Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


UPI reports attack on al-Doura power plant that never happened Updated

posted at 8:30 am on September 4, 2007 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | regular view

Here’s the UPI story:

Iraq’s already burdened electricity sector took another hit Thursday as assailants attacked a plant in southern Baghdad, shutting it down.

The casualty count hasn’t been released, but workers were sent to the hospital after an armed group laid siege to the al-Doura power plant, setting one unit on fire and damaging a second, an Iraq Electricity Ministry source told the Voices of Iraq news agency.

“Unknown gunmen attacked last night,” the source said, “depriving thousands of people in and around al-Doura of electricity.”

“The attackers also set ablaze a fire engine while trying to put out the fire,” he added. “Works of the plant rehabilitation needs security to prevail in this hot spot area. The area cannot be controlled easily despite the huge security forces’ reinforcements arriving there.”

There’s a minor problem with this story. According to a source we have on the scene who works at that plant, a person we have heard from before and have every reason to trust, the attack never happened. The plant is still in full operation. No fire truck was set ablaze. There was small arms fire in the area that night, but other than that, nothing. Nada.

It. Did. Not. Happen.

No attack, no damage to any generator, no burned firetruck. Care for some pictures?

Here are the videos I took this morning that prove no attack took place last week. Unit 3 is running at 60 megawatts output, Unit 4 at 55 MW, unit 5 is down for bearing repairs, and unit 6 is coming up.

I did speak with our head of security this morning. He said the night that was mentioned in the article, there was some activity in the area. But no attack on the plant or the expat compound took place. One theory about this false report is the person in the Ministry of Electricity may have had prior knowledge about an attack, and called his contact in the media prematurely. Another theory is someone exaggerated the activity around us that night. The latter, in my opinion, is the best theory. People around here get excited when they hear S.A.F. at night.

And here are the visuals. You’ll see units 3,4,5 & 6, the fire truck that was supposedly burned, and the interior of the plant. It’s all operating normally. It’s a boring video, but that’s the point. At the time it was filmed, there had been no attack.

That’s the power plant that was supposedly shut down by an attack.

Interestingly, two days after the UPI report hit the wires, there was an attack on the plant. Here’s what my source at Al Doura says.

We had some activity this afternoon, fairly heavy in fact. But we are still alive & kickin’, safe and sound.

But even after the heavy attack, which seems to have been reported by UPI before it ever occurred, the power plant is still up and operating.

So what happened, UPI?

Update: Confederate Yankee checked with his MNF-I sources on this.

The attack on the substation definitely happened, as did the attack on the fire truck. I just saw photos of the burned out building and fire engine.

But, it is a small facility, and the article exaggerates the impact of the attack. Did people lose power as a result? Probably- those serviced in that immediate neighborhood. But, power is intermittent throughout Doura, so to insinuate that the loss of this station is the cause of a city-wide loss of electricity isn’t exactly accurate either. It sounds like another example of one smaller event happening, but then being made into more than it actually was.

The main Doura power plant is still operating per normal output.

The UPI’s story is just vague enough on the definition of “power plant” that they may claim that the attack happened as they describe. But a plain reading of the story — it’s how both our source and I read it, and it’s how the language reads — is that the main power plant was the target, not a small substation. And the main power plant wasn’t attacked at all. At best, the UPI story exaggerates both the target and the extent of the attack’s effectiveness.

As Confederate Yankee says, details, details.

Update: As several readers have noted, the story is no longer available at the link above. UPI appears to have buried it.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Well, it could have happened, and isn’t that enough for the drive-by media?

JammieWearingFool on September 4, 2007 at 8:33 AM

Interestingly, two days after the UPI report hit the wires, there was an attack on the plant.

very very interesting.

Mojack420 on September 4, 2007 at 8:41 AM

UPI’s got some ’splainin’ to do.

flipflop on September 4, 2007 at 8:48 AM

Exactly who does UPI work for bin Laden or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?

Buzzy on September 4, 2007 at 8:57 AM

Embedding with the jihadis to get a scoop ? Now that’s modern journalism/propoganda mongering!

bbz123 on September 4, 2007 at 8:58 AM

I’d suggest asking UPI’s source what happened. UPI needs to burn the source – not only were they wrong, but they’re working for the other side. If it was someone within the Ministry of Energy, you’ve got yourself someone who needs to not only be outed, but brought up on charges.

lawhawk on September 4, 2007 at 9:21 AM

Hey! The media has to keep things interesting or they risk losing their bread & butter and having to find another story to report. If the action is slowing, why not offer the jihadis some suggestions. That’s a great way to garner news stories!

Troy Rasmussen on September 4, 2007 at 9:22 AM

I guess UPI is neither an independent observer nor is part of the solution. Are they part of the problem, then? Perhaps they are AQ-I’s “Dry Run and Response Assessment” Department.

mile66 on September 4, 2007 at 9:32 AM

So is UPI pulling an “al-Jazeera”?

JetBoy on September 4, 2007 at 9:39 AM

The press is conspiring with terrorists for nothing more than a small story, and an attack on the GWoT?

Good night and good luck.

Rode Werk on September 4, 2007 at 9:41 AM

Interestingly, two days after the UPI report hit the wires, there was an attack on the plant. Here’s what my source at Al Doura says.

Either UPI is doing a terrible job, or an incredibly good one but haven’t I heard of this before.

BohicaTwentyTwo on September 4, 2007 at 9:58 AM

Can’t we find out exactly who the writer was? This person should be investigated, this is very serious.

Maxx on September 4, 2007 at 10:03 AM

Obviously, UPI has pulled out ahead of the normal Iraq War coverage by the pedestrian news organizations and is now reporting the news from the future. All this stuff about interviewing people and getting eyewitness accounts of events are just archaic bourgeois details that can not be allowed to interfere with the real truth.

Tantor on September 4, 2007 at 10:07 AM

Remember “Rowand adn Martin’s Laugh-In” ? “And Now, with news of the future, here’s Dan Rowan!”

Texas Nick 77 on September 4, 2007 at 10:09 AM

The latter, in my opinion, is the best theory

Sounds like the former is now more plausible.

mjkazee on September 4, 2007 at 10:22 AM

What is the answer to these dishonest news agencies? The blogs keep catching them, holding them accountable, and they continue to report falsely. What more can we do about it?

nailinmyeye on September 4, 2007 at 10:28 AM

Before the internet (thanks, Algore!), and bloggers fact-checking like crazy in their jammies (thanks, Mary Mapes), everyone pretty much accepted the AP and UPI at their word. Now we know better.

I wonder what other BS we would be fed without all the bloggers digging deeper than the pro’s?

Nevermind. I can guess.

Qzsusy on September 4, 2007 at 10:38 AM

So what happened, UPI?

UPI is simply taking their cue from Reid & Pelosi and reporting an advance summation of what they know will happen since it’s all Bush’s fault and therefore nothing good can come out of this war.

Remember Harry and Nanc have already decided the surge cannot will not probably won’t hasn’t worked. To them, it’s all part of their self-fulfilling prophecy.

fogw on September 4, 2007 at 11:14 AM

The link is down the memory hole. I skimmed the ME grouping at Earthtimes and couldn’t find it listed, either. Google cache is still available, though.

Dusty on September 4, 2007 at 11:25 AM

Just fyi, the link to the UPI story is broken.

Benaiah on September 4, 2007 at 11:27 AM

The UPI is abetting the enemy and reporting propoganda. I guess they are doing the jobs that patriotic Americans won’t do.

Mallard T. Drake on September 4, 2007 at 11:48 AM

The link at the top of your story isn’t working. What do you suppose happened to that link? Did UPI simply “disappear” this fake (but accurate 2 days later) story?

reine.de.tout on September 4, 2007 at 11:50 AM

Indeed!

Jewels on September 4, 2007 at 11:56 AM

“The attackers also set ablaze a fire engine while trying to put out the fire,”

The attackers were trying to put out the fire?

Harpoon on September 4, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Wow. The UPI is prophesying now?

TexasDan on September 4, 2007 at 12:14 PM

Fake but accurate?

georgej on September 4, 2007 at 12:17 PM

picky, picky, picky
It could have, it should have, it would have…what difference would it make?

Without blogs it would have been accurate, and a great story. You ruined it with facts.

Curse the facts…say the liberals, it gets in the way of a good story.

right2bright on September 4, 2007 at 12:44 PM

I didn’t know that UPI hired Miss Cleo to do their reporting.

theholyhermit on September 4, 2007 at 12:48 PM

I just posted this at the UPI site:
“www.hotair.com rebuts this report. You may want your ‘multiple layers of fact checking and editorial control’ start working on correcting this story. The interesting part is that there was apparently an attack on the power plant — 2 days after this report was filed.
And you wonder why reporters are trusted to a lesser degree than used car salesmen.”
They still have it available at:
http://www.upi.com/International_Security/Energy/Briefing/2007/08/31/attack_on_baghdad_power_plant_hurts_sector/9362/

TABoLK on September 4, 2007 at 12:53 PM

One theory about this false report is the person in the Ministry of Electricity may have had prior knowledge about an attack, and called his contact in the media prematurely.

Interestingly, two days after the UPI report hit the wires, there was an attack on the plant.

Now if they’d only print next weeks Powerball numbers . . .

geckomon on September 4, 2007 at 1:05 PM

Maybe it’s just me, but the link now clicks through as not existing.

StoutRepublican on September 4, 2007 at 1:16 PM

ITS ALL ROVE AND CHENEY’S FAULT!!!!
Nothing happened? Well….its still their fault damn it!

Defector01 on September 4, 2007 at 1:36 PM

My link still works, and goes straight to the UPI website.

But they did delete my comment. Hey, Bryan, stand by for traffic from UPI. Maybe they’ll report a denial of service on you a couple of days before they someone does it to you.

TABoLK on September 4, 2007 at 1:49 PM

So did the UPI report inspire the terrorists or did the terrorists inspire the UPI report? One has to wonder if the UPI got wind of the attack somehow (directly from the terrorists?) and tried to scoop it, but either they or the terrorists got the date wrong.

The Earth Times page is gone (imagine that), but here’s another version:

Attack on Baghdad power plant hurts sector

And cached:

Attack on Baghdad power plant hurts sector

JinxMcHue on September 4, 2007 at 1:56 PM

The correct form of address when speaking to a reporter is, “Hey, stupid!”

They haven’t issued a correction…

Merovign on September 4, 2007 at 2:00 PM

Well we know Scott Beauchamp didn’t report it or it would have talked about how the fire truck had swerved to cut a dog in half on the way to put out the fire.

pedestrian on September 4, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Well we know Scott Beauchamp didn’t report it…

because the firefighters weren’t mocking a colleague who had been severely burned.

TABoLK on September 4, 2007 at 2:12 PM

re: the update – Exaggeration is still false reporting. See also: the Lancet’s bogus estimate for the number of Iraqi deaths.

JinxMcHue on September 4, 2007 at 2:15 PM

Actually, UPI still has the story on their homepage, on the right hand side under the heading, “Energy Resources”. Has been there for the past few hours at least

JiangxiDad on September 4, 2007 at 3:21 PM

That fire truck just sitting there and not putting out the fire is one of the 11 of 18 goals that the Iraqi government has failed at.

pedestrian on September 4, 2007 at 3:32 PM

“Reporting is easy when you don’t have to worry about the facts.”
- Chris Wallace

infidel4life on September 4, 2007 at 4:03 PM

There can only be one explanation for this pro-terrorist article:

Helen Thomas has resumed her reportage for UPI

auzerais on September 4, 2007 at 4:35 PM

I think we have been very remiss in not thanking the leadership that has been responsible for the remarkable turnaround in Iraq, for preventing the attack on the power plant, and for protecting the fire truck.

All together now… Thanks, Nancy!!

drunyan8315 on September 4, 2007 at 4:36 PM

Bryan,

The story is removed at the link you provide, but at the actual UPI web site, it still exists:

http://www.upi.com/International_Security/Energy/Briefing/2007/08/31/attack_on_baghdad_power_plant_hurts_sector/9362/

RightWinged on September 4, 2007 at 5:08 PM

The main stream media (MSM) never fail to disappoint.

Zorro on September 4, 2007 at 6:16 PM

Lies, lies, and more lies. I guess we should come to expect that from a media that is controlled by liberals.

SoulGlo on September 4, 2007 at 8:53 PM

There was small arms fire in the area that night, but other than that, nothing. Nada.

Now, had there been a picture of -An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house
following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City
.-

I might have believed it.

whatthecrap on September 5, 2007 at 2:40 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.