Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Video: Fred’s first ad

posted at 10:44 am on September 5, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The plan was (and is) to roll this out tonight at the start of the debate, then informally announce on Leno right after midnight just as a 15-minute video is going live on his website. I guess they couldn’t wait, though: both Jim Geraghty and Marc Ambinder just posted copies of this spot, presumably leaked to them by the campaign. Contrary to popular belief, says Ambinder, this isn’t going to air during the debate but during the last block of commercials for “The O’Reilly Factor.” Smart thinking: given the size of Bill’s audience and the creeping boredom with the debates leading people to tune out, he may get more viewers doing it that way.

They shed another staffer today and Geraghty says the secretive yet influential Arlington Group might be about to abandon ship. (Update: See below for more.) And then there’s this:

Roll Call columnist Stu Rothenberg already has an opinion: Thompson blew his best chance by not getting into the race in the spring or summer. “In delaying his entry into the Republican race, Thompson has looked indecisive and weak,” writes Rothenberg in in his Monday column (subscription only). “He has lost potential supporters and contributors to other campaigns. And he has limited the strategic options of his campaign. But maybe more than anything else, he gave an opening first to Romney and more recently to Huckabee that neither would have had.”

More on Mitt in a minute. Stand by for updates.

Update: Again via Ambinder, here’s Mitt’s return of serve — a new ad set to run this week in the heart of Thompson Country, i.e. South Carolina. It’s called “Energy,” which is an antonym, of course, for … laziness. The goal is to prove that Fred’s beatable even in the south and position Mitt as the true social con choice ahead of the showdown with Giuliani in Florida on January 29.

Update: Already linked in headlines, but be sure to read Tom Bevan’s enjoyably pissy shot at Hugh Hewitt and the other Fred-bashing water-carriers for Mitt. I especially liked the pointed inclusion of HH in the MSM. But let’s go easy on the term “fragging,” okay?

Update: Geraghty follows up on the Arlington Group. One of the things I most like about Fred is one of the things they like least. Ah, the libertarian(ish)/social con divide.

This individual said the Arlington Group members have not been able to agree on a candidate. “There has been a great deal of excitement about the possibility of a Thompson campaign; many of us are very happy about how clearly he criticized and called for the overturn of Roe v. Wade. But there is concern that the federalist constitutional amendment that he leans toward on marriage just wouldn’t work. How can you have a couple married in Massachusetts and then, when they move to Tennessee they’re not married anymore? It just seems to our legal people that America is going to end up with one definition of marriage. That’s what we want, actually, and we want that definition to be the traditional one… We hope to convince all the candidates that on this issue federalism is a not as high a value philosophically as making sure marriage has traditional configuration.”

The source goes on to hint that they’d probably be leaning towards Huckabee if they thought he could win. Which he can’t.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

jdawg,

Um, you need to work a little on your parsing skills. For instance the last quote you chose here

jdawg on September 5, 2007 at 7:31 PM

“However, as governor of the commonwealth, I will protect a woman’s right to choose under the laws of the country and the commonwealth. That’s the same position I’ve had for many years.”

So would you have him break the laws as Governor? He is saying he will follow the law.

Moreover, when you use the quote about the family friend you ignore the fact that he believes it should be legal in cases of rape, incest and the life of the mother.

I don’t have time to argue every little point with you, but it’s clear that you are very, very rigid and there is no viable (no pun intended) candidate who will satisfy you.

By the way, you are wrong about classifying Reagan’s issue as “Communism” as if other issues like taxes and his take on social issues didn’t matter.

Buy Danish on September 5, 2007 at 7:43 PM

Oh, and I forgot to add, Mitt has been consistent that he will not force his views on others. You see, unlike activist judges, he believes the PEOPLE decide these issues.

Buy Danish on September 5, 2007 at 7:45 PM

Buy Danish on September 5, 2007 at 7:43 PM

Now you’re stretching. What is there to say he can’t work to change the laws???? And he said he believed it should be legal, and he supported choice. Let’s face it, the man is pro-life when it suits him, and pro-choice when it suits him.

I like how you just totally ignored everything else I posted. Especially the part where he said he was “committed” to keeping abortion legal. Yeah, some pro-life position. Up is now down. Got it.

jdawg on September 5, 2007 at 7:56 PM

Buy Danish on September 5, 2007 at 7:43 PM

Also, I guess you think pro-lifers should agree that RU-486 is a good thing – Romney does. Or do you choose to ignore that, also?

jdawg on September 5, 2007 at 7:58 PM

Aw. Ful.

I. Cry.

Karol on September 5, 2007 at 7:58 PM

;-} Heh. That’s good. Can I use that sometime? jdawg on September 5, 2007 at 6:30 PM

But of course.

Fred’s gonna make the next four months fun instead of a perfunctory exercise in banal politicking.

Mojave Mark on September 5, 2007 at 8:31 PM

Mojave Mark on September 5, 2007 at 8:31 PM

Thanks, wouldn’t want to use it without proper credit or permission, you know.

jdawg on September 5, 2007 at 8:57 PM

jdawg,

I did not “ignore” everything else, I don’t have time to address it all.

From what I gather you think all abortions should be illegal always. The American people are not with you on that, and they certainly are not on that page in Massachusetts. In order to change the law you need a legislature that will legislate. A little reality is in order here.

The bottom line is that Roe needs to be overturned so the States can decide.

As for RU486, I don’t know that much about it except that it can be dangerous. I’m not sure that calling it an “abortion” drug is really an accurate characterization when taken as a “morning after” pill but I would need to do more research.

Of all this issues facing this Country, it is not on the top of my list.

Goodnight.

Buy Danish on September 5, 2007 at 11:29 PM

Buy Danish on September 5, 2007 at 11:29 PM

The bottom line is that Romney will say whatever to please his audience. He’s so pro-life he endorsed RU-486, and is committed (his word) to keeping abortion legal. This is the rhetoric of a flip-flopper, not a pro-lifer.

jdawg on September 6, 2007 at 12:15 PM

PowWow on September 5, 2007 at 5:56 PM

Thank you.

csdeven on September 6, 2007 at 8:32 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4


You must be logged in to post a comment.