You do realize that comment is an outright absurdity since it is the “religious right” threating to leave the party here. Go ahead and foolishly argue that it is worth it, but don’t deny reality.

I think the real question here is if some like you are able to prioritize issues or if you prefer to lose 100% rather then compromise. I really see people like you as acting exactly like the far left. You both have an inablity to pragmatically evaluate reality and what should currently be a priority. Abortion is just like Darfur, sure it is awful but it is an idealogical tangent that has little to do with what is important in terms of the trends in the world right now.

Resolute on October 8, 2007 at 5:16 PM

Meanwhile in 1858 near the formation of the Republican party…

“I think the real question here is some abolistionists like you are unable to prioritize issues or and you prefer to lose 100% rather then compromise. I really see people like you as acting exactly like the Democratic slave beaters. You both have an inablity to pragmatically evaluate reality and what should currently be a priority.

Slavery is just like King George, sure it was(and is) awful but it is an idealogical tangent that has little to do with what is important in terms of the trends in the world right now.”

The Religious Right isn’t leaving, the Bluebloods who sold their souls and America’s values for some quick cash are pushing us out. The Bluebloods are the ones who always want to tack left to appease the socialists, the blueblood RINOS are the ones who want Bush to give illegal alien amnesty in the name of “doing something. And it is the bluebloods who are the first to blame the religious right for any loss because unlike the bluebloods, socially conservative principles aren’t for sale to the highest bidder.

We tolerate bluebloods because we hope eventually they’ll realize that while a capitalist economy keeps America from going bankrupt, conservative social values are what keeps that system and its members honest. A society with no soul is a dead one.

Dobson is being really very stupid.

…………….This is a public service announcement..

……….Dr. James Dobson will be on Hannity & Colmes tonight at 9:00 eastern

You are the one’s splitting the party, not us.
Lawrence on October 6, 2007 at 12:20 PM

You do realize that comment is an outright absurdity since it is the “religious right” threating to leave the party here. Go ahead and foolishly argue that it is worth it, but don’t deny reality.

I think the real question here is if some like you are able to prioritize issues or if you prefer to lose 100% rather then compromise. I really see people like you as acting exactly like the far left. You both have an inablity to pragmatically evaluate reality and what should currently be a priority. Abortion is just like Darfur, sure it is awful but it is an idealogical tangent that has little to do with what is important in terms of the trends in the world right now.

in other words, CHEMICALS – and we all know about the terrible threat posed by chemicals to nature and the animal kingdom.

Clearly there are no chemicals in nature. Like chlorophyll. Or brain fluid. Or stomache acid. Or snake venom.

And the irony of ironies here is that some left wing eco-kooks have the best plan in the world……?

ROFL McGuyver, I’m saving that link. That’s some of the most batshit insane crap I’ve ever had the pleasure at belly-laughing at.

Seriously, we should bring these guys into a Planned Parenthood office. LEFTY-FIGHT!

See, now the selective nonreproduction liberals I actually like:
BKennedy on October 8, 2007 at 3:06 PM

They have a better, and cheaper, abstinence program than president Bush! Go figure!

……read the whole article……. some of the funniest stuff to date!

Mcguyver on October 8, 2007 at 2:20 PM

See, now the selective nonreproduction liberals I actually like: they aren’t killing anyone else in their zeal to deal with “the population crisis,” nor are they trying to write off their inanity as “a woman’s choice.” They also aren’t getting tax dollars going towards the wholesale slaughter of innocent human life.

Wish Ctrl+F was more effective, I can only seem tp pull up your first post so I’ve been looking down to see them, and hope I didn’t miss one in the middle.
BKennedy on October 8, 2007 at 1:50 PM

Yeah you got them all… I double checked..
…choose “highlight all” after typing in your Find: “key word”

Dobson said this in an interview with Sean Hannity. Sounds like a born loser to me.

If an Obama or Clinton gets in and we (conservatives) have no country, and the Supreme court are all activist leftists. What good are you legalistic beliefs on pro-life and anti-gay marriage?

Dobson is an idiot if he tries to play 3rd party kingmaker, we’ll have Ross Perot all over again.
BKennedy on October 8, 2007 at 1:50 PM

You are right in determining, that, this has been my main emphasis ever since my post linked above.
.
.

Abstinence isn’t now, and I don’t think ever was, an effective form of birth control.
Krydor on October 2, 2007 at 6:09 PM

And the irony of ironies here is that some left wing eco-kooks have the best plan in the world……?

And remember that the best form of birth control – the best form of ‘safe sex’ that is actually safe for the planet, too – is to have no sex at all. Eco-celibacy has a lot going for it.

……read the whole article……. some of the funniest stuff to date!

Also:

Abstinence isn’t now, and I don’t think ever was, an effective form of birth control.
Krydor on October 2, 2007 at 6:09 PM
Right.

Watch for those flying tadpoles!

Mcguyver on October 2, 2007 at 6:26 PM

ROFL. Well, to Krydor’s credit, abstinence didn’t work for Mary. Although technically she consented to the whole business.

The next post was awesome. Next Krydor will be saying that railguards on cliffs aren’t effective at keeping people from falling because some people chose to jump over them, therefore we shouldn’t waste money on cliff railguards.

Anyway,

I certainly don’t want a third party candidate unless his name is Ralph Nader or AlBore and he’ll be pulling votes from Democrats. Dobson is an idiot if he tries to play 3rd party kingmaker, we’ll have Ross Perot all over again.

Should Guiliani be elected by the blueblood contingent, I’ll hold my nose for him and pray he gets a conservative VP to keep him in line. Hillary is so evil and crooked I’d even vote for Nader before her. I’d still much prefer not to have Socialist New Yorker vs. Blueblood New Yorker as my two POTUS options.

Remember that McGuyver, the only thing stopping bluebloods from being bluevotes is if the Democrats don’t give them a cut of the socialist redistribution pie. They’d turn on conservative values in an instant if it fattened their wallet.
BKennedy on October 8, 2007 at 9:50 AM

I’m sure if you have followed me, you did see my posts over on the other blog: (Mcguyver on October 2, 2007 at 2:27 AM)

And now to my pontifications, which is really, more of a dire and urgent warning…..

To all of you out there who read this, or comment here, who fall into any of these following categories:

a) The James Dobsons of the world, et al, who even think of SUGGESTING a third party candidate. (Even Matt Drudge said Sunday night, that this news made him SICK!)

b) Any, Rudy Guiliani shill, who absolutely DOES NOT WANT HILLARY IN OFFICE.

c) Anybody who chooses to sit out the primaries or the general election, who absolutely DOES NOT WANT HILLARY IN OFFICE.

To a), b, and c) YOU, HAVE ABSOLUTELY, LOST YOUR GOD-BLESSED MIND!

Go read all of my posts over there..and I do mean all of them…to the very last one at the bottom and then come over here and I’ll be happy to discuss it further with you..

Fred is our 95% solution. Fear the Fred.

Mojave Mark on October 7, 2007 at 12:44 PM

This message brought to you by the Democratic National Committee with sponsorship from MoveOn.org.

You can start throwing stones, now.

Mcguyver on October 6, 2007 at 2:42 PM

Normally I like you McGuyver, but this time you’re on the wrong side.

Who are the first the bluebloods blame for losing elections? The religious right.

Who do the Democrats claim are the easily led bubba dumbkins? The religious right.

Who is it that wins Republicans elections, despite being every social liberal’s whipping boy every time something goes wrong?

Think real hard about this one. Its the religious right.

Blue blood Rockefeller types are the most easily led constituency of Republicans. Show them some money, throw them some kickbacks and they’ll vote for wherever it came from. The only principle they care about is “what makes me more money.” I’d be a lot more concerned for the mammon followers than I would the “Jesus freaks.” At least the Jesus freaks can’t be bought-and-paid-for with temporal wealth.

Whenever the Republican party runs left, they lose. When the Democrats needed seats in ‘06, they ran right.

Remember that McGuyver, the only thing stopping bluebloods from being bluevotes is if the Democrats don’t give them a cut of the socialist redistribution pie. They’d turn on conservative values in an instant if it fattened their wallet.

Fred is our 95% solution. Fear the Fred.

Tell me what is Fred going to do about Jihad? And I mean the jihad right here in our own country.

Since it’s social conservatives who constantly threaten to bolt the party, isn’t it more accurate to call them the Republicans In Name Only?

Given that they’re the ones that rebuilt the party under Reagan? Um, no.

The Giuliani, center-left Republicans had their go under Nixon. What did we get then? An egomaniacal lefty hawk that failed to win a war he was given, ended up expanding the federal government several times over, introduced affirmative action, the EPA and other brand new bureaucracies to our political lexicon as well as unilaterally welshing on the Breton Woods agreement. Among other things.

I’m supposed to risk that, as well as consign millions of children to the certainty of publicly financed abattoirs, just so that I can get the off-hand chance of maybe getting a strict constructionist that might have an open mind on the validity of Roe v. Wade?

Considering that the author of Roe was appointed by, wait for it, Nixon, you’ll have to forgive me if I tell you to get bent.

[....the PLEASURE was mine, I'm sure...]

johnnyU on October 6, 2007 at 10:31 PM

Fear not, young skywalker. There is no way conservatives will have to pick between Hillary and Obama. One of them will be eliminated in the dems primary.

JM Hanes on October 6, 2007 at 8:39 PM

Thanks for the compliment. [ ";-)" !]