2e1cfd17ed52…

Treason anyone?

“It seems certain to me that bin Laden would use his trial to inspire his supporters. And as his lawyer, if you are going to represent your client, then that is the avenue you have to pursue,” Kuby adds.

Now onto the other fool

““It’s not my case. It is his. I’d really need to un­derstand everything about the social, psychological and historical context in which he grew up and acted,” Tigar says.

“Here we have a man who, from a very early age, had anger against what he regarded as the colonial oc­cupiers” of his homeland, he says. “It’s the concept of umma, the Muslim community of believers. The concept that the U.S. occupied these territories made a number of people very angry.”

Notice the ommision of the study of Laden’s religion? So now that we established Tigar is a Marxist.

Can someone say “dhimmitude”?

It’s bad enough Islamic doctrine states that Non-Muslims are living in the House of War and that the duty of all Muslims is to achieve the submission of the entire world to the House of Islam, it’s worse when we have lawyers in this country who are willing to believe the pretexts that the jihadis gin up to keep their side angry and willing to kill us.

Perhaps you ignorant lawyers should a book “The Al Qaeda Reader” which translates the thinking of Bin Laden, Zarawiri , et al into English and realize they actually believe in their religion.. not your idiotic 1968 worldview.

He may be able to misdirect under waterboarding, but I doubt he’d maintain his composure without his fingernails.

I can see one of the operatives telling him now, “In order to be a martyr, you have to actually die. Suffering while we keep you alive doesn’t count. And we are very, very good at keeping people alive.”

He is the very model of Sayet’s “Modern Liberal” who has rejected not only the principle of judgement, but any possible results of correct judegement, leading him to take the wrong side in every possible situation.

The fact that he would not defend a terrorist who wanted to help stop terror should make that crystal clear.

On Defending Bin Laden:

“But if I were requested by a defendant and felt that this was a job that I could do better than most, I would feel an ethical obligation and put aside my personal concerns and go forward.”

On Defending Bin Laden if He Turns Government Witness:

“Presumably bin Laden would be in a position to reveal information that would be vital to the dismantling of terrorism networks around the world and save tens of thousands of innocent lives…[but] As a rule I don’t represent cooperating defendants, and I’d excuse myself.”

But, but…what if the defendant “requested” that you do it and you were the best around?

I think he’s talking right out of his Craig. Don’t know his politics but he talks like a far lefty. Defend Bin Laden? Sure. Defend him if he’s willing to give info that saves thousands of innocent lives? Nope, no can do.

Everyone there would also assume that he’d actually make it to his trial

If he did that, he’d be lying out of his &ss the whole time. Any intel we get from him would be misdirection.

Read “Inside the Jihad.” Written by a Morrocan guy working for the French Secret Service. He went to Afghanistan and trained with al qaeda in their camps. Along with how to shoot guns, build bombs and fight wearing sandels, he also learned how to misdirect interrogators. Very interesting read if you want to know our enemy.

And a secret burial or cremation so his followers can’t venerate his body.

You know what the saddest thing is about this… we wouldn’t cremate him out of “sensitivity” to muslim sensibilities towards cremation.

1. “To defend bin Laden, Dershowitz says his first order of business would be explaining to his client that he is going to lose.” Don’t know why, but this just strikes me as funny.

2. “Black says he would need a team of lawyers and investigators with significant resources to travel the world for bin Laden’s defense. ‘You have to hire someone who would go up into the mountains and find wit­nesses because I would not be going.’” It’s a wise man who knows his limits.

But there is perhaps one way bin Laden might be able to save his life: Turn government witness. Kuby says it is not as far-fetched as it might seem. “One thing we’ve learned from this government is that there is no one too evil to make a deal with. There is no person whose crimes are so great that we are not willing to sit down and convince him to join Team America if we think there is a payoff.

“Presumably bin Laden would be in a position to reveal information that would be vital to the dismantling of terrorism networks around the world and save tens of thousands of innocent lives,” Kuby continues. “He is not the cook for the Taliban. Like all big crooks, he has things to deal.” That strategy also would be a deal breaker for Kuby. “As a rule I don’t represent cooperating defendants, and I’d excuse myself.”

I won’t question his patriotism.

I do, however, question his humanity.

No trial required.

And a secret burial or cremation so his followers can’t venerate his body.

Q: what is the difference between a catfish and a lawyer?

A: One is a slime sucking bottom feeder, the other is a fish.”

I wonder what color is the sky in Mr. Black’s world.

It’s green.

He doesn’t believe what he’s saying.

He’s a lawyer.

He’s spinning whatever the theoretical sucker jury would buy.

Luckily, no one who is trying to capture Osama is ever going to let this case get anywhere near a Detroit Federal Court.

Lock and load.

Nolo Contendere.

“Osama bin Laden is like the Manchurian candidate or Jason Bourne. He is a product of CIA indoctrination. They used him during the Soviet invasion of Afghan­istan. They trained him and turned him into a killer and incited the religious fervor in him to make him think that any power invading any land in the Middle East is invading the Muslims and has to be killed,”

I wonder what color is the sky is in Mr. Black’s world.

He’s dead.

Sweet dreams.