I do have to say, bottomless pit though her mind may be, I’d hit it. At least if she’d shut up.

Sorry ’bout that last comment, thought I was at Ace’s for a second. And some interface glitch is preventing me from deleting text above this, so I figure it’s fate!

SHE’S NUTS and wants attention. . . . .

Jeffersonian, if not Hegelian, if not Platonic, if not Heideggerian.

What next, Joan Rivers exposes the parallels between 2nd Bush term and second verse of “Louie, Louie“?

“…I could be called an ‘enemy combatant’…”

Nah, just a historically-ignorant goofball, fluffernutter, and flake.

I have a nit to pick, RW…check the post’s byline.

Bryan on August 24, 2007 at 5:34 PM

My bad, apologies Allah… My point stands though. Immediately upon reading BRYAN’s sentence, all I could think of was “this is exactly the type of ‘science’ evolutionists engage in all the time”.

Again, you’re of the hook here Allah… for now! I’m a dumbass.

By this time, and after hearing years of the venomous pabulum of these tiny tools, I think I’d pay to see a movie titled: “Chimpy McBushitler” that was a lampooning of the Nazi fantasies of the extreme Left.

Just have a Curious George-ish uber-fascist monkey doing all the things these doofuses claim are happening (secret wiretaps of “progessive” people in a small town in New Hampshire to find out their choice of withdrawn library books; a planned extra large detention cage at Gitmo for Michael Moore; fugu-poisoned cocaine for Sean Penn; ad absur-dumb).

Just fulfill their paranoia in ani- or clay-mation, and show the calamitous goofiness of it all.

A cross between “MAUS” and “101 Dalamations” (with the film’s ‘swastikas’ pointed in the wrong direction, since these hysterical clowns likely don’t know all that the symbol means, or how it was oriented, or why).

Naomi is probably trying to fight her way out a wet paperbag, somewhere, as I type.

I guess she’s just so much smarter than me.

Laughably silly and out of touch with reality.

RightWinged on August 24, 2007 at 4:09 PM

I have a nit to pick, RW…check the post’s byline.

Darn it!….I knew that receipt for the Silent Hunter III U-boat game would give me away. I wonder, how is Argentina this time of year?

You know that SH4 is out? But then you are an American sub killing Japs. And by JAP, I don’t mean the likes of Naomi Wolf.

Every time some leftist nutjob derides anything good as being Nazi-like in some way, I begin to question why we even bothered to fight WWII and start wondering if, like Patton suggested in the dying days of the European conflict, we were fighting the wrong enemy.

I’m not saying it’s not possible to see Jesus, but given how Wolf feels about religion in general, I’m thinking she would have just slapped him.

hmm…maybe that’s why she can’t talk about it.

You know the funny thing is as much as the Left likes to use the “Nazi” label to hang on Conservatives/Republicans..is today if Nazi Germany rose to power the Left and MSM would oppose any steps by the US against it…and would even whitewash the anti-antisemitism of the Nazi’s and other “bad” quality’s and try to sell how much better they are than us..of course…the Hollywood left would embrace Hitler..Michael Moore would make a movie showing how much better life is under Nazi’s..Chrissy Matthews and KO would do news shows and “Special Comments’ attacking any talk of trying to stop the spread of Nazism….pretty much replace the word Terrorist with Nazi and you’ll have what the typical Liberal reaction would be.

Like too many liberals, Wolf starts with a premise — Republicans are evil and George W. Bush is more evil than most Republicans — and works backward from that conclusion to find or manufacture evidence to support it. It’s not science, but it is political science.

o/t, but that sounds a lot like how evolutionists roll to me.

Spurius Ligustinus on August 24, 2007 at 3:56 PM

Depends on who wins probably, but I’m sure Wolf will say something along the lines of “Look at ME! I helped save America!”

Good post Bryan. How anyone takes Naomi Wolf seriously is beyond me. She has always impressed (depressed) me as one of these nitwit graduate student types, who spends an inordinate amount of time and energy applying a form of criticism to a masterpiece of litierature, which is utterly inappropriate. She is pleased to dispose of what is great as she is so small.

mcgilvra on August 24, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Perfectly put mcgilvra and bonus points for elegance!

Step out of the car please miss.

*readies baton*

BohicaTwentyTwo on August 24, 2007 at 3:50 PM

You will respect my authoritay!

*batters knees with baton*

(Now I know what I’m watchin’ this weekend…)

PMS/NBC must a a list of nuts to interview when they can’t adequately fill-in their line-up. Naomi is on the top ten for sure.

What Wolf and the Loose Change guys have in common, I believe, is narcissism. Neither can face the 21st Century reality of global jihad and terrorism, so both rewrite the story to cast themselves as heroes.

True to a certain extent; malignant narcissism (as opposed to its milder form or just ordinary narcissism) is in play here, but the mental disorder is more properly described as displacement: the inability to cope with what one really fears, and the transference of the related hate response onto something/someone less threatening.

For all her “Bush-as-Hitler” claptrap, Wolfe knows full well that her door isn’t going to get kicked in by a pair of jackboots for saying it. Which is precisely why she feels safe in comparing Repubicans to Nazis.

I really wonder what she and her ilk are going to do when BusHitler steps down from office right on time in January, 2009? Say its all a trick? Or just pretend that all their hysterical, chicken-little prognostications never happened?