Theworldisnotenough on September 5, 2007 at 3:40 PM

A practical post.

It’s really not creepy and quite innocent, I rarely read what you post.

moonsbreath on September 5, 2007 at 1:43 PM

Yet, here you are speaking as if you are an authority on who I am supporting.

Stupid a$$.

But really, didn’t a lot of us think the smae way in the 90′s?

amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 10:40 AM

Riding the coattails of csdeven won’t help you any, most consider him a little nutty obsessive would be a better word (if I could spell). The best is a “man-whore”, how embarassing to actually print that.

Mitt ran from being a conservative when attacked by Kennedy, he ran and hid. That takes Mitt out of the conservative arena. I understand staking out positions, and such, but when confronted you should have the Malkins to stand your ground…Mitt did not, he shrunk away like a little girl.

Now look at the update, and you can see he is more conservative than Mitt, certainly more than Rudy. Huckabee is the only one that can claim more conservative than Fred.

You don’t know where Mitt stands, he has stood on so many postitions he has a hard time figuring out what he is today. What he is is a pretty good businessman, and that is what he should continue. He is just too weak to be a leader. Fred may also be weak in that area (though not as weak as Mitt), we will see.

Not surprising that the hit pieces are coming out on Fred, by next week he will be the poll leader. And you guys will salivate over each liberal attack on a conservative.

He has an “A+” rating from Americans for Better Immigration for his senate voting record on border security issues.

NOT TRUE. He has a “C” grade from Americans for Better Immigration.

So he doesn’t actually respond to the votes pointed out. He just tries to draw our attention to other ones.

amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 2:05 PM

Give him a little time- I’d like to see a more detailed response, but can’t expect one to come instantly given that we’re talking about votes from 12 years ago.

Drawbacks? While he projects like gangbusters with a Hollywood-style camera, his live appearances, without the dramatic cheats of a staged reading, have been underwhelming. And he’s been soft on illegal immigration in the past. Which I don’t think w…

It’s really not creepy and quite innocent, I rarely read what you post.

moonsbreath on September 5, 2007 at 1:43 PM

Ditto. He’s not honest enough to come out and say it, but he’s made it abundantly clear that he’s a Mormon who’ll only vote for the Mormon candidate, no matter what. There’s no point in engaging the troll; I don’t know why people bother.

Since Fred has all but destroyed whatever chance Mitt might have had, that’s where his religion-motivated hatred gets directed.

It’s kinda creepy that after 5 months you still have no clue who I support for POTUS.

csdeven

It’s really not creepy and quite innocent, I rarely read what you post.

Kinda creepy to think you’re keeping tabs on those who are not going to vote for your Mitt! though.

moonsbreath on September 5, 2007 at 12:56 PM

It’s kinda creepy that after 5 months you still have no clue who I support for POTUS.

Bwahahahahaha!!!! fred?, you got lots of ’slaining to do!

csdeven on September 5, 2007 at 12:11 PM

Explaining to do for what? I may write-in my own name come election day.

Kinda creepy to think you’re keeping tabs on those who are not going to vote for your Mitt! though.

Mr. Thompson joined a majority of Republicans in the chamber in opposing it, with many of them thinking the new system would lead to a national ID card.

We already have a national ID card!

Rudy has time and again explained his less popular positions on abortion, gun control, and not reporting illegal aliens seeking city services for health and safety purposes (i.e., sanctuary city). You may not like his answer, but he addresses the issue and explains himself.

The allegation against Fred was very specific and the response was very general, almost generic. The Fredheads will eat it up, I’m sure, but what about us thinking rational individuals?

moonsbreath on September 5, 2007 at 12:00 PM

Bwahahahahaha!!!! fred?, you got lots of ‘slaining to do!

13) I will be voting for man whore Fred.

I expect Fred to have voted against any Senate bill that did not either dissolve a portion of the federal government or defend the nation.

Before long the whole Republican field will be sounding like Fred, too bad they can’t be Fred.

So you’re uncurious?

frankj on September 5, 2007 at 10:57 AM

On that one, no. However, the one that created an employer identification database?…

Tancredo-Hunter looks better all the time.

I sure like Tanc’s position on illegals, but he just doesn’t seem to have the personality to stir the soul of the American people, and that is too bad.

Rudy does, but he is a one trick pony with bad positions on illegals and gun control.

McCain can’t be trusted, but Mitt could be the one.

Mitt /Huckaby could be fun in 08