<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Mary Katharine Ham on Ames and teh ghey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:21:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lothar</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-673081</link>
		<dc:creator>Lothar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 01:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-673081</guid>
		<description>Mary Katherine should have brought out her peeps to explain things.   Tony would&#039;ve fallen out of his chair laughing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Katherine should have brought out her peeps to explain things.   Tony would&#8217;ve fallen out of his chair laughing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Mary Katharine Ham smacks Fred, Silky, Specter, Clinton, Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-672257</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Mary Katharine Ham smacks Fred, Silky, Specter, Clinton, Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-672257</guid>
		<description>[...] is the second time in three weeks that the three of them have giggled their way through a segment. I&#8217;m 95% sure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the second time in three weeks that the three of them have giggled their way through a segment. I&#8217;m 95% sure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbancenturion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-635702</link>
		<dc:creator>urbancenturion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-635702</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Karen Hughes and Peggy Noonan&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, Karen &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a phony conservative who is more of a Bush flack than a rightward thinker.

But I think Peggy is actually a conservative (though not as far-rightist as I am) just, maybe, a bit softer. My only problem with her is her reverent, almost worshipful appreciation of John Paul II. She (and actually, many others) rank him with Reagan and Thatcher in ending the cold ward. Kruschev, Gorbachev, Chevchev, et al couldn&#039;t care less what the &quot;pontiff&quot; had to say. He&#039;s an empty &lt;strike&gt;suit&lt;/strike&gt; hat as far as anyone with nukes is concerned. The papacy is not much more than a seat of socio-political/pseudo-philosophical musings--and hasn&#039;t been much more since they abandoned faith and entered politics. Thus my criticism of an otherwise smart and reliable Peggy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Karen Hughes and Peggy Noonan</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, Karen <em>is</em> a phony conservative who is more of a Bush flack than a rightward thinker.</p>
<p>But I think Peggy is actually a conservative (though not as far-rightist as I am) just, maybe, a bit softer. My only problem with her is her reverent, almost worshipful appreciation of John Paul II. She (and actually, many others) rank him with Reagan and Thatcher in ending the cold ward. Kruschev, Gorbachev, Chevchev, et al couldn&#8217;t care less what the &#8220;pontiff&#8221; had to say. He&#8217;s an empty <strike>suit</strike> hat as far as anyone with nukes is concerned. The papacy is not much more than a seat of socio-political/pseudo-philosophical musings&#8211;and hasn&#8217;t been much more since they abandoned faith and entered politics. Thus my criticism of an otherwise smart and reliable Peggy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PowWow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-635414</link>
		<dc:creator>PowWow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-635414</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Um … is Tony Harris drunk? He seems in “high spirits.”

&lt;/blockquote&gt;I think he&#039;s HAM-mered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Um … is Tony Harris drunk? He seems in “high spirits.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think he&#8217;s HAM-mered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlynch001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-635326</link>
		<dc:creator>tlynch001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-635326</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Threads? They don’t really still call them that do they?

csdeven&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Cool people do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Threads? They don’t really still call them that do they?</p>
<p>csdeven</p></blockquote>
<p>Cool people do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlynch001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-635315</link>
		<dc:creator>tlynch001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-635315</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;No offense to Mary Katharine, she’s very attractive (and funny). But someone needs to fire her makeup person. It looks a little too much like the “Joker” from Batman.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Great, I just finished writing my book &quot;101 Things NOT to Say to a Woman&quot; and now I find out there are actually 102 things.  Better call us the publisher...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>No offense to Mary Katharine, she’s very attractive (and funny). But someone needs to fire her makeup person. It looks a little too much like the “Joker” from Batman.</p></blockquote>
<p>Great, I just finished writing my book &#8220;101 Things NOT to Say to a Woman&#8221; and now I find out there are actually 102 things.  Better call us the publisher&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColtsFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-635250</link>
		<dc:creator>ColtsFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-635250</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
No offense to Mary Katharine, she’s very attractive (and funny). But someone needs to fire her makeup person. It looks a little too much like the “Joker” from Batman. 

Opinionnation on August 12, 2007 at 5:28 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She is so cute.  She does not need any makeup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
No offense to Mary Katharine, she’s very attractive (and funny). But someone needs to fire her makeup person. It looks a little too much like the “Joker” from Batman. </p>
<p>Opinionnation on August 12, 2007 at 5:28 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>She is so cute.  She does not need any makeup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-635202</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-635202</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder how much of Mitt’s victory was a Mormon head count for Iowa?
Mojave Mark on August 12, 2007 at 5:38 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wondered that myself also. But I figure it&#039;s probably about as many as support fred?. The difference is that when you vote for Mitt! you vote for a real person with a real history of executive experience and a conservative platform.

With fred? you&#039;re voting for some character he played on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder how much of Mitt’s victory was a Mormon head count for Iowa?<br />
Mojave Mark on August 12, 2007 at 5:38 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I wondered that myself also. But I figure it&#8217;s probably about as many as support fred?. The difference is that when you vote for Mitt! you vote for a real person with a real history of executive experience and a conservative platform.</p>
<p>With fred? you&#8217;re voting for some character he played on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-635192</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-635192</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And, is someone knockin’ my threads?

marykatharine on August 12, 2007 at 2:00 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Threads? They don&#039;t really still call them that do they? That&#039;s 70&#039;s nomenclature.

lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And, is someone knockin’ my threads?</p>
<p>marykatharine on August 12, 2007 at 2:00 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Threads? They don&#8217;t really still call them that do they? That&#8217;s 70&#8217;s nomenclature.</p>
<p>lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: auspatriotman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634978</link>
		<dc:creator>auspatriotman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 22:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634978</guid>
		<description>MKH is always consistantly hot! Makes good TV and good rep of the right.

I have IE6 and there are some sites I go to where the page is for crap with the graphics over the text.

And that freeking TOWNHALL is the most annoying page that I have ever loaded. They have so much JAVA and crap running that I&#039;m guarenteed slowy-sometimes freezing- page loads that I get at no other site UNLESS it has the same crap. If I leave it open to listen to Hugh at 9-12 EST I got problems with other pages I open outside of them and its a annoying pain in the arse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MKH is always consistantly hot! Makes good TV and good rep of the right.</p>
<p>I have IE6 and there are some sites I go to where the page is for crap with the graphics over the text.</p>
<p>And that freeking TOWNHALL is the most annoying page that I have ever loaded. They have so much JAVA and crap running that I&#8217;m guarenteed slowy-sometimes freezing- page loads that I get at no other site UNLESS it has the same crap. If I leave it open to listen to Hugh at 9-12 EST I got problems with other pages I open outside of them and its a annoying pain in the arse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirthead</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634942</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirthead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 22:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634942</guid>
		<description>Man, MK&#039;s class knows no end...defending Morra here.  Consider me shamed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, MK&#8217;s class knows no end&#8230;defending Morra here.  Consider me shamed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634925</guid>
		<description>I wonder how much of Mitt&#039;s victory was a Mormon head count for Iowa? 

Way back, here in Nevada Pat Robertson did extremely well at the Republican convention but it was more smoke and mirrors than a real ground swell of true support. I wonder if Mitt just had every Ward and Stake get out there and vote or if cornhuskers deep down really want Mitt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much of Mitt&#8217;s victory was a Mormon head count for Iowa? </p>
<p>Way back, here in Nevada Pat Robertson did extremely well at the Republican convention but it was more smoke and mirrors than a real ground swell of true support. I wonder if Mitt just had every Ward and Stake get out there and vote or if cornhuskers deep down really want Mitt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinionnation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634917</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinionnation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634917</guid>
		<description>No offense to Mary Katharine, she’s very attractive (and funny). But someone needs to fire her makeup person. It looks a little too much like the “Joker” from Batman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense to Mary Katharine, she’s very attractive (and funny). But someone needs to fire her makeup person. It looks a little too much like the “Joker” from Batman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilts</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634898</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634898</guid>
		<description>Good to see that MKH (instead of phony conservatives such as Karen Hughes and Peggy Noonan) is getting a lot of air time on CNN, Fox and I believe on NBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see that MKH (instead of phony conservatives such as Karen Hughes and Peggy Noonan) is getting a lot of air time on CNN, Fox and I believe on NBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatthecrap</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634778</link>
		<dc:creator>whatthecrap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634778</guid>
		<description>As a web designer/developer -I have to weigh in on the browser issue:

If you are using Windows - Please download and use Firefox. You can get it here for free: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getfirefox.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.getfirefox.com&lt;/a&gt;. 

Internet Explorer continues to be the bane of my job. You will find a much higher percentage of websites rendering correctly if you use Firefox.
-wtc?

And by the way - &quot;doesn&#039;t even believe in evolution...&quot; Nice. Translation - &quot;He has the gall to disagree with me...how dare him!&quot; 
I&#039;m sorry Morra - but according to your own viewpoint, you have absolutely no rational basis on which to tell anyone else why they &lt;strong&gt;should&lt;/strong&gt; agree with your point of view. If we evolved - you have no basis to use words like &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;ought&lt;/em&gt;. &#039;Should&#039; and &#039;Ought&#039; imply that we already agree upon some non-subjective standard. Naturalism/Materialism (I highly doubt she is a theistic evolutionist)  cannot explain the existence of morals, rational thinking, mathematical proofs, etc.

Maybe I am digging too deap here - but try considering:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://whatthecrap.wordpress.com/2007/06/12/rationality-morality-no-grounds-in-materialism-naturalism/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rationality &amp; Morality: No grounds in Materialism, Naturalism&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://whatthecrap.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/a-response-to-an-agnostic-atheism-wager/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A response to an Agnostic Atheism Wager&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a web designer/developer -I have to weigh in on the browser issue:</p>
<p>If you are using Windows &#8211; Please download and use Firefox. You can get it here for free: <a href="http://www.getfirefox.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.getfirefox.com</a>. </p>
<p>Internet Explorer continues to be the bane of my job. You will find a much higher percentage of websites rendering correctly if you use Firefox.<br />
-wtc?</p>
<p>And by the way &#8211; &#8220;doesn&#8217;t even believe in evolution&#8230;&#8221; Nice. Translation &#8211; &#8220;He has the gall to disagree with me&#8230;how dare him!&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m sorry Morra &#8211; but according to your own viewpoint, you have absolutely no rational basis on which to tell anyone else why they <strong>should</strong> agree with your point of view. If we evolved &#8211; you have no basis to use words like <em>should</em> or <em>ought</em>. &#8216;Should&#8217; and &#8216;Ought&#8217; imply that we already agree upon some non-subjective standard. Naturalism/Materialism (I highly doubt she is a theistic evolutionist)  cannot explain the existence of morals, rational thinking, mathematical proofs, etc.</p>
<p>Maybe I am digging too deap here &#8211; but try considering:<br />
<a href="http://whatthecrap.wordpress.com/2007/06/12/rationality-morality-no-grounds-in-materialism-naturalism/" rel="nofollow">Rationality &amp; Morality: No grounds in Materialism, Naturalism</a><br />
and<br />
<a href="http://whatthecrap.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/a-response-to-an-agnostic-atheism-wager/" rel="nofollow">A response to an Agnostic Atheism Wager</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrimsonFisted</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634741</link>
		<dc:creator>CrimsonFisted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634741</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;marykatharine on August 12, 2007 at 2:00 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;I am so over the smarm, snark, and sneer from the left, especially where it doesn&#039;t belong. She would go much further without it, and distance herself from the Laura/Jane style, and pattern herself after the Kirsten Powers/Mary Katharine Ham style, on the Good Side of the Force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>marykatharine on August 12, 2007 at 2:00 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I am so over the smarm, snark, and sneer from the left, especially where it doesn&#8217;t belong. She would go much further without it, and distance herself from the Laura/Jane style, and pattern herself after the Kirsten Powers/Mary Katharine Ham style, on the Good Side of the Force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634732</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634732</guid>
		<description>It does seem unnatural that MKH never seems to lose her cool no matter how low the blows get.  Myself, I can&#039;t go five seconds without bitch slapping a liberal who annoys me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem unnatural that MKH never seems to lose her cool no matter how low the blows get.  Myself, I can&#8217;t go five seconds without bitch slapping a liberal who annoys me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corona</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634701</link>
		<dc:creator>corona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634701</guid>
		<description>Townhall definitely has problems.  My &quot;favorite&quot; is clicking on the &quot;full article&quot; link of any story brings you to a listing of all the columnists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Townhall definitely has problems.  My &#8220;favorite&#8221; is clicking on the &#8220;full article&#8221; link of any story brings you to a listing of all the columnists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeyboss</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634628</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeyboss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634628</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And, is someone knockin’ my threads? 

marykatharine on August 12, 2007 at 2:00 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, maybe your boots :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And, is someone knockin’ my threads? </p>
<p>marykatharine on August 12, 2007 at 2:00 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, maybe your boots :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marykatharine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634620</link>
		<dc:creator>marykatharine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634620</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting, Allah. FYI, guys, Morra is a friend of mine and a very classy liberal gal whose company I enjoy. Take it easy. 

I thought Tony was a ton of fun. 

And, is someone knockin&#039; my threads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting, Allah. FYI, guys, Morra is a friend of mine and a very classy liberal gal whose company I enjoy. Take it easy. </p>
<p>I thought Tony was a ton of fun. </p>
<p>And, is someone knockin&#8217; my threads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itzWicks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634579</link>
		<dc:creator>itzWicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634579</guid>
		<description>I rather enjoyed the segment, and thought that Harris was giddy from being in the company of two telegenic women while being paid to do so.

MKH continues to shine, as always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather enjoyed the segment, and thought that Harris was giddy from being in the company of two telegenic women while being paid to do so.</p>
<p>MKH continues to shine, as always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abinitioadinfinitum</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634571</link>
		<dc:creator>abinitioadinfinitum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634571</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Um … is Tony Harris drunk? He seems in “high spirits.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Maybe Tony had an early morning dentist appointment- Nitrous Oxide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Um … is Tony Harris drunk? He seems in “high spirits.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe Tony had an early morning dentist appointment- Nitrous Oxide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634548</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634548</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve already self-identified as the &lt;em&gt;biggest&lt;/em&gt; loser in previous comments, but can someone explain &quot;teh ghey&quot; to me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already self-identified as the <em>biggest</em> loser in previous comments, but can someone explain &#8220;teh ghey&#8221; to me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberCipher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634380</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberCipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634380</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...there were no sexual overtones this time. 

csdeven on August 12, 2007 at 8:39 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I take it then that you chose NOT to hear MKH when she said:
&quot;I feel you...your pain.&quot;

I think I heard it. Freudian slip maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;there were no sexual overtones this time. </p>
<p>csdeven on August 12, 2007 at 8:39 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I take it then that you chose NOT to hear MKH when she said:<br />
&#8220;I feel you&#8230;your pain.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think I heard it. Freudian slip maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrimsonFisted</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/comment-page-1/#comment-634372</link>
		<dc:creator>CrimsonFisted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/12/video-mary-katharine-ham-on-ames-and-teh-ghey/#comment-634372</guid>
		<description>Who is this Morra? Dumb as a box of rocks. Never heard of that blog at all. MKH is polite, no digs, gave insightful commentary, and Morra? How DARE someone not &quot;believe&quot; in evolution, as if evolution were somehow a faith and not scientific theory? HELLO? Regardless of a given position on evolution, that sneering, smarmy, Laura-Schwatz-Jane-Fleming attitude just crawls down my spine. Any credibility that broad might have had flew out the window in about 5 seconds with that crack.

What a snot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is this Morra? Dumb as a box of rocks. Never heard of that blog at all. MKH is polite, no digs, gave insightful commentary, and Morra? How DARE someone not &#8220;believe&#8221; in evolution, as if evolution were somehow a faith and not scientific theory? HELLO? Regardless of a given position on evolution, that sneering, smarmy, Laura-Schwatz-Jane-Fleming attitude just crawls down my spine. Any credibility that broad might have had flew out the window in about 5 seconds with that crack.</p>
<p>What a snot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
