Video: “Undercover in Little Morocco”

posted at 1:47 pm on September 5, 2007 by Bryan

This is a video of the future that Mark Steyn, Robert Spencer, Brussels Journal, Oriana Fallaci and others have been warning us about: European cities going Muslim within our lifetimes. It features a young Belgian woman of Moroccan origins, who went undercover among Brussels’ young Muslims to find out what they think about the country that let them in.

In short, they don’t think very much of it.

As you watch the video, pay particular attention to the man’s actions at about 2:35 in. He thinks he owns the streets of Brussels, and he’s probably right.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

It’s a scary world, Bryan. You’re one of the people intelligent and honest enough to see it.

Do you think it’s better to be one of the people worried about twitter and jeans and parties?

Christoph on September 5, 2007 at 1:50 PM

If she needs a safe house Texas will be more then happy to provide one.

Limerick on September 5, 2007 at 1:57 PM

Christoph on September 5, 2007 at 1:50 PM

It’s certainly easier.

Bryan on September 5, 2007 at 1:59 PM

Is it just me, or are all the women combatting radical islam absolute hotties?

CurtZHP on September 5, 2007 at 1:59 PM

Wow. Just, wow.
Immigration without assimilation doesn’t seem to fully explain this phenomenon. The second generation of immigrants, born in the West, are the ones becoming radicalized.
A seemingly intractable situation is unfolding in Europe. Is America far behind?

common sensineer on September 5, 2007 at 2:00 PM

Not good. I hope Europe wakes the hell up before they’re overrun by jihadists.

Bad Candy on September 5, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Belgium has been one of the more appeasing European nations towards Islamofascism.

Hilts on September 5, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Is it just me, or are all the women combatting radical islam absolute hotties?

CurtZHP on September 5, 2007 at 1:59 PM

\
Maybe it’s ’cause they have the most to lose in a mandatory burqa society.

billy on September 5, 2007 at 2:03 PM

So the “shoe man” follows them and tells them they can’t film. The announcer says the man thinks he is the “law” and what he says goes, not Belgium law. So, what do they do? They stop filming in his area. Proving he is the Law.

msflea on September 5, 2007 at 2:03 PM

E V E R Y T I M E … I read about the Islamofacation of Europe, I wonder just how far it would have gone, slithering along, unnoticed by the natives, IF Bush had not decided to take down Saddam and strike at the heart of Islamic terrorism in their backyard, because I DO NOT believe that just going after OBL would have revealed the vastness of the threat this fanaticism is to Western values and just how entrenched they are already!

Texas Gal on September 5, 2007 at 2:04 PM

So the Islamists control Brussels, and Brussels is the de-facto capital of the EU super-state. Nice.

JiangxiDad on September 5, 2007 at 2:04 PM

I think the first step is to stop putting all the adjectives in front of Islam all the time. Militant, radical… It’s clouding the issue more than anything else.

reaganaut on September 5, 2007 at 2:05 PM

So the “shoe man” follows them and tells them they can’t film. The announcer says the man thinks he is the “law” and what he says goes, not Belgium law. So, what do they do? They stop filming in his area. Proving he is the Law.

msflea on September 5, 2007 at 2:03 PM

It’s much preferred to being attacked.

Besides, when he followed them and continued to make his argument that they listen to him, they called the actual law and supposedly settled things down.

Esthier on September 5, 2007 at 2:07 PM

I think the first step is to stop putting all the adjectives in front of Islam all the time. Militant, radical… It’s clouding the issue more than anything else.

reaganaut on September 5, 2007 at 2:05 PM

You don’t believe they make a difference?

The woman who wrote the book would seem to disagree.

Esthier on September 5, 2007 at 2:08 PM

Wake up call.

Kini on September 5, 2007 at 2:11 PM

“Jihad brides.”

Smart. That way he can only own her for a few years.

smellthecoffee on September 5, 2007 at 2:12 PM

“Jihad brides.”

smellthecoffee

I thought it was Jihad Broads. I like that better. It rhymes.

thomashton on September 5, 2007 at 2:24 PM

It feels like “business as usual” in the European cities. Just so much like pre WW11. Don’t rock the boat. Appease and they will go along…NOT!! I believe that we are at the stage just before true atrocities will get started in Europe. I do not believe the Islamists want it right now because they understand that in just a few more years they’ll have so much more power, but there won’t be any choice. Now that people are just beginning to pay attention to what is “on the ground” in their cities and countries, an armed conflict is right around the corner. Our own tinfoil hatted leftist loons will not believe, just as they didn’t pre WW11, but when they see the horrors in Europe, it may be too late to do anything about it again! Millions will be tortured, maimed and murdered before the Left everywhere sees the truth. Were that we could make them “see and hear” before the killings begin in earnest. Islam was founded by a militarily vicious, violent aristocrat who was into power and material wealth above all else. The religion founded has not changed one wit! And, imams in a variety of places have begun to distribute a more violent and vicious form of the Koran that has been “updated”. We are safer than most countries, but not safe enough. We must stop it here before it gets as bad as it is, not only in Europe, but in the rest of the world. Thank you, Bryan, again, for a great post. Please keep up the great work…goes for Allahpundit and Michelle, too.

sharinlite on September 5, 2007 at 2:27 PM

If she needs a safe house Texas…
Limerick on September 5, 2007 at 1:57 PM

What a sad reality to face. The female Belgian reporter in that piece most likely will be hunted down by the same lunatics of whom she seeks to expose.

ScottMcC on September 5, 2007 at 2:29 PM

Those older generation Arabs look like a bunch of Islamophobes.

Not to worry, though, during our mandatory preventative care visits we will all be re-educated not only to respect diversity but also to gladly obey it.

pedestrian on September 5, 2007 at 2:37 PM

Europeans aren’t merely nanny state nappy wearers. They’re also spineless nanny state nappy wearers.

FierceGuppy on September 5, 2007 at 2:42 PM

Reminds me of that freek in England that claimed that the British Police were invading muslim areas of England.

– The Cat

MirCat on September 5, 2007 at 2:48 PM

This just shows why we should not be allowing Muslims to enter our country. Our government can’t determine which Muslims are “radicals” and which are “moderates” and for the future of our country, all Muslims should be barred from coming to the USA in order to prevent adding to the problem that we already have. Our country may already be infected with a deadly cancer (radical Muslims) and I don’t want to add to that deadly cancer by injecting more radical Muslims into our society. I’m not saying that we should deport legal immigrants who happen to be Muslim, but I don’t think we should admit any more Muslims until the “moderates” are back in control of Islam and Islam has renounced jihad, hate and violence. If that doesn’t happen and homicide bombings and terrorist attacks continue, then Muslims should continue to be barred from entry into the USA. Anything less will eventually result in the USA becoming a part of the caliphate and we must insist that US Muslims assimilate into US society and not try to impose Sharia law on those of us who were here before the Muslims arrived.

TruthToBeTold on September 5, 2007 at 2:56 PM

Islamists have exposed Democracy’s fatal flaw and are exploiting it to the fullest.

Majority rules? Then become the majority via immigration. Then rule thru intimidation.

Which democratic country do they start with? Why, France, of course. Nuclear weapons, UN seat, etc.

The real existential issue for democracy (it’s the same one Bush has run into in Iraq, Lebanon and Palestine) is how to overcome that fatal flaw? Who will rise to lead us?

faraway on September 5, 2007 at 2:57 PM

This will never make it into the global MSM networks… and
it’s a travesty of all that is free and democratic that it won’t.

SilverStar830 on September 5, 2007 at 3:05 PM

Europeans aren’t merely nanny state nappy wearers. They’re also spineless nanny state nappy wearers.

FierceGuppy on September 5, 2007 at 2:42 PM

Maybe; Europeans have a tendency to capitulate and appease until things get out of hand… but historically they don’t exactly roll over when their way of life is attacked. France being an obvious exception, of course- they just behead their leaders after storming the palace with pitchforks.

Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 3:10 PM

Liberal Belgium is screwed. No wonder it was a drive-through invasion for the Germans. There is this repeating situation where people move in, plant their culture and then ignore the laws of the host country. If people are not willing to fight for their culture and keep these varmints out, they are doomed.

Every major and minor city in NE England is Hispanic at this point. Same thing. Heaven forbid we offend the invaders that live on our tax dollars.

It doesn’t help that Euros see these people as chic. Between the common deep rooted Antisemitism, and finding their “peace scarfs” fashionable, Europe is going down in ten.

Hening on September 5, 2007 at 3:30 PM

In my dear old Portugal the muslim population is at around 0.5%.
See, sometimes it’s good to be poor! Why come to Portugal and get 50$ a month on welfare when you can mooch off the Spanish, French, Belgians and what not, and make a much better living of it?

madne0 on September 5, 2007 at 3:46 PM

What I find interesting is the older generation seems to disagree and is afraid to speak up against the Islamic radicalization. I would tend to think the elder generation are the immigrants and the younger generation are homegrown. So, where is the radicalization happening? In the mosques? Why isn’t the elder generation following in step with the younger generations radicalization? They go to the same mosques, right? Could it be that the elder generation remembers why they immigrated in the first place? I can’t understand why there is such a wide gap between the young and old regarding radicalization. Can anyone comment on that?

Kini on September 5, 2007 at 3:47 PM

The Belgium gov’t is collaborating with the extremists. They shutdown any discussion or protest. They even cancelled a planned demonstration against terrorism, saying it was too provacative.

Clark1 on September 5, 2007 at 4:07 PM

I can’t understand why there is such a wide gap between the young and old regarding radicalization. Can anyone comment on that?

Kini on September 5, 2007 at 3:47 PM

That is a good question. Perhaps they are more impressionable? More rebellious? This point you brought up made me think about Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s book and how when she was young she began to fall into that trap or radicalization. She began to view all other Muslims who have not fully submitted as hypocrites and considered them to be bad Muslims. Logic eventually prevailed for her but unfortunately not very many people are as free thinking or as smart as she is. Had she not been so free thinking and smart she may still be frolicking with the radical Muslim crowd.

Zetterson on September 5, 2007 at 4:33 PM

Texas Gal on September 5, 2007 at 2:04 PM

Very good point, it’s just to bad that the only public push against radical islam thinks that the West can coexist with islam and that the koran is a peaceful book.

abinitioadinfinitum on September 5, 2007 at 4:40 PM

HEH!

I could give a good God damn about Europe – or any place that bends over and takes it from these guys. They deserve every kick in the head the islamists give them. I’m just gonna sit back and have a good chuckle every time they get knocked around for being such cowards.

thareb on September 5, 2007 at 4:48 PM

Zetterson on September 5, 2007 at 4:33 PM

Impressionable? Perhaps, but I think there’s something more systemic regarding the attraction to radicalization other than being rebellious, don’t you?

Kini on September 5, 2007 at 5:07 PM

Theo Van Gogh said the same thing, until election day 2004.

Then a Muslim elected to try to remove his head.

After the obligatory bullets in his back.

And steak knife driven into his heart.

Manifesto against Hirsi Ali attached.

Muslims belong in crapulous Mecca.

They can’t handle reality

profitsbeard on September 5, 2007 at 5:20 PM

I was actually SURPRISED by the actions of the shoe guy. I would have thought that a police station being so close would have tempered his actions. Come to think of it, it probably did.

However I’m not so worried that the same kind of intimidation would happen here in the states. The good old second amendment has that covered.

i remember when all those cars were being burned in France when the muslims went berserk. I knew then that the first jihadist that tried that around here would have been shot from about 6 different directions before the first lit match went out.

Guardian on September 5, 2007 at 5:27 PM

msflea: “So the “shoe man” follows them and tells them they can’t film. The announcer says the man thinks he is the “law” and what he says goes, not Belgium law. So, what do they do? They stop filming in his area. Proving he is the Law.”

Esthier: “It’s much preferred to being attacked.”

No, it isn’t, Esthier. If you don’t stand up for your rights, the Muslim thugs will roll over you. If you don’t face petty thugs like this down when you’re just videotaping, they will be encouraged by the success of their violence and escalate it to deny you more of your rights.

The proper response to threats of violence are immediate and severe retaliation. If you can get them arrested, that’s good. If not, then they need to have their asses kicked but good. As the old police saying goes, if they come at you with fists, take them down with a club. If they come at you with a club, shoot them. The thugs can not be allowed to win.

Esthier: “Besides, when he followed them and continued to make his argument that they listen to him, they called the actual law and supposedly settled things down.”

Esthier, the cops just smoothed things over. They didn’t solve anything. The Muslim thug won by denying the video crew access to the streets. The proper response would have been to arrest the Islamo-fascist for assault & battery, for threatening them and striking them with the shoe box. Instead, he got away with it. The police, by their inaction, implicitly recognized his right to strike dhimmis and deny them access to the public streets. For Pete’s sake, they captured his assault on tape. How much evidence do you need?

Yours is a very feminine response which seeks to defuse a situation rather than confront it. In doing so, you are just storing up trouble for the future, like an abused woman appeasing a wifebeater who eventually kills her.

Tantor on September 5, 2007 at 5:51 PM

Darwin purported that in any ecosytem, the stronger dominate, and the weaker, by virtue of their weakness, die out. So too with humans, and with human society.

In a way, I don’t mind too much. If the Europeans, in this case the Flemish, wish not to defend their culture, they deserve to be pushed out by other people. That is the way of nature. They don’t deserve to have a Flemish culture, or laws, if they have so little respect for them as to allow this phenomenon to take place. They, by rights, are not then the true inhabitants of that land. The muslims are.

A gazelle can not say to the lion, “You shouldn’t eat me. I have rights to be here grazing. I was here first. What are you doing?” The lion comes in and takes over and eats. He does not respect the gazelle, or respect that fact that it was there first. That is nature’s way. We are apart of nature. It’s been like that since humanity first walked the earth.

So really, I am more philosophical about this all now. I have no respect, nor sympathy, for any culture that does not defend itself. And history shows, all one needs to do to stop islam is simply stand up to it. It is really that simple. But even that little bit, is above them, or perhaps, below them. The strength of islam has only been the weakness of its victims. And as Darwin would have it, the stronger survive and flourish, the weaker die out. Nature demands it, and we should demand no less of nature.

jihadwatcher on September 5, 2007 at 5:55 PM

Everyone, please pray for my daughter and her fiancé (a FedEx exec). They are in Brussels now, apartment-hunting for his months-long assignment there later. I cannot rest easy until they are back home again next Sunday.

Thanks, all.

leepro on September 5, 2007 at 5:59 PM

Guardian-

You must just use a waterpistol on the match and then tell the perp that “Islam means peace”.

If that doesn’t work, Sig Sauer tend to be a little more convincing.

profitsbeard on September 5, 2007 at 6:12 PM

leepro-

They’ll quickly see what areas are infested, and avoid them.

Let the Belgians do their own policing.

Your daughter and her fiance’ll love the food and the country and the original Belgian people.

And they’ll have seen Europe while it was still European.

A poignant memory, someday, perhaps.

profitsbeard on September 5, 2007 at 6:18 PM

We can oppress them or they can oppress us. There is no co-existence with these people…

Tim Burton on September 5, 2007 at 6:35 PM

Great post Bryan. It’s a sorry state of affairs over there in the Benelux. It seems almost hopeless, having to deal with radical islam. But I have Faith. Good will conquer evil.

Everyone, please pray for my daughter and her fiancé: leepro

Will do.

Zorro on September 5, 2007 at 6:37 PM

There can be no coexistance with them. Once they have the numbers they will cut all our throats.

-The End-

TheSitRep on September 5, 2007 at 6:38 PM

Yours is a very feminine response which seeks to defuse a situation rather than confront it. In doing so, you are just storing up trouble for the future, like an abused woman appeasing a wifebeater who eventually kills her.

Tantor on September 5, 2007 at 5:51 PM

No, it’s more like a person, any person, walking in a dangerous neighborhood. If in this neighborhood, someone comes up to you and tells you to leave or else be treated with violence, only an idiot will stay.

You haven’t won any battle by being beaten.

Exposing this nonsense as they’ve now been able to do with the footage they took is actually doing something which would not have been possible had their cameras been destroyed.

Running from a fight you cannot win is not the “feminine” response. It’s simply the smart one, especially when you know you can come back with armed police.

In fact, this is akin to a woman who been beaten who leaves her husband. In your view, it’s better for her to stay and prove she belongs to be in the house that has her name on it???

Esthier on September 5, 2007 at 6:42 PM

Esthier, the cops just smoothed things over. They didn’t solve anything. The Muslim thug won by denying the video crew access to the streets.

Also, the video crew clearly got the access they wanted. In fact, the shoe man gave them EXACTLY what they wanted, proof of the theory that radical Muslims are taking over the city.

What more did they want? Another shot at the street? So what. The real story, as Allah himself points out, is that this man believes he owns the street, and with his stupid outburst, the proof of that story was caught on film.

The camera crew could not have gotten a better response had they paid the man as an actor.

Esthier on September 5, 2007 at 6:46 PM

You don’t believe they make a difference?

The woman who wrote the book would seem to disagree.

Esthier on September 5, 2007 at 2:08 PM

Having studied Islam in an academic setting I can tell you those titles doesn’t mean a thing.

Militant Islam = Islam
Moderate Islam = Apostasy
Love in Islam = Christianity

Tim Burton on September 5, 2007 at 6:48 PM

Oh, and last, media make it a point to not interfere with what they film. One cameraman is famous for photographing a starving little girl who could barely walk.

In the photo, she’s hunched over on the ground, while a vulture stands just feet behind, waiting for her to die.

He caught a lot of crap about how he took her picture then did nothing to save her. He decided his role was to get the information out and not to try and stop it himself, theorizing that more action will be done if he can get others involved.

You may disagree with him, but that’s the general line journalists take no matter their media format.

Esthier on September 5, 2007 at 6:49 PM

Esthier: “Oh, and last, media make it a point to not interfere with what they film. One cameraman is famous for photographing a starving little girl who could barely walk. In the photo, she’s hunched over on the ground, while a vulture stands just feet behind, waiting for her to die. He caught a lot of crap about how he took her picture then did nothing to save her. He decided his role was to get the information out and not to try and stop it himself, theorizing that more action will be done if he can get others involved. You may disagree with him, but that’s the general line journalists take no matter their media format.”

Esthier, Esthier, Esthier, you are such a trusting soul. Journalists are not there to report the news but to create the news. They twist and bend and fabricate the facts to fit their prefabricated story line. Much of the news journalists present is staged, a cooperation between journalists and the interests whose agenda the journalists want to promote.

As I recall that photo of the starving girl, the photographer did not leave her to be eaten by vultures. Journalists have no substantial ethics but even they don’t leave children to be eaten by wild animals.

As for your defense of appeasement of the violent Muslim thug shoe man, Esthier, what you don’t realize is that most bullies fold when their bluff is called. When you retreat from such threats, you are escalating the violence. You are teaching every Muslim thug that he can win with threats.

Your idea that videotaping the Muslim thug in the act of making threats is a victory is not persuasive. We have plenty of film of Nazis invading Europe and killing people, yet such film does not constitute a victory.

Yes, if a woman is beaten by her husband she should not find ways to accommodate it. Her husband should go to jail, get sued, get a restraining order, and any other legal punishment that fits. Failing that, her male family members should administer a beating to him worse than the one he dealt out and tell him to leave town. Failing that, the next time he strikes her, she should shoot him.

Tantor on September 5, 2007 at 7:10 PM

I was actually SURPRISED by the actions of the shoe guy. I would have thought that a police station being so close would have tempered his actions. Come to think of it, it probably did.

[…]

Guardian on September 5, 2007 at 5:27 PM

One of the problems with Muzzies in EuroLand, is the Europeans don’t ever put the Big Pimp Slap™ on them. I had a Paki here in the DFW area, get in my face once with the whole rage and indignation routine, and I put him on his ass.

You could tell from his reaction, that that was the first time anyone had ever knocked the crap out of him! Well, he jumped right up, and it was all yelling and arm waving, so I smacked him again. It was like flipping a switch, he became real docile and meek after that. All these folks need is a real good honest to God AssWhipping. Takes the starch right out of them.

cmdrsubfleet on September 5, 2007 at 8:01 PM

Notice the key comment here, “the media seems to be playing a large part in the radicalization”, or words to that effect. Blocking the satellite poison will be a good start. Next, shut down all the mosques. Start a mandatory state education program for all kids and teach them the evils of Islam – just like our schools do for Christianity. Problem solved.

warriorlawyer on September 5, 2007 at 8:03 PM

Esthier, Esthier, Esthier, you are such a trusting soul. Journalists are not there to report the news but to create the news. They twist and bend and fabricate the facts to fit their prefabricated story line. Much of the news journalists present is staged, a cooperation between journalists and the interests whose agenda the journalists want to promote.

Twisting the facts and changing the situation that is already there are two different things.

I’m aware that they twist facts. That doesn’t mean that they personally interfere with their stories.

As I recall that photo of the starving girl, the photographer did not leave her to be eaten by vultures. Journalists have no substantial ethics but even they don’t leave children to be eaten by wild animals.

Vultures only eat dead people, at which point, nothing else would have been done for the girl anyway.

He may have taken her back to her village, but he didn’t bring the starving village food, which was my point to begin with. He simply showed what was there and did not try to change anything despite how horrible the situation was.

As for your defense of appeasement of the violent Muslim thug shoe man, Esthier, what you don’t realize is that most bullies fold when their bluff is called. When you retreat from such threats, you are escalating the violence. You are teaching every Muslim thug that he can win with threats.

You sound like an after school special. Many bullies actually mean what they say and will attack you if you do not do what they tell you to do, especially when these “bullies” are fully grown men with an entire community to support them.

Your idea that videotaping the Muslim thug in the act of making threats is a victory is not persuasive. We have plenty of film of Nazis invading Europe and killing people, yet such film does not constitute a victory.

A victory in what sense? Militarily, no, the video tape didn’t win. But all they wanted in this clip was proof that Muslim radicals were taking over, and that’s exactly what they got.

There was a time when no one believed Nazis were doing the horrible things that were being said of them. When proof, such as video tapes, came out, it motivated others to finally confront something they’d long ignored.

In that sense, yeah, I’d say the videos were a win, especially if those taking the videos were few in number and would have been unable to mount much of an attack on their own. Sometimes it’s just important that the truth get out.

Failing that, the next time he strikes her, she should shoot him.

Why in the world is that woman still with him?

How about, the first time he beats her, she does the smart thing and leaves?

What’s wrong with leaving an abusive husband? Why would anyone with any self respect stay in a household like that?

Look, I might understand your point if this camera crew was unable to get the footage it wanted and was prevented from doing the job it wanted to do by this shoe guy, but it wasn’t.

Why fight someone who isn’t keeping you from doing what you want to do? Why get into a pointless fight?

Once you leave, even if the shoe guy was a bluffer, he’ll simply go back to his old ways around people who won’t attack him. You’re not changing the world by standing up to him and are likely doing nothing but taking a beating for the sake of taking a beating.

Fighting without a purpose has no purpose. Your assertion that I’m simply being a woman will not change that.

Esthier on September 5, 2007 at 8:13 PM

I have no respect, nor sympathy, for any culture that does not defend itself. And history shows, all one needs to do to stop islam is simply stand up to it. It is really that simple.

jihadwatcher on September 5, 2007 at 5:55 PM

Amen!

cmdrsubfleet on September 5, 2007 at 8:13 PM

The caption underneath says Kevin only shooed away the vulture and let the girl continue on her journey.

He didn’t save her from anything.

Esthier on September 5, 2007 at 8:18 PM

Well, ‘they’ don’t seem to allow overt video cameras in the Belgian ‘muslim street’….

If there aren’t a bunch of COVERT video and audio recorders all over the place there, the Belgian police and every intelligence agency from every civilized country in the world is really falling down on the job.

LegendHasIt on September 5, 2007 at 8:25 PM

Tim Burton on September 5, 2007 at 6:48 PM

Nail. On. Head.

Those that do not take up Jihad have not studied their Quran.

AZ_Redneck on September 5, 2007 at 10:09 PM

Those that do not take up Jihad have not studied their Quran.

AZ_Redneck on September 5, 2007 at 10:09 PM

Or prefer the easy good life, especially those in the West….

Tim Burton on September 5, 2007 at 10:34 PM

God bless Hind Frahl! She is probably now a target!I hope she is armed.

This situation tells me that there is now an accepted break down of law and order in Little Morocco if the Belgian Govt does not step in and remind the Islamists whose law IS law!

If we are not careful, this situation could start up in American towns and with the weak PC city officials that haunt the city halls and governors mansions, it is all too possible.

The False Dervish on September 5, 2007 at 11:16 PM

Islamists have exposed Democracy’s fatal flaw and are exploiting it to the fullest.

Majority rules? Then become the majority via immigration. Then rule thru intimidation.

faraway on September 5, 2007 at 2:57 PM


Which is why we should never forget, and be forever grateful, that we do not live in a democracy, but instead a representative republic. Now, if only we would behave like it…

Herikutsu on September 6, 2007 at 12:27 AM

The strength of islam has only been the weakness of its victims…
jihadwatcher on September 5, 2007 at 5:55 PM


As frequently pointed out by Ayn Rand and others gifted with a clear thinking mind, the strength of any thug (islamic or otherwise) lies in the weakness of its victims.

Any bully requires the consent of those he would dominate.

Herikutsu on September 6, 2007 at 12:37 AM

Solution #1: Ban the Islamic religion (cult) in the civilized world. Ship all Muslims living in the civilized world back to the middle east. Let them kill each other off.

Argument for Solution #1: If Nazism would have been banned millions of innocent lives would have been saved.

Golfer_75093 on September 6, 2007 at 9:10 AM

Argument for Solution #1: If Nazism would have been banned millions of innocent lives would have been saved.

Golfer_75093 on September 6, 2007 at 9:10 AM

Argument against solution #1: Many Muslims are themselves innocent people.

How can people in this thread both praise the woman who exposed this nonsense and also wish all Muslims would kill each other off. She is a Muslim and so are many good people that society is better off having in this world than not having.

Esthier on September 6, 2007 at 9:43 AM

If we are not careful, this situation could start up in American towns and with the weak PC city officials that haunt the city halls and governors mansions, it is all too possible.

The False Dervish on September 5, 2007 at 11:16 PM

Ahh…no! There are too many armed rednecks like myself, that won’t hesitate to take matters into hand. In fact, a bunch of us are waiting for the need to do just that.

cmdrsubfleet on September 6, 2007 at 10:17 AM

cmdrsubfleet-

Exactly.

The First Amendment is the mouth.

The Second Amendment is the teeth.

profitsbeard on September 6, 2007 at 10:32 AM

Terrific piece, I wonder if the young journalist’s book is available in English?

Belgium is one of several nations in Europe that has encouraged radicalization of Islamic youth by backing Muslim schools. That new school in New York is referred to as “Arabic.” But isn’t that the same sort of nonsense???

doufree on September 6, 2007 at 12:34 PM

Esthier:

Kudos to you for resisting the temptation to comment on the “typical” male chest thumping elsewhere in this thread, as I might have done. Your point is well made.

JM Hanes on September 6, 2007 at 12:42 PM

Time for the Belgans to close the mosques, and start shooting the Imams.

If the muslim who threatened the camera operator tried it with me, I’d tell him to take his best shot. But I’d warn him that I don’t usually carry around bodybags in HIS size.

georgej on September 6, 2007 at 5:33 PM