Didn’t he quit the Republican party?

krabbas on September 22, 2007 at 1:58 AM

He did and no one noticed, or cared.

Shillsack’s timing is awful.

Tom and the legislature negoiated an education bill that included performance pay that he was going to sign. But at the signing ceremony he informed the republicans he line item vetoed the money for the performance pay part and was creating a “study committee” to look at the idea!!

Stay classy Tom!!

jeanie on September 22, 2007 at 12:27 PM

Up to you… but your contention to me if flawed.

Face it, politicians take, and change, stances as the political winds blow. They sell votes. They trade votes. They do things for reasons they do not tell us, but all we have to go on is their voting record.

For a Congressman, I look at their record, and what they say… but here we’re talking about the President the US. One of the few men in the world with the ability to make decisions on the fly that can chage world event… the Commander in Cheif of the most powerful military ever.

The President is NOT there to run an agenda… he’s the guy in charge who makes decisions when the Feces impacts the rotating airflow device…

When in the crunch, its ALL about character, and your personal life is a window into what kind of character you have…

One flaw, or one ding? Not a big deal. But when your personal life is a constant disaster, its a danger sign. Its an indicator of potential character flaws which need to be looked into.

Typical move-on soros smears–t

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Vilsack
– - – The national co-chair for Clinton’s presidential campaign.[3]

“There’s his number of marriages”

“And his relationship with his children”

Then he says ….

“We ought not be focusing on scandals”.

.

Libs. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Supporting BJ’s wife. HAHAHAHAHEEHEEHEEHEE

This is going to be fun.

He never had a chance to wear a dress on national TV like Rudiani. And, Rudiani’s position on abortion: Baby killing is OK as long as no one gets hurt. Moron.

AprilOrit on September 22, 2007 at 4:42 AM

Thank you. I guess I’m a social conservative at heart, but much less of one in my own mind.

Just like questions about your religion.

Face it, these are big fundamental life altering things which the voters need to know about.

To say they are dirty pool, or mean nothing, puts another person like Bill Clinton in the White House.

I want my President to have integrity… because not matter what they say on the campaign trail, its fundamental beleifs which come into play when there is a crises.

But I wonder, if we knew how many skeletons the Clintons had in their closet in ‘92 instead of what we found out by ‘98, would they have gotten into the white house, let alone been re-elected? I ask that mostly because my memory of politics in the early 90’s is mildy fuzzy, given that I was in middle school.

Well, we knew about Gennifer Flowers back when he was campaigning in 1992, and Clinton still got elected. But even then he always came off as sleazy to me, while Hillary always came off as shrill.

Knowing what we know now, it should be more of a reason to not elect Hillary because I would not want to see the White House turn into a personal brothel for Bill.

Boy,Mr.Vilsack sure blew thru the Homeland Security issue as an aside.Call me wacky,but,If Homeland Security(that includes the illegal issue)isn’t the #1 priority,all other issues will eventually become moot.(..or not so eventually..)

Regney on September 22, 2007 at 7:36 AM

A point Rudy has made on more than one occasion.

Battles over health care and minimum wage pale in comparison to the battle for life and liberty. Vilsack is living in a 9/10 world and has, therefore, removed himself from any participation in a serious debate regarding the future of our country.

hey Spc Steve

I read your speech – it was excellent. I am not a social Conservative but everything you said made perfect sense to me, very well written/put.

Now, it would seem that Vilsack is rubbing his hands at the prospect of Rudy being the Republican nominee, because then they could just go hogwild on him and his more than one marriage, life not-custom-made for Presidency, so forth and so on. In other words, Democrats are trying to sound like they want Guiliani to be the GOP nominee for no other reason than to play dirty pool with campaigning. But I wonder, if we knew how many skeletons the Clintons had in their closet in ’92 instead of what we found out by ’98, would they have gotten into the white house, let alone been re-elected? I ask that mostly because my memory of politics in the early 90′s is mildy fuzzy, given that I was in middle school.

What’s that old joke? Never trust a guy with ’sack’ in his name. Guess we need to pull some never was out of retirement to respond to this outrage…somebody get Linc Chaffee on the phone.

austinnelly on September 21, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Didn’t he quit the Republican party?