wrong side.

tommylotto on October 10, 2007 at 12:15 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thus speaketh the lawyer who sues people for a living...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As Bush said, you are either with us or with the terrorists. It seems Fred picked the wrong side.</p>
<p>tommylotto on October 10, 2007 at 12:15 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Thus speaketh the lawyer who sues people for a living&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommylotto</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727802</link>
		<dc:creator>tommylotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727802</guid>
		<description>Fred can be bought by terrorists.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/10/11/rec.giuliani.prince/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rudy, not so much...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred can be bought by terrorists.  <a href="http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/10/11/rec.giuliani.prince/index.html" rel="nofollow">Rudy, not so much&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727800</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727800</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Male bovine scatology!

I thought better of you.

Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 10:54 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He doesnt like you you dude. So why dont you do the Jonny Fairplay jumpy huggy chest humpy thing so we can all watch Allahpundit pull a Danny Bonaduce on you....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Male bovine scatology!</p>
<p>I thought better of you.</p>
<p>Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 10:54 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>He doesnt like you you dude. So why dont you do the Jonny Fairplay jumpy huggy chest humpy thing so we can all watch Allahpundit pull a Danny Bonaduce on you&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommylotto</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727799</link>
		<dc:creator>tommylotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727799</guid>
		<description>Question:  What is more disturbing?

1)  That B. Hussein Obama is named&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; B. Hussein Obama&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
2) That B. Hussein Obana may have been educated in a madrassa,
3)  That Fred Thompson has himself confirmed that he provided legal advice to enable terrorism and lied about the nature of his work (its not venue stupid); or 
4) Fred&#039;s continued association with &quot;Jihad Spence&quot;

Frankly, I find the terrorist connection to Fred much more persuasive.

As Bush said, you are either with us or with the terrorists.  It seems Fred picked the wrong side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question:  What is more disturbing?</p>
<p>1)  That B. Hussein Obama is named<strong><em> B. Hussein Obama</em></strong><br />
2) That B. Hussein Obana may have been educated in a madrassa,<br />
3)  That Fred Thompson has himself confirmed that he provided legal advice to enable terrorism and lied about the nature of his work (its not venue stupid); or<br />
4) Fred&#8217;s continued association with &#8220;Jihad Spence&#8221;</p>
<p>Frankly, I find the terrorist connection to Fred much more persuasive.</p>
<p>As Bush said, you are either with us or with the terrorists.  It seems Fred picked the wrong side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727784</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727784</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think it would be respectful to Debbie to send people to her site to read it rather than post the entire article. She has a lot of other stuff there that is very interesting.
csdeven on October 10, 2007 at 11:47 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Everybody please go...no you MUST go over to Debbie Schlussel&#039;s website...or else I&#039;ll duct tape you to the wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think it would be respectful to Debbie to send people to her site to read it rather than post the entire article. She has a lot of other stuff there that is very interesting.<br />
csdeven on October 10, 2007 at 11:47 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Everybody please go&#8230;no you MUST go over to Debbie Schlussel&#8217;s website&#8230;or else I&#8217;ll duct tape you to the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727768</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727768</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 11:38 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think it would be respectful to Debbie to send people to her site to read it rather than post the entire article. She has a lot of other stuff there that is very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 11:38 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I think it would be respectful to Debbie to send people to her site to read it rather than post the entire article. She has a lot of other stuff there that is very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727763</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727763</guid>
		<description>In the &lt;strong&gt;Spirit of&lt;/strong&gt; the Constitution enacted in &lt;strong&gt;1776&lt;/strong&gt;, I am flashing three fingers (with the index finger being in the center) at you....can you read between the lines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <strong>Spirit of</strong> the Constitution enacted in <strong>1776</strong>, I am flashing three fingers (with the index finger being in the center) at you&#8230;.can you read between the lines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727760</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727760</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-071009romney-story,1,5265083.story&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I looked and looked and looked&lt;/a&gt; and I didn&#039;t see one single tie to terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-071009romney-story,1,5265083.story" rel="nofollow">I looked and looked and looked</a> and I didn&#8217;t see one single tie to terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727758</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727758</guid>
		<description>In the &lt;strong&gt;Spirit of&lt;/strong&gt; the constitution enacted in &lt;strong&gt;1776&lt;/strong&gt; here is 
the second half of Debbie Schlussel&#039;s artcle:
&lt;blockquote&gt;When your man continues to employ a pan-Jihadist as his top advisor--after he&#039;s been informed of the man&#039;s frightening views--that means your man has no problem with those views and gives you a good idea what he would do as President. I mean, would you vote for a guy who employed CAIR&#039;s Ibrahim Hooper as his top campaign guy? Would you want him in the White House? Abraham is basically the same thing as Hooper (and was very close to Hooper as a U.S. Senator and Bush Secretary of Energy).

You&#039;ll recall that this past summer, as soon as Thompson announced that Jihad Spence was his new campaign manager, I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/07/jihad_fred_fred.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reposted and updated a past column I&#039;ve written about Abraham&#039;s work on behalf of Islamic terrorists,&lt;/a&gt; including sending billions of our money directly to Hezbollah and refusing to condemn Yasser Arafat&#039;s homicide bombings. &lt;strong&gt;This caused a lot of conservatives to dump Thompson and sent his campaign reeling.&lt;/strong&gt;

So--in addition to&lt;strong&gt; attacking me (Debbie Schlussel) personally--the Thompson campaign stepped back from Abraham, naming a new &quot;campaign manager.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; But, as I pointed out, that was all for show. &lt;strong&gt;A big fat lie&lt;/strong&gt; . . . kinda like Fred.

Now we have the confirmation. Spencer Abraham--the pan-Jihadist Senator and Energy Secretary--is still running Fred Thompson&#039;s campaign.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <strong>Spirit of</strong> the constitution enacted in <strong>1776</strong> here is<br />
the second half of Debbie Schlussel&#8217;s artcle:</p>
<blockquote><p>When your man continues to employ a pan-Jihadist as his top advisor&#8211;after he&#8217;s been informed of the man&#8217;s frightening views&#8211;that means your man has no problem with those views and gives you a good idea what he would do as President. I mean, would you vote for a guy who employed CAIR&#8217;s Ibrahim Hooper as his top campaign guy? Would you want him in the White House? Abraham is basically the same thing as Hooper (and was very close to Hooper as a U.S. Senator and Bush Secretary of Energy).</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll recall that this past summer, as soon as Thompson announced that Jihad Spence was his new campaign manager, I <a href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/07/jihad_fred_fred.html" rel="nofollow">reposted and updated a past column I&#8217;ve written about Abraham&#8217;s work on behalf of Islamic terrorists,</a> including sending billions of our money directly to Hezbollah and refusing to condemn Yasser Arafat&#8217;s homicide bombings. <strong>This caused a lot of conservatives to dump Thompson and sent his campaign reeling.</strong></p>
<p>So&#8211;in addition to<strong> attacking me (Debbie Schlussel) personally&#8211;the Thompson campaign stepped back from Abraham, naming a new &#8220;campaign manager.&#8221;</strong> But, as I pointed out, that was all for show. <strong>A big fat lie</strong> . . . kinda like Fred.</p>
<p>Now we have the confirmation. Spencer Abraham&#8211;the pan-Jihadist Senator and Energy Secretary&#8211;is still running Fred Thompson&#8217;s campaign.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727740</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727740</guid>
		<description>Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 11:04 AM

Don&#039;t copy a whole article.  It&#039;s very poor form.  I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s why your comments were axed, but could very well be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mcguyver on October 10, 2007 at 11:04 AM</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t copy a whole article.  It&#8217;s very poor form.  I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s why your comments were axed, but could very well be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727710</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727710</guid>
		<description>O.K.

Finally......

What was the hold up with those first two comments in moderation, AP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K.</p>
<p>Finally&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>What was the hold up with those first two comments in moderation, AP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727698</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727698</guid>
		<description>Two comments in moderation which are Debbie Schlussel&#039;s article copied in their entirety you will not allow?
&lt;strong&gt;
Male bovine scatology!&lt;/strong&gt;

I thought better of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two comments in moderation which are Debbie Schlussel&#8217;s article copied in their entirety you will not allow?<br />
<strong><br />
Male bovine scatology!</strong></p>
<p>I thought better of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/comment-page-9/#comment-727692</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/09/open-thread-the-highest-lowest-debate-expectations-evah/#comment-727692</guid>
		<description>O.K.

So you allow me to link Debbie Schlussel but not copy the whole article?

What the hell?

You&#039;re not biased are you?

Bovine scatology!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K.</p>
<p>So you allow me to link Debbie Schlussel but not copy the whole article?</p>
<p>What the hell?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not biased are you?</p>
<p>Bovine scatology!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
