Shock: Major attacks decline by 50% in Iraq
posted at 10:12 am on August 13, 2007 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | regular view
Says the USA Today:
The number of truck bombs and other large al-Qaeda-style attacks in Iraq have declined nearly 50% since the United States started increasing troop levels in Iraq about six months ago, according to the U.S. military command in Iraq.
The high-profile attacks — generally large bombs hitting markets, mosques or other “soft” targets that produce mass casualties — have dropped to about 70 in July from a high during the past year of about 130 in March, according to the Multi-National Force — Iraq.
Why? The surge and the awakening.
Al-Qaeda militants generally attempt large, headline-grabbing incidents aimed at symbolic targets or mass casualties. Al-Qaeda in Iraq, for example, claimed responsibility for the April suicide bomb attack on parliament.
Successes against al-Qaeda have also been helped by shifting Sunni public opinion and a growing number of insurgent defections, the military says.
“Tribes and people are starting to stand up and fight back,” said Brig. Gen. Mick Bednarek, deputy commander of the U.S. division north of Baghdad. “They are turning against al-Qaeda.”
This is great news, no doubt. 70 attacks in a month still means that there are more than 2 bombings per day somewhere in Iraq, but the trend line is going in the right direction. Ironically, it’s just as the surge and the awakening are starting to pay off that the Iraqi government seems to be in a freefall and the British seem to be bugging out and slipping in a shiv as they exit. Public opinion on the war in the US is ticking up, reflecting the trend in news from Iraq, but across the pond the Beeb is fantasizing about putting Tony Blair on trial for his role in the Iraq war.
We’re in a race against time now: Can US public opinion hold out, can the Iraqi people maintain their indigenous fight against al Qaeda, and can that create enough unity to make the political situation in Baghdad improve, or will the Democrats and the insurgents hold out long enough for Basra to collapse and anti-war pressure bubble up enough to force our hand?
Photo of US and Iraqi troops in Baquba, Iraq from DVIDS
Update (AP): From Michael Yon’s latest:
Large numbers of Iraqis detested us after the prisoner abuse stories, and some over-the-top attacks on Fallujah, for example. But through time, somehow the American military has managed to establish a moral authority in Iraq. It’s not the only authority, but the military has serious and increasing moral clout. In the beginning, our influence flowed from guns, or dropped from the wings of jets. Later it was the money. Today, the clout still is partially from the gun, and definitely the money is key, but there is an intangible and growing moral clout and it flows from an increasing respect among Iraqis for our military. Washington has no moral clout in Iraq. Washington looks like a circus act. The authority is coming from our military. The importance of this fact would be difficult to understate.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Pull out now, before we win!
-This message brought to you by the Democratic National Committee
TheBigOldDog on August 13, 2007 at 10:18 AM
Wait a sec, fighting a war like it’s an actual war is working? Perish the thought.
Mazel tov to the troops. Keep up the stellar work! (for as long as you can)
mjk on August 13, 2007 at 10:28 AM
That is the absolute definitive statement for this thread.
Well said!
TheSitRep on August 13, 2007 at 10:28 AM
I get the feeling that the Iraqi government is watching us watching them watching us watching them….
A collapse of the current government may be just what the doctor ordered. Maliki doesn’t seem to be willing and able to get it done. This is as good a time as any to change course.
Pablo on August 13, 2007 at 10:29 AM
Nice trend, similar to that of the Tet Offensive.
It’s a bit premature to say anything we’re doing is an actual “success”. If it lasts for the next few months, then maybe it’s all good. But what does it matter? The Iraqi’s don’t even want us there and they’d rather take a vacation than get their act together, Syria and Iran will never stop meddling and providing aid and comfort for the enemy, the different factions and tribes will never ever stop fighting like the blood-thirsty barbarians they are…
Bring all our men and women home now!
SilverStar830 on August 13, 2007 at 10:30 AM
It was Karl Rove all the time.
TheSitRep on August 13, 2007 at 10:31 AM
Clearly, this is great news…unless you are the MSM in which case this is no news at all, nothing to see here, move along, move along…
Not to take anything away from Gen. Patraeus and the excellent counterinsurgency he is running, but does anyone think AQ in Iraq might be building up for a big splash, ala Tet in 1968? Especially with what seems to be going on the AQ camps in Pakistan emptying out…
I know that Tet broke the back of the Viet Cong but it was a victory for the North Vietnamese given the MSM coverage…
Leonidas Hoplite on August 13, 2007 at 10:32 AM
I was thinking that too. Maybe the camps are emptying out, not to go after western targets, but for a large push into Iraq.
BadgerHawk on August 13, 2007 at 10:37 AM
Now we need to sack the current Iraqi government, draw up their Constitution filled with HUMAN RIGHTS for them and call for new elections to be held within 2 months to establish new lawmakers to address the specific needs and laws of the country OUTSIDE OF human rights.
Constitution that we draft for them says:
#1 – All people (men and women) are equal under the law.
#2 – Religion is private and should not be part of law (therefore all religions – especially minorities – are protected under the law).
From there the elected government can begin to draft localized laws about distribution of oil funds and government projects.
Just because we did it wrong the first time doesn’t mean we can’t fix it now. Go AMERICA! Good luck Iraq.
ThackerAgency on August 13, 2007 at 10:41 AM
It’s a Liberal fallacy that all good flows from the top down – from a Central Government to the people.
They focus on the Central Government’s lack of accomplishments as if it determines the overall outcome for Iraq. That’s dead wrong.
Peace and prosperity flows from the bottom up – from the people up. Liberals still haven’t learned that important lesson. The are always looking to big central government as the answer.
TheBigOldDog on August 13, 2007 at 10:43 AM
This might seem contradictory, but the implication is that you can’t make a law that punishes people if they choose to change their religion as sharia law does.
ThackerAgency on August 13, 2007 at 10:44 AM
We can has hearts and minds?
frankj on August 13, 2007 at 10:49 AM
This is great news. Whatever happened to the piglet, Muqtada al-Sadr?
moonsbreath on August 13, 2007 at 11:06 AM
Ha, that’s great.
I am the DNC and I approve of this message.
right2bright on August 13, 2007 at 11:19 AM
Milestones crafted by Americans will be used next month to measure the political progress of a nation with no history of the rule of law. In the U.S.A. whoever wins the election next year will be POTUS, even Hillary. There will be no bombs in malls or beheadings of political enemies. Iraq has no such history of just going along with the voting majority.
To meet a deadline imposed by the U.S. the majority could just vote in a law, any law the majority wants. That will not bring peace and reconciliation. Reconciliation in Iraq requires more than a 51% vote.
The top-down milestones for Iraqi political progress were developed to measure progress on the Bremer, Rumsfeld plan. We are about to use those top-down milestones to measure the botton-up plan of General Petraeus. Bad idea.
I see political progress in every Michael Yon post. But it’s all at the grassroots level. I know its way late in the process, but the new plan needs new measurement.
TunaTalon on August 13, 2007 at 11:25 AM
I honestly believe that liberals want hundreds of thousands of Americans sent home in body bags. Because if America suffers horribly, we would never go to war again. And the entire world would be a happy place with sing-a-longs.
It’s kind of scary to think that dropping a few nukes is probably the best way to fight the next war. You don’t have to deploy thousands of troops. There’s no billions invested in reconstruction for people whose religion pretty much says we’re infidels and should be killed anyway. You drop the nukes and there is no further fighting and the liberals can only b!tch about nuclear fallout. We say we’re sorry and say that they started it. The enemy knows we mean business.
I think the West is amazing in trying to bring civilization to Afghanistan and Iraq. The cost in lives, and billions of dollars is staggering. Especially when WE WERE THE ONES ATTACKED!!
Considering the anti-war group in the west, in the future, dropping nukes is probably the best way to go. You’ve destroyed the enemy and just have to say sorry. The war is over, you don’t have to go through all of the current crap we’re seeing as the left tries to sabotage the war effort. You just tell the liberals we understand that they are uncomfortable with long wars. Billions of dollars are saved. Not very unattractive.
We live in interesting times.
Canadian Infidel on August 13, 2007 at 11:41 AM
mjk on August 13, 2007 at 10:28 AM
Yes, amazing isn’t it? You take risks increase your exposure show the civilians you are willing to protect them and you hunt and kill the bad guys for them and all of a sudden the people start to respect you and your sacrifice. Our Army is the greatest its our political leaders in congress/white house that have failed us for the last 60 years. I can count the great leaders of our country over the last 60 years on one finger. It is shameful.
unseen on August 13, 2007 at 11:42 AM
Which is the beauty of Parliamentary style government. When it’s failing to do what the people put it in place to do, it’s much easier to replace.
In Iraq, it needs to do just one thing, and it needs to do it soon. It needs to reach a political agreement between the various factions that will allow the country as a whole to move forward. It needs to create the political framework that will enable the security and economic stability that will allow the market to do what it does and encourage the people to act in their own interests. It needs to remove chaos from Iraqi society.
If this one can’t do it, then it’s time for another one.
Pablo on August 13, 2007 at 11:44 AM
SilverStar, but this time we have alternative sources of news to tell us the truth, unlike during Tet when the mono-Enemedia lied to us and said we were losing.
Go Troops! Kick ass!
Tony737 on August 13, 2007 at 11:44 AM
It would be an interesting exercise, and possibly an excellent talking point come September to compare the volume of legislative achievement by Iraq’s government versus our own.
Pablo on August 13, 2007 at 11:47 AM
An attitude like that is precisely the type that will lose every time.
The Tet Offensive was in reality a huge failure for North Vietnam. The MSM spun it in to a huge victory for them. Same way they are trying to do it with Iraq now. The only difference is we now have the embedded bloggers like Yon to bring us the truth.
Kowboy on August 13, 2007 at 11:54 AM
Wow, SilverStar. I never thought I’d hear you say that. You want us to give up and lose just when it looks like we just might win?
pullingmyhairout on August 13, 2007 at 11:55 AM
It has been easier to get some sleep in my part of Baghdad lately. Our men and women get a hearty round of applause from us working on this power plant. And, for those interested, our unit came back on line last week. Although we’ve had a few shutdowns and it has not been continuous power, we quickly get it back up in short order.
Just doing a small part to bring peace in Doura.
Texas Nick 77 on August 13, 2007 at 12:26 PM
Talk about anal retentive! Me thinks their whities are too tighties.
dm60462 on August 13, 2007 at 12:41 PM
Great news! I hope the trend continues!
However, don’t tell the cut and run crowd. They don’t like news like this….. but don’t question their patriotism.
Yakko77 on August 13, 2007 at 1:11 PM
Not to be negative, but the thought also occurs to me.
Spirit of 1776 on August 13, 2007 at 1:25 PM
“To say there has been no political progress in Iraq in 2007 is patently absurd, completely wrong and dangerously dismissive of the significant changes and improvements happening all across Iraq. Whether or not Americans are seeing it on the nightly news or reading it in their local papers, Iraqis are actively writing their children’s history.”
Three Marks on the Horizon
- Michael Yon
TheBigOldDog on August 13, 2007 at 2:01 PM
General Patraeus has mentioned this as “to be expected”.
General Jack Murtha floated a trial balloon that Patraeus was not credible. Unfortunately for Murtha pork is not a good material for balloons.
TunaTalon on August 13, 2007 at 2:03 PM
“To say there has been no political progress in Iraq in 2007 is patently absurd, completely wrong and dangerously dismissive of the significant changes and improvements happening all across Iraq.”
- Michael Yon
“The six ministers from the National Accordance Front, the main Sunni political bloc, announced their withdrawal from Mr. Maliki’s coalition government at a Baghdad news conference yesterday.
“The National Accordance Front has promised the Iraqi people to withdraw from the current government that didn’t respond to our demands,” the bloc said in a statement carried on the Web site of President Talabani’s Patriotic Union of Kurdistan Party.”
“Five ministers loyal to former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, Iraq’s first leader after the fall of Saddam Hussein, today said they will boycott future cabinet meetings.”
“Relations between Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and US Gen. David Petraeus are so tense that aides to al-Maliki say he has considered asking Washington to pull the general out of Baghdad. The two major sources of tension appear to be al-Maliki’s continued lack of control over all Iraqi military units and operations, and Petraeus’s policy of arming Iraqi Sunni Arab tribesmen willing to fight the foreign Salafi Jihadis. Al-Maliki fears that once the Sunni tribesmen have dispatched “al-Qaeda,” they will turn on the largely Shiite government with their new American weapons.”
“President Bush also directly warned Iraq’s Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki about his close ties to Iran. Al-Maliki is currently on a three-day trip to Tehran where he has met with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other top Iranian officials. According to Iran’s state-run news agency, Al-Maliki has thanked Iran for its “positive and constructive” work in “providing security and fighting terrorism in Iraq.” At Thursday’s news conference President Bush was asked about Al-Maliki’s ties to Iran.
President Bush: “Now, is he trying to get Iran to play a more constructive role? I presume he is. But that doesn’t — what my question is — well, what my message to him is, is that when we catch you playing a non-constructive role there will be a price to pay.”"
MB4 on August 13, 2007 at 9:02 PM
I see your unattributed quote and raise with an attributed quote.
“U.S. and Iraqi officials acknowledged today that differences existed between Prime Minister Nouri Maliki and the top U.S. commander but denied that the Iraqi leader wanted Gen. David H. Petraeus removed. “
MOLLY HENNESSY-FISKE Los Angeles Times
But that dispute is based on the assumption that stability in Iraq will start at the top of the political process and trickle down to the people. The belief that political power flows from the top down is central tenet of liberal philosophy. That is not what Michael Yon had in mind when he wrote:
“To say there has been no political progress in Iraq in 2007 is patently absurd, completely wrong and dangerously dismissive of the significant changes and improvements happening all across Iraq.”
Read Michael’s posts and watch his videos. The political progress is real and at the grassroots level. The military success and political progress in Iraq are driven from the bottom-up. Expect all of the leftie Senators to reject the Petraeus report in September because they are true believers in top-down control.
TunaTalon on August 13, 2007 at 10:09 PM
Why would a believing Muslim be grateful to infidel dogs?
Islam teaches them that we are their inferiors.
All that we do is ultimately no compensation for our insulting denial of Allah’s truth.
We are mistaken that they ultimately care about the contemptible material details of this world. (Electricity, security, health care, education, et al.)
They are more oriented to the next world. To eternal Paradise.
Their complaints about mundane “bad” conditions are merely tactical leverage points to play on our pragmatic naivete.
What we really need to do, in their eyes, is humbly submit to their higher religious authority.
Until we understand the supremacist mindset promulgated by the Koran (and Hadiths), we are operating in a parallel moral universe, thinking we are “helping” them while they see our rebuilding and policing of Iraq as justifiable reparations for our kaffir invasion of a sacred Muslim land.
We are playing simplistic “hearts and minds” hopscotch while they are whirling “Islam must dominate” dervishes.
What to do?
Kill jihadis, and defend our own principles.
The rest may be beyond our political and military scope.
And in the realm of philosophical and religious debate.
The ideological war which our side has not yet begun to openly fight.
profitsbeard on August 14, 2007 at 1:37 AM
“Relations between Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and US Gen. David Petraeus are so tense that aides to al-Maliki say he has considered asking Washington to pull the general out of Baghdad…”
MB4 on August 13, 2007 at 9:02 PM
I see your unattributed quote and raise with an attributed quote.
TunaTalon on August 13, 2007 at 10:09 PM
Picky, picky, picky.
Does it really make any difference? Are you any more likely to believe it?
It was from AP (Associated Press) where a preponderance of articles come from.
MB4 on August 14, 2007 at 3:14 AM
Read Michael’s posts and watch his videos.
TunaTalon on August 13, 2007 at 10:09 PM
Michael Yon can not see the forest for the trees.
He has tunnel vision.
He needs to read more of Robert Spencer and Hugh Fitzgerald.
MB4 on August 14, 2007 at 3:17 AM
Comment pages: