Doesn’t he have any researchers who can find out a bit more about Benjamin’s background. She is a founder of Code Pink. She is not a Democrat. She is at the very least a Socialist. She was against the US going into Afghanistan.

Surely, armed with this information, Hannity might have been able to attack Code Pink’s efforts at the recruiting station in Berkley.

JAIL FOR BROSSARD.

Allahpundit on October 6, 2007 at 6:47 PM

Transfer to DailyKos for Allahpundit

JAIL FOR BROSSARD.

Allahpundit on October 6, 2007 at 6:47 PM

So I take it you already have him convicted AP?

This is a terrible case from the prosecution side, even with the video evidence; there are too many other factors like paid legal council, media attention and the idea that what this man did was justified. I would fight any charges brought and I would be able to beat this case .{This case would defiantly be going to the box. Jury trials cost the county alot more money then a plea bargin} I am saying it will be a disturbing the peace plea bargain with no suspended sentace and court probation and maybe a small fine. So jail time won’t even be an option, even if he violates the court probation.

Just to let you all know . none of these code pinko morons were not anywhere near the celebration and air show in SF for our brave soldiers and sailors. I guess self preservation out weighed their outrage about the war.

Here’s a bio on this vile womyn

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=626

VinceP1974 on October 6, 2007 at 7:07 PM

That bytch was one of the organizers of the WTO riots in Seattle in 1999. That was a pointless distruption to our city by these insane self-appointed guardians of the “truth.” And it’s always the same: they gather to protest and violate the delegates right to assembly at the conference. When the police intervene, they show no respect for authority and the mayhem ensues. In the end, the POS libs blame the police for the whole thing. Meanwhile those hurt the most by their actions are the local people whose businesses are damaged and who have to clean up after these vile dip$hits.

I would like to meet this bytch, just so I could tell her to go fu*k herself.

Too bad it’s a recruiting office and not some private business so that the Brossard analogy would be complete.

Sorry Allah, as well as vandalizing a government building Code Pink could quite easily be found guilty of conspiracy to commit vandalism on a government building. Analogy not even close. While Brossard could be found guilty of petty theft and maybe even brandishing a weapon, it is a stretch to call it vandalism. Cutting the rope while committing the theft of the flag would be ‘destruction of property’. Vandalism would be cutting the rope for no obvious purpose. It would be an even bigger stretch to call it conspiracy. Maybe one could prove that the camera man knew what Brossard was planning to do before he did it and that could possibly be a conspiracy but I’m sure everyone can admit that the Brossard incident was more or less spontaneous while the Code Pink incident was planned in advance.

JAIL FOR BROSSARD.

Allahpundit on October 6, 2007 at 6:47 PM

At best Brossard would be sentenced to a fine and thirty days suspended sentence for petty theft. Not sure what vandalism and conspiracy to commit vandalism could get Code Pink members but I’m sure it’s not much worse.

So let’s end the discussion now with the understanding that what Allah is telling us, that committing a crime to make a larger political statement is always wrong and should be punishable by a felony sentence. Long live the Monarchy.

So let the hammer fall on both, equally. That’s the only fair way.

Again, my heart is with the vet and my venom with that pathetic leftist bint, but the law provides for avenues to deal with both.

If we don’t like the laws, we can lobby to change them. It’s the right way, and the legal way. Vigilantism is…let’s just say “fun,” but it’s illegal and you can’t condemn it in one case and be for it in another if you’re in favor of following and applying the law equally.

I hate you, AllahP.

:-)

Code Pink doesn’t pull these stunts on accident. They don’t have the intellectual substance or political weight to succeed as an independent actor, so this is the only way that they can force the media to pay attention.

but that was an easy gotcha.

Allahpundit on October 6, 2007 at 6:23 PM

Only if you believe in relativity. Code Pink attacks that which is good in this country using the freedoms provided as a tool to destroy them. Same is true with the scumbag Mexican. Both the Mexican and Code Pink are wrong and it is up to patriots to challenge them.

S.F. Code Pink was merely breaking the law by defacing property as an option to protesting legally, and it isn’t the first time they’ve done it.

Got it. I’ll have my online law degree yet…

COLMES: Don’t they have a right to free speech?

BENJAMIN: I’m sure if you took a vote at Berkley they would vote to close down this recruiting station.

BENJAMIN: I’m not a democrat.

LOL, yeah, right. She’s not a dummy-crat. Maybe she doesn’t consider herself one because she doesn’t vote. She certainly reasons like one, though.

“You only have a right to free speech and to rent office space if the people of the surrounding community vote to allow it?”

Now that’s got “dumb-butt-ocrat” written all over it.