They will have crystal-clear sounds – no small feat inside of a car – and very little distortion….

That’s because I’m hanging out at Hot Air all week. Come check me out! I’m back here next week, and Tuesday I’m opening for Charlie Rich at the Sands. Try the veal! Here’s some good posts I wrote there: This……

Oh boy it seems we have a little discrepency as to what Mitt says now and what Mitt said then about every conservative issue in a debate with Kennedy where he gets laughed of the stage AWW Poor Mitt, even the leftards can see right through him. Only someone who has a personal stake in a Mitt presidency could suspend that much disbelief. He really makes one have to suspend disbelief doesn’t he. This is scarey pathological liar Mitt. Is this the man we want to represent us as a party? I for one think absolutely not.

sonnyspats1 on September 14, 2007 at 12:13 AM

Yeah sonnyspats, cause absolutely, positively nothing could possibly have changed in thirteen years.

Patholigical liar… or… grew up politically, as evidenced by his actual policies which he put forth and conducted as Governor, a much more recent and concrete use of power than debate talking points in an election against The Swimmer.

Speaking of patholigical liars, why is it Fred mysteriously “does not recall” the details of the only thing he ever actually fought for in the Senate? You’d think he’d know every detail of what he then would probably call a crowning achievement, but now that his Washington insider status is unpopular, he seems to have changed his skin.

Funny how to “prove” Mitt has “lied” you have to go back thirteen years, but Fred’s change of stripes is quite current. In fact, its origin seems to start with his “testing the waters” a few months ago. Mitt embraces his past and explains his changes in detail. Fred pretends like he fell off the bus yesterday, and all you need to know about him can be handled in a well scripted Fred Thompson ’08 ad.

Let me straighten you out. If you think saying it matters or is FALSE) if an article is first or second on a page means anything…lean over and listen to this…get a life. If there is an abstract on the page, there is one on the page, top, bottom, sideways, learn how to comprehend. If you think that there is no abstract because I said bottom of the page and you can’t find it, learn how to read (here is a hint, add the word emerald to your search and you will find the abstract at the top, on the sdsu you will find it on the bottom…man o man, sheeesh).

Right2bright,

I’m sorry but I do not have a freaking clue what you are babbling about there^^^. Do you have a translator handy?

Remember this…you had no idea this existed, you had no idea what an abstract (and still don’t) is, until I pointed it out to you, I am the one who gave you the link.

You’re right! I had no idea the ARTICLE existed! So what? It doesn’t have anything to do with Mitt Romney. I know exactly what an abstract is, and YOU most certainly did NOT give ME the link. I had to take a portion of what you quoted and Google it with the author’s names to find it… myself.

This is all very easy to prove – it’s all in the original thread.

Me, not you, I had to spoon feed you. You should pay me for the lack of schooling you had, and for what I have had to teach you the past couple of days.

Ha Ha Ha. You have indeed “fed” me a lot of delusional “ideas” but you haven’t “taught” me a single thing, except that there are all sorts of kooks in the world, and even conservative blogs have their share of them.

This is one of the “lies” that you are upset about.

Since most everything you write it a figment of your imagination, why should I have thought that that was any different from the rest of your bizarre assertions? It reflects poorly on you, not me.

And no, it began the day before you stated, you foolish person

It began for ME when you made that comment about Mitt’s job being “bought”. How does that make me a “foolish person”? Why do you keep babbling on about csdeven? Is this his blog?

By the way, did I mention I am the one who provided you the link, and that you were completely unaware of Mitt and Bain consulting with Monster.com?

Why yes you did mention that you provided me the link! Right up there^^!! That is twice in one post that you are , err, mistaken about the truth, and you have yet to show me that Mitt did consulting with Monster.com. You claim that because he was running Bain and Company he personally did the consulting work with monster.com, but you’ll excuse me if I don’t take your word for that. Surely you understand that the person who runs a multi-billion dollar company hires other people doing the consulting work.

And I ask you again how many sons do I have that are attorneys oh great accurate one?

Listen up! I hope your feelings are not hurt by this, but I. don’t. care.about.the.gender.of.your.children.

After you straighten out you little minion, Buy Danish, sit down and have a talk with yourself.

I’m a “little minion”?! Ha Ha. I think I’ll go with this definition and thank you for the compliment:

One who is highly esteemed or favored; a darling.

As for talking to myself, no thanks, but I don’t doubt for a moment that you yourself do that frequently.

Buy Danish on September 13, 2007 at 8:42 PM

Let me straighten you out. If you think saying it matters or is FALSE) if an article is first or second on a page means anything…lean over and listen to this…get a life. If there is an abstract on the page, there is one on the page, top, bottom, sideways, learn how to comprehend. If you think that there is no abstract because I said bottom of the page and you can’t find it, learn how to read (here is a hint, add the word emerald to your search and you will find the abstract at the top, on the sdsu you will find it on the bottom…man o man, sheeesh). Remember this…you had no idea this existed, you had no idea what an abstract (and still don’t) is, until I pointed it out to you, I am the one who gave you the link. Me, not you, I had to spoon feed you. You should pay me for the lack of schooling you had, and for what I have had to teach you the past couple of days.

I have his transcripts of his court hearing where he swore on whatever book the Mormons use to admit that he brought a gun in to Monster and forced them to hire his son (that was when he was for gun control, but is now for it). I just don’t want to give you that transcript, instead you will have to use common sense…sure

This is one of the “lies” that you are upset about.

And no, it began the day before you stated, you foolish person. And by csdeven rules, once you jump into an argument, you own all of the others persons arguments. That is his rules (ask him, and if he doesn’t admit I have his statement) and he makes the rules for you Mitt-wits. He is the leader, he has stated that. So before you jump on me, check with your commander. You are way out of line, csdeven is not going to be happy with you, oh he will not state it publicaly, but he will be very unhappy that you were concerned about the abstract being at the top and not the bottom.

By the way, did I mention I am the one who provided you the link, and that you were completely unaware of Mitt and Bain consulting with Monster.com?

Your welcome.

Okay, you drive a hard bargain, the secret documents and testimony I can sell you for $250. Hardly used, and only I have them.

And I ask you again how many sons do I have that are attorneys oh great accurate one?

csdeven on September 13, 2007 at 8:38 PM

oops, look like you aren’t too good at choosing a gender, have you always had that problem? Or just when the lights are out.
What tipped you off Sherlock?

Looks like you have a little problem with facts yourself. After you straighten out you little minion, Buy Danish, sit down and have a talk with yourself.

This post is about gone.

1 Iraq
2 Global war on teror
3 Border securety
4 The democrats indifference
5 Immigration
6 China’s military build up
7 Abortion
8 Anchor babies
9 Santuary cities
10 Earmarks
11 Long term military spending
12 A level playing field with regards to trade agreements

If you would like to hear it first hand from Fred Thompson You can see and hear his Iowa State Fair speech at http://www.Imwithfred.com

1) Lobbied for a dictator
2) Lobbied for a failed power plant
3) Lobbied against citizens suffering from asbestos poisoning
4) Lobbied for a pro-choice group
5) Was proud to be a womanizer
6) Supposedly married just to run for president
7) Flip-flopped on abortion
8) Failed to nail Clinton in the china scandal
9) Voted not to impeach Clinton
10) Co-authored McCain/Feingold
11) Funneled campaign cash to his son
12) His staff is in disarray because of his wife’s desire for power
13) Did nothing in the senate
14) Has no executive experience at all
15) His staff is loaded with lobbyists
16) Lies about being a Washington insider
17) Refuses to debate
18) Refuses to engage in specific policy questions
19) His PAC raised little to no money for conservative causes
20) Has created an image that is not what he is. Just like his fake red pickup and his blue jeans and flannel shirts he used in 94.
21) He

So, these are just a few of the “conservative” credentials you Fred supporters want the rest of us to fawn over Fred about.

The conclusion is that Fred is the most dangerous candidate to the conservative cause in America because if he receives the nomination, he will be destroyed by Hillary. Or if he miraculously does win the general, he’ll bring his nepotism and lobbying ways to the white house. His campaign staff is loaded with lobbyists and by all accounts, a power hungry wife.

Got anymore insults?

right2bright,

Is the truth “insulting”? Do you not remember what you say from one minute to the next?

You said:

This gets better, the article was an abstract (it stated it right at the top)

That is FALSE. It stated right at the top that it was an ARTICLE.

After that summary (which I already copied and pasted for you) there was a brief abstract.

After the abstract the full article followed.

That is indisputable, and if you are having difficulty with this then perhaps commenting on blogs is above your capabilities.

As for where this “began”, It began with your FIRST comment on that thread at 12:59 a.m. when you said:

And please, don’t pretend that his dad’s influence didn’t buy him his jobs and prestige. And I would love a 30 month vacation in France, some mission.

That is what I was responding to, and whatever discussion you had with csdeven has nothing to do with my comments to you.

Who is this “she” you are always talking about?
right2bright on September 13, 2007 at 6:28 PM

Yeah, riiiiight. It’s pretty evident you are a female.

steveegg on September 13, 2007 at 7:57 PM

Awesome.

I want a boomstick!

right2bright on September 13, 2007 at 8:01 PM

Now, that’s funny right there. I don’t care who you are.

jdawg on September 13, 2007 at 7:38 PM

Yeah go ahead use Mitt-wits, I think I stole it from someone else. Mitt-wits, Fred-heads, what are Rudy’s and McCain’s? Ron Paul is bizzarro.

see-dubya on September 13, 2007 at 7:25 PM

I thought all of you guys posted something controversial then went to bed.
Here are some suggestions:
Mitt is a Christian or not.
Mitt is a draft dodger
Mitt is a flip flopper
Rudy is a liberal
Rudy embraces sanctuary
Rudy did not lower crime
Fred drives a red truck
Fred drives a red truck
Fred drives a red truck
McCain and Kennedy, buddies forever
McCain and immigrants, buddies forever
McCain and free speach, enemies forever
Huckabee, big government, or stop smoking
Ron Paul, is he from Jupiter or Mars
Newt, will he or won’t he
Newt, can the majority even understand him

Post one of those and wake up to a cool 250 to 500.

Night night see-dubya.

Clinton II. Heh. Sounds like a movie sequel.

First they came for your wallets…now they want your soul!

Slublog on September 13, 2007 at 1:59 PM

You do realize that the appropriate clip from “Army of Darkness” must now be hunted down.

Come get some.

BKennedy on September 13, 2007 at 12:24 PM

Thank you again for proving my point.

And I’ll take strawberries.

LOL all you need to do is mention something negative about Fred or Mitt and it is jello wrestling night at hooters time in terms of popularity!

Bradky on September 13, 2007 at 7:29 PM

LOL!!! Fixed that for ya!

LOL all you need to do is mention something negative about Fred or Mitt and it is jello wrestling night at hooters time in terms of popularity!

Bradky on September 13, 2007 at 7:29 PM

Lime or Strawberry?

Mitt-wits

Heh. That’s good – can I use that sometime?

Come on, keep fighting, let’s go for 250 comments!!

Oh, never mind.

see-dubya on September 13, 2007 at 7:25 PM

LOL all you need to do is mention something negative about Fred or Mitt and it is jello wrestling night at hooters time in terms of popularity!

Oh, never mind.

Buy Danish on September 13, 2007 at 7:13 PM

I will type real slow so you can understand.

This was born out of an original argument with csdeven, when I said that George helped Mitt get started in business. I said an influential powerful man helps sons get jobs…he said no way prove it. So I showed him the Phoenix article stating that Mitts son was hired by a personal friend and business ally. Plus I said common sense dictates that and gave several examples: Kennedy, Bush, Jessie Jackson jr., Trump, and others. They all benefited from their fathers. Not uncommon, and nothing wrong with it.

I upped the ante (and jerked your chain) when I found how over the top you guys got, and stated I had secret testimony, I never thought you would fall for it; that you could seperate reality from fantasy…you can’t.

You hopped in and called it envy, csdeven finally admitted that fathers help sons.

That is all this really is about. End of it, end of you calling people names, end of you being a jerk…unless you want to continue being a jerk.

Now let’s get back as to why Mitt is falling so far behind, that is what is really important (nobody wants to hear any more bickering, including me). And why Fred is surging. What are you Mitt-wits going to do about this turn of events?

The abstract is before the article. Abstracts always precede the full thesis.
Buy Danish on September 13, 2007 at 6:50 PM

Got anymore insults? You mean the abstract is before the article, you mean the abstract you couldn’t find isn’t 2″ below but above?

You sure got me now…what a debater.

Ummmm, you never answered me about the sexist, you say that my sons have law degrees? Never occured that they could be daughters, or one son and one daughter? Jump to conclusions are we?

Is the abstract really above the thesis? Dang your clever. That makes Mitt all the more important, that should move him to double digits. You certainly know how to pick out the important things in an argument.

Man, you are brilliant. Are you sure you don’t want to buy that secret sworn testimony? Marked down to $500.

And please, don’t pretend that his dad’s influence didn’t buy him his jobs and prestige.

In other words, according to not2bright, Mitt’s jobs and “prestige” were bought for him.

There is NO other way of interpreting that, despite jdawgs chivalrous but tortured explanation.

Who are these “sons” you (By Danish) talk about?

right2bright on September 13, 2007 at 6:28 PM

Time to call 911.

BKennedy on September 13, 2007 at 6:29 PM

This is like arguing with someone who is in a room with padded walls. She also moves the goal posts every time with yet a new fantasy so it is nearly impossible to keep up with the previous ones.

You can take my word for it or read the original thread here :)

HAHAHAHAHA!

not2bright,

OMG. I’m beginning to think you are quite insane.

The abstract is before the article. Abstracts always precede the full thesis.

I asked you for a source to back up one of your ridiculous claims and your pitiful response is right here in the archives:

right2bright on September 8, 2007 at 3:19 PM

As for my “sexism”, you have added another reason for me to be convinced that you are really a moonbat, and I can easily imagine you as someone who squawks about how unfair it is that it is that our past is “history” and not “herstory”.