Open thread: The last Fred-less GOP debate; Update: Huckabee clashes with Paul over the surge; Update: GOP candidates smack Fred; Update: Rudy defends his personal life
posted at 8:30 pm on September 5, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Eight elephants in a room and another who isn’t. The only one likely to mention Fred is Huckabee, who’s been knocking him regularly of late to try to boost his profile as a social con alternative. Count on a video highlight or two here later; the obligatory “Fred announces on Leno’s couch” clip will get its own post shortly after midnight. (FYI, the taping’s over and he’s already made it official.) Standard rules apply — if you’re watching and you see something, say something.
Some reading while we wait. Carl Cameron, who contributed to today’s earlier Fox News bombshell about Fred and who called the world’s attention to the fact that he rode around the Iowa state fair in a golf cart, kicks off the coverage tonight by noting how pissed the New Hampshire Republicans are at him for skipping the debate. Rush Limbaugh piles on by smacking Fred for devaluing the office of the presidency by announcing on Leno, an odd gripe for someone as media savvy as he is. Meanwhile, the last guy to announce on Leno takes a hard look at the electoral master stroke the GOP is trying to pull off in his state and comes out against it, naturally. And Rudy’s campaign trumpets the fact that he’s locked up Robert Duvall’s endorsement, which is somehow viscerally, if not logically, impressive, even if it does possibly reinforce the increasingly poisonous image of the party as “very old-fashioned, very old and not in touch with the realities of today’s society.”
I’ll leave you with Hillary’s awful new cookie-cutter ad about “change” with “experience.” It’s good at moments like these to remember the big differences with the other side.
Update: Brit wasn’t going to let them dodge the elephant in the room. Here’s the very first question of the night, preceded by a transparent slap at Fred ducking the debate by the head of the New Hampshire GOP.
Update: Arguably the most interesting, and deftly handled, answer of the evening. Frank Luntz’s focus group says it was McCain’s night, though.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8 Next »
Mitt wants to wiretap not only Mosques, but churches too. Gotta be careful about those Protestants and their radical ham sandwich making.
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:03 PM
They’re grownups! The dems wouldn’t have a chance.
bat wings. heh.
TexasDan on September 5, 2007 at 10:03 PM
Great answer by Tancredo.
amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 10:03 PM
Only because they were able to overwhelm the pilots and take control of the plane. If they had not, the passengers would likely still be alive. Most of them, anyway. I agree with securing the cockpit, but allowing individuals to carry onboard is not something that I think is necessary or safe.
Big S on September 5, 2007 at 10:03 PM
TANK! He is my man, to bad he is unelectible
conservnut on September 5, 2007 at 10:03 PM
There is no easy way for Mitt to respond to that guy. I don’t think Mitt meant anything by his comments, but he will have to live up to his mistakes.
HYTEAndy on September 5, 2007 at 10:04 PM
Only because
theythe terrorists were able to overwhelm the pilots and take control of the planeBig S on September 5, 2007 at 10:04 PM
McCain just lied again
VolMagic on September 5, 2007 at 10:04 PM
I’ve never listened to Ron Paul before tonight. He’s a raving freaking lunatic. He has no perception of honor or reality.
Tennessee Dave on September 5, 2007 at 10:04 PM
Tanc understands the Gov. only has 2 jobs 1. to protect us from foreign or domestic threats and 2. to uphold the law. Its waterboarding time baby
Joey1974 on September 5, 2007 at 10:04 PM
Hasn’t McCain used this exact answer before? Does he not understand the difference between pretend torture like waterboarding, and real torture like what Al Qaeda does?
nailinmyeye on September 5, 2007 at 10:04 PM
Tanc doesn’t think waterboarding is torture. McCain thinks it is, I guess.
AZCON on September 5, 2007 at 10:05 PM
Tancredo, you’ve got my vote. Major improvement in delivering a very consistent message evident tonight.
heroyalwhyness on September 5, 2007 at 10:05 PM
“they’ll use that as an excuse to torture our brave men and women”.
What’s their excuse as they’re doing it now?
amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 10:05 PM
Weak argument McCain. They torture our guys anyway.
Stupid ass
conservnut on September 5, 2007 at 10:05 PM
They already torture us you freaking moron!!!
infidel4life on September 5, 2007 at 10:05 PM
Old man Fred, that old man Fred,
He dont say nothin, but he must know somethin
That old man Fred, he just keeps shufflin along.
He dont do debates,
But he does do Leno.
But them that debate em, may soon be forgotten,
Old man Fred, he just keeps shufflin along, oh yes he does.
The other candidates all sweatin and toilin,
Their bodies all achin and rackin, now listen!
Lift that bar, youd better, tote that campaignin,
And if ya are too lazy,
Youll land in hades.
That god-darn old Fred, he just keeps shufflin along.
Keeps on shufflin along.
MB4 on September 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM
what’s the over/under that RP is a Soros plant?
jp on September 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM
Sure there is, he an just answer the guy’s question. The fact that he side-stepped it, with a wink and a nod to his website, totally turned me off. That was a douche move.
yo on September 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM
Rudy, you make an allusion to NY with every single answer. You need to wise up that NY is not the favorite city of everyone in the US.
TexasDan on September 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM
Have to admit, Good job Rudy
conservnut on September 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM
Rudy- “We can’t close Guantanamo because nobody want the people held there”. Huh? That’s the best reason?
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM
McCain is wrong on torture.
Who would we lose our reputation with? Europe? Big deal… and it’s not like we have a good rep with the Middle East.
American lives are more important than your “cred.”
HYTEAndy on September 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM
Close Gitmo–and send ‘em to San Francisco. Then build a fence around that.
Tennessee Dave on September 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM
“The terrorist in Gitmo have little to do with the war on terror”, asked by the one moderator. Huh? We didn’t find them as they were having tea in the Tavern on the Green.
amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 10:07 PM
True, but what else does he have as a point of reference? Besides divorce court.
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:07 PM
Hunter’s on it. Lock um up and throw away the key.
AZCON on September 5, 2007 at 10:07 PM
5000,000 of them should be obliterated for every Nick Berg, or Paul Johnson beheading. Animals have no reason they only understand “King of the Jungle” mentality
By the way duncan Hunter is pretty great too.
Joey1974 on September 5, 2007 at 10:08 PM
No, his point is that if you’re going to release them, where are they going to go? Where will we send them? New York? LA? No other country wants them.
amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 10:08 PM
McCain may be wrong about the enemy being more pat to torture our guys if we “torture” theirs…but I guess if any of these guys knows, as Huck alluded to, about torture, it’s McCain.
JetBoy on September 5, 2007 at 10:08 PM
Nice.
nailinmyeye on September 5, 2007 at 10:08 PM
Great idea!!!!
conservnut on September 5, 2007 at 10:08 PM
Wendle said war in Iraq.
IIRC, most detainees are from Afghanistan.
rslancer14 on September 5, 2007 at 10:08 PM
And why don’t the other countries want them? They see them as too dangerous.
amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 10:08 PM
I think what Mitt meant was, National Security is a CIVIL RIGHT, one which civil libertarian absolutist have to ignore. And it is the most important of civil rights which makes all the others possible.
jp on September 5, 2007 at 10:09 PM
MB4 on September 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM
Wow, a showboat reference !!!!!
NICE :0)
Joey1974 on September 5, 2007 at 10:09 PM
Bingo. Classic case of NIMBY
JetBoy on September 5, 2007 at 10:09 PM
Brownback… yawn. The VP does this, but the President does THIS.
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:09 PM
That’s why he is unfit for command my friend.
conservnut on September 5, 2007 at 10:10 PM
That’s the whole point! Without arms, the passengers couldn’t stop the terrorists. How do you propose a different outcome next time without force to oppose the attackers? You’re following the whole “guns are unsafe” nonsense of the left. you’re around guns all the time and don’t know it, most likely. Are they going off and hurting people?
TexasDan on September 5, 2007 at 10:10 PM
Hunter is cool.
HYTEAndy on September 5, 2007 at 10:10 PM
Complimintarity???WTF?
OneEyedJack on September 5, 2007 at 10:10 PM
jp on September 5, 2007 at 10:09 PM
you’re probably right.
I just had some Shiavo flashbacks. (shudder)
VolMagic on September 5, 2007 at 10:10 PM
Am I having flashbacks or is Brownback morphing into Edwards/Gore.
sonnyspats1 on September 5, 2007 at 10:10 PM
I’m sure the Palestinians will take them. Maybe Iran too.
Heck the US should take them. They can enjoy a nice cozy existance six feet underground.
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:11 PM
McCain: “… tax increases… and I’ll continue to
imoppose tax increases…”RD on September 5, 2007 at 10:11 PM
A guy who has been tortued is not and can not be objective about it. period
Dersu on September 5, 2007 at 10:11 PM
McC, you destroyed the trust with the base.
TexasDan on September 5, 2007 at 10:11 PM
Except for his obnoxious “maverick-ness” and shamnesty, McCain really ain’t that bad. Better than Shrillary.
HYTEAndy on September 5, 2007 at 10:12 PM
McVain just took a swipe at Duke Cunningham who was even more decorated in Vietnam than he was…… thats awful no class at all,, stockholm syndrome has set in
Joey1974 on September 5, 2007 at 10:12 PM
Those people behind Wallace haven’t smiled yet.
amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 10:12 PM
I gotta say- McCain is pretty good on fiscal policy. Too bad he stinks otherwise.
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:12 PM
Open Fred Thread, yet no post from csdeven?
What the hell is the world coming to?
otcconan on September 5, 2007 at 10:12 PM
past csdeven’s bedtime.
AZCON on September 5, 2007 at 10:13 PM
BigS and TexasDan,
You guys gettin on OK?
Dersu on September 5, 2007 at 10:13 PM
I’m not worked up. It’s getting OT and distracting, so I’ll drop it.
TexasDan on September 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM
TexasDan on September 5, 2007 at 10:10 PM
I reiterate: I agree that the cockpit should be as secure as possible, which may or may not include the presence of a firearm. However, this can (and to some extent, has) been done without allowing passengers to carry guns. A shot fired on a plane, full of important electronics, fuel, and sealed off from the exterior, at 30,000 feet, has the potential to be extremely harmful.
In any case, the problem on flight 93 was that the cockpit was siezed by the terrorists. If a simple locked, reinforced cockpit door had been used, the passengers would still be here.
Big S on September 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM
I’m with Texas on this one but I’m trying to stay on the topic of the debate. We can have our guns on planes flamewar after.
RobertCSampson on September 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM
Can’t claim to disagree with Rudy on the pledges.
cadetwithchips2 on September 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM
Rudy and McCain need the extra tax revenue to support the illegals’ social welfare programs once they get amnesty.
Valiant on September 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM
“fee fee”
LOL!
AZCON on September 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM
One more time: Great job Chris.
Spirit of 1776 on September 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM
Oh, Mitt only raised taxes by a quarter of a billion dollars on gun owners, used-car shoppers, and those looking to fight domestic abuse.
amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM
He’s standing in front of his life-sized poster of Mitt and pleasuring himself, like most nights.
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM
Mitt is getting slaughtered tonight
conservnut on September 5, 2007 at 10:16 PM
The more I listen to Mitt, the more I like him.
nailinmyeye on September 5, 2007 at 10:16 PM
0 capital gains WOOT!!!
RobertCSampson on September 5, 2007 at 10:16 PM
Heh, that’s funny! This is one hell of a debate! Huge difference from the simpering little dem. debates.
4shoes on September 5, 2007 at 10:16 PM
Corrected:
the
passengersplane would still be hereDersu on September 5, 2007 at 10:17 PM
Romney- well, I increased fees because we needed the money! Well, OK then. Not like there’s any other option like reducing spending- that’s just crazy talk!
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:17 PM
That just made my day. Not the image, but, you know, the joke…
nailinmyeye on September 5, 2007 at 10:17 PM
Uh oh. Fair tax is confusing. Anyone know if this is a feasible idea at all?
VolMagic on September 5, 2007 at 10:17 PM
Haircut!
HYTEAndy on September 5, 2007 at 10:17 PM
Ah the fair tax question, this is why Fred ditched tonight.
Spirit of 1776 on September 5, 2007 at 10:17 PM
Fair tax at 34%? A bargain! Think about it.
AZCON on September 5, 2007 at 10:17 PM
I’d come out ahead but several thousand
conservnut on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Thanks, but now you made me picture the image. Ewww.
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
how much would the average salary increase if employer contribution was included as wages instead of sent to the IRS.
TexasDan on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Poor Paul. He stands there for an hour and speaks twice. :(
VolMagic on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
The other candidates are audibly laughing at Ron Paul. And, the dude deserves it.
nailinmyeye on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
who keeps laughing in the mike when Chris rags on Paul?
TexasDan on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Poor Ron Paul…I almost feel sorry for him…
JetBoy on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
How would we have any idea whats going on withOUT the CIA??
Um??
cadetwithchips2 on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Great idea, Ron! Let’s get rid of all of those nuissance agencies like the FBI, CIA, Department of Homeland Security. Who needs those? We have the great Ron Paul. He’ll do it himself!
amerpundit on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Wow, they’re really ridiculing Paul tonight. Awesome.
Big S on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Pastor Mike well I never! Prostitutes and drug dealers paying taxes?
sonnyspats1 on September 5, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Wallace is hardcore! In this, he’s a chip off the old block.
baldilocks on September 5, 2007 at 10:20 PM
Or the fact that he hasn’t officially announced yet. But I agree- this is the best debate so far, and I’d have liked to see him participate.
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:20 PM
Paul: “You might ask a better question…”
No – I might ask you the question I just asked you, pal…
RD on September 5, 2007 at 10:20 PM
Sacrifice liberty for security? That’s just crazy talk!
nailinmyeye on September 5, 2007 at 10:20 PM
Sounds like Rudy to me, but I could be wrong.
Big S on September 5, 2007 at 10:20 PM
haha that look from Rudy
JetBoy on September 5, 2007 at 10:20 PM
I love how Paul says eliminate the IRS and stuff… but the CIA? X(
HYTEAndy on September 5, 2007 at 10:20 PM
Ron Paul- I AM A FULL BLOWN RANTING MOONBAT! RAAARRWWW.
Hollowpoint on September 5, 2007 at 10:20 PM
I’m guessing that Paul is the sort of personality that feeds off the antagonism. Probably really does believe he’s the only one that can save America.
TexasDan on September 5, 2007 at 10:21 PM
It’s cracking me up!….. everytime Chris Wallace addresses Ron Paul and he answers, you can hear someone laughing in the backround! What a joke RP is… is he still in the debate just for entertainment value?!
4shoes on September 5, 2007 at 10:21 PM
OK RP We’ll be free to submitt to islam.
sonnyspats1 on September 5, 2007 at 10:21 PM
Hardcore questions all around.
RobertCSampson on September 5, 2007 at 10:21 PM
Paul doesn’t realize the Islamists will still hate us even after we ditch the FBI and withdraw our troops from everywhere.
Valiant on September 5, 2007 at 10:21 PM
Hard hit from the Poli. Sci. major to Rudy.
HYTEAndy on September 5, 2007 at 10:22 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8 Next »