I’ll make this very easy for you. This is all you need to answer:

Did you intend to convey the message that you believe Rush is a Chickenhawk, or not? Do you continually mean to convey the message that some commentators here at Hot Air are Chickenhawks?

Or is poor little MB4 being misunderstood by big bad Buy Danish (and others)?

Somehow I missed your latest screed, and you probably went to bed convinced your arguments were so brilliant I couldn’t respond. Not.

First you say that I used that term on Limbaugh like he would even care if I did.

I never said that you used that word and I defy you to find a quote from me where I said you did. I have repeatedly said you used that argument. Child, the point is not whether HE would care, the point is that I care because it is a cheap trick used by dishonest cowards like you.

Now you are back to saying I used the actual term Blah Blah Blah.

I most certainly did NOT. There’s a very easy solution:

Find the quote where I said what you hallucinate I said. Have fun looking!

You also seem to be of the opinion that anyone who does use that term is violating some commandment of God or law of man. Using any manner of other “condemnation” like “wants to surrender”, “traitor”, “cut-and-run” is perfectly OK, but that term that you seem so unbelievably obsessed with is somehow VERBOTEN!

What the hell are you ranting about? It is a cheap and dishonest argument, but it has nothing to do with religion. Isn’t it atheists who argue that it’s not necessary to believe in God in order to be moral and ethical?

It is perfectly ethical and reasonable to say that the Democrats (and you) want to cut and run. That is a matter of taking evidence and drawing an obvious conclusion. It is not ethical or reasonable to argue that unless one served in the military one has no right to an opinion on the war.

If you had ever been in the U.S. Army you would probably know that.

Bwak Bwak Bwak. There you go using a chicken hawk argument again. It’s an expression MB4, that’s all. Grow up.

Go find someone of you own age and intellectual level to play with if you can find anyone like that.

LOL. If that were my criteria, I would not be spending even a millisecond with you.

It was my understanding that Blackwater exists for the purpose of providing security to private interests.

But let’s be clear that in Iraq, what they’re doing is providing security for lots of state Department folks, and for those contractors that are providing services to the US military and diplomats. The 4 that were murdered and desecrated in Fallujah were providing security for a food service convoy. KBR property, yes, but it was food and the equipment to serve it destined to feed our military men and women.

So what that maggot Moulitsas is saying is “I, like, totally support the troops. But the people who see to it that those troops are able to eat? Screw them.” He would have you think that it was an oil stealing convoy or some such “war profiteering” idiocy. But no, it was food for our troops. If that isn’t supporting them, I don’t know what is.

And of course you’ll never see the MSM call him out on it.

As the Blackwater honcho said in response to a “mercenary” comment in the recent hearings…

We are Americans working for America.

Period. End of story.

MB4,

I found the quote last week at Democrat Underground, and you know that because when I asked if it was you you responded to it, so it’s a little late to play a brand new game at this late hour.

Buy Danish on October 7, 2007 at 2:19 AM

What kind of convoluted “thinking” is that?

Over and out.

Buy Danish on October 7, 2007 at 2:19 AM

You can not be both over and out. It makes no sense.

If you had ever been in the U.S. Army you would probably know that.

OK, I bothered with you one more time, but that’s it. Go find someone of you own age and intellectual level to play with if you can find anyone like that.

MB4,

FACT. You routinely call people chicken hawks, either directly or indirectly.

Buy Danish Pinocchio on October 7, 2007 at 2:22 AM>

Of what a tangled web we weave, once we practice to deceive.

First you say that I used that term on Limbaugh like he would even care if I did.

Then when demonstrated otherwise, by the link that you yourself provided on an earlier thread, you say that well I used that type of argument (presumable directly by default) in effect conceding that I did not use that word, on Limbaugh.

Now you are back to saying I used the actual term but that I do it directly or indirectly like you can not even tell, but you just know that it must be one or the other. You just know it! Presumably indirectly or you would not likely have stuck the word indirectly in.

That is if I can even follow your ridiculously convolutions anymore Mike Nifong II/John Murtha II.

Make up your profoundly challenged mind!

You also seem to be of the opinion that anyone who does use that term is violating some commandment of God or law of man. Using any manner of other “condemnation” like “wants to surrender”, “traitor”, “cut-and-run” is perfectly OK, but that term that you seem so unbelievably obsessed with is somehow VERBOTEN!

To be perfectly blunt about it, you are a silly shallow ridiculous obsessed stalker that I will not bother with any more.

FACT. You routinely call people chicken hawks, either directly or indirectly.

Stop projecting your pathological tendency to prevaricate onto me.

I found the quote last week at Democrat Underground, and you know that because when I asked if it was you you responded to it, so it’s a little late to play a brand new game at this late hour.

As for your rant about Mexico, if I can’t understand it it’s because your overwrought writing was not clear.

By the way, here’s a quote from Hammes about Blackwater that you have not cited:

“The problem is, in protecting the principal they had to be very aggressive, and each time they went out, they had to offend locals, forcing them to the side of the road, being overpowering and intimidating, at times running vehicles off the road, making enemies each time they went out,” Hammes said in a PBS interview. However, Hammes noted, “Black water’s an extraordinarily professional organization, and they were doing exactly what they were tasked to do.”

Over and out.

Do you ever tire of your chicken hawk routine?

Buy Danish Pinocchio on October 7, 2007 at 1:26 AM

The ignore tap tap yappy dog light is now on.

My memory is faulty now? Last week you said it was you who didn’t remember making a comment about expelling Lieberman from the Democrat Party, after I cut and pasted a direct quote with your name on it.

Buy Danish on October 7, 2007 at 1:12 AM

Hello!!! MB4 is not my real name. It is actually Christoper Hitchens! No only fooling. You did a search on the entire internet and found some quote on a website that I had never even heard of by some one using MB4 and so it must be me? Who even cares Michael Nifong II. As big as the internet is, you do realize that it is not just us commenting at HotAir, there may be dozens of people using that. Tens of thousand of guys who went to the U.S. Army Field Artillery school know what it means. It could have been Tommy Franks for all I know. Oh tell the world Tommy Franks is MB4!!! Could even have been someones initials. It is not exactly unique like an SSN. The only way I could even imagine my saying what you quoted was if I was pulling some lefty legs, but the wording did not even match my way of wording things very well. BTW when I post on other sites I usually don’t even use MB4. I have other “handles” that I like much better. You are sure obsessed with extraneous piss ant trivia in any case.

Are you referring to the Mexican elite or the Americans who give them jobs?

Buy Danish on October 7, 2007 at 1:12 AM

Learn how to read.

P.S. Are you Mcguvers replacement as my stalker? Neither one of you is very good at it. Why don’t you go tap tap at Larry Craig for a while. All your obsessive attention is getting rather embarrassing. I’m going to have to try to just ignore you.

Hammes said removing the regime of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein “introduced major instability not just in Iraq, but in the greater Middle East.” And while the Bush administration has repeatedly said the war in Iraq is critical to U.S. security, “it has asked nothing of the majority of U.S. citizens,” he said.

“While asking major sacrifices, to include the ultimate sacrifice, from those Americans who are serving in Iraq, we are not even asking our fellow citizens to pay for the war,” Hammes complained. “Instead we are charging it to our children and grandchildren.”

That does sounds kinda very Lefty to me.

Do you think that they are a couple of leftists too? It is so obvious that you have never been in the U.S. Army. Why don’t you join up and get back to me later.

MB4 on October 7, 2007 at 1:06 AM

I realize that was not directed to me, since I never said “What’s the matter with you anyway” but I do have a comment: Do you ever tire of your chicken hawk routine?

As for whether those men whom you and the Leftist author use as fodder for their arguments, I have no idea if they are Leftists or not. Since former Nato General Wesley Clark is a Leftist, it’s certainly within the realm of possibilities.

What matters is how much of what is quoted was taken out of context or generously interpreted by the Leftist book author. It also could be a matter of turf wars which go on all the time.

What’s obvious is that you seem awfully eager to take what these men are quoted as saying and come to the worst possible conclusion.

Why is that I wonder?

Your memory is still faulty. Better have your B12 blood level checked to start with.

My memory is faulty now? Last week you said it was you who didn’t remember making a comment about expelling Lieberman from the Democrat Party, after I cut and pasted a direct quote with your name on it.

I don’t abhor “radical” Islam, I abhor Islam!!!

Mea culpa!

I also abhor the invasion of our once sovereign country by illegals and I abhor even more their money grubbing serf master plantation employers and their facilitators in our government such as Jorge Arbusto!!!

Are you referring to the Mexican elite or the Americans who give them jobs?

What is the matter with you anyway?

What part of what Colonel Thomas Hammes, the US military official once overseeing the creation of a new Iraqi military and Brigadier General Karl Horst, deputy commander of the 3rd Infantry Division said don’t you understand? Do you think that they are a couple of leftists too? It is so obvious that you have never been in the U.S. Army. Why don’t you join up and get back to me later.

Are you just playing agent-provacateur as you claimed you were doing when I found a comment by you at Firedoglake.com, where you opined that the Dems needed to “expel” Joe Lieberman?

Buy Danish on October 6, 2007 at 10:41 PM

Your memory is still faulty. Better have your B12 blood level checked to start with.

The only things I have ever seen you say that could possibly be construed as “conservative” is your abhorrence of radical Islam.

Buy Danish on October 6, 2007 at 10:41 PM

I don’t abhor “radical” Islam, I abhor Islam!!!
BTW, I also abhor the invasion of our once sovereign country by illegals and I abhor even more their money grubbing serf master plantation employers and their facilitators in our government such as Jorge Arbusto!!!

Buy Danish on October 6, 2007 at 10:41 PM

Your analytical abilities are showing further deterioration.

MB4 on October 7, 2007 at 12:44 AM

Uh huh. That limp response is what happens when you don’t have a quote handy.

Any more Leftists you’d like us to read so we can have an open mind and trash Blackwater or Rudy Guiliani like you? So far today you’ve given us Fred Kaplan and Jeremy Scahill. Maybe a little Noam Chomsky would be fun!

By the way since you think that growing up on the Upper East Side holds some symbolic significance, what shall I make of Oregon?

Crunch crunch.

Buy Danish on October 6, 2007 at 10:41 PM

Your analytical abilities are showing further deterioration.

In other words, the latrine is full of happy rats wallowing in the perfect medium, led by the head-rat, Mr. Moulitsas himself.

The conduct of these private forces sends a clear message to the Iraqi people: American lives are worth infinitely more than theirs, even if their only crime is driving their vehicle in the wrong place at the wrong time. One could say that Blackwater has been very successful at fulfilling its mission–to keep alive senior US officials. But at what price?“

MB4,

Who said that? Jeremy Scahill, I presume.

Just a little tidbit from his resume’ –

He serves as a correspondent for the U.S. radio and TV program Democracy Now!. He is a Puffin Foundation Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute, and a frequent contributor to The Nation magazine…Up until 1998, he was a regular contributor to the socialist newspaper Catholic Worker.

You may not wish to open those links so I’ll do it for you:

Democracy Now! serves as the flagship program for the Pacifica Radio network.

Pacifica Radio is a network of five independently operated, non-commercial, listener-supported radio stations in the United States that is known for its progressive political orientation.

The Nation (ISSN 0027-8378) is a weekly [1] U.S. periodical devoted to politics and culture, self-described as “the flagship of the left.”

Are you just playing agent-provacateur as you claimed you were doing when I found a comment by you at Firedoglake.com, where you opined that the Dems needed to “expel” Joe Lieberman?

The only things I have ever seen you say that could possibly be construed as “conservative” is your abhorrence of radical Islam. However, I think that’s just because you’re a self-described Atheist and you probably don’t have much nice to say about Christianity either.

Your a sick little fella Markos, Move-on

and MB4 — it is painfully obvious you are a DougJ spoof/concern troll, so get bent. You are not fooling anyone.

Topsecretk9 on October 6, 2007 at 8:54 PM

Now, now don’t get yourself all upset and I’m not trying to fool anyone.

Was it Colonel Thomas Hammes or Brigadier General Karl Horst, deputy commander of the 3rd ID, who’s words upset you the most?

Ugh…that SUIT.

Every time I see it, I die a little in side.

Good Lt on October 6, 2007 at 5:16 PM

I think he bought it in the boys department at Sears.