<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China defends its one-child policy: Hey &#8212; at least it cuts carbon emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:53:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ochlan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-669682</link>
		<dc:creator>Ochlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-669682</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;one percent of any group is going to be unbalanced&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yikes. To me, that reads like you managed to interview a gaggle of Chinese where only 1% was _sane_ ! That doesn&#039;t speak very well to their [absent] understanding of liberty.

Jeez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>one percent of any group is going to be unbalanced</p></blockquote>
<p>Yikes. To me, that reads like you managed to interview a gaggle of Chinese where only 1% was _sane_ ! That doesn&#8217;t speak very well to their [absent] understanding of liberty.</p>
<p>Jeez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acton Institute PowerBlog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-669571</link>
		<dc:creator>Acton Institute PowerBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-669571</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Global Warming Consensus Alert:  Silver Lining Edition...&lt;/strong&gt;

It turns out that the Chinese were really thinking ahead back in 1979 when they implemented their one child policy.  After all, imagine what their carbon emissions would be today if they hadn&#8217;t:The number of births avoided equals the entire popul...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Global Warming Consensus Alert:  Silver Lining Edition&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It turns out that the Chinese were really thinking ahead back in 1979 when they implemented their one child policy.  After all, imagine what their carbon emissions would be today if they hadn&#8217;t:The number of births avoided equals the entire popul&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BKennedy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-669526</link>
		<dc:creator>BKennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-669526</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;China’s one-child is second only to it acceptance of capitalism as why China may be a positive for the future. Have any of the opponents of China’s stopped for one second to think of the environment in China? How much environmental devastation is permissible for fetal idolatry? 

I have to talked to well over a hundred Chinese in America–where presumably they have freedom of speech–and all but one were in favor of the one-child policy. Admittedly, the one opposed was rather fervent, insanely fervent, but one percent of any group is going to be unbalanced.

thuja on August 31, 2007 at 1:17 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure. Hey, if its so great, why don&#039;t we implement it here? The feminists would love to kick those breeders where it hurts, they could even offer a spaying program for their political opposition. After all, why should anyone else have kids that will eventually vote and undermine them when big government allows them to slaughter any family who doesn&#039;t take their &quot;enlightened&quot; willfully barren path.

While we&#039;re at it, why don&#039;t we bring back Sparta&#039;s policy of throwing born children off cliffs or the Roman Policy of leaving them out in the wilderness for the wolves to eat. Those would be &quot;progressive.&quot;

But I suppose 1.3 billion people can&#039;t be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>China’s one-child is second only to it acceptance of capitalism as why China may be a positive for the future. Have any of the opponents of China’s stopped for one second to think of the environment in China? How much environmental devastation is permissible for fetal idolatry? </p>
<p>I have to talked to well over a hundred Chinese in America–where presumably they have freedom of speech–and all but one were in favor of the one-child policy. Admittedly, the one opposed was rather fervent, insanely fervent, but one percent of any group is going to be unbalanced.</p>
<p>thuja on August 31, 2007 at 1:17 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure. Hey, if its so great, why don&#8217;t we implement it here? The feminists would love to kick those breeders where it hurts, they could even offer a spaying program for their political opposition. After all, why should anyone else have kids that will eventually vote and undermine them when big government allows them to slaughter any family who doesn&#8217;t take their &#8220;enlightened&#8221; willfully barren path.</p>
<p>While we&#8217;re at it, why don&#8217;t we bring back Sparta&#8217;s policy of throwing born children off cliffs or the Roman Policy of leaving them out in the wilderness for the wolves to eat. Those would be &#8220;progressive.&#8221;</p>
<p>But I suppose 1.3 billion people can&#8217;t be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thuja</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-669415</link>
		<dc:creator>thuja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 05:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-669415</guid>
		<description>China&#039;s one-child is second only to it acceptance of capitalism as why China may be a positive for the future.  Have any of the opponents of China&#039;s stopped for one second to think of the environment in China?  How much environmental devastation is permissible for fetal idolatry?  

I have to talked to well over a hundred Chinese in America--where presumably  they have freedom of speech--and all but one were in favor of the one-child policy.  Admittedly, the one opposed was rather fervent, insanely fervent, but one percent of any group is going to be unbalanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China&#8217;s one-child is second only to it acceptance of capitalism as why China may be a positive for the future.  Have any of the opponents of China&#8217;s stopped for one second to think of the environment in China?  How much environmental devastation is permissible for fetal idolatry?  </p>
<p>I have to talked to well over a hundred Chinese in America&#8211;where presumably  they have freedom of speech&#8211;and all but one were in favor of the one-child policy.  Admittedly, the one opposed was rather fervent, insanely fervent, but one percent of any group is going to be unbalanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryoldfatman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-669238</link>
		<dc:creator>angryoldfatman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-669238</guid>
		<description>Nothing to see here people, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acton.org/article.php?article=205&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;just a big coincidental non-conspiracy thing&lt;/a&gt;, move along move along. *Waves hand*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing to see here people, <a href="http://www.acton.org/article.php?article=205" rel="nofollow">just a big coincidental non-conspiracy thing</a>, move along move along. *Waves hand*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p40tiger</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-669177</link>
		<dc:creator>p40tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-669177</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;JiangxiDad&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;amerpundit&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My nieces are from Hunan, and I have lived in China for 4 years now (2 of those in Hunan).  Congratulations both of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>JiangxiDad</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>amerpundit</p></blockquote>
<p>My nieces are from Hunan, and I have lived in China for 4 years now (2 of those in Hunan).  Congratulations both of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668985</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668985</guid>
		<description>I have long believed that the environmental movement is dominated by two groups. One is the &quot;watermelon&quot; environmentalists, Green on the outside but Red on the inside, who use environmental policies to restrict private property rights and convert the economy to socialism. I consider Al Gore and the Democrat leadership to be of this group. The others are the neo-Luddites, who always find an excuse to sue to block any project ever undertaken, regardless of its actual environmental effects or the relative effects of the alternatives. This group is noted by their insistence that our civilization must revert to primitive stone-age technology while they themselves live with the most advanced technology their upper and upper-middle class incomes and credit lines can afford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long believed that the environmental movement is dominated by two groups. One is the &#8220;watermelon&#8221; environmentalists, Green on the outside but Red on the inside, who use environmental policies to restrict private property rights and convert the economy to socialism. I consider Al Gore and the Democrat leadership to be of this group. The others are the neo-Luddites, who always find an excuse to sue to block any project ever undertaken, regardless of its actual environmental effects or the relative effects of the alternatives. This group is noted by their insistence that our civilization must revert to primitive stone-age technology while they themselves live with the most advanced technology their upper and upper-middle class incomes and credit lines can afford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668870</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668870</guid>
		<description>Most environmentalist are basically anti-human, seeing us as a stain and virus on the planet.  I&#039;m sure they loved the one-child policy even before this nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most environmentalist are basically anti-human, seeing us as a stain and virus on the planet.  I&#8217;m sure they loved the one-child policy even before this nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rode Werk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668738</link>
		<dc:creator>Rode Werk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668738</guid>
		<description>What I find contradictory is most of the Chines publicity pictures show pretty girls, yet they are slaughtering female fetus&#039; at rate that even makes the U.S. slaughter rate pale by comparison.

Well, hooray for women&#039;s liberation, or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find contradictory is most of the Chines publicity pictures show pretty girls, yet they are slaughtering female fetus&#8217; at rate that even makes the U.S. slaughter rate pale by comparison.</p>
<p>Well, hooray for women&#8217;s liberation, or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VolMagic</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668633</link>
		<dc:creator>VolMagic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668633</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;China says its one-child policy has helped the fight against global warming by &lt;strong&gt;avoiding&lt;/strong&gt; 300 million births, the equivalent of the population of the United States…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Am I the only one who thinks most of these births were not simply avoided?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>China says its one-child policy has helped the fight against global warming by <strong>avoiding</strong> 300 million births, the equivalent of the population of the United States…</p></blockquote>
<p>Am I the only one who thinks most of these births were not simply avoided?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saved</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668593</link>
		<dc:creator>saved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668593</guid>
		<description>If one child is good enough for BJ and Hill, then China should take a cue from its American comrades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one child is good enough for BJ and Hill, then China should take a cue from its American comrades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guardian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668563</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668563</guid>
		<description>&quot;parrying the thrust with an appeal to the left’s tippy-top-most social virtue.&quot;

I won&#039;t be surprised if the pro-abortion group picks up on China&#039;s logic as a way to bolster their cause.

Since the loony left is so concerned about the environment shouldn&#039;t they be concerned about the effects of all that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T_KGHubIGo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;smug&lt;/a&gt; in the air in San Francisco?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;parrying the thrust with an appeal to the left’s tippy-top-most social virtue.&#8221;</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be surprised if the pro-abortion group picks up on China&#8217;s logic as a way to bolster their cause.</p>
<p>Since the loony left is so concerned about the environment shouldn&#8217;t they be concerned about the effects of all that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T_KGHubIGo" rel="nofollow">smug</a> in the air in San Francisco?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theworldisnotenough</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668553</link>
		<dc:creator>Theworldisnotenough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668553</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder, does this verrrry compelling “population = warming” logic implicate any major U.S. policy debates? Hmmm.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was thinking abortion. Planned Parenthood is keeping our  carbon down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder, does this verrrry compelling “population = warming” logic implicate any major U.S. policy debates? Hmmm.</p></blockquote>
<p>I was thinking abortion. Planned Parenthood is keeping our  carbon down&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony737</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668552</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony737</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668552</guid>
		<description>Hey ChiComs, did ya ever stop to think that you might just be aborting the girls who were destined to be the scientists responsible for solving the global warming &quot;crisis&quot;? Nah, didn&#039;t think so.

JiangxiDad and AmeriPundit. God bless you for adopting those little girls from China, you are true lifesavers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey ChiComs, did ya ever stop to think that you might just be aborting the girls who were destined to be the scientists responsible for solving the global warming &#8220;crisis&#8221;? Nah, didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>JiangxiDad and AmeriPundit. God bless you for adopting those little girls from China, you are true lifesavers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BelchSpeak</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668549</link>
		<dc:creator>BelchSpeak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668549</guid>
		<description>I blogged &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.belch.com/blog/2007/05/03/chinese-abortions-reduce-global-warming/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one &lt;/a&gt;back in May.

At the time I said that the Chinese women have freedom of choice.  Either walk to a clinic for a forced abortion or be transported by the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blogged <a href="http://www.belch.com/blog/2007/05/03/chinese-abortions-reduce-global-warming/" rel="nofollow">this one </a>back in May.</p>
<p>At the time I said that the Chinese women have freedom of choice.  Either walk to a clinic for a forced abortion or be transported by the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabriel sutherland</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668547</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriel sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668547</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t Chinese women the ones that primarily work the textile factories?

I think China&#039;s OCPC policy has less to do with controlling population growth and more to do with creating female textile workers that never need a pre-natal break.

Exit question: Where are all those Chinese males going to go when they&#039;re looking for a bride?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t Chinese women the ones that primarily work the textile factories?</p>
<p>I think China&#8217;s OCPC policy has less to do with controlling population growth and more to do with creating female textile workers that never need a pre-natal break.</p>
<p>Exit question: Where are all those Chinese males going to go when they&#8217;re looking for a bride?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila (Pillage Idiot)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668546</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila (Pillage Idiot)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668546</guid>
		<description>I always knew it was people, not massive coal-burning pollution, that was at the root of China&#039;s contribution to GW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always knew it was people, not massive coal-burning pollution, that was at the root of China&#8217;s contribution to GW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservnut</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668541</link>
		<dc:creator>conservnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668541</guid>
		<description>AlGore to announce a plan for manditory abortions after the first child in 5...4...3...2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AlGore to announce a plan for manditory abortions after the first child in 5&#8230;4&#8230;3&#8230;2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Charles G. Waugh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668540</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Charles G. Waugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668540</guid>
		<description>Allah,

U.S. fuel efficiency policies designed to reduce American car sizes should help us reduce &quot;car born emissions&quot; also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allah,</p>
<p>U.S. fuel efficiency policies designed to reduce American car sizes should help us reduce &#8220;car born emissions&#8221; also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiangxiDad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668494</link>
		<dc:creator>JiangxiDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668494</guid>
		<description>amerpundit- nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amerpundit- nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amerpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668490</link>
		<dc:creator>amerpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668490</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Less time than that I think, and it will be a hot war. Terrorism is no threat at all compared to China.

Maxx on August 30, 2007 at 4:22 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

IMO, yes and no. The Chinese don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;want to&lt;/em&gt; die. Terrorist do. Just like with the USSR, there&#039;d be assured mutual destruction. The economies rely on each other, so it would really erase many of their gains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Less time than that I think, and it will be a hot war. Terrorism is no threat at all compared to China.</p>
<p>Maxx on August 30, 2007 at 4:22 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>IMO, yes and no. The Chinese don&#8217;t <em>want to</em> die. Terrorist do. Just like with the USSR, there&#8217;d be assured mutual destruction. The economies rely on each other, so it would really erase many of their gains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668483</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668483</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I say about 30 years until a “Cold War” with China.

Nonfactor on August 30, 2007 at 4:17 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Less time than that I think, and it will be a hot war. Terrorism is no threat at all compared to China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I say about 30 years until a “Cold War” with China.</p>
<p>Nonfactor on August 30, 2007 at 4:17 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Less time than that I think, and it will be a hot war. Terrorism is no threat at all compared to China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amerpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668481</link>
		<dc:creator>amerpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668481</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;JiangxiDad on August 30, 2007 at 4:20 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thought so. Our little one&#039;s from Hunan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>JiangxiDad on August 30, 2007 at 4:20 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Thought so. Our little one&#8217;s from Hunan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhEssYouCowboys</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668479</link>
		<dc:creator>OhEssYouCowboys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668479</guid>
		<description>OK, well, we heard it from our beloved, Chinese-Communist, trade superiors first -

exterminating your female babies is ecologically sound.

But, then again, don&#039;t drowned, female babies, in Chinese lakes and rivers, constitute their own kind of pollution? Now I&#039;m all mixed-up.

:O(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, well, we heard it from our beloved, Chinese-Communist, trade superiors first -</p>
<p>exterminating your female babies is ecologically sound.</p>
<p>But, then again, don&#8217;t drowned, female babies, in Chinese lakes and rivers, constitute their own kind of pollution? Now I&#8217;m all mixed-up.</p>
<p>:O(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiangxiDad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-668477</link>
		<dc:creator>JiangxiDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/30/china-pimps-its-one-child-policy-hey-at-least-it-cuts-carbon-emissions/#comment-668477</guid>
		<description>amerpundit -

where my kids were born.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amerpundit -</p>
<p>where my kids were born.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
