CNN looks into 9-11 “white plane” mystery

posted at 10:09 am on September 13, 2007 by Bryan

Not the one in Shanksville. The one over the White House, witnessed by CNN’s John King, among others.

It was about 10 am on 9-11. The hijacked planes had already hit the World Trade Center and the Pentagon (the Pentagon crash occurring at 9:37 am), and the White House was among the government buildings in Washington that were being evacuated. NORAD had scrambled fighters into the air without any clear idea of where the fighters would go or what their responsibilities or orders were. At that moment, a mysterious plane appeared in the restricted air space above the White House. That plane, as you’ll see in the clip, was most likely an Air Force E-4B flying command post.

The CNN story gives too much air time to the Truthers for my tastes, but it’s not hard to see why. In the absence of having every single thing about that day explained, conspiracy theories arise among the paranoid and narcissistic. And the government has no long-term interest in acknowledging that the E-4B was sent up, why it was sent up or who might have been on board. In telling our citizens every single thing about what the E-4B might have been used to do on 9-11, we would also be telling our enemies quite a bit more about that plane’s roles and capabilities than would be prudent.

If you sift through the 9-11 Commission report, it’s not all that difficult to come up with some roles the E-4B might have played without resorting to Trutherism.

9-11 was probably the single most chaotic day in US history. We had an unknown number of planes hijacked by an unknown number of terrorists from an as of that time unknown group, and until the planes began to crash into buildings, the hijackers’ intentions were unknown. The hijackers turned off or manipulated the transponders in the planes they had seized, crippling the FAA’s ability to track them and also making it more difficult for military planes to find them for potential escort or shoot-downs. In the early minutes of 9-11, it wasn’t clear what the nation was facing or what the emergency’s full scope was.

I’m former Air Force, and even I don’t know a lot about the E-4B. It’s a highly classified “doomsday plane” built to make sure that the government survives an extreme emergency. 9-11 was an extreme emergency. Why wouldn’t a standing order to send that plane up in the event of an extreme emergency be enacted when such an emergency arose? It would be stranger if the E-4B had never launched on 9-11, than the fact that it did launch but the government hasn’t seen fit to explain its role.

Now, what might it have been doing? Well, we all know that President Bush was in Florida that morning, reading books to school kids and touting his education policies. From Florida, he flew a zigzag route around the country in Air Force One before returning to Washington that evening. At the moment that the mystery plane is spotted over Washington, United 93 was still airborne, the last of the known hijacked planes to remain aloft, but there were other planes still flying on to their destinations or to the nearest available airport. Flights had been grounded, but grounding flights that are already underway takes time, as the air crews have to find places to land and coordinate their flights and landings with airports and with other planes, landings which were unplanned and being conducted on a very ad hoc basis. With its transponder off, ground controllers had little way of tracking U93. It was thought to be en route to Washington with unknown but by then presumably ill intentions. The government had every reason to suspect that there were other planes in the sky that were either already hijacked or would soon be hijacked. But there was massive confusion within the national command authority–were the scrambled fighters authorized to shoot down planes or not? The E-4B might have been sent up to use its radar to determine where U93 was and if there were other planes in the skies that needed to be checked out. Since fighters had been scrambled from Langley AFB in Va and Andrews AFB in Md, the E-4B might have been acting as an AWACS and coordinating their movements. It might also have been carrying high ranking military officers or cabinet officials as part of its doomsday role. At that point, we didn’t know if the hijackings were the core enemy strategy, or merely a precursor to more extensive attacks. The E-4B might have been aloft just in case the latter turned out to be the case, to get someone in line for the presidency out of harm’s way.

That’s speculation of course, but it makes more sense than to just assert that the E-4B was command on control for the hijacked 9-11 aircraft, which had mostly already crashed into buildings that would be brought down in controlled demolitions or hit by…missile? That’s where the Truthers come down on the mystery plane, to a theory that has thousands of moving parts, makes no sense and is harder to believe than anything the 9-11 Commission reported.

The fact at the end of the day is that you’ll never explain every single thing about 9-11. Some questions will always remain unanswered, either because those who have the answers are dead, or because those who have the answers have legitimate national security reasons to remain silent, or because life is full of anomalies that require no nefarious reason for their existence. To require that every single thing about 9-11 be wrapped up tight with ribbons and bows is to require the impossible. Real life doesn’t work that way. For the Truthers, anomalies or the few unexplained aspects of 9-11 are room for irresponsible conjecture and accusations. For the rest of us, the adults in the room, it’s hardly remarkable that there are things about that day that remain unexplained. Real life does work that way.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

From my time in the USAF as well, I recall that an e-4b is always orbiting somewhere in conus 24/7 (but i served during the cold war). Maybe it was just near DC or called there when the stuff starting hitting the fan.

albo on September 13, 2007 at 10:20 AM

Leave it to those sensationalists at CNN to create doubt and suspicion for what appears to be a strongly plausible and logical reason for the appearance of the airplane.

rplat on September 13, 2007 at 10:22 AM

Maybe…as you stated…we don’t need to know.

DCJeff on September 13, 2007 at 10:24 AM

Truthers….More like knumb skulls.

saiga on September 13, 2007 at 10:24 AM

Why don’t they simply ignore the truthers?

Slublog on September 13, 2007 at 10:25 AM

The E-4B, when deployed, pretty much has carte blanche in the skies. When flying (especially when filled with military brass and cabinet members), it gets highly preferential flight paths, especially during the most vulnerable periods, takeoff and landing. In DC, this means it would be expected to fly over restricted air space: nobody else is flying there, so there is much less chance of a collision.

Just makes sense.

stonemeister on September 13, 2007 at 10:30 AM

In the absence of having every single thing about that day explained, conspiracy theories arise among the paranoid and narcissistic.

What a perfect description of CNN reporters!

highhopes on September 13, 2007 at 10:30 AM

They can’t even explain everything about Pearl Harbor or the JFK assassination. Most people accept that as part of life. You can’t explain everything about even the littlest things.

Those that want explanation for EVERYTHING need a job or a life.

mjk on September 13, 2007 at 10:32 AM

You have to admire the consistancy of the thought processes of the ‘enlightened ones’. Truth will prevail!

…..Life/evolution is the result of completely random events and random interaction of atomic particles…

…..Nothing random ever happens in government. Everything is designed in the StarChamber. All the strings are pulled according to the ‘plan’. We are all being controlled and manipulated. We just have to open our eyes and behold the puppetmaster. Nothing happens by chance. It all happens by design.

Limerick on September 13, 2007 at 10:33 AM

Reality works that way, NSS ,I just wish I could find my glasses…..

bbz123 on September 13, 2007 at 10:34 AM

What a perfect description of CNN reporters!

highhopes on September 13, 2007 at 10:30 AM

Don’t forget their self importance and self aggrandizing arrogant nature.

doriangrey on September 13, 2007 at 10:37 AM

You see that was Osamas family tipping it’s forty to the Bush’s.

tomas on September 13, 2007 at 10:39 AM

Why don’t they simply ignore the truthers?
Slublog on September 13, 2007 at 10:25 AM

What is it…37%?…of Democrats are to some degree Truthers. Pretty large audience to ignore.

Let’s see: doomsday plane operating pretty much according to what’s known of its mission, or command post for Government-organized attack on America. Since “The People” have the absolute right to know everything about the Government, and the Government’s not saying – must be the latter.

eeyore on September 13, 2007 at 10:41 AM

Thanks CNN. Another “Great 9/11 Mystery” huh?

There is only one great mystery surrounding 9/11. Why can’t the doubters and finger-pointers, like CNN, accept the fact that 19 jihad terrorists were responsible for the devastation brought upon the World Trade Center that day, and we did everything humanly possible, under great duress and confusion, brought about by an unforseen attack on American soil using our own commercial aircraft as a weapon.

And I couldn’t help noticing Hamilton’s response when asked why the commission’s 9/11 report didn’t address the white mystery plane flying over DC airspace,

“You get thousands of things that come out at you. You can’t possibly sort through all of them.”

If only those clowns on the commission had cut President Bush the same amount of slack when he had to muddle through mounds of gathered intelligence data prior to determining a course of action in response to the 9/11 attack.

fogw on September 13, 2007 at 10:46 AM

John King almost sounds disapointed that it’s not a 9-11 command center.

Texyank on September 13, 2007 at 10:50 AM

To require that every single thing about 9-11 be wrapped up tight with ribbons and bows

And if it were so, then they’d be complaining that it was too pat, too perfect, that must indicate an insider-job conspiracy.

andycanuck on September 13, 2007 at 10:51 AM

Why was this story, which panders to the Truthers, introduced by Anderson Cooper as part of a “Keeping it Truthful in Iraq” segment?

Buy Danish on September 13, 2007 at 10:51 AM

Well, in defense of the MSM, they are only speaking to the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately for this country, that block of people is growing by the day.

csdeven on September 13, 2007 at 10:57 AM

andycanuck on September 13, 2007 at 10:51 AM

Great point. Like someone said recently, contrariness is seen as a virtue by these people.

csdeven on September 13, 2007 at 10:59 AM

As a retired G.I. USAF involved in various special airlift and plans and tactics all I can say is “Do not worry about the mystery aircraft and do not waste your time speculating”.

There are some things the public does not need to know because their imagination would run wild as it does in this clip and in the congress of today.

MSGTAS on September 13, 2007 at 10:59 AM

fogw on September 13, 2007 at 10:46 AM

The 9/11 Commission was too busy preparing to bloviate with self-aggrandizing speeches to go through the thousands of things that came at them.

I was also bothered by Hamilton’s somewhat lackluster response to the Truthers when he says, “We of course had heard the conspiracy theories…and we have absolutely no evidence of that”.

Wouldn’t something along the lines of “they have been completely and utterly repudiated” been much better?

Buy Danish on September 13, 2007 at 11:00 AM

Buy Danish on September 13, 2007 at 10:51 AM

So true. That header they’ve been using “Keeping it Honest in Iraq” really burns me. It implies Bush and Petraeus are liars, so it’s up to CNN to give the public the truth.

…..waiting for the segment “Keeping it Honest at Hillary’s Campaign Headquarters”.

fogw on September 13, 2007 at 11:02 AM

That plane, as you’ll see in the clip, was most likely an Air Force E-4B flying command post.

I’m glad to know we have something like this and don’t need to know any thing more about it. Somethings just have to be classified – If I know, then our enemies know too.

Ann on September 13, 2007 at 11:04 AM

Wouldn’t something along the lines of “they have been completely and utterly repudiated” been much better?

Buy Danish on September 13, 2007 at 11:00 AM

We’re on the same wavelength today. I was thinking the same, only more along the lines of “they were a pack of lies”.

fogw on September 13, 2007 at 11:06 AM

Yeah, if I was a criminal mastermind behind a series of attacks on the USA, I would circle around the airspace above the White House in an inconspicuous 747.

jaychandra on September 13, 2007 at 11:08 AM

If only those clowns on the commission had cut President Bush the same amount of slack when he had to muddle through mounds of gathered intelligence data prior to determining a course of action in response to the 9/11 attack.

fogw on September 13, 2007 at 10:46 AM

Ask the “Truthers” how many of the Democrat Senators actually read the intelligence report to begin with? Oh, and Kerry and Clinton were too busy to read the report.

kiakjones on September 13, 2007 at 11:14 AM

I’ve always said there are things regarding national security that I don’t need to know.
I’m cool with that.
Mainly because, if they informed a lowly peon like me…who else would know???

CBarker on September 13, 2007 at 11:18 AM

This Hotair entry makes me wonder what the TACAMO birds were doing that day.

ricer1 on September 13, 2007 at 11:23 AM

Maybe we don’t need to know, but if the explanation is just that the plane was up there “in case,” I don’t see why that wouldn’t have been explained.

Sorry for the double negatives.

It just doesn’t seem to me that they’d have to give away any secrets to be able to explain the plane being there if it were something that simple.

I’m not buying the Truther bs, but it seems a tad odd to me that they would have been unable to come up with an explanation that didn’t give away security secrets. But it’s possible that I think that way just because I don’t know enough about our military defenses.

Esthier on September 13, 2007 at 11:28 AM

from Langley and Andrews AFB in Virginia

Ha! That proves a conspiricy!!1! You’re just trying to confuse us by moving AN ENTIRE AIR FORCE BASE to another STATE.

Seriously, these nuts have grasped at smaller straws.

MamaAJ on September 13, 2007 at 11:28 AM

D’oh. Andrews AFB is in MD, of course.

Bryan on September 13, 2007 at 11:34 AM

Not to worry, Troooothers™ always end up cutting their own throats with Occam’s Razor.

N. O'Brain on September 13, 2007 at 11:40 AM

Can’t we find a better name than “truthers”, how about dummies or “those stupid people”.

We need a better name.

right2bright on September 13, 2007 at 11:45 AM

right2bright on September 13, 2007 at 11:45 AM

“Lyingbastardswhohavetheirheadssofaruptheir@sstheycanseewhattheyateforbreakfast”

….probably too long, ya think?

fogw on September 13, 2007 at 11:58 AM

We see these Air Force whites all the time in my neck of the woods. It could be a E-4B. It could also just be someone trying to get to station ASAP.

pat on September 13, 2007 at 12:43 PM

You send up an E4-B to coordinate an air attack and to jam radars. It’s that simple…

Babs on September 13, 2007 at 12:56 PM

The existence of this plane in the air on that day is evidence that the government knew nothing of the attacks. This is the Doomsday Plane, a flying command post in case Washington is destroyed. All important functions of Washington can continue onboard, as per its design. Since Washington was a target, it was sent up as a precaution.

If Bush was behind 9/11, and the whole thing was staged, there would have been no such need for this plane. But, of course, Truthers are idiotic, they present us with the very evidence to discredit them, unfortunately, they are also too idiotic to even see that.

jihadwatcher on September 13, 2007 at 1:12 PM

Limerick on September 13, 2007 at 10:33 AM

Great logical arguement……I think I just heard some Truthers a$$clowns heads explode.

omnipotent on September 13, 2007 at 1:26 PM

I can’t get video at work anymore. Are they talking about the National Emergency Airborn Command Post (NEACP) pronounced ‘kneecap’? Back in my Air Force days this is the type of plane that was in the air 24/7.

Queeter on September 13, 2007 at 1:45 PM

Isn’t the whole idea of the presidential plane that no matter what we would have a command structure in place to respond?

The entire SOP of the Presidential plane fleet is to grab the nearest leader get them aloft just in case say that 9-11 hijacker attack was followed by a nuclear terrorist strike or a coordinated overseas conventional strike on US forces with the intent to take advantage of say if a plane had hit the white house and say Bush had been their and killed. Whoever VP Sec Def or or whoever was the 2nd 3rd 4th in command in that plane that was reachable would have been needed to give our forces the green light to do what maybe needed to defend themselves or even retaliate on the fly.

At some point we are going to have to come to terms with the fact that their is a certain portion of people in authority in the US that cannot be compromised or placated. They have pure hatred for the US as it was founded and support our destruction so they can rebuild it in whatever cliche they happen to follow.

Washington, Wilson, Lincoln, FDR, all were war time presidents that loved and would easily die for the freedom of speech. However they were sane men and believed freedom of speech neither was meant to or does support the freedom to damage/destroy the state. All those leaders jailed, deported, censored ect…. groups and leaders who were damaging the US nation during time of war.

Sedition – is a crime and we need to wake the f*ck up and accept some of our leadership are whether for political gain, personal vanity, or willfully hatred of the US are committing or supporting daily acts of Sedition of the US war effort.

We need to draw the line somewhere because from 9-12 on the level of the openness of the Sedition of the GWOT has gotten worse and worse to the point were we have Senators comparing US troops to Stalinist Gulags and we have Generals that are giving reports not being asked “what do you need to win General” but told “we have lost how soon can we retreat and give up this hopeless war”.

C-Low on September 13, 2007 at 1:51 PM

I seriously can’t figure where morons come up with some of these conspiracy theories… What really gets to me is how the experts explanations are never good enough for all the layman who think there’s a conspiracy.

j_ehman on September 13, 2007 at 4:26 PM

Speaking as an old navigator in USAF F-4Es, the footage of the jet is unmistakeably an E-4B. I’m kinda surprised one is over the East Coast because they’re based out of Offut AFB in Omaha.

That said, it seems pretty obvious that the people on board were taking a look at Washington. That’s the only reason that you would circle DC at medium altitude like that. Remember, the E-4B is meant to be flying up at 30,000+ feet. This guy looks like he’s down around 15,000 feet or lower. My guess is that somebody big wanted to get some reliable eyes on Washington to report on what was actually happenning.

Remember that the morning of Sep 11 all was confusion. The first jet hit the WTC and the initial reports were that it was a small plane. The world tuned in just in time to see the second jet hit. Reports were confused and unreliable after that from the TV.

The networks have perched some TV cameras permanently on top of a skyscraper a few blocks north of the White House. I believe those are the cameras which showed smoke coming up from the Pentagon area soon after the WTC attacks but nobody knew what had happenned there. My guess is that some two or three star general ordered the E-4B to make a pass over DC to ascertain what had been hit and then leave the area.

Of course, the Air Force is not going to tell the public anything about the E-4B because: 1) It has nothing to do with the attacks; and 2) Anything they say might give potential enemies some advantage in defeating it.

The Troofers crazed assertion that the E-4B was “Mission Control” for the Sep 11 is absurd, as usual. First, they’re assuming that the US Air Force is going to launch an attack against America. I would very much like to hear a Troofer tell me that to my face so that I can kick him in the balls where he needs it most. Second, why would these suicide jets need any controlling? Even in their own goofy parallel universe, the Mission Control theory doesn’t make sense. Once those airliners got their wheels in the wells, they were independent actors which needed no direction.

Tantor on September 13, 2007 at 6:10 PM

MSGTAS on September 13, 2007 at 10:59 AM

It is an E4-B and I agree with your admonitions to not worry. Some truths just will not be divulged in our lifetimes. I was a SATCOM guy myself.

Bradky on September 13, 2007 at 7:11 PM

This is as close to the truth as you are going to be able to get on the E-4B shown in the video. Specs & Pics:

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/c3i/e-4b.htm

I hope this shuts the kool-aid drinkers up on this topic.

mcptek on September 13, 2007 at 9:41 PM