<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP YouTube debate officially back on &#8212; possibly without Mitt; Update: CNN seeking submissions from DU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 12:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: p00pies</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637960</link>
		<dc:creator>p00pies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637960</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Then again, the snowmen should really HATE li’l Silky. Hair dryer + CFC’s in hairspray = teh global warming&lt;/blockquote&gt;

those are the types of responses that would make this debate watchable. if the whole thing is geared toward attacking republican candidates in a stupid, childish guise then maybe stupid, childish answers are all we can hope to give back at them. it wont give them the satisfaction of watching a candidate sweat under pressure if all he has to say is in response is &quot;oh you mean like when Hillary voted for [whatever]?&quot; M.A.D. all the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Then again, the snowmen should really HATE li’l Silky. Hair dryer + CFC’s in hairspray = teh global warming</p></blockquote>
<p>those are the types of responses that would make this debate watchable. if the whole thing is geared toward attacking republican candidates in a stupid, childish guise then maybe stupid, childish answers are all we can hope to give back at them. it wont give them the satisfaction of watching a candidate sweat under pressure if all he has to say is in response is &#8220;oh you mean like when Hillary voted for [whatever]?&#8221; M.A.D. all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacenprosperity</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637649</link>
		<dc:creator>peacenprosperity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637649</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand the defeatist attitude that we have to accept the rules as set up by the msm.  Let them go totally negative on the republicans (they can&#039;t get much more anyway). Set up alternative serious debates and let the msm refuse to show them and let the clueless middle see what the msm is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the defeatist attitude that we have to accept the rules as set up by the msm.  Let them go totally negative on the republicans (they can&#8217;t get much more anyway). Set up alternative serious debates and let the msm refuse to show them and let the clueless middle see what the msm is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacenprosperity</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637633</link>
		<dc:creator>peacenprosperity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637633</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe it will thin the herd a bit. &lt;/blockquote&gt;


For who? The msm?  Less republican candidates to attack and more time to do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Maybe it will thin the herd a bit. </p></blockquote>
<p>For who? The msm?  Less republican candidates to attack and more time to do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PowWow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637468</link>
		<dc:creator>PowWow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637468</guid>
		<description>Right from when I first of heard there were going to be You Tube/CNN debates I knew it was going to be skewed in the Dims favor. I still have been going back and forth over whether or not Repubs should go through with it. This DU thing just confused me more. I&#039;ve filp-flopped more than Waffles. But I still think they should just try and make the best of a bad situation. Just like they did with MSNBC. It seems obvious that the MSM isn&#039;t going to slam Dims for not showing at FNC, but they are more than willing to jump the R&#039;s for not going to this, so go and &quot;have fun&quot; with it. Just try and not look stupid. Maybe it will thin the herd a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right from when I first of heard there were going to be You Tube/CNN debates I knew it was going to be skewed in the Dims favor. I still have been going back and forth over whether or not Repubs should go through with it. This DU thing just confused me more. I&#8217;ve filp-flopped more than Waffles. But I still think they should just try and make the best of a bad situation. Just like they did with MSNBC. It seems obvious that the MSM isn&#8217;t going to slam Dims for not showing at FNC, but they are more than willing to jump the R&#8217;s for not going to this, so go and &#8220;have fun&#8221; with it. Just try and not look stupid. Maybe it will thin the herd a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Always Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637441</link>
		<dc:creator>Always Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637441</guid>
		<description>What gets me is that this enviro-conscious, global-warming worried, birkenstock-wearing tree-hugging talking snowman...

has a mouth made out of FRANKFURTERS.

Bwahahahahahaa !!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What gets me is that this enviro-conscious, global-warming worried, birkenstock-wearing tree-hugging talking snowman&#8230;</p>
<p>has a mouth made out of FRANKFURTERS.</p>
<p>Bwahahahahahaa !!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacenprosperity</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637416</link>
		<dc:creator>peacenprosperity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637416</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I personally think that Michelle Malkin brings enough clout to the table that her submission alone would be newsworthy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How many times has Michelle been interviewed on CNN in the last 6 months?

This will be such a set up that all the candidates who attend will spend 6 weeks trying to unspin the spin put on their answers by the msm.  CNN will load up on &quot;Do you still beat your wife questions&quot;.  If Mitt stays off he will cement my support and probably alot of other people&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I personally think that Michelle Malkin brings enough clout to the table that her submission alone would be newsworthy.</p></blockquote>
<p>How many times has Michelle been interviewed on CNN in the last 6 months?</p>
<p>This will be such a set up that all the candidates who attend will spend 6 weeks trying to unspin the spin put on their answers by the msm.  CNN will load up on &#8220;Do you still beat your wife questions&#8221;.  If Mitt stays off he will cement my support and probably alot of other people&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Race Card</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637385</link>
		<dc:creator>The Race Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637385</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;lightbulb:&lt;/strong&gt;

What about a HotAir produced question? It would be a way for us to get our &lt;em&gt;Vent&lt;/em&gt; fix. And we could vote on which videos to submit to the debates on behalf of HotAir.

I personally think that Michelle Malkin brings enough clout to the table that her submission alone would be newsworthy.

The more I think about this, the more I am about ready to start begging.

&lt;strong&gt;Please, please, please&lt;/strong&gt; submit a youtube edition of &lt;em&gt;Vent&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>lightbulb:</strong></p>
<p>What about a HotAir produced question? It would be a way for us to get our <em>Vent</em> fix. And we could vote on which videos to submit to the debates on behalf of HotAir.</p>
<p>I personally think that Michelle Malkin brings enough clout to the table that her submission alone would be newsworthy.</p>
<p>The more I think about this, the more I am about ready to start begging.</p>
<p><strong>Please, please, please</strong> submit a youtube edition of <em>Vent</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigOldDog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637375</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigOldDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637375</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Update: Via tipster RLW, maybe Mitt’s got a good idea here:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re a man for admitting it AP. It&#039;s a setup. All risk, no reward.

&lt;blockquote&gt;

I’d like to see how well Huckabee answers the questions. He’s become my new underdog.

kiakjones on August 13, 2007 at 2:07 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have a great deal of respect for his communication ability. He&#039;s very good. I don&#039;t care much for his paternalistic instincts but we could do a lot worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Update: Via tipster RLW, maybe Mitt’s got a good idea here:</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re a man for admitting it AP. It&#8217;s a setup. All risk, no reward.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I’d like to see how well Huckabee answers the questions. He’s become my new underdog.</p>
<p>kiakjones on August 13, 2007 at 2:07 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>I have a great deal of respect for his communication ability. He&#8217;s very good. I don&#8217;t care much for his paternalistic instincts but we could do a lot worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Race Card</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637366</link>
		<dc:creator>The Race Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637366</guid>
		<description>I think this community typifies the broad spectrum of conservatives and Republicans. It would be great if one of you regular HA commenters actually got your question into the lineup.

Regardless of the issue, I know that someone from within these ranks can craft an appealing query that digs to the root of some of our most important issues.

I will make it a point to support the videos submitted by HA fans. I have found agreement and been taken to task by some very capable Hot Airheads. 

Please let us know if you submit a question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this community typifies the broad spectrum of conservatives and Republicans. It would be great if one of you regular HA commenters actually got your question into the lineup.</p>
<p>Regardless of the issue, I know that someone from within these ranks can craft an appealing query that digs to the root of some of our most important issues.</p>
<p>I will make it a point to support the videos submitted by HA fans. I have found agreement and been taken to task by some very capable Hot Airheads. </p>
<p>Please let us know if you submit a question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiakjones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-637059</link>
		<dc:creator>kiakjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-637059</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see how well Huckabee answers the questions.  He&#039;s become my new underdog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see how well Huckabee answers the questions.  He&#8217;s become my new underdog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ex-tex</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636976</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-tex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636976</guid>
		<description>OHHH NOOOO! (DON&#039;T DO IT FRED)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OHHH NOOOO! (DON&#8217;T DO IT FRED)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kowboy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636972</link>
		<dc:creator>Kowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636972</guid>
		<description>One other thing I just noticed. Mr. Snowman leans to his left.

Coincidence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing I just noticed. Mr. Snowman leans to his left.</p>
<p>Coincidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjs1943</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636945</link>
		<dc:creator>cjs1943</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636945</guid>
		<description>Everyone here knows that this is just a setup against the republican candidates if CNN&#039;s people are picking the videos to show. If I was on that stage and got confronted by an idiotic video, my reponse would be: I&#039;ll pass on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone here knows that this is just a setup against the republican candidates if CNN&#8217;s people are picking the videos to show. If I was on that stage and got confronted by an idiotic video, my reponse would be: I&#8217;ll pass on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636882</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636882</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;‘S no joke. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

If it&#039;s not yet a joke, it is quickly becoming one.

An MTV Mr. Bill knockoff it a snowman&#039;s clothing.

I wonder if the GOP candidates realize how this so-called debate thing is being used to ridicule them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>‘S no joke. </p></blockquote>
<p>If it&#8217;s not yet a joke, it is quickly becoming one.</p>
<p>An MTV Mr. Bill knockoff it a snowman&#8217;s clothing.</p>
<p>I wonder if the GOP candidates realize how this so-called debate thing is being used to ridicule them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636840</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636840</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He should only attend if the Star Wars kid is the moderator.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Hee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He should only attend if the Star Wars kid is the moderator.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EduardoOTI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636822</link>
		<dc:creator>EduardoOTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636822</guid>
		<description>Pathetic. A total mockery of the democratic process. 

And no, it isn&#039;t a medium that brings the common voter face to face with the candidates. It&#039;s a farce. A gimmick that&#039;s good theater for CNN and just another way for self-described &#039;internet political gurus&#039; to make themselves seem relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathetic. A total mockery of the democratic process. </p>
<p>And no, it isn&#8217;t a medium that brings the common voter face to face with the candidates. It&#8217;s a farce. A gimmick that&#8217;s good theater for CNN and just another way for self-described &#8216;internet political gurus&#8217; to make themselves seem relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Malor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636813</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Malor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636813</guid>
		<description>The candidates should do the debate regardless of the quality of the comments and just consider it a rite of passage. The other guys did it, now it&#039;s their turn.

At this point it appears that the debate will be an exercise in speaking coherently to sometimes incoherent questioners and in keeping one&#039;s temper. Both are skills that will be required of the President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The candidates should do the debate regardless of the quality of the comments and just consider it a rite of passage. The other guys did it, now it&#8217;s their turn.</p>
<p>At this point it appears that the debate will be an exercise in speaking coherently to sometimes incoherent questioners and in keeping one&#8217;s temper. Both are skills that will be required of the President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captivated_dem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636803</link>
		<dc:creator>captivated_dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636803</guid>
		<description>Those begging for this to happen don&#039;t seem to be commenting on this thread. Will there be an open &quot;I told ya so!&quot; thread in late November or early December, regardless of the outcome?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those begging for this to happen don&#8217;t seem to be commenting on this thread. Will there be an open &#8220;I told ya so!&#8221; thread in late November or early December, regardless of the outcome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottMcC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636799</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottMcC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636799</guid>
		<description>This snowman seems so skeeeered of Mitt... Probably because Mitt&#039;s the only one of our guys that&#039;s packing the most feared anti-snowman weapon called the hair dryer.

Then again, the snowmen should really HATE li&#039;l Silky. Hair dryer + CFC&#039;s in hairspray = teh global warming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This snowman seems so skeeeered of Mitt&#8230; Probably because Mitt&#8217;s the only one of our guys that&#8217;s packing the most feared anti-snowman weapon called the hair dryer.</p>
<p>Then again, the snowmen should really HATE li&#8217;l Silky. Hair dryer + CFC&#8217;s in hairspray = teh global warming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy70</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636764</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636764</guid>
		<description>Smells like a set up, but our candidates will have to face a big, bad world out there, so this should be a cakewalk. Guiliani should shine in this format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smells like a set up, but our candidates will have to face a big, bad world out there, so this should be a cakewalk. Guiliani should shine in this format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allahpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636730</link>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636730</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the second time you&#039;ve left an off-topic comment on this thread that I&#039;ve had to delete, DfD.  Next time&#039;s a banning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the second time you&#8217;ve left an off-topic comment on this thread that I&#8217;ve had to delete, DfD.  Next time&#8217;s a banning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kowboy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636711</link>
		<dc:creator>Kowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636711</guid>
		<description>Who built that snowman? It&#039;s gotta be one of the ugliest, lopsided, wobbly headed snowmen I&#039;ve ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who built that snowman? It&#8217;s gotta be one of the ugliest, lopsided, wobbly headed snowmen I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guardian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636677</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636677</guid>
		<description>There are currently 1157 questions in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/contest/RepublicanDebate&amp;results_all=true?goto=01&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lineup&lt;/a&gt;. Nearly all of them are crap. I would even say most are nothing more than demeaning statements in question form. There are a few decent questions but what are the odds those will show up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are currently 1157 questions in the <a href="http://youtube.com/contest/RepublicanDebate&amp;results_all=true?goto=01" rel="nofollow">lineup</a>. Nearly all of them are crap. I would even say most are nothing more than demeaning statements in question form. There are a few decent questions but what are the odds those will show up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636659</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636659</guid>
		<description>Where don&#039;t snowmen melt in the summer? If summers were below 32 degrees, I&#039;d be demanding global warming.

Stupid snowman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where don&#8217;t snowmen melt in the summer? If summers were below 32 degrees, I&#8217;d be demanding global warming.</p>
<p>Stupid snowman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zane</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-636653</link>
		<dc:creator>zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/13/gop-youtube-debate-officially-back-on-possibly-without-mitt/#comment-636653</guid>
		<description>Trancredo will get a question about nuking Mecca.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trancredo will get a question about nuking Mecca.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
