Cool……

Hello I\’m Zeke first time by and thought I would drop a line and say hey, and cool blog….

This gives you the full experience of the sound, perfectly balanced for your listening enjoyment….

A cable descrambler may cost between 55 dollars and 450 dollars, depending on its quality feature and amount of ‘service’ provided….

Those suppliers of wedding invitations keep up with the times, and these companies often provide a wide selection of wedding invitation wording for their products….

I saw this domain for sale, according to the appraisals, its worth over $5000.00 usd. It has just the perfect amount of keywords….

pedestrian on August 20, 2007 at 12:58 PM

No doubt, Fred may be a shoe-in for the nomination.

http://pajamasmedia.com/2007/08/the_manolo_the_gucci_shoes_of.php

The former Massachusetts governor is at 14%, behind Rudy Giuliani (32%) and Fred Thompson (19%).

You just don’t get it. I know there are taxes (as stated in the law review), but they are hiding…oh never mind.

You are the only one on this blog who does not understand. You just can’t read and understand. Are you employed? Honestly, do you have a job where you have to read and understand and make decisions?

Read my quotes, and you should begin to understand the basic principles of taxes and fees.

Where did I mention income fees or sales fees? I am dead serious when I ask this question…do you read or skim what people write?
I know you have a hard time understanding Professor Blather and RushBaby (they are a notch above me also), so I have tried to “tone” it down for you. But I just can’t make it any more simple. I run out of mono syllable words.

Here I will try this:
There are fees and taxes. Fees are being used to replace some taxes because so people who are elected polititions people who work for the government city and bigger, do not have to impose give us a tax. We must pay income taxes and sales tax, and other tax, but those people who work for city also want us to pay more. They give us fees to pay so they do not have to say the word tax. Tax is a bad word, a no no. Fees are a good word. Can you say tax is bad, fees are good? Good for you, you are a good fiscal (fiz-col) liberal (lib-a-role).
Now go back to the sand box.

right2bright on August 20, 2007 at 10:21 AM

Bwahahahahahaa!!!!

I look forward to paying my federal income fees next year. Today, I will buy some furniture and I will pay a 6% sales fee.

LOL!

Mitt! is ahead in Nevada!

Mitt! builds his front runner image!

It’s over? Time for you to try a different tack. AGAIN.

Listen carefully, all polititions place fees on certain things because they do not want to be known as “taxers” (that is so supporters can say “my man didn’t raise taxes”). The laws have been changed to allow fees, in place of taxes, in the public arena. That is to by-pass the word tax. A committee can pass fees, but can’t impose taxes. Therefore, a politico can point to a committee and say, “The insurance commission raised the fee, I didn’t raise the tax”.
Read your history, and read some econ books and you would never ever argue this one point. It is so basic it is embarrassing to state the obvious.
Now you know, and can pass on correct information. It is not my “thinking”. Here is a brief description.

If citizens can opt to not pay the fee, and forgo the service provided for that fee as a result, it would appear to be a genuine fee. A fee is charged for a privilege that you can start or stop at will, whereas a tax is a contribution for the support of a government required from those who live within the jurisdiction of that government.

So, can you drive a car in most states without a “smog fee”? No, so it is a tax, EPA is now trying to impose a “storm water run off fee” for any city over 50,000. If you now live in any city over 50,000, to get away from this “fee”, you have may have to move.
Fees on gasoline, can you drive a car, can you realistically live in the U.S. without an auto? Then you must pay a “fee”, it is a tax.

EMERSON COLLEGE v. CITY OF BOSTON et al.
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.
Argued Nov. 8, 1983 – Decided March 14, 1984
Fees imposed by a governmental entity tend to fall into one of two principal categories: user fees, based on the rights of the entity as proprietor of the instrumentalities used, or regulatory fees (including licensing and inspection fees), founded on the police power to regulate particular
businesses or activities… Such fees share common traits that distinguish them from taxes: they are charged in exchange for a particular governmental service which benefits the party paying the fee in a manner “not shared by other members of society”; they are paid by choice, in that the party paying the fee has the option of not partilizing the governmental service and thereby avoiding the charge, and the charges are collected not to raise revenues but to compensate the governmental entity providing the services for its expenses. Fees are legitimate to the extent that the ervices for which they are imposed are sufficiently particularized as to justify distribution of the costs among a limited group (the “users,” or beneficiaries, of the services), rather than the general public….

So real estate fees are not taxes, but to own or buy real estate (which is the object of the great majority) you must pay a “fee”. Liberals call them fees, conservatives call them for what they are…taxes.
BTW, fees are not used in computing tax impact, how convienient for states like Calif, New York, Mass., Florida, who have a massive “fee structure” that if re-defined would make their taxes even more preposterous.

End of class: Fees and Taxes 101

You can spin away

Numbers are numbers and facts are facts Romney transferred a collective burden a sales tax collected by all parties who do business with the states to the middle class increasing their burdens

You can scream fred this and Fred that

Romneys a rich kid – he’s already being labeled by RealClearPolitics and the WSJ as the trust fund candidate

Its over CS

Till he runs against Teddy Baby

Love fred?, love his lies and fakeries.

Also, ANY rep candidate is better than freddie boy. When we have to make a choice between someone who raises taxes and cuts spending and a moron like fred? who says this: “We are going to be getting in if we get in”……it’s a no brainer, the tax and cut spending candidate with lots of executive experience is 100% better than that lying fake.

Fees are not taxes.

Anyone who believes this, is not a fiscal conservative…and is very naive, and not very, well how can I put it nicely, astute.

The libs (and greedy weak conservatives) have been doing this for years, and pulling the wool of naive voters eyes. It is a “smog fee”, not a tax…you have to spend $50 a year forever, but it is not a tax it is a fee.

Nobody, is that stupid to believe that “fees are not taxes”. They use that to get around some states that have to have a super majority to impose taxes, or that they have propostions limiting taxes, or they are too afraid to face the voters so they creat this “fee” lie.

“Fees are not Taxes”, hey I have part ownership in a bridge to sell you. Or send me some money and I will release my uncles inheritance to you, it is worth over $3 mil.

How can you laugh out loud on this blog, at such an insane comment, fees are not taxes, that is funnnnny!

Learn a little history, then take a course in economics. This defense of Mitt is getting more stupid everyday.

“I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.”