Video: Dr. Hillary’s going to make it all better

posted at 10:45 am on September 18, 2007 by Allahpundit

Are you ready for change?

You have to be ready, or else she can’t lead.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Sounds great! Where do I sign up??? Oh, I have to give up my freedom first? Never mind.

Liberals: Doin’ what’s right…by force if necessary….

ScottG on September 18, 2007 at 10:50 AM

She was the useless figurehead for Bill’s Healthcare socialist healthcare debacle… Or at least they’re saying that now, so they can blame Bill for its failure and make her sound competent now.

Just wait..we’ll have a crappy NHS here if she’s elected.

tickleddragon on September 18, 2007 at 10:52 AM

I saluted her with the one-finger victory sign the whole 30 seconds.

Mcguyver on September 18, 2007 at 10:55 AM

No problem. I’m sure that as they quadruple what they take out of my check for taxes will more than be made up for in lower rent and gas prices.

Ordinary1 on September 18, 2007 at 10:59 AM

What has the good doctor got that will fix my nausea? I feel an overwhelming urge to puke.

CyberCipher on September 18, 2007 at 11:00 AM

So under Hillary’s healthcare plan, if Hillary finds a breast lump and commoner Jane Doe finds a breast lump. Which woman gets her lump attended to first? Anyone??????

bloggless on September 18, 2007 at 11:00 AM

Obviously, “change” is an euphemism for lobotomy.

T J Green on September 18, 2007 at 11:01 AM

She was on Morning Joe this morning. Few things are more disgusting then Joe constantly apologizing for opposing her in the 90s and groveling over her “change”. He even hinted that universal health care is needed.

Newsbusters has some notes on this horrible display by a once honorable man.

Complete7 on September 18, 2007 at 11:01 AM

You have to be ready, or else she can’t lead.

Haha. Help me help you! [kicks wall]

Spirit of 1776 on September 18, 2007 at 11:03 AM

Picture Hillary’s large soft hands and then hearing from her say “Turn your head and cough please”,

That’s about how I feel about the “new health care” plan.

I just had a chill run up my spine thinking about it…buuurrr!

Sgt. Khe Sahn

1GooDDaDDy on September 18, 2007 at 11:06 AM

I like how her system isn’t actually single payer. It just increases the medical insurance system that’s funding her campaign. Should provide for some good red on red moments over the next few weeks.

BadgerHawk on September 18, 2007 at 11:06 AM

Her plan is laid out here:

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/feature/healthcareplan/americanhealthchoicesplan.pdf

notice the end where she adds up all the savings…and that savings will more than pay for the plan. Riiggghhhtt.

sunny on September 18, 2007 at 11:07 AM

Hillary is a Marxist and if elected this nation as we have known it will cease to exist. Be afraid people . . . be very afraid.

rplat on September 18, 2007 at 11:08 AM

Oh Utopia!
I guess Hillary thinks that the role of the Federal Government is to provide all of the services required of every walking piece of DNA in “America” (I guess that means Illegal Aliens too – Still waiting for that explanation). Our Federal Government is supposed to protect and defend our freedoms and our liberty. That includes my freedom to choose my healthcare. That means protecting our borders Hillary! That means defending our nation against all enemies foreign and domestic! And you know what Hillary? That means in the course of our nation’s history we may have to torch a few fez wearing sand travelers who want to convert or exterminate us.

AMRAAM on September 18, 2007 at 11:12 AM

“So if you’re ready for change, she’s ready to lead.”

Nah, I’m fine with the way things are, thank you.

Mallard T. Drake on September 18, 2007 at 11:14 AM

rplat on September 18, 2007 at 11:08 AM

somehow i think this great nation of ours has been through worse and come out alive.

you give hillary way too much credit

ernesto on September 18, 2007 at 11:18 AM

Hillary is a Marxist and if elected this nation as we have known it will cease to exist. Be afraid people . . . be very afraid

If it’s democratic, it’s gotta be good for you!

Don’t think, people…just follow the mob

Ochlan on September 18, 2007 at 11:24 AM

Nurse Wretched.

JammieWearingFool on September 18, 2007 at 11:43 AM

To quote a great American…..

“Yet anytime you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, we are denounced as being against their humanitarian goals. They say we are always “against” things, never “for” anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so. We are for a provision that destitution should not follow unemployment by reason of old age, and to that end we have accepted Social Security as a step toward meeting the problem.

But we are against those entrusted with this program when they practice deception regarding its fiscal shortcomings, when they charge that any criticism of the program means that we want to end payments to those who depend on them for livelihood. They have called it insurance to us in a hundred million pieces of literature. But then they appeared before the Supreme Court and they testified that it was a welfare program. They only use the term “insurance” to sell it to the people. And they said Social Security dues are a tax for the general use of the government, and the government has used that tax. There is no fund, because Robert Byers, the actuarial head, appeared before a congressional committee and admitted that Social Security as of this moment is $298 billion in the hole. But he said there should be no cause for worry because as long as they have the power to tax, they could always take away from the people whatever they needed to bail them out of trouble! And they are doing just that.”

Ronald Reagan, 1964, “A Time For Choosing”

Want a preview of a Hillary presidency? Look back 40+ years.

God Bless You, Ronald Reagan. His words still ring true.

Enough said.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on September 18, 2007 at 11:44 AM

I forgot to highlight the following passage.

They have called it insurance to us in a hundred million pieces of literature. But then they appeared before the Supreme Court and they testified that it was a welfare program.

Hillary’s entire tactic relies on the “insurance” line.

Take heart everyone…..If Le Madame Hillary is elected, we’ll ALL be paying for illegal aliens health care. Might as well take your paycheck and flush it down the toilet.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on September 18, 2007 at 11:47 AM

I like what Newt said (not exact quote) but the gist is
I woke up and Hillary was proposing National Healthcare and OJ was in jail. Where did the last 13 years go?”

ritemama on September 18, 2007 at 11:48 AM

But, wait, some doctors will earn more than other doctors. That won’t be fair. The income of physicians will have to be regulated, or her system will not fly actuarially.

shaken on September 18, 2007 at 11:50 AM

The moveon/betray us debacle is bad enough that she’s willing to moveon to Hillary care to distract from it.

Speakup on September 18, 2007 at 11:53 AM

Picture Hillary’s large soft hands and then hearing from her say “Turn your head and cough please”,

That’s about how I feel about the “new health care” plan.

I just had a chill run up my spine thinking about it…buuurrr!

Sgt. Khe Sahn

Damn, dude! I was just about to go have lunch!!

CurtZHP on September 18, 2007 at 11:53 AM

“So if you’re ready for change, she’s ready to lead.”

What she really means here in Clintonspeak, is, all we’ll be left with is the change in our pockets if she get’s elected and gets her meathooks into national health care.

I also heard Cankles explain away her past failure by saying “she made a mistake the last time around”. I can’t figure out if she was referring to her adulterous husband, or health care.

fogw on September 18, 2007 at 11:55 AM

Typical: As long as something changes, it must be good.

nottakingsides on September 18, 2007 at 11:56 AM

Since when are Democrats content with individual choice?

Or is the government choosing for you the change she’s talking about?

Speakup on September 18, 2007 at 12:01 PM

I work in healthcare and am acutely aware of many problems related to getting paid. But Hillarycare is NOT the answer. Definitely not.

The answer lies in allowing doctors and patients to do what is necessary, and whether that’s paid for by private insurance or medical savings accounts or other instruments should be nobody’s business. And the states should have every right to offer their own version of insurance as well.

I cannot imagine the nightmare we would have if we nationalized health insurance.

Mommynator on September 18, 2007 at 12:18 PM

JWF: Those who are tardy will not get fruit cup.

fogw: Last time it was a mistake, this time exactly the same thing will not be a mistake.

This is the leftist mindset in a nutshell case.

Why is the left so married to nationalized health care? Is it just “romantic Marxism” or self-delusion or what?

Merovign on September 18, 2007 at 12:54 PM

Shorter version:

Hillary: “How much of this money would it take for you to vote for me?”

Voter: “Hey, that’s my wallet!”

Merovign on September 18, 2007 at 12:57 PM

Since when are Democrats content with individual choice?

Or is the government choosing for you the change she’s talking about?

Speakup on September 18, 2007 at 12:01 PM

One step at a time. First it’s this and then it’s that.

Uni healthcare will drive up costs which will bankrupt Health Insurance Companies.

Bankrupting health insurance will wreck non-union corporations benifits packages which will feed the unions.

Now the whole us is a union worker.

Tie that with the fact that every american is bot a union worker and a wellfare recipient. . . . welcome to the USSA.

- The Cat

MirCat on September 18, 2007 at 1:00 PM

bot = now

MirCat on September 18, 2007 at 1:01 PM

I work in healthcare and am acutely aware of many problems related to getting paid. But Hillarycare is NOT the answer. Definitely not.

Just like Cuba.

saiga on September 18, 2007 at 1:03 PM

I found this at this link:

To pay for this, Clinton would tap a number of funding sources. She’d rescind part of the Bush tax cuts, ask large employers to contribute money if they don’t provide their workers with insurance, and wring some savings from modernization and improved efficiency. She’d also yank back some of the unnecessary subsidies government now throws at private insurers through the Medicare drug benefit — while letting the government use its bargaining leverage to get better prices for Medicare beneficiaries.

The obvious bogus sources of revenue are all there. What I like best is the idea she’d “ask” large employers to contribute if they didn’t provide workers with insurance.

Hillary: Would you be willing to contribute the money you’re keeping by not paying for health insurance?

Employers: Why, yes! Yes, of course, we’d be delighted to!

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on September 18, 2007 at 1:15 PM

Hillary is just afraid too many people are going to live long enough to try and collect their Social Security, which has already been spent, hence socialized medicine… that should bring life expectancy way down. If your not working, you are of no use to the government because they aren’t collecting income taxes from you… you become a useless eater. We can’t have any of that… now can we ?

Maxx on September 18, 2007 at 1:21 PM

Touchy Feely Warm and Fuzzy

Turn your head and cough.

Kini on September 18, 2007 at 1:25 PM

Decisions about your health, whether or not you get treatment, how much treatment, and how long it takes to get it, brought to you by the same people who run:

The Department of Transportation and your local DMV
FEMA
Veterans Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Social Services
…and every single other department that the government can’t run efficiently or properly.

Our average life spans will drop 10 years while the age for Social Security eligibility will be upped by 15.

Yay for socialism!

SilverStar830 on September 18, 2007 at 1:41 PM

I…can’t…click…to…play…must not click…to play…must..survive…

Christine on September 18, 2007 at 1:45 PM

CyberCipher on September 18, 2007 at 11:00 AM

Here’s a little something for your nausea and anyone else not “ready for change.”

Wingo on September 18, 2007 at 2:31 PM

I’m not sure this does a very good job of balancing the various demand stimuli (from expanding coverage, subsidizing the purchase of insurance) with any sort of fundamental cost control. It seems incredibly unrealistic.

Also, no new bureaucracy, but how is are the individual and employer mandates enforced? How will the not-to-exceed-a- percentage-of-family-income provisions be handled?

Finally, do we get performance yardsticks? If the plan comes in over cost projections, or we see insurers failing or consolidating, or the cost savings needed to finance the program don’t materialize, will she declare it a failure and lay in a course correction? What is she promising? What are the benchmarks? What are the specific predictions regarding the program’s performance?

DrSteve on September 18, 2007 at 2:47 PM

If it can save one childs life, it is worth it. If it can allow one person to live out their life in dignity, it is worth it. If it can allow one single mother the peace and comfort, it is worth it. If it can allow one minority to beat the odds, it is worth it.

If it bankrupts a nation, is it worth it? If for decades the middle class suffers under the extreme burden of taxes, is it worth it? If only the wealthy (read leaders) can receive immediate health care, is it worth it? If thousands die because health care is rationed, is it worth it? When your baby dies waiting in line for a shot, is it worth it? And when the rationing creates a lottery for health care and your number is too high, is it worth it? And is it worth is to have a special system for congress so they never have to wait in line, wait for a doctor? If we made Hillary wait 3 months to see a doctor about a lump in her breast, would she think it is worth it? We will never know, because they will always have special priviledge. If they have others pay, it will be worth it.

When Peter is robbed to pay Paul, Paul never complains.

right2bright on September 18, 2007 at 2:49 PM

According to Hillary we can build a gigantic bureaucracy that requires we carry a card as proof to employers that we have health insurance but we can’t find and deport illegal aliens,not even the worst criminal aliens?

Speakup on September 18, 2007 at 3:12 PM

When Peter is robbed to pay Paul, Paul never complains.

right2bright on September 18, 2007 at 2:49 PM

In an America not to far in the past, Paul would have complained and returned what wasn’t his to begin with.

Speakup on September 18, 2007 at 3:16 PM

How many vaccine manufacturers have gone out of business since Hillary’s price controls went into effect? How many more pharmaceutical companies will abandon unprofitable drugs once her new price controls take effect? Health care itself is not in need of great reform. If you want to fix what is wrong with our health care system, think tort reform. Hillary, of course, will never address this issue being comfortably (though not so comfortable as Edwards) in the pocket of the trial lawyers.

I truely hope her Republican challenger will bring these things to light during the general election campaign. Health care under the control of any of the dems would be an absolute nightmare.

Wingo on September 18, 2007 at 3:36 PM

I live in Canada. We have universal health care here. Any American who thinks universal health care is a brilliant idea should simply pick up the phone, call ANY random Canadian, and ask him/her what he/she thinks of Canada’s health care system.

We Canadians are intimately familiar with how incredibly stupid the idea of universal health care is. Even our lefty party (the Liberal Party) concedes that we can’t have a “free” health care system anymore. It’s one of these ideas that sounds all nice and fuzzy and warm, but it just doesn’t work.

dave_lantos on September 18, 2007 at 3:48 PM

I can’t believe that anyone would believe that any kind of government-provided health insurance wouldn’t turn into another massive entitlement program. First they start with the poor, giving free insurance to those who can’t afford to buy it in order to buy their vote. Then the income caps get raised to include even more people. And again.

In the meantime, they realize that if they can only cut down on unhealthy or dangerous behavior, they enact more regulation to protect us from ourselves, going beyond the seatbelt and helmet laws enacted for that same purpose to increase taxes on alcohol, tobacco, etc.

Later they argue that the private insurance companies are discriminatory because they cater to those who can afford it- either directly or through their employer- while low income people are being discriminated against in the inferior federal program… you see where this is going.

Hollowpoint on September 18, 2007 at 4:09 PM

Wingo on September 18, 2007 at 3:36 PM

Thanks for the reminder about the vaccine shortage. I’d forgotten. If any of you aren’t familiar with it, here’s a brief summary from August of 2003:

Hillary’s Vaccine Shortage:

Everyone knows America’s vaccine industry is in serious trouble, with an ever dwindling number of producers and recent severe vaccine shortages. What everyone also should know is that the National Academy of Science’s Institute of Medicine has now pinned much of the blame on the government vaccine-buying program promoted by former First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The panel of doctors and economists issuing a report on vaccines last week identified as a fundamental cause of the problem the fact that the government purchases 55 percent of the childhood vaccine market at forced discount prices. The result has been “declining financial incentives to develop and produce vaccines.”

The root of this government role goes back to August 1993, when Congress passed Clinton’s Vaccines for Children program. The plan, promoted by the Children’s Defense Fund, was to use federal power to ensure universal immunization. So the government agreed to purchase a third of the national vaccine supply (the President and Mrs. Clinton had pushed for 100 percent) at a forced discount of half price, then distribute it to doctors to deliver to the poor and the un- and under-insured. As a result:

* Where 30 years ago, 25 companies produced vaccines for the U.S. market., today only five remain, and there is only one producer for a number of critical shots.

* Recent years have brought shortages of numerous vaccines, including those for whooping cough, diphtheria and chicken pox.

The Institute panel in effect said that one of Senator Clinton’s pet projects is a bust.

That article links to the WSJ as a source. The WSJ also stated:

Apart from price controls, the other great threat to vaccine makers has been tort lawyers. Congress took a significant step to solve this problem in 1986, creating the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and requiring the injured parties to seek redress there before they can sue in regular courts. But plaintiffs’ lawyers have been crafty in finding ways around the VICP, most notoriously by claiming damages due to the discontinued but harmless vaccine additive thimerosal. There’s still work to be done here.

The Institute of Medicine panel deserves credit for highlighting the threat to vaccine makers from government price controls. Mrs. Clinton is a powerful Senator now with Presidential ambitions. It took some guts for the Institute panel to say in effect that one of her pet projects is a bust…

Here’s something from CDC about the shortages:

Shortages of several of these vaccines necessitated temporary changes in recommendations for their use. During that period, summary information about the shortages including projected duration and recommendations for temporary changes in the childhood immunization schedule were provided.

Some are still short. Anyone know more?

INC on September 18, 2007 at 4:20 PM

The Reagan quote posted by Dr.Cwac.Cwac on September 18, 2007 at 11:44 AM was great and quite apt.

In their conniving to use the ruse “for the children” to further their centralized power schemes Bill & Hill and the dear old CDF caused children more problems. (Notice I didn’t even mention Edwards & the lawyers!).

INC on September 18, 2007 at 4:24 PM

Laura Ingraham on her show today says, Karl Rove has a big article writen up in the WSJ today about how the Republicans can take the initiative on this health care issue..I agree..quit talking about their plan is this and their plan is that..get our own plan and start pushing it, Laura explained it and its a winner..Couldn’t pull it up on the WSJ web cause you have to be a paid member. I’m sure HA could..Over 40million voters without health ins. another untold millions who can barely afford the premiums and blame that on the illegals. The GOP is half way there, they have got the immigration right and will gain voters there, now add a senseable healthcare idea and we WIN IN ’08

Legions on September 18, 2007 at 5:10 PM

Dr. Hillary’s going to make it all better

Now, please bend over…

oldleprechaun on September 18, 2007 at 6:07 PM