Next, someone will come along and debunk spirit photographs and dowsing for water.

And could that music have been any more pompous and annoying? I had it stuck in my head for about half an hour, until the Chili’s Baby Back Ribs jingle came on and obliterated it. Thank god.

Might as well finsh packing to climb the twin peaks of Kiliminjaro…

To hold on to a belief in extraterrestrial visitors is pure folly. It is akin to pondering time travel.

You see, it is like this, there is no past and no future. There is only a constant now. The conception of time is a construct of the mind.

Kids in kollege have A/V equipment as powerful as Light & Magic studios. They can create & animate & radiosity anything they want to. The cloning of the treetops was a “just so you know” waterstamp.

AP, if Jesus or an iPhone were aliens, would you believe?

The second video could have nothing to do with the first – so saying the second one debunks the first is wrong. So, the whole debunking of the first video rests on the tops of 2 trees. I’m sure it’s a fake but this debunking is weak.

TheBigOldDog on August 12, 2007 at 9:07 PM

Yeah, I have to agree here. It proves for a fact that the trees were fake, which makes it highly probable that the second video is a fake but doesn’t say anything about the first one and never even addresses the UFOs.

I’m still hoping for more on this one.

:)

- The Cat

The problem is, they coppied McCain too well and they can’t tell which is the copy, so they keep switching him back and forth.

- The Cat

MirCat on August 13, 2007 at 12:35 AM

Check for pods in the basement.

This is nothing more than the Men in Black trying to cover it up!

Oh, and this explains how a politician can be a conservative during the election and then go liberal while in office. It’s a conspiracy by the aliens. They wait for them to get elected and then SWITCH.

The problem is, they coppied McCain too well and they can’t tell which is the copy, so they keep switching him back and forth.

- The Cat

The entire argument rests on the description (often screwed up as dozens of people load the same video having no idea or not caring what the facts are once it hits YouTube – in addition, who knows what the relation is between the person who shot the video and who posted it?), and the trees (they appear to have been edited for THIS video – if so, All Hands Down).

In addition, people often change names & places “to protect the innocent,” as well as because they just don’t care.

The “chronological order” thing is complete bullcrap, I don’t recall the original videos claiming they were in chronological order.

Also, the “debunker” converted the already-compressed YouTube videos to use their editing program, introducting even more “artifacts” into the picture.

Yeah, the original videos are probably CGI. But this “effort” at debunking is so bad, it will probably INCREASE the credibility of the videos with the GP.