Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Video: New York governor gets his very own fake Mexican ID

posted at 10:33 am on October 4, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Sad that it took CNN to think of this but take it where you can get it. Spitzer’s defenders are mystified by the uproar. What’s wrong with letting illegals drive? Answer: nothing, if you don’t mind state governments aiding and abetting violations of federal law by granting privileges that lend the imprimatur of state authority to illegals’ presence in the United States and make it easier for them to find work. The crux of the argument is that driver’s licenses shouldn’t be used as proof of citizenship, legal residency, or ID, the way they are now; those tasks should be handled by an independent national ID card, which would let the driver’s license be relegated to what it is — a simple license to drive. All of which is super keen, but it’s not going to happen anytime soon and may not happen at all if libertarians can carry the day. If amnesty fans are so hot to have illegals on the roads, how about waiting until that national ID is in place to do it? Especially given how comically easy it is to fake the documents needed for licenses now, as you’re about to see.

Spitzer’s been droning on about the “politics of fear” and his own glimmering moral superiority in trying to document the undocumented but his own party is starting to get nervous. One Republican assemblyman claims that you can’t legally give licenses to people who don’t have Social Security numbers and is planning to sue to enforce that fact. Your quote of the day: “We’re not only dealing with an illegal alien problem, we’re dealing with an illegal Eliot problem.” Click the image to watch.

Update: Bring the whole family! Licenses for everyone!

spitzer.jpg


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

say no the the national ID…i dont need any cops askin me for my freakin “papers”

ernesto on October 4, 2007 at 10:38 AM

So much for representing the citizens of this state, Governor.

Grrrr!!!!

looking4statesmen on October 4, 2007 at 10:42 AM

And its all reflected in your auto insurance, including higher premiums and incredibly lower maximum payments for uninsured motorists. My personal opinion is that proof of insurance should be a sticker on your windshield, just like registration and inspection is here in TX.

tomg51 on October 4, 2007 at 10:42 AM

say no the the national ID…i dont need any cops askin me for my freakin “papers”

If we didn’t have 12 to 20 million illegals here, no cop would need to ask for anyone’s papers.

Having said that, I’m not a supporter of any national ID. The Social Security cards and drivers licences we already have should suffice – if the citizenship or legal residence requirements are properly enforced.

Bigfoot on October 4, 2007 at 10:43 AM

The Social Security cards and drivers licences we already have should suffice – if the citizenship or legal residence requirements are properly enforced.

Bigfoot on October 4, 2007 at 10:43 AM

The social security cards we have now are laughable. What’s wrong with updating them with a photo and some info?

Big S on October 4, 2007 at 10:49 AM

say no the the national ID…i dont need any cops askin me for my freakin “papers”

ernesto on October 4, 2007 at 10:38 AM

What exactly is your problem with that? Sounds like you have something to “freakin” (sp) hide.

Wade on October 4, 2007 at 10:54 AM

Will illegals with new NY licenses be required to register their cars in NY and provide proof of liability insurance like I am?

We have a little game here in NY played by illegals with cars registered in North Carolina. Everybody knows about it who drives the highways here. By the number of NC plates here, you’d assume we all own second homes there. The police, unfortunately, don’t seem to have noticed.

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 10:54 AM

What exactly is your problem with that? Sounds like you have something to “freakin” (sp) hide.

Wade on October 4, 2007 at 10:54 AM

What’s the problem? This isn’t Communist East Germany here. We’re supposed to be a free country.

Immigrants, let them carry the ID’s. The rest of us are just fine.

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 10:57 AM

In unrelated news, Sputnik gets its very own 50th anniversary Google logo; Google artists hard at work polishing Veterans’ Day and Memorial Day logos to perfection.

saint kansas on October 4, 2007 at 10:59 AM

Your state ID/DL should be all that is required. It could have all the info needed. Name, address, POB, DOB, SSN, linked directly to your auto registration and car/health insurance. Police or medical personnel swipe the card and everything is right there. We do it with billions of worldwide credit/debit card transactions everyday.

Let the government put together the system it will take 20 years and cost us 40 billion and still won’t work. Give it to Equifax or Sun Micro and it will be up and running in 2 years and they get a cut on renewal fees.

Limerick on October 4, 2007 at 11:03 AM

Spitzer is, of course, a douchebag of the first order, but he’s just a run-of-the-mill Democrat on illegal aliens, unable to see the hilarious irony that a former State’s Attorney and now Governor advocating for illegal aliens represents.

Fun to see Hillary sticking to her convictions on open borders, though, despite the politically suicidal role modeling by Bush. You can see her thinking “33% job approval – nice!”.

Jaibones on October 4, 2007 at 11:09 AM

Meine papiere sind verloren, herr politzei oberfuhrer

Dieses ist nicht Amerika, dieses ist ein Polizeizustand

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 11:13 AM

Immigrants, let them carry the ID’s. The rest of us are just fine.

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 10:57 AM

Assuming you mean non-citizens.

Can see both sides of this national ID issue. Sounds totalitarian, and yet how do we identify the illegals among us?

There’s a flip side to the story of “papers” too. My kids were born in China. I was so grateful and happy on the day they got their citizenship “papers”. I quickly applies for passports for them, and keep them current. Otherwise, they wouldn’t have any proof that they actually belong here. So papers can be a wonderful thing.

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:13 AM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 11:13 AM

Dann mussen Wir die Mauer bauern!

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:21 AM

Ah the joys of babelfish ;-)

America will have lost its soul the day we roll over and accept the states assumed authority to demand our papers…anchoring the legitimacy of our claim to American citizenship to a piece of gubmint-issued paper. Makes me nauseous just imagining the day…

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 11:30 AM

say no the the national ID…i dont need any cops askin me for my freakin “papers”
ernesto on October 4, 2007 at 10:38 AM

How ignorant. So, do you have a driver’s liscence? They’ll ask for that. National ID? Same thing.

Grow up. No one is taking away any rights.

Mazztek on October 4, 2007 at 11:31 AM

Good news in Arizona this morning. A Fox reporter said the illegals are leaving in droves, probably for New York, because of anticipation of the Jan 1 enactment of their new illegals law. Employers have to match SS#s to real Americans on current employees and those hired in the future or lose thier business licenses. First offense is a couple of months; second offense – permanent loss of the license. Businesses that service the illegals are already crying about it and the racist ‘la raza’ and jerk ACLU are filing suits for discrimination. It’s a start, at least, to do something on a state level to stop the flow. Of course other states are glad to take them. It will be a very interesting test case on the problem. Let’s hope it works.

countywolf on October 4, 2007 at 11:31 AM

What’s the problem? This isn’t Communist East Germany here. We’re supposed to be a free country.

Immigrants, let them carry the ID’s. The rest of us are just fine.

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 10:57 AM

And how does that infringe on your freedom? How would you prove you are not a “Immigrants, let them carry the ID’s” who does not have a card? Or yet, an illegal alien who does not have a card? What does this have to do with communism? You mention immigrants, are you referring to immigrants or illegal aliens? As I am sure you know they are not the same thing.

Wade on October 4, 2007 at 11:33 AM

Did anyone else catch the date on this thing?

11 SEP 2001

WTF, is that supposed to be some kind of sick joke? Leave to a douche bag like this to slap the U.S. twice in one moveon.org fellating gesture.

Brass Pair on October 4, 2007 at 11:34 AM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 11:30 AM

Get it, but…I assume you “have” papers, you just don’t want to have to show them on demand? But you want to have them?

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:36 AM

Brass Pair on October 4, 2007 at 11:34 AM

Oh sh**! Didn’t see that. Wow.

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:37 AM

Hmmm. I want one of those cards.

nosliwelyk on October 4, 2007 at 11:37 AM

Did anyone else catch the date on this thing?

11 SEP 2001

WTF, is that supposed to be some kind of sick joke? Leave to a douche bag like this to slap the U.S. twice in one moveon.org fellating gesture.

Brass Pair on October 4, 2007 at 11:34 AM

Did you listen? It is a fake to show how easy it is to get one.

Wade on October 4, 2007 at 11:38 AM

What exactly is your problem with that? Sounds like you have something to “freakin” (sp) hide.

Wade on October 4, 2007 at 10:54 AM

Not directed to me, but I’m sure I know the answer having seen this in many forms before…

How would you feel having a camera installed in your car videotaping your driving in case you get into an accident? Or having a camera watch you work during your job all day? Or having a GPS track where your car goes all day?

The first would help prove liability in accidents, the second is done by some companies (7-11 for example), the third would cut down on auto theft and help prove location in some criminal cases.

The question is, would you mind being presumed and treated as guilty in your daily life? Since you aren’t guilty, and have nothing to hide; surely you don’t mind having every waking moment recorded, videotaped, and tracked for liability purposes, right?

Now, the previous is excessive… but it makes a point. The “what do you have to hide” reasoning for adding new intrusive measures into Government is willfully and actively presuming guilt across the citizenry. Taking that one step further and questioning anyone who doesn’t like being presumed guilty is somewhat offensive.

If you believe that the Government can be trusted to collect, have, and use more information without improperly using or losing that information; feel free to state your trust in the Government.

If you believe that this won’t have enough information attached to be intrusive, and you trust the Government not to increase the scope drastically at a later date; again state how and why you trust the Government.

But impugning the motives of someone who disagrees with your trust of the Federal Government isn’t necessary in this discussion, and is a way to deliberately shut down discussion and be somewhat insulting in the process.

Personally, having a Passport, and going through that process; the Government already has the same information they’d likely collect. Since I’m already trusting them with that information once, it’s not a burden to have to trust them with what would likely be the same information again.

And, at no new loss of privacy to me, we could gain a better Voter ID and ID used for requesting and receiving Government services… I’m actually for it.

But I can understand easily how someone could be opposed, and not simply because they “have something to hide”.

gekkobear on October 4, 2007 at 11:38 AM

What’s the problem? This isn’t Communist East Germany here. We’re supposed to be a free country.

Immigrants, let them carry the ID’s. The rest of us are just fine.

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 10:57 AM

Agreed. “Papers, Comrade?”

PRCalDude on October 4, 2007 at 11:39 AM

Two words:

Motor Voter

Connie on October 4, 2007 at 11:41 AM

There’s a flip side to the story of “papers” too. My kids were born in China. I was so grateful and happy on the day they got their citizenship “papers”. I quickly applies for passports for them, and keep them current. Otherwise, they wouldn’t have any proof that they actually belong here. So papers can be a wonderful thing.

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:13 AM

I have my wife’s citizenship documents framed on the wall. She came from China at age 9, went through the LEGAL channels to citizenship, and attended school without programas like “English as a second language” or getting a teacher’s aid to follow you around and translate stuff.

Needless to say, she was an honor’s student, got two undergratuate degrees, and became a successfull trader on Wall Street. Today she’s going back for her third degree so she can be an administrator in public education. She’s had every trading license you can get, and has a deep apprectiation for citizenship. Like so many other immigrants that come here legally, she’s appalled at how this country ignores those breaking the law and not doing it legally.

Finally, she makes a great point when she says we are no longer a melting pot, but a “tossed salad.” I’m sure she heard that somewher else, but its true. Let’s hope we get back to melting and step away from the tossing.

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 11:42 AM

And how does that infringe on your freedom? How would you prove you are not a “Immigrants, let them carry the ID’s” who does not have a card? Or yet, an illegal alien who does not have a card? What does this have to do with communism? You mention immigrants, are you referring to immigrants or illegal aliens? As I am sure you know they are not the same thing.

Wade on October 4, 2007 at 11:33 AM

I stand corrected for not saying non-citizens. My wife, as previously stated is an immigrant, as well as my parents.

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 11:43 AM

fogw’s world …….

NY DMV agent: “Thank you for coming in to register for your drivers license Mr. _______ , kindly step into the bus behind the building and we will begin your processing.”

fogw on October 4, 2007 at 11:44 AM

This country is going to H*ll in a handbasket…

*shaking my head*

pullingmyhairout on October 4, 2007 at 11:45 AM

gekkobear on October 4, 2007 at 11:38 AM

well said. There does seem to be the issue of having a passport, and having given the gov’t all your info. already, and how often you’d be required to produce it, and under what circumstances. It seems to me that Americans returning from abroad are only too happy to prove their citizenship.

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:46 AM

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 11:42 AM

Xie-xie.

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:48 AM

she makes a great point when she says we are no longer a melting pot, but a “tossed salad.”

I cannot even begin to express how deeply disturbing I consider your wife’s vision of America ;-)

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 11:49 AM

I cannot even begin to express how deeply disturbing I consider your wife’s vision of America ;-)

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 11:49 AM

between the bra pad or giant diaphragm that Fred Thompson’s daughter was chewing on and my most recent comment about a country being a “tossed salad,” Hot Air is turning into an adults-only community!

Yikes!

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 11:51 AM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 11:49 AM

Someone said the same the other day, don’t know if it was Vincenzo. But the context was that the Muslims were the croutons trying to throw out the bacos. Feel any better?

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:53 AM

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:36 AM

Sure. I have ‘papers’ up the yingyang ;-)

My first response to any cop that asks for ID etc is “NO”, followed a polite request for an explanation why he wants to see such articles…ie. demonstrate probable cause. If he cannot, the conversation is over and I demand to be left in peace. I imagine there are states where this would not be received well…those states have severe problems.

Anyone familiar with a ‘Terry Stop’?

The ‘Terry’ in the name comes from a trial name or something, but the principle is this…anytime a cop takes your ‘papers’ he has effectively detained you. Absent probable cause, this is _unlawful_ detention/restraint.

I also consider the authority to demand such articles as a significant element in a police-state arsenal.

The idea of supposedly _free_ people being subject to the arbitrary application of _force_ by the state is horrific to me.

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 11:51 AM

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 11:53 AM

LOL…not sure if I feel better, but thanks for the laughs guys :-)

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 12:00 PM

gekkobear on October 4, 2007 at 11:38 AM

And what does all your post have to do about changing the 4th amendment?

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Did having Social Security cards change it? Does having a birth certificate change it? Does having a drivers license change it? What makes you thing a Nation Card would change it? It is only an ID, no more than a passport or voters registration card. How about a library card, does that take away your freedoms? Seems to me if you are legal in the Country you would have no problem when being asked legally for your ID.

Wade on October 4, 2007 at 12:01 PM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 11:58 AM

I didn’t know any of what you said. But you do produce your driver’s license when asked, right? Also, I’m scared to death of the whole German-Nazi thing too, but I love the cops here and hate to give them a hard time. Plus, they never asked me, or mistreated me in any way. I want to cooperate with law enforcement, more so now, because I have to help them move on quickly from me to have more time to catch the bad guys. I am not blind to the line that dare not be crossed, just more unsure these days where it is.

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 12:08 PM

Seems to me if you are legal in the Country you would have no problem when being asked legally for your ID

And if I _do_ have a problem with being asked for such things, am I to be considered de facto guilty? Should I be detained, arrested, imprisoned?

What picture of America would you like to paint?

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 12:10 PM

No matter what kind of ID card we’re issued, there’s always going to be a way for people to fake ‘em, or use the ol’ ID theft rings…

All we need to do, is when any illegal is found, have them deported. End of story. States need to start enacting enforceable laws…look what’s happening in Arizona.

JetBoy on October 4, 2007 at 12:11 PM

Wait a second. I have to have a photo Drivers liecence or I cant drive. I have to have ID or I can access my account. I have to have ID to enter or leave the US

I have no problem with some forms of ID. And I doubt we will see massibe police stops over ID issues.

So I have no problem with me having to prove I am a US citisen. In fact due to an error on my birth Certificate I have gone through years of proving Im a US citisen and its frustrating but I accept it

William Amos on October 4, 2007 at 12:13 PM

Wade,
I understand it’s fake, but why use that date? Why not use September 16th? That’s Mexico’s independence day. It just seems like an intentional slap to me, and one I’d be willing to slap the sh*t out of him back for.

Brass Pair on October 4, 2007 at 12:15 PM

But you do produce your driver’s license when asked, right?

Only if the cop has probable cause…like when he busts me for speeding ;-) But on the street, not a chance. I don’t even produce my CHP for cops, even when they’re pointing at my gun…now I _know_ there are states where _that_ would get me arrested ;-) My state still resembles the America of the founding fathers, however…and the cops know their place.

I want to cooperate with law enforcement

Me too. I want good laws enforced, bad laws struck down, and everybody to leave me the hell alone ;-)

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 12:16 PM

Finally, she makes a great point when she says we are no longer a melting pot, but a “tossed salad.” I’m sure she heard that somewher else, but its true. Let’s hope we get back to melting and step away from the tossing.

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 11:42 AM

I think it’s probably too late for that, barring some internal ethnic strife. Moreover, nobody would agree to it because of the inherent differences in crime rates, wealth, and education amongst the different racial groups here.

There used to be many German newspapers and speakers until WWI, then they all shut down because we were at war with “the Krauts.” The same thing would happen if we went to war with Mexico, or if the Mexicans began some type of secession movement (which is possible). Ultimately, any country with competing ethnic groups is headed for some type of violence. Just look at the Balkans and the Caucasus.

PRCalDude on October 4, 2007 at 12:19 PM

Wade,
I understand it’s fake, but why use that date? Why not use September 16th? That’s Mexico’s independence day. It just seems like an intentional slap to me, and one I’d be willing to slap the sh*t out of him back for.

Brass Pair on October 4, 2007 at 12:15 PM

To highlight the fact that terrorists can use IDs to get driver’s liecences. Click on jammiewearingfool’s link about to see that 9/11 families are very upset over this.

In fact should be pointed out the whole reason for putting spitzer on the card. he is allowing Foreign ID to be used to grant the Driver’s liecences.

William Amos on October 4, 2007 at 12:19 PM

Will add this story to the debate.

Did everyone know that the mexican govrnment sent officials to the US to register mexicans in THIS country to vote and change US immigration laws ?

Mexican leaders in US Here

A

William Amos on October 4, 2007 at 12:21 PM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 12:16 PM

I’m curious. what state?

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 12:22 PM

Brass Pair on October 4, 2007 at 12:15 PM

It is to prove a point and very effective. Look how pissed you are about it. Who are you going to slap?

Anyway, the more 9/11 is brought forth the better. Maybe not for you and me for for those who have forgotten.

Wade on October 4, 2007 at 12:23 PM

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 12:22 PM

Sorry dude…not in the public square ;-)

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 12:26 PM

Ultimately, any country with competing ethnic groups is headed for some type of violence. Just look at the Balkans and the Caucasus.

PRCalDude on October 4, 2007 at 12:19 PM

With competing being the operative word. That is why I have never understood why anyone would object to a majority Christian America, which has let others in like me to have wonderful lives. I know it’s OT.Sorry

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 12:27 PM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 12:26 PM

Are you serious?? I’m looking to move. Am always curious when I talk to someone who is happy in their state. First letter???

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 12:28 PM

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 12:28 PM

Hey…I only said ‘resembles’…there’s still plenty for me to be unhappy about even here in the Glorious South ;-)

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 12:32 PM

I would like to thank Governor Spitzer, for making NY State even more retarded then California. Ok we might have the moonbats of SF and the anti troops anti American communist want to be’s running the port of Oakland and the mecha mayor of La la land. But today all I can say it thank you spiter. You have saved my state from being the worstest state in the nation. Now if only the 2-4 million illegals here will move east and show there appreciation for your kindness stupidity.

Mojack420 on October 4, 2007 at 12:33 PM

WTF, is that supposed to be some kind of sick joke? Leave to a douche bag like this to slap the U.S. twice in one moveon.org fellating gesture.

Brass Pair on October 4, 2007 at 11:34 AM

I actually think it might be trying to make a point that NY could be giving IDs to potential terrorists.

Bad Candy on October 4, 2007 at 12:33 PM

New York can hand out DL’s to anyone it likes, as far as I’m concerned – but the NY driver’s license should then be discounted as legal ID in every other state, since it now documents no such thing.

This could be a real money-maker for the neighboring states, BTW. Pull over any NY-plated cars and write up the drivers for lack of legal ID.

Yee-haw!

mojo on October 4, 2007 at 12:36 PM

Mojack420 on October 4, 2007 at 12:33 PM

half my family is in ny, half in bay area. is why I live online. Wonder if I can get a HA ID?

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 12:40 PM

This could be a real money-maker for the neighboring states

Think you’d have to go as far as South Carolina to find anyone who disagrees with this.

JiangxiDad on October 4, 2007 at 12:44 PM

Spitzers real motives to DL for all illegals .
Now I know we all think this is just pandering to the illegal voting block and the coffer filling 12-20 million x 15-30$ , but if you think about it real hard you can see the truth behind this move.
It could work

Mojack420 on October 4, 2007 at 12:46 PM

Lets see…

Passport?… check…
Social Security Card… yep…
Colorado drivers license… uh huh…
Concealed carry permit… yes…
Retired Military Id… in the wallet…

All of these are cards for which the Government already has data… and of course, the voter rolls…

Why don’t we just consolidate? One ID card tied to ALL of them?

Add in citizenship in the Data base… and you got somthing…

One card to drive, enter and leave the county, VOTE…

And the Congress COULD do the drivers license part under the guise of Interstate Commerce…

Could do the immigration part under controling the borders.

SSN? Heck, they already do it…

I’m all for it… make it FREE, and FEDERAL, and you can’t vote without it??? Goodby voter fraud…

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 1:22 PM

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 1:22 PM

How about a ‘free’ federal RFID tag? That way you wouldn’t have to be inconvenienced at all…just scanned as you pass by.

What should the punishment be for rejecting such a system of registration?

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 1:32 PM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 1:32 PM

Well… you have to get a license to drive… so I guess to drive you’d have to get one…

You have to register to vote… so I guess you wouldn’t be able to vote without one…

SSN? same thing…

Passport??? same…

And then make it part of the LEGAL immigration process to get one… and tie it to a PICTURE data base so you can actualy use it to ID people…

Penalties? None… you just won’t be able to use your privileges.

As to the RFID… typical, taking somthing pretty inocuous to ridiculous levels to throw out the entire idea…

Key here is that ALL of this data already exists! How can putting this data in one single coherent database make it so it abuses your Privacy?

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 1:38 PM

Lets see…

Passport?… check…
Social Security Card… yep…
Colorado drivers license… uh huh…
Concealed carry permit… yes…
Retired Military Id… in the wallet…

All of these are cards for which the Government already has data… and of course, the voter rolls…

Why don’t we just consolidate? One ID card tied to ALL of them?

Add in citizenship in the Data base… and you got somthing…

One card to drive, enter and leave the county, VOTE…

And the Congress COULD do the drivers license part under the guise of Interstate Commerce…

Could do the immigration part under controling the borders.

SSN? Heck, they already do it…

I’m all for it… make it FREE, and FEDERAL, and you can’t vote without it??? Goodby voter fraud…

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 1:22 PM

Ditto

Viper1 on October 4, 2007 at 1:43 PM

Sure…the RFID thing is a joke…I think we’ll have to wait about 50 years before the general public is dumbed-down enough to buy into that one. We’re currently on schedule though ;-)

My criticism here is not that these artefacts don’t accomplish anything, but that they have _no legitimacy_ in the first place.

What aspect of liberty do you think you have lost when the government _forces_ you to obtain a document so you may travel the country in your private automobile? What have you lost when you are criminalized for not submitting your personal information to a database?

How sacrosanct is your privacy when the government can _force_ you to disclose information about yourself?

Just how damaging are these ‘privileges’ to the core fabric of America? When did they surpass our _rights_ as free people?

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 1:53 PM

How about a ‘free’ federal RFID tag?
Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 1:32 PM

you mean for all illegals that will be applying for NY DL.
Hey I would have no problem with that what so ever .
Then the whole hiding in the shadow line would be finished once and for all.
An since they are being given special rights I figure they would be more then willing to go the extra mile if not no dl for you .

Mojack420 on October 4, 2007 at 1:55 PM

…and we can put frickin’ lasers on their heads too…

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 1:57 PM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 1:57 PM

now that’s funny .

How will they be able to wear their sombreros on with lasers on their frickin’ heads?

Mojack420 on October 4, 2007 at 2:02 PM

How will they be able to wear their sombreros on with lasers on their frickin’ heads?

With the passing of the “USA Patriot Headwear Act” this will no longer be an issue.

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 2:12 PM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 1:53 PM

so its your contention that the US should have NO IDs at all?

No drivers licenses, no passports (even though its other countries that also demand them), no SSN, no taxpayer ID?

No form if ID at all?

Or do you have problems with making it an effective ID?

We’ve got problems with illegal immigration in this country. They are tromping on MY RIGHTS as a citizen by taking up resources that I am paying for. They are breaking OUR laws by the very fact of being here… but you won’t let us FIX THE PROBLEM!!!!

And once again, how does putting data the government already has on us into a single database infringe on my rights?

Fact is that the only people who would have to worry about this are illegals… and it would be EASIER to get my priveleges as a citizen if we had it in place.

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 2:25 PM

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 2:25 PM

No drivers licenses – check
No passports – check (other countries can just change their laws or do without our tourist $$$s)
No SSN – check…no ‘Social Security’ either
No taxpayer ID – check (I’m a FairTax guy)
No form if ID at all – check(ish)…_voluntary_ ID systems are OK with me.

We’ve got problems with illegal immigration in this country

Indeed. How does layering more and more bureaucracy help?

but you won’t let us FIX THE PROBLEM!!!!

I object to your proposed ‘fix’, as I consider it impotent and unconstitutional.

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 2:41 PM

I guess Spitzer will only be a 4 term gov. He is pro illegal aliens. He did a similar thing when they all marched in NYC and threatened employers in violation federal employment law. He must have received his law license from a cracker jacks box!

xler8bmw on October 4, 2007 at 3:11 PM

We don’t need more ID we need to stop the illegal aliens at the border! And that is easy if we had the balls to do it.
By the way a drivers license is a license to drive not ID.
SS number is for SS not ID.(which is why it was taken off drivers licenses.
Your birth certificate, passport or military ID are the only true forms of ID here.
I also have refused to show ID for no reason, nothing more was said.

Gooch on October 4, 2007 at 3:33 PM

Come on…. trust the government. Just because they haven’t done their job before doesn’t mean if we just give them a little more power over us and forget about silly privacy and “rights” … ( who needs that crap )…. that they won’t keep us safe in the future !

This is really what you always want to do. Whenever the government defies the people and refuses to do its job, the only solution is to give them even more power and more responsibility and more ability to control your life. That’s natural, everybody knows that !

I know, some people will say…. well we already have a national ID, we have passports and of course they get counterfeited all the time. Others will say, look at the money the feds print, it gets counterfeited too. But trust me, these national ID’s will be 100% secure, yes sir, the feds will get this right, all we got to do is trust them. And who cares that the problem isn’t that we can’t identify illegal’s. We can identify them just fine when we see the sneaking across our border…. but this national ID…. you see, those illegal’s will stop that right away…. because, well you know, they won’t have one and won’t dare cross that border without it, or at least without having a fake one….. so problem resolved !!

And hey, don’t worry about giving every detail of your personal affairs over to the government so they can put into a single database and put it online. You know the government can be trusted to keep your information safe. No hacker will ever get into it and steal your identity. No government employee will ever steal the information and sell it. And they would never abuse such power, just because they could blackmail you doesn’t mean they would, it never happens in politics, does it ?

But of course in this particular case, it was the federal government that CAUSED the problem in the first place by refusing to enforce the laws they are Constitutionally mandated to enforce. In other words, they FAILED to do their Constitutionally mandated duty and we the Citizens therefore get to give them even more power and pay for a whole new bureaucracy, just as it should be. No Matter…. we should indeed REWARD the federal government with even greater power because they failed so miserably that doing the job they were suppose to do in the first place. Yes sir… don’t worry, this national ID is going to fix everything, you just wait and see !

RANT/ off

Maxx on October 4, 2007 at 4:19 PM

Well played Maxx ;-)

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 4:34 PM

Maxx on October 4, 2007 at 4:19 PM

Tell me, without putting thousands of Active duty military on the border, how do you seal it? (which I am for by the way…).

There will ALWAYS be ways of getting into a country when you have thousands of miles of border. Add in those who overstay visas, and you have our problem.

Now, without a form of ID or Identity check to see if you are here legaly, how do you enforce the laws? Which ones are Citizens? which ones are legal immigrants? which ones are illegal?

You HAVE to have some way of checking, and under equal protection arguements with our overly litigious society, you then have to check EVERYONE… citizen, legal, or illegal.

I’m proposing that the Government does just that… before that proof is needed to get resources, or use the priveleges of our country.

Tell me… how do you enforce Illegal immigrant laws if you can’t tell who is illegal, and who is legal?

And just what is your solution to that problem, without a National ID?

Its nice to sit your principals, right up until it stops you from solving problems that alreay exist.

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 5:21 PM

Tell me, without putting thousands of Active duty military on the border, how do you seal it?

Why are you preemptively eliminating this option from discussion?

I _want_ the National Guard to _guard our nation_. I _want_ a tight string of outpost infrastructure across the whole southern border, if not an actual wall. I want big guns, starving dogs, landmines and swarms of killer bees to ‘incentivize’ these mexicans to reconsider violating our law and sovreignty.

I _want_ our government to eliminate _all_ entitlement programs. No welfare checks, no free school, no housing.

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 5:31 PM

Ochlan on October 4, 2007 at 5:31 PM

Northern border as well?

And what do you do with those already here?

Or who overstay visas?

Or come in as tourists, and stay??

And you do realize that the National Guard could NOT do this without Federalizing them? It would have to be done by Active Duty troops as National Guards are reserves, who are supposed to be part time soldiers.

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 5:37 PM

There will ALWAYS be ways of getting into a country when you have thousands of miles of border. Add in those who overstay visas, and you have our problem.

I think the best method remains internal enforcement and punishing employers. You could always mine the border, but I don’t like the thought of being trapped in by land.

PRCalDude on October 4, 2007 at 6:41 PM

Tell me, without putting thousands of Active duty military on the border, how do you seal it? (which I am for by the way…).

There will ALWAYS be ways of getting into a country when you have thousands of miles of border. Add in those who overstay visas, and you have our problem.

Now, without a form of ID or Identity check to see if you are here legaly, how do you enforce the laws? Which ones are Citizens? which ones are legal immigrants? which ones are illegal?

You HAVE to have some way of checking, and under equal protection arguements with our overly litigious society, you then have to check EVERYONE… citizen, legal, or illegal.

I’m proposing that the Government does just that… before that proof is needed to get resources, or use the priveleges of our country.

Tell me… how do you enforce Illegal immigrant laws if you can’t tell who is illegal, and who is legal?

And just what is your solution to that problem, without a National ID?

Its nice to sit your principals, right up until it stops you from solving problems that alreay exist.

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 5:21 PM

First you build the wall so they can’t slip over the border. Then you increase the penalty for employers for hiring illegals. There are ways set up for employers to verify citizenship. Once illegals can no longer get jobs or free services without being a citizen they will stop coming. Take the incentive out of them coming here and the problem is largely resolved.

ICE has been doing a lot more raids and rounding up many. Once the word gets out that illegal are no longer tolerated in the USA, even more of the problem is resolved. By attrition over time the number of illegals will be reduced to a very tolerable level and we will have stopped the flood of new illegals coming in.

We should not allow the feds to use this as an excuse to usurp yet another lawful responsibility of the state.

What you don’t do is reward the federal government for doing a lousy job. They have been trying to pass this national ID act for decades, long before the terrorist threat and long before illegal immigration became such a huge problem.

A national ID will not be anymore secure than state ID’s but we will get to pay for another huge bureaucracy. People will learn to fake a national ID just like they do passports and our currency, both produced by the feds. So in the end, all you have is another huge expense with no benefit and the potential for all of your data and everyone’s data to be stolen in a single clean sweep. Once the national ID has failed what’s the next thing the government will demand we do ? Will it be time for the government to demand that each person be fitted with an electronic beeper up our butts so they can track our every move by satellite ? Yes… of course that’s what they want next, the diminishment of our personal security and privacy never ends for as long as we are stupid enough to give them more and more power.

We must demand that government keep our borders secure AND keep our privacy and liberties in tact, or it’s all for nothing. We pay government big bucks to do exactly that and we should demand it. It’s not good enough that they solve the problems at the expense of our privacy and liberty. But that is always the route they want to take and the route they will always take unless we demand they do better. Caving into the national ID act is just another big brother dream come true. It will resolve nothing and do more harm to our privacy, our personal security and our liberty.

Maxx on October 4, 2007 at 7:10 PM

First you build the wall so they can’t slip over the border. Then you increase the penalty for employers for hiring illegals. There are ways set up for employers to verify citizenship.

Maxx on October 4, 2007 at 7:10 PM

Uhh… without information on ALL citizens, and immigrants, and illegals… just how do you do that?

We do not even have a database of who are citizens in this country… how do you weed out the illegals so you know who you can hire?

And even more so, under equal protection, you will have to ask EVERYONE for proof, or you will be accused of prejudice and be taken to court.

So, without a NATIONAL database… how do you figure out if that person is legal? or illegal?

And if your going to create that database anyway, may as well make it truly usefull.

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 7:31 PM

What’s the problem? This isn’t Communist East Germany here. We’re supposed to be a free country.

Immigrants, let them carry the ID’s. The rest of us are just fine.

Vincenzo on October 4, 2007 at 10:57 AM
The illegals do not have any ID. Does that mean that they qualify as citizens by default ?

SIJ6141 on October 4, 2007 at 7:33 PM

I hope New York gets flooded with illegals now. Then after the crime rate skyrockets and the budget collapses, they will finally get the message.

SoulGlo on October 4, 2007 at 7:34 PM

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 7:31 PM

Uhh… without information on ALL citizens, and immigrants, and illegals… just how do you do that?

You know, I’m not an employer, so I don’t know exactly how it works but I think it’s something like this. You hand me a California driver’s license, there is a phone number to call to verify the number on that license that it is valid, along with a description of the person it was issued to. There is a way to do it.

We do not even have a database of who are citizens in this country… how do you weed out the illegals so you know who you can hire?

There is a database for each state, if it’s a Missouri license then you call the Missouri number, if it’s a Florida license you call the Florida number. That’s how.

And even more so, under equal protection, you will have to ask EVERYONE for proof, or you will be accused of prejudice and be taken to court.

That’s no problem, yes everyone does it. I got the job I have now over 23 years ago and I had to prove who I was and give them references and prove my qualifications and shows lots of papers from many sources. That’s the way it should be.

So, without a NATIONAL database… how do you figure out if that person is legal? or illegal?

The same way we have always done it, see previous answers.

And if your going to create that database anyway, may as well make it truly usefull.

Yeah, put all of our eggs into one untrustworthy unreliable self-serving basket, you really love big brother don’t you ?

Maxx on October 4, 2007 at 7:56 PM

Maxx on October 4, 2007 at 7:56 PM

Except that the previous ways are not working… or we wouldn’t have 20 million illegals here, most working.

First off.. I do hire people… I own my own company… small… but still.

The drivers license is NOT proof of citizenship, and part of the problem is states like New York who are going to give it to anyone… so all the call does is proove that someone has a valid drivers license with that name and number (if you even check that).

Yes, you can ask for references, and social security cards, and you do register with the state for Unemployment insurance and Social Security…

But theres a HUGE amount of identity theft. The Feds don’t even tell you when a SSN does not match a name.

Last time I registered to vote, I was at a supermarket… and I guarentee that no one followed up to see if I was a Citizen or not, becuase there is NO WAY TO CHECK!

I often work as a consultant… no one checks my citizenship, or even references… when I had my deck built… I didn’t check references… and those guys who just go popped working at McDonald’s? I’m sure they all had “paperwork”.

Problem is that there are holes in the system… it aint working… so keepin the status quo is not an option I’m willing to try.

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 8:35 PM

Romeo13 on October 4, 2007 at 8:35 PM

So if you caught an employee stealing from your company would you give them a raise and a promotion and increase their paid vacation time ? I’m thinking that must be the way you would deal with it because the federal government has steadfastly refused to enforce the law they are Constitutionally obligated to enforce and you want to reward them with more power. They tried to force shamnisty down our throats twice. Not enforcing the law benefits them because we just give them more and more power. These people are not trustworthy with the power they have now, it’s crazy to give them more.

You say there is a HUGE amount of identity theft. By putting all of our data in one place it will become even more prevalent.

Maxx on October 4, 2007 at 9:56 PM

The 56 State and Territory databases would become on large database under REAL ID. And one presumes that each DMV would have access to these databases at the very least to confirm that the applicant does not have a REAL ID license or ID card in another state. If a criminal could break the security of any one of the tens of thousands of entrance points, then the criminal would have access to the personal data, including Social Security numbers, of every single person in the United State with a REAL ID license or ID card. This would put hundreds of millions of people at risk for identity theft.

The Department of Homeland Security contemplates a universal design for compliant and non-compliant REAL ID cards. A universal design, especially for a card including citizenship status, would cause irreparable harm, as it would foster suspicion of those who do not wish to carry the REAL ID card. Uniform design for a national identification card would also create an enormous security risk.

The agency is considering a uniform REAL ID card design, asking for comments on “[w]hether DHS should standardize the unique design or color required for non-REAL ID under the REAL ID Act for ease of nationwide recognition, and whether DHS should also implement a standardized design or color for REAL ID licenses.” Mandating distinct designs or colors for both REAL ID and regular licenses and identification cards and requiring non-REAL ID driver’s licenses or ID cards to have explicit “invalid for federal purposes” designations turns this “voluntary” card into a mandatory national ID card. It would divide the country into two — people with the REAL ID card and those without — and anyone with a different license or ID card would be instantly suspicious. Significant delay, complication and possibly harassment or discrimination would fall upon those who choose not to carry a REAL ID card.

In the agency’s economic analysis (pdf) of the draft regulations, reducing ID theft is listed as one of the potential ancillary benefits of the national identification system. However, the agency says that the potential benefit would depend on a vast expansion of REAL ID uses from the three official purposes required in the draft regulations; DHS suggests what is needed is “incidental and required use of REAL ID documents in everyday transactions.” DHS envisions that employers, social service agencies (including Medicare, Medicaid and student financial aid), firearm sellers and licensors, and election workers will all use this national identification system. The official and unofficial uses of REAL ID must not be broadened. Such expansion would harm national security. Using a single card for many identification purposes would be the same as using one key for every lock. Using a single national ID card is a foolish, ineffective, and easily circumvented attempt at security.

Maxx on October 4, 2007 at 10:14 PM

Well, after all, this IS the People’s PC Republic of the State of New York, so what else should we expect from Comrade Governor Elliot Spitzer-on-the-people?

He claims it is not his job to go after illegal aliens, but as former Attorney Bully of the Republic, he should realize that he did take an oath to defent the Constitution of the US and its laws as well as the Constitution of New York State and NYS laws…or perhaps I am mistaken?

What a slap in the face to our laws, our security, our soveirnity, and to those who come here…LEGALLY.

The False Dervish on October 4, 2007 at 10:25 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.