Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Disgrace: Hillary, Reid, 23 other Democrats vote against resolution expressing support for Petraeus

posted at 1:48 pm on September 20, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view

They own you now, Glacier. The text of the amendment:

SEC. 1070. SENSE OF SENATE ON GENERAL DAVID PETRAEUS.

(a) Findings.–The Senate makes the following findings:

(1) The Senate unanimously confirmed General David H. Petraeus as Commanding General, Multi-National Force-Iraq, by a vote of 81-0 on January 26, 2007.

(2) General Petraeus graduated first in his class at the United States Army Command and General Staff College.

(3) General Petraeus earned Masters of Public Administration and Doctoral degrees in international relations from Princeton University.

(4) General Petraeus has served multiple combat tours in Iraq, including command of the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) during combat operations throughout the first year of Operation Iraqi Freedom, which tours included both major combat operations and subsequent stability and support operations.

(5) General Petraeus supervised the development and crafting of the United States Army and Marine Corps counterinsurgency manual based in large measure on his combat experience in Iraq, scholarly study, and other professional experiences.

(6) General Petraeus has taken a solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

(7) During his 35-year career, General Petraeus has amassed a distinguished and unvarnished record of military service to the United States as recognized by his receipt of a Defense Distinguished Service Medal, two Distinguished Service Medals, two Defense Superior Service Medals, four Legions of Merit, the Bronze Star Medal for valor, the State Department Superior Honor Award, the NATO Meritorious Service Medal, and other awards and medals.

(8) A recent attack through a full-page advertisement in the New York Times by the liberal activist group, Moveon.org, impugns the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all the members of the United States Armed Forces.

(b) Sense of Senate.–It is the sense of the Senate–

(1) to reaffirm its support for all the men and women of the United States Armed Forces, including General David H. Petraeus, Commanding General, Multi-National Force-Iraq;

(2) to strongly condemn any effort to attack the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all the members of the United States Armed Forces; and

(3) to specifically repudiate the unwarranted personal attack on General Petraeus by the liberal activist group Moveon.org.

And the roll. Amazing.

petraeus-roll.png

Update (BP): From the Romney campaign:

Today, Governor Mitt Romney issued the following statement on the Senate’s vote to condemn the MoveOn.org ad:

“Hillary Clinton had a choice. She could stand with our troop commander in Iraq, or she could stand with the libelous left wing of her party. She chose the latter. The idea that she would be a credible commander-in-chief of our armed forces requires the willing suspension of disbelief.”

Hillary does realize that the job she’s applying for is Commander in Chief, right?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Someone has to say it:

They voted for General Petraeus before they voted against him.

aunursa on September 20, 2007 at 1:50 PM

obama took a brave stance, I see.

lorien1973 on September 20, 2007 at 1:50 PM

Invested in Defeat

Defector01 on September 20, 2007 at 1:50 PM

Meanwhile KOS is outraged that dems voted FOR it

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/9/20/13927/4420

William Amos on September 20, 2007 at 1:51 PM

In fairness to Obama, he’s not in Washington today. He’s in South Carolina.

amerpundit on September 20, 2007 at 1:52 PM

Even Feinstein voted for it. Heh.

And, no surprise I suppose, Kerry among the Nays.

nailinmyeye on September 20, 2007 at 1:52 PM

Other nays:

Reid, Clinton, Schumer, Boxer, Dodd, Durbin, Feingold, Kennedy, Menendez, Stabenow and Lautenberg.

amerpundit on September 20, 2007 at 1:54 PM

A number of lazy tongues on the Senate floor. I lost count, the number of times, Senators, including McCain, pronounced General Petraeus’s name Butrayis.

captivated_dem on September 20, 2007 at 1:54 PM

Can we question their patriotism now?

infidel4life on September 20, 2007 at 1:55 PM

Huh. I am surprised.

Spirit of 1776 on September 20, 2007 at 1:56 PM

Obana’s in SC! Didn’t Jessie tell him get to LA to support the “Jena-6″?

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on September 20, 2007 at 1:56 PM

obama took a brave stance, I see.

lorien1973 on September 20, 2007 at 1:50 PM

Heh, and Biden, the big talk…

Entelechy on September 20, 2007 at 1:57 PM

aunursa…..you beat me to the punch!

So can we now question their patriotism???

If they can not stand up to moveon, how will they fare against terrorists?

robo on September 20, 2007 at 1:57 PM

Democrats and moveon are traitors.

The sooner we destroy them, the better.

georgej on September 20, 2007 at 1:58 PM

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on September 20, 2007 at 1:56 PM

Get this: Hillary’s going to be on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace this Sunday – the same day the Congressional Black Caucus is hosting its debate in Detroit, which she boycotted. Across on Drudge..

amerpundit on September 20, 2007 at 1:59 PM

At the DU, the war is on.

Entelechy on September 20, 2007 at 1:59 PM

Can we question their patriotism now?

infidel4life on September 20, 2007 at 1:55 PM

WOW? Where the heck have you been?!!

On-my-soap-box on September 20, 2007 at 1:59 PM

MoveOn is a subsidiary of Clinton, Inc. She’d never vote against herself.

JammieWearingFool on September 20, 2007 at 2:00 PM

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00344

Really?

♫ ♪ ♫ Money. Money changes everything. ♫ ♪ ♫

IrishEi on September 20, 2007 at 2:00 PM

The Reaper – Beauty!

Entelechy on September 20, 2007 at 2:01 PM

Sorry, my musical rendition was in response to this:

Huh. I am surprised.

Spirit of 1776 on September 20, 2007 at 1:56 PM

IrishEi on September 20, 2007 at 2:01 PM

I suspect this proves what many have said and some don’t wish to recognize; that Democrats are, in fact, afraid of the Moveon.org traitors. It is beyond any sense of intellect that anyone could not recognize that the fear is real.

MNDavenotPC on September 20, 2007 at 2:02 PM

Interesting how the testament of an honest man really puts the hurt on liberals.

Really says something doesn’t it about the lack of character and integrity of liberals and liberalism?

Sunshine cauterizes the rotten soul.

Speakup on September 20, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Move0n’s makin’ a new list, checking it twice.

IrishEi on September 20, 2007 at 2:03 PM

That title at the Kos is precious.

Lefties wetting their panties :):):)

Entelechy on September 20, 2007 at 2:04 PM

Collapse. (From title)

The libs are completely over the cliff!

Sorry.

No more going-over-the-cliff stories.

Only crashed-and-burned stories.

Mcguyver on September 20, 2007 at 2:05 PM

♫ ♪ ♫ Money. Money changes everything. ♫ ♪ ♫

Yes, I don’t see how there will every be a more clear list of those bought and paid for by MO.org. That’s the lastest Madam’s blackbook out of Washington to be sure.

Spirit of 1776 on September 20, 2007 at 2:06 PM

Obana’s in SC! Didn’t Jessie tell him get to LA to support the “Jena-6″?

Obama didn’t get an invite. In case you haven’t heard, he’s not “black enough”.

taznar on September 20, 2007 at 2:08 PM

I was surprised that both Democrat senators from West Virginia voted “nay.”

Granted, they have always been trending liberal in their votes. But Byrd was conservative and voted “pro-Constitution” on the sham-nesty bill.

But today’s vote caused me to realize that both WV senators are trending moon-bat, far, far liberal.

ColtsFan on September 20, 2007 at 2:08 PM

♫ ♪ ♫ du du de du du, du du de du du ♫ ♪ ♫

Mcguyver on September 20, 2007 at 2:08 PM

Gen. Petraeus’ confirmation roll call:

- Voting for him: Reid/Reaper, Hillary C., Kennedy, Dodd, Biden, Obama.

- Not voting: Kerry

Entelechy on September 20, 2007 at 2:09 PM

Huh. I am surprised.
Really?

Yes, I have been under the impression that Hillary was running more of a GE campaign then a primary campaign. I did not anticipate she would think it to her advantage to tack left on this issue. I thought she would play the middle, as AP mentioned earlier, and voted ‘aye’ to give cover for her denial later. I am surprised.

Spirit of 1776 on September 20, 2007 at 2:11 PM

Go Claire! Another pleasant surprise from her.

Tanya on September 20, 2007 at 2:12 PM

This will be the Glacier’s anti-sister-soldjah moment.

Entelechy on September 20, 2007 at 2:13 PM

It would be interesting to see how many dimocraps would vote FOR terrorist visits to Ground Zero. I am betting that if that vote came up you would see only (D)’s voting “YES”, much like this vote. Is it any surprise that all the “NO” votes were (D)’s save one and I am betting he is up for reelection.

On-my-soap-box on September 20, 2007 at 2:13 PM

Awriiiiight! EXCELLENT!

Bring it on!

petefrt on September 20, 2007 at 2:13 PM

On-my-soap-box on September 20, 2007 at 1:59 PM

Firmly ensconced in my comfortable sarcasm.
;-)

infidel4life on September 20, 2007 at 2:13 PM

It is quite a relief that McCain-Feingold took the money out of politics.

DavidM on September 20, 2007 at 2:14 PM

Ahhhhhh, I see my Senators Comrade Carl levin and Fat Debbie Stabenow voted the against the folks here in Michigan again. We are not even remotely represented in the United States Senate, what a joke!

deadbackpacker on September 20, 2007 at 2:14 PM

Democrat = Commie

Maxx on September 20, 2007 at 2:16 PM

Let the Blue on Blue civil war begin!

Who knows….maybe a little red will be spilled.

Come on, Liebs. You know you want to switch to the dark side…..

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on September 20, 2007 at 2:17 PM

I love it. It’s time the RNC made some ads over this.

jdawg on September 20, 2007 at 2:17 PM

In fairness to Obama, he’s not in Washington today. He’s in South Carolina.

amerpundit on September 20, 2007 at 1:52 PM

He was there long enough to vote for the Boxer amendment which would have added the Cleland ad and the Swift Boat Veterans ad to the resolution.

LakeRuins on September 20, 2007 at 2:20 PM

I hope those of you who are enraged about Ahmadinijead’s attempt to go to Ground Zero will reconsider the initial reaction of some to punish the RNC for this.

We need to support the RNC and get the ads rolling.

Buy Danish on September 20, 2007 at 2:24 PM

The sooner the IRS and FBI starts investigating them and their money, the sooner Soros will be off to the graybar hotel.

And the sooner the directors of moveon will be trying to leave the country to evade prosecution.

I hope they resist arrest….

georgej on September 20, 2007 at 2:25 PM

Ahhhhhh, I see my Senators Comrade Carl levin and Fat Debbie Stabenow voted the against the folks here in Michigan again. We are not even remotely represented in the United States Senate, what a joke!

deadbackpacker on September 20, 2007 at 2:14 PM

I hear ya. I went from the frying pan (NY) into the fire (NJ). As Kermit would say, “It ain’t easy being green red.”

IrishEi on September 20, 2007 at 2:28 PM

deadbackpacker on September 20, 2007 at 2:14 PM

I’m in Michigan too. In the event you haven’t noticed, we are rapidly becoming the US version of France.

swami on September 20, 2007 at 2:31 PM

Why didn’t Biden vote for it?

bnelson44 on September 20, 2007 at 2:33 PM

(1) to reaffirm its support for all the men and women of the United States Armed Forces, including General David H. Petraeus, Commanding General, Multi-National Force-Iraq;

(2) to strongly condemn any effort to attack the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all the members of the United States Armed Forces; and

Nice way to officialy show us how much you “Support the troops” there Donks.

FireFly on September 20, 2007 at 2:34 PM

Hillary does realize that the job she’s applying for is Commander in Chief, right?

No, the job she is applying for is panderer to Moveon.org and Hollywood. She couldn’t have cared less about the military when her husband was in office, and she couldn’t care less about them now.

bnelson44 on September 20, 2007 at 2:35 PM

Obama,doesn’t vote,how convenient.

As President Bush said today in his news conference,
he’s tried for two years to work with the otherside,
and thats the truth.
Democrats on the otherhand have successfully wasted two years of Bushs administration time on Irag.
Lets just face facts,the DNC are not going to work
with Republicans,there just going to run the clock out on Bushs Administration period.

canopfor on September 20, 2007 at 2:35 PM

Excellent, tie Hillary to MoveOn and watch her campaign sink.

Bad Candy on September 20, 2007 at 2:37 PM

Limbaugh was right. Eventually, they will reveal themselves, it appears that eventually is happening today.

swami on September 20, 2007 at 2:37 PM

A Nay vote means you would not condemn the ad.

LakeRuins on September 20, 2007 at 2:37 PM

Hey, didn’t Waffles come out and condemn the MoveOn ad? Sure he did.

And now he votes against this resolution condemning MoveOn.

You’ve certainly earned your name Waffles. And then some. His support for the military comes through loud and clear once again.

notta_dhimmi on September 20, 2007 at 2:39 PM

I want to say something about this, but cant think up anything that wont get me banned. So suffice it to say this only confirms what I already think about Hillary and the dems. 24 dems tell the troops right to their face…Hey I do not support you…Yes I am calling them unpatriotic now, in fact I’m calling them traitors…

doriangrey on September 20, 2007 at 2:40 PM

On-my-soap-box on September 20, 2007 at 2:13 PM

About a third if the poll in my link is any indicator.

Bad Candy on September 20, 2007 at 2:41 PM

(7) During his 35-year career, General Petraeus has amassed a distinguished and unvarnished record of military service to the United States

Allah P
Unvarnished? Shouldn’t that be untarnished?

leepro on September 20, 2007 at 2:42 PM

Disgraceful. I question their patriotism! (*gasp*)

By the way, not sure about Obama not being there. One news story specifically noted his ‘non-vote’:

Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, another contender for the Democratic nomination, did not vote, although he voted minutes earlier for an alternative resolution by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. That resolution condemned the MoveOn ad as an “unwarranted personal attack,” but also condemned political attack ads that questioned the patriotism of Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., and former Sen. Max Cleland, D-Ga., both Vietnam veterans.

CP on September 20, 2007 at 2:42 PM

It’s still the Primaries. Once the running starts for the General Election, they will switch to a different ‘pro-American’ playbook and all this stuff will go down the memory hole.

Like it always does.

Asher on September 20, 2007 at 2:43 PM

I LIKE Romney’s response. All the Pub candidates should be piling on.

Hell, pile on Ubama’s non-vote too!

Darksean on September 20, 2007 at 2:44 PM

No, the job she is applying for is panderer to Moveon.org and Hollywood. She couldn’t have cared less about the military when her husband was in office, and she couldn’t care less about them now.

bnelson44 on September 20, 2007 at 2:35 PM

No you are wrong, Hillary cares very deeply about the Military. Her earnest desire is to see it gutted and emasculated and reduced to bare empty shell of its former self. A good health military combined with a populace armed with their second amendment right to bear arms means she doesn’t have a prayer of being crowned Queen of America or President for life of the United Socialistic States of America.

doriangrey on September 20, 2007 at 2:45 PM

States run exclusively by moonbats:

Massachusetts (foulest liberal fever swamp)
New Jersey (corrupt as they come)
New York (elected Glacier, unforgivable)
Rhode Island (has coastline, only redeeming thing about it)
West Virginia (good roads and mountains, Byrd is senile)
Illinois (the midwest Masschusetts, just as dirty)
Michigan (Michael Moore stopped paying lip service to it)
Washington (where California kicks its crazier moonbats)
Hawaii (should it even have a vote?, guam doesn’t)

Zach on September 20, 2007 at 2:48 PM

Liked Mitts response, but I really would’ve liked to see something stronger. Wonder what Rudy or Fred will say? This needs to be a nationwide ad…

jdawg on September 20, 2007 at 2:49 PM

“Betray us” is acceptable language to many Democrats as it applies to this situation.

So the people who have claimed for decades that absolutely no speech can possibly constitute “treason” have finally found a guilty man.

Sitting Democrat Congressmen accusing American soldiers of being “Nazis” and “cold-blooded mass murderers”: A truer example of patriotism America has never known.

General Patreus’ exhaustively researched and annotated report on the current condition of our military situation: Treason most foul.

Yeah, I’d say the Democrats have finally made their position clear.

logis on September 20, 2007 at 2:51 PM

Romney is winning this week’s pithy, dagger-to-the-guts campaign statements contest.

BelchSpeak on September 20, 2007 at 2:51 PM

Asher on September 20, 2007 at 2:43 PM

I’m not sure of that. With legions of bloggers keeping video and records, if the morons in the upper echelon can put together some good ads, it’ll put the hurt on the Dems. I know I’m being way too optimistic about the dumbasses at the RNC, but a guy can hope…right?

Bad Candy on September 20, 2007 at 2:54 PM

I can’t wait to see how Hillary spins her rationale on this.

flipflop on September 20, 2007 at 3:01 PM

The idea that she would be a credible commander-in-chief of our armed forces requires the willing suspension of disbelief.”

Excellent response. I think it should be boiled down to a bumper sticker:

Hillary as President requires the willing suspension of disbelief.

Mallard T. Drake on September 20, 2007 at 3:02 PM

Same gaggle of leftist pukes that are constantly trying to cause our defeat in Iraq. Their radical left wing political headquarters, MoveOn.Org, must be very proud of them.

rplat on September 20, 2007 at 3:02 PM

I can’t wait to see how Hillary spins her rationale on this.

flipflop on September 20, 2007 at 3:01 PM

…in the general ‘08…

Entelechy on September 20, 2007 at 3:05 PM


Hawaii (should it even have a vote?, guam doesn’t)

Zach on September 20, 2007 at 2:48 PM

Hawaii is a state. Guam is not.

leepro on September 20, 2007 at 3:06 PM

Hillary does realize that the job she’s applying for is Commander in Chief, right?

Sure she does but, in Hillary’s mind, that job is subsumed under the position of “Queen of the World.” Of course she will be Supreme Commander in Chief, or whatever you called it; but she’ll also be a whole lot more than that.

And you can be sure that belittling, insulting and libeling American troops – even to the point of officially accusing active duty US generals of treason when they give unwelcome reports – will be part and parcel of the role Hillary Clinton intends to play.

logis on September 20, 2007 at 3:07 PM

Obama FTW!

SouthernDem on September 20, 2007 at 3:08 PM

sharott brown…The moron Senator from Ohio voted against this…General Petraeus has more class and honesty under his little toe nail than sharott brown has in whole body…what a disgrace for Ohio…

areseaoh on September 20, 2007 at 3:09 PM

Hawaii is a state. Guam is not.

Senators Adoodoo and Inyourway

Kini on September 20, 2007 at 3:09 PM

My Senators voted, “Nay”.

Gee, not surprised. /snark

kiakjones on September 20, 2007 at 3:10 PM

I think we have just found the most succinct way to define our country’s problems, in one set of 25 people.
The “Villainous 25″
The “deuce-five death squad”
The “Pseudo Senators-Move-on”
The “Acting like the French-Quarter”
The “Seditious two-five”
The “infringement fringe”
The deuce and a nickel left us in a pickle.
.
In ALL seriousness, America without these 25 anti-American mouth pieces would be far FAR better than it is. Can you imagine the unity, serenity and inner peace we would enjoy if miraculously all of these 25 we’re voted out forever?
They’re a disgrace , an embarrassment, a failure of AMERICAN way of government and life…a road block to the pursuit we were promised.
It’s a sad day.

shooter on September 20, 2007 at 3:11 PM

Massachusetts (foulest liberal fever swamp)
New Jersey (corrupt as they come)
New York (elected Glacier, unforgivable)
Rhode Island (has coastline, only redeeming thing about it)
West Virginia (good roads and mountains, Byrd is senile)
Illinois (the midwest Masschusetts, just as dirty)
Michigan (Michael Moore stopped paying lip service to it)
Washington (where California kicks its crazier moonbats)
Hawaii (should it even have a vote?, guam doesn’t)

THESE ARE STATES WHERE I WILL NEVER SPEND ANY OF MY VACATION DOLLARS…PERIOD…THE BOYCOTT IS ON…

areseaoh on September 20, 2007 at 3:12 PM

Liked Mitts response, but I really would’ve liked to see something stronger. Wonder what Rudy or Fred will say? This needs to be a nationwide ad…

I don’t know. I bet they were all tripping over themselves to get something out, and Mitt beat them to the punch.

Hillary does realize that the job she’s applying for is Commander in Chief, right?

No. If elected, she’ll probably appoint Krazy Kucinich to the all new Peace Department……except that she will keep the Defense Department and IRS to use against her enemies (aka the American citizens).

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on September 20, 2007 at 3:12 PM

Man, Hillary keeps creating great GOP campaign ads for the general election.

Clark1 on September 20, 2007 at 3:12 PM

I can’t wait to see how Hillary spins her rationale on this.
flipflop on September 20, 2007 at 3:01 PM

The same way she “spins” all of her leftism: she will only bring it up during Socialist rallies, and never allow it to be reported during generally distributed news programs.

That is her strategy: Fox and talk radio can say whatever they want; she’ll simply write them off and focus on her image broadcast by the 90% of the media who support her.

logis on September 20, 2007 at 3:17 PM

The idea that she would be a credible commander-in-chief of our armed forces requires the willing suspension of disbelief.”

Quote of the month at least! Way to go Mitt! I am not a big supporter of his but that has to be the best jab I have heard out of any of the candidates so far.

conservnut on September 20, 2007 at 3:18 PM

By the way, I notice that Obama didn’t have the “Malkins” to vote on this one.

conservnut on September 20, 2007 at 3:20 PM

If Chillary is the democratic candidate for President and her Republican opponent runs a powerful tv ad showing how she voted against the military today and she still gets elected, God help us. We can’t be that stupid, can we??

deedledee on September 20, 2007 at 3:26 PM

Not defending the Hillary, et al, or the underlying sentiment, but would any of you have voted for something that said…

(8) A recent attack through a full-page advertisement in the New York Times by the neocon activist group, Hotair.com, impugns the honor and integrity of [WHOEVER] and all the members of the [WHATEVER]

(b) Sense of Senate.–It is the sense of the Senate–

(3) to specifically repudiate the unwarranted personal attack on [WHOEVER] by the neocon activist group Hotair.com.

The repeated use of the superfluously antagonistic phrase “liberal activist group MoveOn.org” was likely put there to bait them into voting against it. It was a brilliant move, but don’t construe a vote against this as a vote explicityly “against the troops”.

DaveS on September 20, 2007 at 3:30 PM

Disgusting. How can Hilary expect the loyalty of the military if she won’t stand behind them? Every active officer has followed the constitutional orders he received whether he supported the war or not. They know their duty lies with the civilian authority.

Clearly no Clinton understands the idea that loyalty has to run both ways. But they probably view the US armed forces as a bunch of soldiers for hire. They are patriots, every one. How else can one explain their willingness to sacrifice everything for mediocre pay, and vilification.

doufree on September 20, 2007 at 3:31 PM

The idea that she would be a credible commander-in-chief of our armed forces requires the willing suspension of disbelief.

Hillary “Who said that? It’s a lie”.

Entelechy on September 20, 2007 at 3:31 PM

DaveS on September 20, 2007 at 3:30 PM

It’s a trap!

SouthernDem on September 20, 2007 at 3:37 PM

Exactly, SouthernDem.

DaveS on September 20, 2007 at 3:38 PM

Hawaii is a state. Guam is not.

leepro on September 20, 2007 at 3:06 PM

I know.

Hawaii is only important as a strategic military base and an overpriced tourist destination. Should islanders hundreds of miles from the US mainland have influence on US policy?

It’s only a state because 50 is a nice round number.

Just sayin…

Zach on September 20, 2007 at 3:54 PM

Mitt Romney is now officially my hero.

Hawkins1701 on September 20, 2007 at 3:55 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.