When they loose, they will blame ‘Rush’ as a phone talk show icon when they cannot even invent a ‘Talk Radio’ host or program that people want to listen to. Oh, I am sorry, they invented “NPR” which is their version of ‘Radio Free America’ in America. Anyone actually try one of their recipes?

I bet it would contain more e coli than all of California’s illegal immigrant fields where the left supports illegals to work. The same fields they would not want their kids to face the dangers of real character building work.

Here’s more on Media Matters from Discover the Networks, one of David Horowitz’ projects.

In the left sidebar there are links to articles around the web.

Yep.

If true it would end Media Matters 501(c)(3) status and provide David Brock with an opportunity to fulfill his greatest homosexual fantasy: Being gang raped in federal prison after conviction for PERJURY.

“…the tangled web of Soros’ financial/political influence?

NightmareOnKStreet on October 2, 2007 at 2:18 PM”

Soros owns countries and banks. An investigation would take awhile. Let’s start now. Maybe by 2020, we’ll have it figured out.

Connie on October 2, 2007 at 2:25 PM

Getting any one of his “astroturf” or fake grass roots organizations through which Soros can launder money into court would force them to open internal communications and lead to a fascinating paper trail. Too bad we don’t have the luxury of that kind of time (”2020″). For an eye opening look at the many groups funded by or affiliated with George Soros, I borrowed the link below from Texas Rainmaker It is for map engine that allows you to click on any of its groups/individuals and CONNECT THE DOTS from Soros & his Open Society Institute to Media Matters and the Clintons, etc. Of course it offers only a glimpse and is of no value legally, but the sheer volume and reach of his tentacles is both astonishing and frightening.

BTW HA/Bryan: I searched through previous HA threads to see if this link had already been given out and could not find it. Sorry if it is redundant.

Condemned by his own deceitful litany, Senator Tom Harkin crawled upon the Senate floor yesterday and lied some more. Worse, he was just downright nasty. Even more worse, he seemed to display a certain level of happiness that’s inappropriate to the d…

Too craven to directly vote for the surrender in Iraq that they would like to hang around the neck of President Bush as a defeat, desperate House Democrats are seeking other ways to lose the war in Iraq. One technique……

For starters (as to lies), she deploys the ever-handy Liberal method of lying in misstating and/or mischaracterizing the actions of those who point out her lies (and do so effectively): in regards Bill O’Reilly, she declares this lie, that “Bill O’Reilly tried to discourage people from coming to Chicago” and then she waxes for crowd appeal in declaring Chicago to be “a great city” and the sports stuff related.

It’s not Chicago, the city of Chicago, that was or is “discouraged” by ANYone in reference to anything Hillary related (though her ego in this regard is astounding…apparently in Hillary Clinton’s mind, Chicago and her political greed and Democrats are all interchangeable things, to discourage support for Hillary Clinton, Liberals and the Liberal blogosphere in Hillary’s mind is to be ‘against Chicago’ — what claptrap, what foolery, what deception she makes while wearing that foolish grin of hers).

These ongoing deceptions in speech are the main reason that people who are wise to and about others as to misleadments, lies and the dangers inherent in both are the reason why BOTH the Clintons are so continuously non supportable by most Conservatives. And why I as a Conservative question the capacity of many Liberals who fall for their deceptions, who seem unable to discern what these two Grifters are about, or, if they do discern what they’re about, that they’re supporting them (and that is to then participate in the Grift involved — and in this case, it’s the White House).

Liberals read comments such as these of mine and just think it’s some sort of attitudinal rant or the like from a Conservative. And they then persist in supporting people like the Clintons in their various escapades in some sort of rebound or spite or the like.

I just wish, to the contrary, that people would take a step back from Hillary Clinton and closely, very closely, examine who is behind the hype, who it is of character (or not) behind the presumption of popularity (it’s Bill Clinton’s popoularity, let’s face it, whether he’s on the stage in person with Hillary or not, Hillary is where she is because of Bill’s name, not due to her own abilities, but largely due to Bill Clinton’s name in history and “circles”).

I wish that more Liberals could take a step back and approach this person (Hillary) with criticism as to what she.actually.says or does.not.say and how and about what. To examine very closely what she’s selling (and she is selling) and why. Listen to the drifts of issues and names and topics she uses to confuse issues and to avoid providing any real infomation about herself and what she intends and has in mind, as to plans and politics.

Media Matters, Hillary Clinton…they are two of a kind, and they’re both lying as fast as they can, about nearly anything, everything, but their method of lying is subtle and persistent, just like is revealed about and by Hillary Clinton in this vidoe you’ve provided the link to…they CONFUSE and RECOMBINE statements to such an extent that you can start off asking them about, say, “ponies,” and you’ll end up reading (quickly) that, to this effect, “evil animals stomped on unsuspecting grasslands and devoured deserving daisies while they worked to establish pleasant aromas for all to enjoy. We condemn all spotted animals with manes.”

Audio: Hillary Clinton brags about starting Media Matters

That’s like bragging about starting Ebola.

Hillary can then say she is above the politics of negative attacks. But hopefully there will be people like Rush who call them on it like this.

There should be campaign contribution investigations on these ‘organizations’ to determine the legality of the activities. It doesn’t seem right to me.

the tangled web of Soros’ financial/political influence?

NightmareOnKStreet on October 2, 2007 at 2:18 PM

Soros owns countries and banks. An investigation would take awhile. Let’s start now. Maybe by 2020, we’ll have it figured out.

I’d love to see MediaMatters and MoveOn’s or any other leftist outfits’ internal docs, emails and communications and see if they’re coordinating.

Bad Candy on October 2, 2007 at 1:01 PM

That’s exactly what they do.