No, I don’t think most of the commonters here are anti-Semites, but I do think the commenters here, in general, are a bit too Christo-centric for my tastes.
BTW, I don’t read Kos or DU, so what they do is irrelevant to me.

billy on October 2, 2007 at 11:45 PM

I’m Jewish, dipshit, and the other commentators here are not too “Christo-centric” for my taste.

Now,everyone understands, Mark Levin does not recognize Christ as his Savior?
Right?
billy on October 2, 2007 at 11:23 PM

.
Not YET.

When it comes to talk shows…….

And it’s not about Rush, O’Reilly, or anyone else so much as it’s about our liberty and free speech. If we don’t take this fight seriously, it’s going to be lost within this generation.

SicSemperTyrannus on October 3, 2007 at 8:10 AM

there would be nothing left but a bloody pulp

I know the Democrats had hoped to equate this with the MoveOn.org ad, but the difference is there was no doubt what the Petraeus ad was about. It was clear and no one on their side denied it. But Rush absolutely denies what they are accusing him of and has the transcript to prove it.

It’s beyond sad and ridiculous and shows how malicious, yet stupid the Democratic leaders have beome.

Lets form a club!
El Guapo on October 3, 2007 at 1:50 AM

And use that club to beat the stupid out of Harkin!

Wes Clark is telling Meredith Viera that the attacks against Rush are necessary for “balance”, while at the same time bemoaning that it is taking up time on the floors of Congress.

Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl responded to the charge, becoming the first Republican lawmaker to support the radio host publicly.

“It’s troubling that some Democrats have taken a comment by Rush Limbaugh about “phony soldiers” totally out of context in order to find some moral equivalence to get them off the hook for refusing to condemn the MoveOn.org ‘Petraeus’ ad,” he said. “The only thing phony about this is the contrived controversy.”

heres the link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298999,00.html

you would first think its a TYPO, and the NOT was incorrect, and that he is being condemned for supporting the troops who are after all murderous, torturing thugs according to SENATOR Dick Durbin…

and upon being told it was not a typo,

you would then have laughed yourself into an apoplectic coma.

right?

The whole ‘Rush edited the transcript’ argument is now a strawman, because the libs have nothing else. They realize what Rush was realy talking about, so they are switching the focus on his supposed “unethical” practice to make it seem like he is hiding something. The libs are pretty pathetic.

This is exactly what is happening in a comment board of my local paper. Nevermind that Media Matters LIES. “Rush edited the audio to falsely accuse Media Matters.”

I love the screan name! LMAO! Nice post too. There is definitley a lot of bogotry, hypocrisy, and ignorance among liberals. Am I ever glad I crossed over.

Such as this: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298920,00.html

I am beginning to like Gutfeld.

Now,everyone understands, Mark Levin does not recognize Christ as his Savior?
Right?

billy on October 2, 2007 at 11:23 PM

So? Freedom of Religion, remember?

Those who ignore the facts are more dangerous than those who listen and still debate against them. This should be a lesson learned about everyone who signed the letter condemning Rush. See if your Senator is on the list: http://www.drudgereport.com/flashsr.htm

I noticed the treasonist Jay Rockefeller and war hero faker Tom Harkin are on there. Lets form a club!

Mark Levin does not recognize Christ as his Savior?
Right?

billy on October 2, 2007 at 11:23 PM

No. neither does the illustrious Allahpundit. What’s your point?