Comments on: Comedy gold: “Hillary Clinton — Socialist”

By: BKennedy

BKennedy — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:39:48 +0000

At the risk of moral equivalence, how is this different than Bushitlerism? Serious inquiry, not condemnation.

hadsil on September 5, 2007 at 3:20 AM

Because Hillary has already been quoted as supporting government takeover of whatever company the empress finds is “making too much money.” She has already stated that she doesn’t want America to be an “on your own society,” she wants it to be a collective society. Things like “Bush Knew!” and “Bush Lied People Died!” are unfounded speculation.

Observe:

Hillary Clinton
Hill Clinton
Hugo Clinton
Hugo Chavez

If we didn’t have proof they could be in the same place at the same time, you’d think they were the same person.

Mix 10 quotes from Hillary Clinton with 10 quotes from Stalin. Proceed to tell me who wrote which.

By: Maxx

Maxx — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:12:08 +0000

At the risk of moral equivalence, how is this different than Bushitlerism? Serious inquiry, not condemnation.

hadsil on September 5, 2007 at 3:20 AM

Go back to Kos.

By: Robert B. Steely, MSgt, USAF

Robert B. Steely, MSgt, USAF — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:47:15 +0000

A video warning from the future…

About Hillary? Watch…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfip7ltY13gH/T: Hot Air…

By: hadsil

hadsil — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:20:54 +0000

At the risk of moral equivalence, how is this different than Bushitlerism? Serious inquiry, not condemnation.

By: sonnyspats1

sonnyspats1 — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:04:53 +0000

LBJ's Daisy add of 1964 was based on the same premise. If hindsight is 20/20 then with his Great (big welfare) Society and escalation and ultimate disgrace in Vietnam we have Reagan's record to compare. OT But I have to say here my theory that this country has been steadily disected by the Trilateral Commission beggining with the assasination of JFK. ONE WORLD is here.

By: T J Green

T J Green — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:49:44 +0000

Spot on selecting St. Louis as the designated victim city. Hill the Racist has already lamely identified it as Gandhi’s favorite town: “He ran a gas station down in St. Louis”.

Need to nuke one? It’ll do…

By: TBinSTL

TBinSTL — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:47:01 +0000

The “break point” on the Arch would be about 1/3 down on each leg as the lower portion is filled with concrete and stressed steel stringers. It will likely be one of the last human artifacts when we all die from CO2 poisoning or the NAU plague or whatever world-ender du jour gets us.
That angle on the arch looked like it was shot from right near my house. There is an extensive cave/tunnel system under the city with lots of hidden entrances. Occasionally someone will show up in the basement of some old office building or factory after going exploring.

By: thuja

thuja — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:27:08 +0000

Wow!

From 1992-2000, we had Clinton Derangement Syndrome (CDS).
From 2000-2008, we had Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS).
Come 2008, are we doomed to have Clinton Derangement Syndrome (CDS) again?

Perhaps, some sanity on both sides is in order. And to those with CDS, I invite you take one second to think about the other Democratic nominees. They are so much worse. If it is possible, I ask you to get real with your insanities.

By: dcthornton.com » Blog Archive » Billary Rears Its Ugly Head

dcthornton.com » Blog Archive » Billary Rears Its Ugly Head — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:37:47 +0000

[...] A message from the not-so-distant future? You decide (via Hot Air). [...]

By: Tim Burton

Tim Burton — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:20:04 +0000

Seems spot on to me. Hillary the Marxist.

By: sibobr

sibobr — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:11:21 +0000

I’m not worried. Patrick Swayze and the Wolverines will still be around to save the country.

Anyway, why was he pointing at the map with his middle finger?

By: mram

mram — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:57:27 +0000

I’m surprised by how many people here are taking this seriously. C’mon.

By: Tanya

Tanya — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:02:11 +0000

Monster, what is a maroon?

That’s a Bugs Bunnyism.

By: jihadwatcher

jihadwatcher — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:22:23 +0000

This video is unrealistic. In 2021, wouldn’t he be a Mexican?

By: MirCat

MirCat — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:04:52 +0000

Are transmissions and transactions the same thing, or did he come topside to score? Hening on September 4, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Transmission would be sending something out over radio waves. Transaction would be transmissions, broadcasts, e-mails, blog posts, or anything be Mr. McFeely. - The Cat

By: sharinlite

sharinlite — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:40:31 +0000

Monster, what is a maroon?
Physics geek…thanks also.
Esthier, we have been using implants in various way and with nanotechnology by 2020′s everything will be tiny.
Kini, rich will go along regardless of ideology, poor are gullible and greedy but the middle class will be wipped out.

I personally thought it was pretty good. The concept was great the execution needed work. Kind of like liberal intent:
the road to hell is not paved in gold, folks, only on the failed good intentions of the left.

By: sabbott

sabbott — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:52:41 +0000

Laugh now comrades…when you are bent over in the rice fields and they are blasting “herself” over the intercom 15 hours a day as a message from our “great and glorious leader” you will remember your freedom and weep…

By: Labamigo

Labamigo — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:41:28 +0000

And I don’t think the special effects were that impressive. They looked very fake.

DaveS on September 4, 2007 at 1:40 PM

Oh.

By: JamesLee

JamesLee — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:35:30 +0000

Even the smaller semi-arch would probably be affected by, you know, explosions weakening the structure

I can see it now— “For the first time in human history, ‘explosions’ have weakened steel!”

By: Esthier

Esthier — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:08:07 +0000

Are transmissions and transactions the same thing, or did he come topside to score?

Hening on September 4, 2007 at 3:50 PM

With the mutants?

The Monster on September 4, 2007 at 3:37 PM

I’m sure you’re right. Then again, it’s more recognizable this way.

Also, after watching it again, everything is still smoking. Is it probable that the two sides would take time before falling into each other?

By: MirCat

MirCat — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:56:29 +0000

I’m sorry, but this deserves a TV series.

- The Cat

By: Hening

Hening — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:50:44 +0000

Are transmissions and transactions the same thing, or did he come topside to score?

By: The Monster

The Monster — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:37:00 +0000

Wouldn’t that depend on how much of the arch was destroyed?

Certainly, the more that was destroyed, the further the centers of gravity would move outward, but the depiction in the clip looks like at a minimum the larger of the semi-arches should have started leaning over like the Tower of Pisa soon after the chunk got knocked out, if it hadn’t fallen over completely. Even the smaller semi-arch would probably be affected by, you know, explosions weakening the structure.

By: Weebork

Weebork — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:33:58 +0000

The arches wouldn’t fall because the builders reinforced the concrete with the bones of Irish midgets, aka. Leprechauns.

By: Esthier

Esthier — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:27:40 +0000

Take the ‘keystone’ out, and the sides of the Arch would fall against each other.

The Monster on September 4, 2007 at 3:07 PM

Wouldn’t that depend on how much of the arch was destroyed?