61b7b9df1a25…

But you don’t defeat a strong leftist candidate by veering to the middle. Bush 41 proved that all too well. Provide a clear contrast for the public with a strongly conservative agenda and the adults will carry the day.

primary play to your leftist,
general lie about being a leftist to try and fool the general .

Doctor Zero on September 16, 2007 at 10:51 AM

You actually had me laughing out loud. You’re right about Republican voters- at least those with brains. But it’s a year til election day, a few hours til football, a few more hours til baseball, so why not bash Rep. candidates a bit? I’m with you Doc. Vote R on elec. day.

JiangxiDad on September 16, 2007 at 8:50 AM

The one who works like hell, has family values, hides his hot air and is suspicious of the dogs.

Mcguyver on September 15, 2007 at 11:17 PM

Which AP were you talking to/about? The one who posts blogs, or the one who comments in them?

I have also made my respect for him abundantly clear and I think that speaks for itself.” ~The Glacier

Yeah, we noticed Hillary, but crapping all over people isn’t in line with most people’s definition of “respect.”

I don’t think any Republican can win in the general

A year is an eternity in politics. Ford almost pulled it out in ‘76, post-Vietnam, post-Watergate and unelected to the job.

Here, the Dems’ prohibitive fave is HRC, who habitually scores a majority or near-majority who already say they will not vote for her.

Well, I have repeatedly not only expressed my strong admiration and support for our men and women in uniform, but with respect to General Petraeus, I have also made my respect for him abundantly clear and I think that speaks for itself.”
Really, calling him a liar (admittedly in “prettier” language) is “respect”?

“…this requires the willing suspension of disbelief.”

RightWinged on September 15, 2007 at 5:15 PM

RightWinged—you and I are cut from the same thought brain. Your words were EXACTLY what I was going to comment! Touche’!!!!!!

If you mean will KP denounce the ad herself, she’s already called it “despicable.” **She did a good job on that.

**Hubba hubba….. XO XO

No one’s going to rise like a cork. Fred or Mitt will back into the nomination after voters object to the rest of the field. And then they’ll be slaughtered in the general.

I don’t think any Republican can win in the general although Rudy would probably have the best shot, especially if Hillary is the nominee on the left. A moot point anyway given his prospects in the primary.

But….he’s still finished, right?

I’m beginning to wonder who is shilling for Hillary Clinton…..

Yeah. Republicans can get the same hawkish, anti-jihadist message minus the liberal social policies from Fred or Mitt

.
AllahPundit, did you get the memo that I’m blaming all my negativity on you from now on if you’re not careful?

Here is an appetizer:
Just where in the hell does all this negative sentiment for the republicans comes from unless you are shilling for Hillary (You and Drudge both)? Drudge mentioned he would probably vote for Hillary if he wasn’t afraid that she was going to raise the blogger’s taxes. So all Hillary has to do I guess is promise she won’t raise taxes on bloggers and you guys are in.

Sweet.

As opposed to you, who mindlessly, reflexively defends Bush Hillary every time she so much as farts?

Is it the 3rd hand Hillary farts, AP?

If you’re going to keep running this picture of Hillary, in which she strongly resembles a rat sniffing, please at least airbrush in a large cheese wedge in front of her.

What the Republican leadership in both Houses ought to do is introduce a sense of the congress resolution condemning moveon for defaming one of America’s finest generals and demanding retraction.
…………..

georgej on September 15, 2007 at 5:44 PM

Amanda Carpenter Townhall.com

After the Moveon.Org advertisement ran on Monday, Sen. John Cornyn (R.-Tex.) introduced a resolution which “strongly condemn[ed] personal attacks” against Petraeus and indicated support for all members of the Armed services. When it was offered Wednesday on the Senate floor, the Democratic Majority Whip, Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.) used a parliamentary move, called a point of order based on “germaneness,” against the measure to prevent the Senate from voting on it.

What a crock!!!

Then again Mitt would have us out of Iraq even faster than Hillary’s plan and he gave up his anti gun, pro abortion ways about the same time he decided to run for President as a Republican.

Then there’s Fred. I’m not exactly sure where he stands on a lot of stuff but he went to a gun show this weekend.

here.

Christoph replied: “I’ve heard Biden did, but haven’t seen the quote. I wouldn’t doubt it though.”

Does anybody have a link to any such statement from Biden?

For God’s sakes, csdeven, that one part of his life does not define him.
Christoph on September 15, 2007 at 6:55 PM

Maybe not for himself, his family, or his groupies, but for regular folks who vote in a general election? The word “lobbyist” is absolutely radioactive. Especially since almost every single client he lobbied for was working against the exact type of folks that will be voting in the general.

Fred couldn’t be elected dog catcher in a general.