I make no distinction between nationally elected Democrats to the degree that they advocate and support evil, like partial birth abortion.

I despise them whether they are a Senator or a baker.

Christoph on August 18, 2007 at 3:15 AM

Abosolutely! I hear the same party BS from both. And neither can have a discussion of ideas without getting emotional and/or resorting to name calling.

I prefer “weasels”
profitsbeard on August 18, 2007 at 9:58 PM

Interesting that you should mention weasels. A couple of years ago I saw a taxidermy weasel *shudder*… those things are not comedic in the least. Raccoons are vicious enough around here – I can’t imagine confronting a live weasel.

Rove was a political Machiavellian par excellence. The good ones always are. (It isn’t badmitton, it’s a life and death struggle.) Rove was and is despised by the partisan irrationalists for the same reason that Chimpy McBushitlerburton is: the militant opposition cannot criticise coherently, so they go for the weakest, knee-jerkiest demonizing. And revel in juvenile gushings of spastic, sadistic incontinence.

(Curiously, for a group who are always self-declaring how much they are “utterly against torture”, their febrile fanatsies about how they would love to physically torment Bush, Cheney, Rove, et al, reveal the underlying unreconstructed hypocrisy of their “principled” stance.)

Mason is usually sharper, and more flamboyant. Open the vents on that semantic shotgun a little more, Jackie! The varmints deserve greater flair and flash.

(Stylistically, I prefer “weasels” to “pigs” for a coda, since it has a more comedic heritage, from Stewart Chaplin’s “weasel words” to “Pops Goes the…” by the 3 Stooges, and because Carville certainly looks more ferret-y than porcine.)

Rushbaby=PNG on Hot Air.

I despise them whether they are a Senator or a baker.

And the disconnect between personal feelings people have about life, and what they feel overall about the nation are consistently revealed in polls.

RightWinged on August 17, 2007 at 10:40 PM

To clarify, this section and what followed in my rant were to illustrate the difference between “Democrats” (the regular citizens) and “Democrats” the nationally elected politicans. As I said, Mason was talking about elected Democrats, not Democrat citizens. This was all part of my reaction to Sandman stating that we’re attacking soldiers and firefighters, etc. when we attack Democrats. The problem is our friends and family and neighbor Democrats are simply in the dark about what their party is really all about, as explained here:

There’s a difference in people who vote Democrat, and the politicians that run the party, who have been kept in the dark by the MSM. Pelosi – hangs out with enemy leaders against the wishes of the Prez (don’t bring up “some Republicans did it to”, because they weren’t prancing around and they were attacked in Syrian media, Ms. Botox was used as propaganda). Reid – “The war is lost” while troops are in harms way, etc. etc. Kerry – Troops are terrorizing women and children, and are stuck in Iraq because they didn’t study hard, for the funds before against it. Murtha – Do I really have to say anything? Durbin – Gitmo troops are like Nazis. House Whip Clyburn – It would be bad for us (Democrats) if there is progress in Iraq. Howard Dean – Well, I won’t touch that, I don’t have the time… Well just a couple “I hate Republicans”, idea that Bush knew about 9/11 beforehand “most interesting theory” he’s heard. Do I really need to go on?

and here:

These people are evil SOBs. They want troop deaths and innocent people in Iraq killed because that means they have a better chance of winning elections. They run on nothing but empty promises of “health care” and “hope”, but as always they only seek to win by default, with help from a dishonest media swaying public opinion. The Democrats need and hope for all things negative to happen to our country, because the only thing they actually run on is “change”. Well if things go well, “change” doesn’t fly does it? So they want things to go badly.

I just realize that I didn’t tie that other part back to it when I initially posted and some may not have understand the seemingly unrelated bit.

I dunno. Which group supports hiring doctors to insert needles into their full-term babies’ brains again?

Christoph on August 17, 2007 at 6:42 PM

Actually, it’s an interesting point in the “who’s worse” debate, because abortion kills 1.3 million/year in the United States alone, and almost all of them are for nothing more than after the fact birth control. (I can pull the stats if someone needs the proof, but it’s something like 94%+ that amount to birth control. Reasons given are “don’t want any more children” “aren’t ready for kids”, etc.)

Every time you haters compare Democrats to jihadists, and worse, call them worse than terrorists, realize that you’re talking about; your neighbor, your child’s doctor, soldiers, firefighters, police officers, teachers, co-workers, family members, and many other good people.

sandman on August 17, 2007 at 6:40 PM

There’s a difference in people who vote Democrat, and the politicians that run the party, who have been kept in the dark by the MSM. Pelosi – hangs out with enemy leaders against the wishes of the Prez (don’t bring up “some Republicans did it to”, because they weren’t prancing around and they were attacked in Syrian media, Ms. Botox was used as propaganda). Reid – “The war is lost” while troops are in harms way, etc. etc. Kerry – Troops are terrorizing women and children, and are stuck in Iraq because they didn’t study hard, for the funds before against it. Murtha – Do I really have to say anything? Durbin – Gitmo troops are like Nazis. House Whip Clyburn – It would be bad for us (Democrats) if there is progress in Iraq. Howard Dean – Well, I won’t touch that, I don’t have the time… Well just a couple “I hate Republicans”, idea that Bush knew about 9/11 beforehand “most interesting theory” he’s heard. Do I really need to go on?

Anyway, as I explained here:

RightWinged on August 17, 2007 at 4:01 PM

Mason was using hyperbole, but one can make a case that these people are enabling terrorism so they’re just as bad. They argued that Saddam had WMDs right up until the war began, and flipped a few months in when the election cycle began. Edwards supported the war and Bush’s actions at the UN leading up to the war through the Dem primaries… of course he’s not held accountable, but then again, it’s seeming lately as if his entire existence is based on being the biggest hypocrite possible. Attacking anything and everything he can think of, only to be exposed by conservatives for doing those exact things and making piles of money doing it (i.e. News Corp, “predatory lending”)

These people are evil SOBs. They want troop deaths and innocent people in Iraq killed because that means they have a better chance of winning elections. They run on nothing but empty promises of “health care” and “hope”, but as always they only seek to win by default, with help from a dishonest media swaying public opinion. The Democrats need and hope for all things negative to happen to our country, because the only thing they actually run on is “change”. Well if things go well, “change” doesn’t fly does it? So they want things to go badly.

And the disconnect between personal feelings people have about life, and what they feel overall about the nation are consistently revealed in polls. Particularly with the economy, we consistently see a vast majority of people happy with their own financial situation, while a vast majority is negative about the economy. Well, shouldn’t they be happy about the economy if they’re happy about their own finances? No, because the media bashes the economy and the folks aren’t all economists, so they take the tone of what they’re hearing in the media and it translates in to their opinion. A poll just came out the other day showing that 94% of the country are somewhat-very satisfied with their lives. Yeah, a record 94%!. But they’re down on the direction of the country, etc. So let’s see, your satisfaction with your lives’ has gone up to record levels since Bush took office.. but things are going badly? Again, media driven public opinion.

Yes Allahpundit. Not even jihadists. Because unlike liberal Democrats, Jihadists do not demand the protection of the American military and simultaneously do everything in their power to destroy it. A jihadists never held the highest office in the land least of all disrespected and degraded it as the current Democrat Queen and King Hilary and Bill Clinton.
But yet, Liberal Democrats nation wide, so love Bill and Hilary that they are willing to empty out their piggy banks (see their fund raising) to get them back in the White House.

I could go on with Hollywood and the MSMS plus etc.etc.etc…but I suspect you already know all that.

Liberals know what they want and they are intent on getting what they want. Isn’t time Conservatives start doing the same?

If you still need concrete proof of what happens to Conservatives who take liberals to lightly look no further than Canada, where the so-called Conservative Party are now debating with the Green Party as to who is more green.

So Jackie Mason’s little rant is tame compared to what I believe should be unleashed on the Democrats.

But then again I suspect you already know all that.

Your strolling in and calling us all haters doesn’t help the dialogue much either. Actually I don’t hate them, not even the jihadist, but I do hate what they stand for, which is a culture of death.

Your strolling in and calling us all haters doesn’t help the dialogue much either. Actually I don’t hate them, not even the jihadist, but I do hate what they stand for, which is a culture of death. Do you want to defend Democrats from a culture of death when abortion has probably killed more innocent children than all the jihadist bombs combined ? And Democrats stand for communism and socialism which killed 25 million in Russia during the Bolshevik and Stalinist eras, perhaps 65 million in China under the eyes of Mao Zedong, 2 million in Cambodia, millions more Africa, Eastern Europe, and Latin America. The ideas of the jihadi fascist and Marxist Democrats are very worthy of hate.

Maxx on August 17, 2007 at 8:29 PM

Indeed.

And a baby’s sucked out bloody brains with dismembered and now chemically poisoned corpse is easily recognized fruit.

I dunno. Which group supports hiring doctors to insert needles into their full-term babies’ brains again?

Every time you haters compare Democrats to jihadists, and worse, call them worse than terrorists, realize that you’re talking about; your neighbor, your child’s doctor, soldiers, firefighters, police officers, teachers, co-workers, family members, and many other good people.

To the extent that a limited number of them support evil practices equally matching that of committing suicide/homicide against your enemies and their population in war, to wit hiring “doctors” to kill your own — or allowing others to kill their — fully developed children, I am in fact talking about my neighbor, my child’s doctor, soldiers, firefighters, police officers, teachers, co-workers, family members, and many other good people.

Every time you haters compare Democrats to jihadists, and worse, call them worse than terrorists, realize that you’re talking about; your neighbor, your child’s doctor, soldiers, firefighters, police officers, teachers, co-workers, family members, and many other good people.

I’m still trying to figure out why someone who considers themselves a Democrat are all terrorists or terrorist enablers. That’s a lot of homegrown terrorists. Thank God for the Republican party, which protects our country from all of those evil, Democratic monsters, just waiting for the opportunity to bomb their own neighborhoods.

I understand that the political environment is divisive, but this rhetoric only turns us against one another, and gives the true terrorists a victory. Each side is guilty.

Dialogue and debate is great, but this rhetoric gets us nowhere.

sandman on August 17, 2007 at 6:40 PM

Your strolling in and calling us all haters doesn’t help the dialogue much either. Actually I don’t hate them, not even the jihadist, but I do hate what they stand for, which is a culture of death. Do you want to defend Democrats from a culture of death when abortion has probably killed more innocent children than all the jihadist bombs combined ? And Democrats stand for communism and socialism which killed 25 million in Russia during the Bolshevik and Stalinist eras, perhaps 65 million in China under the eyes of Mao Zedong, 2 million in Cambodia, millions more Africa, Eastern Europe, and Latin America. The ideas of the jihadi fascist and Marxist Democrats are very worthy of hate.

There’s nobody lower than the Democrats? Not even jihadists, huh?

Allahpundit on August 17, 2007 at 2:35 PM

I dunno. Which group supports hiring doctors to insert needles into their full-term babies’ brains again?

 
[Understand I'm not referring to all Democrats, but to those who would do or support the above.]

I’m still trying to figure out why someone who considers themselves a Democrat are all terrorists or terrorist enablers. That’s a lot of homegrown terrorists. Thank God for the Republican party, which protects our country from all of those evil, Democratic monsters, just waiting for the opportunity to bomb their own neighborhoods.

I understand that the political environment is divisive, but this rhetoric only turns us against one another, and gives the true terrorists a victory. Each side is guilty.

Dialogue and debate is great, but this rhetoric gets us nowhere.