Video: Whoopi says she wants to “do” Nancy Pelosi and her husband

posted at 4:42 pm on October 2, 2007 by Allahpundit

I know she doesn’t mean it the way it sounds. I know she isn’t actually joking with the Speaker of the House about having a threesome.

But I can’t figure out what she could mean. And, um, neither can Mary Ann Akers of the Washington Post.

Exit question: What the hell?

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Spoken like a classless, moron. I’m sure the level of this show will slip lower as time goes by, and the Dems will continue to laugh when people make jokes about having sex with their spouses. Funny stuff?

Hening on October 2, 2007 at 4:46 PM

Why do I seem to hear the Hillary cackle towards the end? And I thought were we in a war and didn’t have time to do anything but debate the war (and Rush), how did she find time to do this??

Tyrs Fury on October 2, 2007 at 4:46 PM

Whoopie wants her some PALOMINO!

KelliD on October 2, 2007 at 4:51 PM

I’m a female but I do.not.get all this estrogen-gushing-gender thing from among Liberals and Liberal females espcially. I never have, and I hope I never do.

S on October 2, 2007 at 4:51 PM

“and along the way she managed to raise 5 kids.”

Uh, doubtful. I think a bevvy of highly-paid nannies raised her kids.

Hollywood and S.F. Liberals. Dumber than a box of sand.

Mindcrime on October 2, 2007 at 4:53 PM

The juxtaposition is astonishing. In introducing San Fran Nan, Whoooooopie mentioned that she is the first woman Speaker, as if to draw attention to the advancement of women’s equal rights issues. Then this cabal of female pundits brings the conversation down into the sexual morass that they claim once oppressed them. Burn your bras ladies, cause whoopie would like to touch them bare.

Weight of Glory on October 2, 2007 at 4:53 PM

I’m sure that it was just a botched Red Eye style introduction.

rw on October 2, 2007 at 4:54 PM

at least it wasn’t rosie saying that, that would be even worse

Defector01 on October 2, 2007 at 4:55 PM

Whoopi says she wants to “do” Nancy Pelosi and her husband

with or without blinking?

Pam on October 2, 2007 at 4:56 PM

Aaaaaawkwaaaaaard. I couldn’t tell if Pelosi was embarassed or intrigued by Whoops proposal since she’s constantly got that affixed, botox-like smile.

mboprey on October 2, 2007 at 4:57 PM

Palomino! Palomino!

ronsfi on October 2, 2007 at 4:57 PM

Eh, it was kind of Red Eye-ish.

baldilocks on October 2, 2007 at 4:58 PM

Classy. Just promoting those great San Franciscan values.

Most Sexual Congress evah?

simon on October 2, 2007 at 4:58 PM

Exit question: What the hell?

There is only one context in popular culture that the term “do” fits. Your mommy or daddy can explain it to you.

Troy Rasmussen on October 2, 2007 at 4:59 PM

What an effing, unfunny, classless, clueless, piece of sub-human debris…

JWS on October 2, 2007 at 4:59 PM

Classy, to the last.

I won’t watch the clip, so please tell me that Elizabeth did not join in the disgusting display.

I have other disgusting displays in mind for her that don’t involve any of the other players.

ej_pez on October 2, 2007 at 5:02 PM

Remember this SNL skit? For some reason, it comes to mind.

http://www.zoopy.com/video_773_SNL_:_Nancy_Pelosi.html

windbag on October 2, 2007 at 5:02 PM

Apparently Babwa also told Faith Hill they all wanted to “do” her husband.

And Joy said Clarence Thomas should write a book “If I Harrassed Her”

Brat on October 2, 2007 at 5:03 PM

I know she doesn’t mean it the way it sounds. I know she isn’t actually joking with the Speaker of the House about having a threesome.

Um, clearly she does mean it the way she sounds… how else could she mean it?

RightWinged on October 2, 2007 at 5:03 PM

Whoopie wants her some PALOMINO!

KelliD on October 2, 2007 at 4:51 PM

same wavelength!!

urbancenturion on October 2, 2007 at 5:03 PM

Palomino indeed.

Spirit of 1776 on October 2, 2007 at 5:09 PM

Mmm, how could Mr. and Mrs. Pelosi resist a little three way with the The View’s own Hottentot Venus?

(link conceivably unsafe for work, though it’s nothing you wouldn’t find in a biology or anthropology textbook.)

wordwarp on October 2, 2007 at 5:10 PM

Disgusting.
Pelosi, if she had an ounce of class, should have excused herself right then and there. I felt sorry for Mr. Nancy.

Tru2my2 on October 2, 2007 at 5:10 PM

Oh for the love of Pete, Allah!

Did you really have to do this blog?

Headlines….. headlines are appropriate for some things.

Mcguyver on October 2, 2007 at 5:11 PM

wordwarp, can you please pass the brain bleach?

For the love of Pete!

Mcguyver on October 2, 2007 at 5:15 PM

I know she doesn’t mean it the way it sounds. I know she isn’t actually joking with the Speaker of the House about having a threesome.

Um, clearly she does mean it the way she sounds… how else could she mean it?

RightWinged on October 2, 2007 at 5:03 PM

Would that be MMF, or MFF? Clarification please[don't]?

geckomon on October 2, 2007 at 5:15 PM

Tru2my2 on October 2, 2007 at 5:10 PM

Pelosi does not have said ounce of class. They all swim in the same garbage…

JWS on October 2, 2007 at 5:17 PM

Will no one embrace the Palomino Challenge?

see-dubya on October 2, 2007 at 5:20 PM

A manage-a-trios with Whoopie, Pelosi and who ever she’s married to was not the visual I needed after a shirtless Jackie Mason.

liquidflorian on October 2, 2007 at 5:20 PM

Does Miller sponsor the View?

JiangxiDad on October 2, 2007 at 5:21 PM

And conservatives are the stupid ones? Cripes.

mjk on October 2, 2007 at 5:22 PM

What side of the brain do liberals use again?

pat on October 2, 2007 at 5:29 PM

I don’t know, if I was on TV with Nancy Pelosi, I’d have an instinct to say something embarassing to her.

Enrique on October 2, 2007 at 5:29 PM

Just when I was actually starting to have a grudging respect for Whoopie….

What’s even wierder is Walters starting that downward spiral

JamesLee on October 2, 2007 at 5:30 PM

If I can quote Tim Meadow’s ‘The Ladies Man’ character:

“All right, now thatth dithguthtin …”

thirteen28 on October 2, 2007 at 5:31 PM

What side of the brain do liberals use again?

pat on October 2, 2007 at 5:29 PM

….it’s ahhh the…underside……
.
.

Oooh that was bad! …Muy bad!

Mcguyver on October 2, 2007 at 5:36 PM

.
Welcome to the jungle, speaker Pelosi.
.
Or as Jane Goodall might say, “would you take a banana instead?”
.

Keith_Z on October 2, 2007 at 5:36 PM

Congratulations Allah, you have successfully triggered my gag reflex three times in one day.

SouthernDem on October 2, 2007 at 5:37 PM

Well at least she has standards, albeit low ones, but standards none the less. Anything to bring the troops home I guess.

SPIFF1669 on October 2, 2007 at 5:42 PM

Huh – I feel a like I have just been in a Ted Danson nightmare…

Timothy S. Carlson on October 2, 2007 at 5:45 PM

What side of the brain do liberals use again?

pat on October 2, 2007 at 5:29 PM

I think it’s the bottom side.

Guardian on October 2, 2007 at 5:48 PM

What is it with people. If they are ‘a something’ and the first ‘that something’ becomes the first whatever it’s all like ya know. Anyway, as a vegitarian I would NOT be happy if Kucinich were president.

Whoopi, who cares if she’s the first female speaker of the house? Aren’t people just people regardless of gender, race, or sleep number(tm)?

- The Cat

MirCat on October 2, 2007 at 5:49 PM

Welcome to the jungle, speaker Pelosi.
.
Or as Jane Goodall might say, “would you take a banana instead?”
.

Keith_Z on October 2, 2007 at 5:36 PM

Is this crap necessary?

baldilocks on October 2, 2007 at 5:53 PM

I’m a female but I do.not.get all this estrogen-gushing-gender thing from among Liberals and Liberal females espcially. I never have, and I hope I never do.

S on October 2, 2007 at 4:51 PM

Two possibilities
1) They are mocking the historic interest in the physical attractiveness of the male candidate’s wife.

2)Barbara WaWa’s efforts to say something positive turned into the boorish.

We should assume the first–in the absence of evidence to the contrary–to show that we are better than the Democrats who interpreted Rush so moronically recently.

thuja on October 2, 2007 at 5:53 PM

“What side of the brain do liberals use again?”

pat on October 2, 2007 at 5:29 PM

———–

Obviously, the part they SIT on.

georgej on October 2, 2007 at 5:54 PM

Greg Proops? Shoulda had on Drew Carey instead. Proops’ first link is antiwar.com for crying out loud.

- The Cat

P.S. Gut turned the NRA bash back on him hehe

MirCat on October 2, 2007 at 5:59 PM

cripes….Baba Wawa actually provided the segue for Whoopie…

JetBoy on October 2, 2007 at 6:06 PM

Wrong thread

MirCat on October 2, 2007 at 6:15 PM

Ugh. That is a visual image I did NOT need (and I think Mr. Pelosi was just as embarassed).

MsUnderestimated on October 2, 2007 at 6:16 PM

Lemme channel my inner moonbat for a sec:

What’s more obscene? A Whoopi-Pelosis threesome or a war for oil based on lies?

Also (this is me again:) ewww.

Hannibal Smith on October 2, 2007 at 6:20 PM

If y’all ever get the video of that, please DO NOT post it!

TheSitRep on October 2, 2007 at 6:22 PM

Oh for the love of Pete, Allah!

Did you really have to do this blog?

Headlines….. headlines are appropriate for some things.

Mcguyver on October 2, 2007 at 5:11 PM

Now, see, I was disappointed in the big A because I saw it first at the Post and couldn’t believe anyone could have beaten Allah to anything View-related.

Quisp on October 2, 2007 at 6:24 PM

I wonder what Whoopi’s dreds smell like. Really I do.

SouthernGent on October 2, 2007 at 6:29 PM

Well, there’s two meanings to “do”:

Colloquial sexual euphemism. “I’d like to do her,” says the horny frat boy.

OR

Euphemism for killing, ala the Mob. “Are you going to do that loudmouth Joey Pants?” asked the irate Mafioso.

So, she either wants her in bed, or dead.

In the immortal words of Ash from “Army of Darkness”: First you want to kill me, now you want to do me. Blow.

Nethicus on October 2, 2007 at 6:40 PM

Whoopie being Whoopie is really much better than the
thing she replaced. Did anyone catch Pelosi’s reaction ?

Afterall she is the San Fran delight. : )

I’m really trying to keep it cleeeean.

Texyank on October 2, 2007 at 6:40 PM

Man I’ve got an old pet rock thats smarter than Whoopi and Joy combined.

Zoot Allure on October 2, 2007 at 6:50 PM

“Report, Mr. Data.”

“Captain, it appears the Romulans have used their transporters to beam Guinan’s brain out of her body. It is now being kept in a quantum singularity inside the Debrilex Nebula.”

“But Data, if Guinan has no brain now, what is it that gives her the power to speak, move, and feebly attempt to reason?”

“Currently, Captain, Guinan’s head does not contain a brain; the Romulans have replaced it with a conglomerate of positronic circuits that tilt dangerously to the left.”

“Is there any chance Guinan’s brain can be restored?”

“I am formulating a plan with Lieutenant La Forge to do just that. First, however, we will attempt to get that twentieth century automobile air filter off of Jordi’s head.”

radjah shelduck on October 2, 2007 at 6:52 PM

Multi-culti ménage à trois, either which way.

Entelechy on October 2, 2007 at 6:53 PM

Did anyone catch Pelosi’s reaction ?

There’s apparently a time-lapse photograph still being taken, while waiting for the effects of botox to wear off. Reaction to follow.

JiangxiDad on October 2, 2007 at 7:00 PM

Exit question: What the hell?

Perhaps Whoopie was floating a line to see if Nancy is partial to differing kinds of tuna or just starkist.

http://www.newsbusters.org/node/10126

swami on October 2, 2007 at 7:01 PM

I don’t understand where Barbara Walters thinks she is going with the comment about doing Paul Newman?

Resolute on October 2, 2007 at 7:07 PM

It was more like a disguised apology (I’m not flirting with your husband) tossed off as a bad joke imo.

aengus on October 2, 2007 at 7:15 PM

I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

zerodamage on October 2, 2007 at 7:27 PM

radjah shelduck on October 2, 2007 at 6:52 PM

nerd

Wingo on October 2, 2007 at 8:18 PM

Having finally watched this, it was definitely more than a ménage à trois.

Entelechy on October 2, 2007 at 8:51 PM

Ew! Just Ew!

Just when you think you’ve seen it all, The View plumbs to a new depth.

Lawrence on October 2, 2007 at 8:51 PM

Geez, they’re having swell fun.

Griz on October 2, 2007 at 9:03 PM

Exit question: What the hell?

It’s San Francisco thing AllahP, a New Yorker like yourself wouldn’t understand.

Kini on October 2, 2007 at 9:26 PM

Is this any different from what she did in 2004 during the campaign, that she eventually got fired from Slim Fast for?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,125747,00.html

ToddonCapeCod on October 2, 2007 at 9:57 PM

Whats really amazing about this,is that you didn’t hear two people on the street talking about this,or in Whoopi’s mind speaking out loud how she would like two canoes,but strangely only one paddle,this crap is all over the news.
So,Liberals what the H!LL!

canopfor on October 2, 2007 at 9:59 PM

wordwarp on October 2, 2007 at 5:10 PM

Congratulations on the most disgusting link ever posted here. I’d ban you if I could.

infidel4life on October 2, 2007 at 10:21 PM

Baba Wawa started it. Whoopi jumped right in. I can’t believe (although clearly I should) what an inane remark that was, first about “doing” Mr. Pelosi, and then “doing” Nancy Pelosi also.

How inappropriate, disrespectful (of anyone, even the Pelosi’s), disgraceful, and uncouth. Whoopi should be ashamed of herself, Baba Wawa should be also for starting the whole thing. ABC should stop and think about the future of the whole show.

What a disgusting show!

Qzsusy on October 2, 2007 at 10:23 PM

To be fair, Whoopi didn’t start it. They were talking about Paul Newman and saying he was attractive, and Sherri asked if Whoopi would do him.

Pelosi’s husband reminds me a little of Chris Noth. From the side more than from the front.

Tanya on October 2, 2007 at 10:30 PM

“and along the way she managed to raise 5 kids.”

Uh, doubtful. I think a bevvy of highly-paid nannies raised her kids.

Anyone for a bet on lowly-paid, no-tax nannies of “undocumented” status?

AmericanDad on October 2, 2007 at 10:32 PM

I wonder what Whoopi’s dreds smell like. Really I do. SouthernGent on October 2, 2007 at 6:29 PM

You had to write that, didn’t you? And here I’ve been trying to fight off the horrible suspicion that Whoopi has dreds above and below.

Amen zerodamage: I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

smellthecoffee on October 2, 2007 at 10:36 PM

Congratulations…
Infidel4life on October 2,2007 at10:21PM.

I agree Infidel4life,the link belongs on KOS.

canopfor on October 2, 2007 at 10:37 PM

Whoopi is disgusting. I can’t stand to look at her and listen to her foul mouth spew filth. She has no talent. Ugh.

sinsing on October 2, 2007 at 11:01 PM

Burn your bras ladies, cause whoopie would like to touch them bare.

Weight of Glory on October 2, 2007 at 4:53 PM

I actually busted out laughing at that.

Today I watched The View. Tomorrow shall be back to the regularly scheduled Yo Gabba Gabba.

LindsayK on October 2, 2007 at 11:16 PM

I could hurl in so many different directions after that one!

sMack on October 2, 2007 at 11:54 PM

Nancy Pelosi: The San Francisco Treat!

hillbillyjim on October 3, 2007 at 12:18 AM

Whoopi caught teh lesiban from rosies chair?!?!

soundingboard on October 3, 2007 at 2:25 AM

I should have done it this way:

Nancy Pelosi: The San Francisco Treat!

hillbillyjim on October 3, 2007 at 2:38 AM

YUK!!!

Just the thought of that woman ‘doing’ anybody makes me want to puke.

What a disgusting individual.

OBX Pete on October 3, 2007 at 3:38 AM