the rest of the country could be a microcosm for the rest of the country if the illegals here now are not deported.

*Southern California could be a microcosm…

Yesterday, I sat next to an airline pilot from southern California who was born and raised here. He was appalled by how bad its gotten, how expensive it is to raise kids here, and how he has to pay for his own demographic displacement through taxes.

We sit here and talk about enforcing the borders, but demographically, the horse is already out of the barn. It’s really too late. Perhaps the US will become ethnically partitioned, as Peter Brimelow says. But I think many in the middle class will start looking at emigration, just as many of the native Britons are doing.

Numenorean – I’ve not been to Mexico for several years, refuse to buy anything labeled “made in Mexico” including Hershey’s chocolate. Taking it further, I don’t plan on vacationing in any U.S. city that has declared itself a sanctuary city either.

Furthermore, I would like to humbly request that our esteemed Congress deny further financial aid of any kind to the sovereign nation of Mexico without the express consent of their American constituents. As a legal citizen and registered voter, I would prefer that our money go to paying off the national debt, promoting rational thought through education, and national security. (Unless they wish to make the reconquistas claim true by annexing Mexico against their will — since we are taking care of them all already I doubt it will make much difference.)

I would also like to propose that instead of a fence that we grab our shovels and extend the Rio Grande from the Gulf to the Pacific. We could make piranhas and passing sharks honorary border patrol agents. If we make it wide enough, we could actually make a profit off of it as a shipping channel. It would pay for itself…

Think twice before you plan your next vacation to Cancun/Cozumel or any cruise ship that takes you to Mexico, folks. Let’s spend our money on non-whiny countries.

“We cannot remain quiet in view of this injustice and must ask for firm action from our authorities,” Mexican Sen. Humberto Zazue said.

Hey we’ll trade ya…

Give our border agents the trigger happy, shoot’in from-the-hip

guns that your Border agents have and we’ll be glad

to take care of any problems you send our way.

Maybe Al Gore can figure out how to move it further away from the USA? He’s a genius ya’ know.

Anglophobia!

Thomas the Wraith on August 23, 2007 at 4:53 PM

It’s all our fault, of course

All it would take to bring that pathetic sh*thole to a grinding halt would be to stop private financial transfers from being wired there. How much fun would that be?

Then we would see some action in the sombrero senate.

Hey, but there’s Good News: even if we made Mexico the 51st state, New Orleans and Chicago would remain the 1st and 2nd most corrupt cities in America. All of Mexico would tie for 3rd…

Hmmmm….

“We cannot remain quiet in view of this injustice and must ask for firm action from our authorities,” Mexican Sen. Humberto Zazue said.

Oh, yeah, Senior Senator?

Why is it an injustice when America enforces her laws, especially border security and immigration laws? Perhaps we should do what you guys do on Mexican’s southern border…shoot those who cross the border because they do not look like Americans just like you guys shoot Guatamalans and anyone else who does not look like Mexicans.

I think the real crime is that the Mexican govt appears to do nothing to improve conditions in Mexico fo that their citizens want to stay in Mexico.

I wonder if they would protest if we made Mexico our 51st state in order to control our border:)I know it would never happen but it would be funny if a diplomat said that to the Mexican government.

jaybird on August 23, 2007 at 8:35 PM

I know you are only joking… :-)

But if Mexico, a Third World country with an entrenched oligopoly of corruption and theft and socialism, ever became the 51st state, then that would logically mean it would produce 2 more liberal Democrat Senators.

And the Senate confirms judicial appointments to the Supreme Court.

When an anti-amnesty person brings up a fact, the pro-amnesty start talking about abstractions like “civil rights”, and include abstract phrases like “Doing the jobs Americans won’t do” or “No human being is illegal.” When a rebuttal point is brought up by anti-amnesty people, the pro changes the subject and immediately begins an emotional attack, usually at their opponent.

The same thing happened in the Senate with the Shamnesty bill. The proponents of the bill all talked about ideas, while were easily refutable, they, Grahamnesty, Lott, Feinstein, McCain, et al, refused to respond to any refuation. End result? Complete defeat for the immigration bill.

All of these pro-illegal types will remain in the abstract and thus, will ultimately lose out in the end. So when up against these types, remember to stay in the real, with facts and don’t let them distract you with abstractions!

Remember the Alamo!

Is it because Mexico gets more of an economic boost from those who illegally work in the U.S. sending their proceeds back to relatives in Mexico?

Yeah, pretty much.

crazy_legs on August 23, 2007 at 5:02 PM

It is Economics 101. Mexico receives tens of billions of dollars in revenue from illegal aliens living in the USA with no expenses.

When a Mexican illegal alien goes to the Emergency Room for out-patient health care, the hospital billing department does not generate a bill to Mexico City.

The economic reality is that illegal immigration is a lucrative windfall for the Mexican government: tens and tens of Billions of incoming revenue, and not a single expense.

She wants the Mexican government to protect Mexicans who illegally move to the US and commit Social Security fraud. —Bryan of Hot Air……