Comment of the month!

Did she bring him aboard to reward him for his criminal destruction of classified material? Or did she sign him up because of his stellar record in fighting bin Laden in the late 1990s?

Some hire ex-criminals to catch criminals (i.e. true story behind ‘Catch me if you can’).
Others hire experienced criminals to perpetuate the crimes with even less chance of being caught. Experience indeed, Sandy Burglar and both Clinton’s, lots of experience in deception and most probably waves of crime.

Poor donkeys! To be associated with such criminals and traitors.

The Republicans need to reiterate at every opportunity these facts.

A good debate question for Hillary would be, “Why did you choose to make Sandy Burger your national secuity advisor now that you know he is very sloppy and keeps a very messy desk?”

Zetterson on September 13, 2007 at 7:37 PM

Very funny.

And isn’t it fun to fantasize about what questions we would ask Hillary in a debate. That could be a thread in and of itself.

How about, “Boxers or briefs”?

As for Sandy Burglar, for some reason this phrase by Web Hubbell comes to mind: I guess, I’ll just have to roll over one more time.

I say nominate Ted Olson because it will force the (D)emocrats to smear a man whose wife died in the plane that hit the Pentagon exposing the (D)emocrats transparent politicizing of 9/11 by trotting out the few 911 widows stone-stupid enough to support appeasement.

I want to see Ted Olson face down the (D)efeaticrats and ask them how many of them are “Truthers”.

I say nominate Ted Olson because he has already beat the (D)emocrats before the Supreme Court by stopping Al Gore and his partisan (D)emocrat appointees of the Florida courts from selective “hanging chad count’em” re-counts and suppressing military votes which is one of the real reasons the (D)emocrats hate him.

I say nominate Ted Olson because his wife wrote two books exposing Hillary(D) and the fight will remind us of those horrible truths exposed by that heroic woman and is the second reason the (D)emocrats hate him.

I say nominate Ted Olson because it will expose the (D)emocrats lie that they had any reason to dislike Gonzalez, or Ashcroft, except for their petty partisan politics.

I say nominate Ted Olson because we want a fight up to, and including, jamming that brave man up the party of the ASS until it bleeds.

- The Cat

About that pic…is that a donkey or a camel? Or is it some grotesque hybrid? Do the Dems have a new mascot?

RedWinged Blackbird on September 13, 2007 at 7:35 PM

I think it’s a mule, if so, not a good mascot for the dems, mules are quite intelligent in spite of their reputation for stubborness.

I think Hillary wants to keep a character like Sandy Burglarized close both to reward and keep an eye on… that’s the problem with having hit men like that working for you, you never know when they might turn on you.

Criminals and smear artists, ok with Democrats. John Rizzo, Ted Olson and Gen. David Patraeus, not ok with Democrats. The twice-demoted Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp is evidently the Democrats’ model soldier; Gen. Petraeus is just a political shill.

This shows that those who have no honor – fear it!

Democrats embrace criminals and smear artists,

Birds of a feather…

Democrats embrace criminals and smear artists, shun patriots.

wow you could knock me over with a feather