<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Crazed by Rush, Wes Clark calls for political discourse to be rated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Manufactured Media Matters scandal over Ann Coulter &#171; Eric&#8217;s Article Archive</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-739410</link>
		<dc:creator>The Manufactured Media Matters scandal over Ann Coulter &#171; Eric&#8217;s Article Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-739410</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;ve got some random hunches about what could be driving all the seemingly disconnected but eerily related manufactured scandals. And by &#8220;random hunches&#8221; we mean &#8220;the NJDC press [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;ve got some random hunches about what could be driving all the seemingly disconnected but eerily related manufactured scandals. And by &#8220;random hunches&#8221; we mean &#8220;the NJDC press [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: General Clark To Head Speech Police? : American Conservative Daily</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-736128</link>
		<dc:creator>General Clark To Head Speech Police? : American Conservative Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-736128</guid>
		<description>[...] non-scandal is to suggest that speech be “rated” I missed this earlier, but you can see the video of Comrade Clark’s comments at Hot Air. Hey General Clark, what part of Congress shall make no law is so difficult for you to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] non-scandal is to suggest that speech be “rated” I missed this earlier, but you can see the video of Comrade Clark’s comments at Hot Air. Hey General Clark, what part of Congress shall make no law is so difficult for you to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The future of free speech : [H] Hegemonic Pundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-731889</link>
		<dc:creator>The future of free speech : [H] Hegemonic Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-731889</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s Wesley Clark who apparently sees some kind of military government in our future, no doubt for the good of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s Wesley Clark who apparently sees some kind of military government in our future, no doubt for the good of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mere Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-729050</link>
		<dc:creator>Mere Rhetoric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-729050</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Manufactured Scandal Of The Week: Media Matters Accuses Coulter Of Wanting To Wipe Out American Jews, Action Alerts To Pull Her Off The Air Immediately Follow...&lt;/strong&gt;

This week&#039;s manufactured Media Matters scandal is now online. The Jewish blogs and Democratic organizations are all over it. And wow, it is totally fucking retarded. It combines the best elements of liberal sophistication: the banality of multicultura...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Manufactured Scandal Of The Week: Media Matters Accuses Coulter Of Wanting To Wipe Out American Jews, Action Alerts To Pull Her Off The Air Immediately Follow&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This week&#8217;s manufactured Media Matters scandal is now online. The Jewish blogs and Democratic organizations are all over it. And wow, it is totally fucking retarded. It combines the best elements of liberal sophistication: the banality of multicultura&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This ain&#8217;t Hell, but you can see it from here &#187; Sorry state of the Left; the politics of bad taste</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-722790</link>
		<dc:creator>This ain&#8217;t Hell, but you can see it from here &#187; Sorry state of the Left; the politics of bad taste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 16:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-722790</guid>
		<description>[...] Wes Clark (h/t Hot Air) has decided that Rush shouldn&#8217;t be on Armed Forces Radio - but it was because of the popular demand of the troops that Rush was added to AFRTS broadcasts back in 1994 (when they were abandoned by the then-current administration). Shouldn&#8217;t it be by popular demand that Rush is removed by the line-up or is Wes Clarke the sole arbiter of what the troops should have for entertainment? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wes Clark (h/t Hot Air) has decided that Rush shouldn&#8217;t be on Armed Forces Radio &#8211; but it was because of the popular demand of the troops that Rush was added to AFRTS broadcasts back in 1994 (when they were abandoned by the then-current administration). Shouldn&#8217;t it be by popular demand that Rush is removed by the line-up or is Wes Clarke the sole arbiter of what the troops should have for entertainment? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pc</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-722354</link>
		<dc:creator>pc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-722354</guid>
		<description>acronym down LOWS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>acronym down LOWS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pc</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-722353</link>
		<dc:creator>pc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-722353</guid>
		<description>One of the Lords of the Wide Stance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the Lords of the Wide Stance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our fragile democracy &#171; FYI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-721984</link>
		<dc:creator>Our fragile democracy &#171; FYI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-721984</guid>
		<description>[...] Clark, the general, came up with another solution: Political speech should be rated. Like sex and the movies you know? You would have to be 14 to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clark, the general, came up with another solution: Political speech should be rated. Like sex and the movies you know? You would have to be 14 to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiny Norman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-721884</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiny Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-721884</guid>
		<description>Yes, jeanie, that&#039;s the same General Wesley Clark, former CO of NATO. I doubt it&#039;s senility (that&#039;s likely Jimmy Carter&#039;s problem) but it is clear he is proof positive that the Peter Prinicple applies to the Military structure as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, jeanie, that&#8217;s the same General Wesley Clark, former CO of NATO. I doubt it&#8217;s senility (that&#8217;s likely Jimmy Carter&#8217;s problem) but it is clear he is proof positive that the Peter Prinicple applies to the Military structure as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pot&#8230;Kettle&#8230;Black (moveon.org Edition) at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-721866</link>
		<dc:creator>Pot&#8230;Kettle&#8230;Black (moveon.org Edition) at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-721866</guid>
		<description>[...] Wilkes&#8221; Clark, who declares at the end of this MSNBC segment that - I swear neither I nor Allahpundit are making this up - &#8220;no liberal commentator would accuse someone on the other side of being [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wilkes&#8221; Clark, who declares at the end of this MSNBC segment that &#8211; I swear neither I nor Allahpundit are making this up &#8211; &#8220;no liberal commentator would accuse someone on the other side of being [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ft. Hard Knox &#187; Sign the Petition - Stand With Rush</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-720688</link>
		<dc:creator>Ft. Hard Knox &#187; Sign the Petition - Stand With Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-720688</guid>
		<description>[...] (update/correction): hat-tip, Michelle Malkin andHotAir [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (update/correction): hat-tip, Michelle Malkin andHotAir [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeanie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-720236</link>
		<dc:creator>jeanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-720236</guid>
		<description>Is he by any chance Wes Clark the general or whatever he was?  If so, he&#039;s as over the hill as I am and is not to be taken seriously because senility might have set in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is he by any chance Wes Clark the general or whatever he was?  If so, he&#8217;s as over the hill as I am and is not to be taken seriously because senility might have set in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeanie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-720234</link>
		<dc:creator>jeanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-720234</guid>
		<description>While I haven&#039;t yet taken up gambling, perhaps senility is beginning to surface because I have no idea whatsoever who Wes Clark is?  Is it important that I should know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I haven&#8217;t yet taken up gambling, perhaps senility is beginning to surface because I have no idea whatsoever who Wes Clark is?  Is it important that I should know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terryfrank.net &#187; Unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-720224</link>
		<dc:creator>terryfrank.net &#187; Unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-720224</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out the good liberal Wesley Clark. Hot Air notes that Clark wants radio to be rated. But Clark goes beyond public broadcasting, he states his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out the good liberal Wesley Clark. Hot Air notes that Clark wants radio to be rated. But Clark goes beyond public broadcasting, he states his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BKennedy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-720162</link>
		<dc:creator>BKennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-720162</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Consequently, nobody laughs at Media Matters or the other smear merchant subsidiaries of Soros and Clinton, Inc…not even the Dems!!

landlines on October 4, 2007 at 9:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, I laugh &lt;strong&gt;at&lt;/strong&gt; them all the time.

Just never &lt;em&gt;with&lt;/em&gt; them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Consequently, nobody laughs at Media Matters or the other smear merchant subsidiaries of Soros and Clinton, Inc…not even the Dems!!</p>
<p>landlines on October 4, 2007 at 9:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, I laugh <strong>at</strong> them all the time.</p>
<p>Just never <em>with</em> them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: General Wesley &#34;Orwell&#34; Clark - Online Debate Network Forums</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-720131</link>
		<dc:creator>General Wesley &#34;Orwell&#34; Clark - Online Debate Network Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 07:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-720131</guid>
		<description>[...] for the Fairness Doctrine, planting a few seeds which he hopes will flower a few years from now. Hot Air </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Fairness Doctrine, planting a few seeds which he hopes will flower a few years from now. Hot Air </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: landlines</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-719731</link>
		<dc:creator>landlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-719731</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...  If we applied the RATING standards used for the movies, Wes and his buddies at Media Matters, Daily KOS, and the Soros spin machine would get nothing but &quot;R&#039;s&quot; with a few daggers, while Rush, Michelle, and even Ann Coulter would consistently rate &quot;G&quot; with just a few &quot;PG&quot;&#039;s.  But the Hollywood ratings are for the method of presentation, not &quot;content&quot;, so a good or bad rating says nothing about the quality of the show.

But what Wes is really ticked about is CONTENT: Rush&#039;s comments hit home!  Rush always remembers that it is the duty of a radio show to &lt;strong&gt;entertain&lt;/strong&gt; (a concept completely foreign to leftist hosts and the departed Air America).  And, as Rush has pointed out many times, satire isn&#039;t funny unless there is a grain of TRUTH in it!

Consequently, nobody laughs at Media Matters or the other smear merchant subsidiaries of Soros and Clinton, Inc...not even the Dems!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;  If we applied the RATING standards used for the movies, Wes and his buddies at Media Matters, Daily KOS, and the Soros spin machine would get nothing but &#8220;R&#8217;s&#8221; with a few daggers, while Rush, Michelle, and even Ann Coulter would consistently rate &#8220;G&#8221; with just a few &#8220;PG&#8221;&#8216;s.  But the Hollywood ratings are for the method of presentation, not &#8220;content&#8221;, so a good or bad rating says nothing about the quality of the show.</p>
<p>But what Wes is really ticked about is CONTENT: Rush&#8217;s comments hit home!  Rush always remembers that it is the duty of a radio show to <strong>entertain</strong> (a concept completely foreign to leftist hosts and the departed Air America).  And, as Rush has pointed out many times, satire isn&#8217;t funny unless there is a grain of TRUTH in it!</p>
<p>Consequently, nobody laughs at Media Matters or the other smear merchant subsidiaries of Soros and Clinton, Inc&#8230;not even the Dems!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Donaldson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-719664</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Donaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-719664</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve already written Congresscritters about this, and I have written some scathing stuff to Clark.  I used his OWN site to send messages to Congress as well.  I suggest you all do the same.  Clark needs to stfu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already written Congresscritters about this, and I have written some scathing stuff to Clark.  I used his OWN site to send messages to Congress as well.  I suggest you all do the same.  Clark needs to stfu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdawg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-719580</link>
		<dc:creator>jdawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-719580</guid>
		<description>Liberals are the enemy within.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals are the enemy within.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CP</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-719302</link>
		<dc:creator>CP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-719302</guid>
		<description>WTF is wrong with this man?  What an empty-suited-hack.  A rating system for political discourse?!  Rush is right.  These people are Stalinists.  This country is in real trouble of they get in the WH and continue to control Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF is wrong with this man?  What an empty-suited-hack.  A rating system for political discourse?!  Rush is right.  These people are Stalinists.  This country is in real trouble of they get in the WH and continue to control Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srhoades</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-718906</link>
		<dc:creator>srhoades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-718906</guid>
		<description>Weasley Clark, still weasley after all these years!  The &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; &quot;General Betray Us&quot;.  Tucker Carlson needs to grow a pair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weasley Clark, still weasley after all these years!  The <em>real</em> &#8220;General Betray Us&#8221;.  Tucker Carlson needs to grow a pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: politicalpartypoop.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Crazed by Rush, Wes Clark calls for political discourse to be RATED</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-718823</link>
		<dc:creator>politicalpartypoop.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Crazed by Rush, Wes Clark calls for political discourse to be RATED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-718823</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air  He doesn’t say who’ll be doing the rating but he digs the idea of Congress yanking Rush [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air  He doesn’t say who’ll be doing the rating but he digs the idea of Congress yanking Rush [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petefrt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-718712</link>
		<dc:creator>petefrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-718712</guid>
		<description>Stalinism lives between Wes Clark&#039;s ears.

From the sounds of him, he&#039;s never read the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stalinism lives between Wes Clark&#8217;s ears.</p>
<p>From the sounds of him, he&#8217;s never read the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talk Radio Under Attack &#171; Nice Deb</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-718704</link>
		<dc:creator>Talk Radio Under Attack &#171; Nice Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-718704</guid>
		<description>[...] Oh, and then there&#8217;s this brilliant Wesley Clark idea. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oh, and then there&#8217;s this brilliant Wesley Clark idea. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TallDave</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/comment-page-2/#comment-718656</link>
		<dc:creator>TallDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/03/video-crazed-by-rush-wes-clark-calls-for-political-discourse-to-be-rated/#comment-718656</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Spirit of 1776 on October 4, 2007 at 12:35 AM
Tucker didn’t have Clark on to argue over Rush’s reputation. He was arguing about the Orwellian nature of Clark’s position and the surreal hypocracy of it.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Again, &lt;strong&gt;that&#039;s the point&lt;/strong&gt;.  You don&#039;t choose to fight from the low ground with the sun in your eyes and your feet in the mud.

Even leaving aside the choice of what to debate, he did not have to say &quot;I grant you that&quot; when Clark said Rush was attacking our troops.  He could have disputed it without making that dispute his central topic.  Conceding that Rush was attacking our troops is idiotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Spirit of 1776 on October 4, 2007 at 12:35 AM<br />
Tucker didn’t have Clark on to argue over Rush’s reputation. He was arguing about the Orwellian nature of Clark’s position and the surreal hypocracy of it.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Again, <strong>that&#8217;s the point</strong>.  You don&#8217;t choose to fight from the low ground with the sun in your eyes and your feet in the mud.</p>
<p>Even leaving aside the choice of what to debate, he did not have to say &#8220;I grant you that&#8221; when Clark said Rush was attacking our troops.  He could have disputed it without making that dispute his central topic.  Conceding that Rush was attacking our troops is idiotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
