<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Thread: Michelle hosts The O&#8217;Reilly Factor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 12:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumb Ox Daily News</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-661620</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumb Ox Daily News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-661620</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lindsay Lohan Case Sends, Duh, Wrong Message...&lt;/strong&gt;

Celebs should be treated differently than regular folks... they should have the book thrown at them!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lindsay Lohan Case Sends, Duh, Wrong Message&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Celebs should be treated differently than regular folks&#8230; they should have the book thrown at them!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highrise</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-635951</link>
		<dc:creator>Highrise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-635951</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed the show...as usual.

I look forward to her having her own show one day.

Sometimes I wish fox in general on all it&#039;s programs had a MUTE button for some guests that insist on not allowing the host to talk or the host to have another guest talk.  It&#039;s truly annoying all the yelling over.  Less of it happens on the oreilly show though than some of the other fox shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed the show&#8230;as usual.</p>
<p>I look forward to her having her own show one day.</p>
<p>Sometimes I wish fox in general on all it&#8217;s programs had a MUTE button for some guests that insist on not allowing the host to talk or the host to have another guest talk.  It&#8217;s truly annoying all the yelling over.  Less of it happens on the oreilly show though than some of the other fox shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-635606</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-635606</guid>
		<description>And to clarify RD (and anyone else) what I mean is he didn&#039;t mention AT ALL the revising of the &quot;hottest year&quot; numbers.

It really doesn&#039;t matter, because there is a COMPLETE mainstream media blackout, but does anyone know if he even mentioned it on his radio show?  Did Rush?  Did anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to clarify RD (and anyone else) what I mean is he didn&#8217;t mention AT ALL the revising of the &#8220;hottest year&#8221; numbers.</p>
<p>It really doesn&#8217;t matter, because there is a COMPLETE mainstream media blackout, but does anyone know if he even mentioned it on his radio show?  Did Rush?  Did anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-635574</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-635574</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;FWIW, announced on H&amp;C: Hannity’s America will air a segment about it on Sunday. Guess it just wasn’t Rich Lowry’s story to “break”; looks like Hannity will do it himself, even if it means weekend billing.

RD on August 11, 2007 at 3:16 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

UPDATE:
He didn&#039;t talk about this, again he just whined about &quot;alarmism&quot;, rather than the science that is debunking MMGW all together.  Again, he usually just complains about hypocrisy and alarmism, which is all fine and good, but it doesn&#039;t go far enough to ending all this sh**.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>FWIW, announced on H&amp;C: Hannity’s America will air a segment about it on Sunday. Guess it just wasn’t Rich Lowry’s story to “break”; looks like Hannity will do it himself, even if it means weekend billing.</p>
<p>RD on August 11, 2007 at 3:16 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>UPDATE:<br />
He didn&#8217;t talk about this, again he just whined about &#8220;alarmism&#8221;, rather than the science that is debunking MMGW all together.  Again, he usually just complains about hypocrisy and alarmism, which is all fine and good, but it doesn&#8217;t go far enough to ending all this sh**.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EricPWJohnson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-635482</link>
		<dc:creator>EricPWJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-635482</guid>
		<description>I think they should have spots during the day called Malkins&#039; Minute

Where she can do her points when she is not subbing for O&#039;Reilly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should have spots during the day called Malkins&#8217; Minute</p>
<p>Where she can do her points when she is not subbing for O&#8217;Reilly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-634539</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-634539</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;jaleach on August 11, 2007 at 4:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

True!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>jaleach on August 11, 2007 at 4:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>True!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Friday Factor Update: Video link added</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-634421</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Friday Factor Update: Video link added</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-634421</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Video highlights here.  Posted in: The Factor  comments (51)&#160;&#160;&#160;trackbacks (0) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Video highlights here.  Posted in: The Factor  comments (51)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;trackbacks (0) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaleach</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-632716</link>
		<dc:creator>jaleach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-632716</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This is supposed to be, after all, a serious and classy TV program.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Then what&#039;s O&#039;Reilly doing on there?

Michelle Malkin is a stupendously gorgeous woman. She just is. Toning it down isn&#039;t in the cards. She&#039;d either have to wear a burka or a paper bag over her head to hide the good looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is supposed to be, after all, a serious and classy TV program.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then what&#8217;s O&#8217;Reilly doing on there?</p>
<p>Michelle Malkin is a stupendously gorgeous woman. She just is. Toning it down isn&#8217;t in the cards. She&#8217;d either have to wear a burka or a paper bag over her head to hide the good looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-632594</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-632594</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;She *is* a beautiful woman, but this time her make-up did not do her justice. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think they&#039;re trying to tone down the sexiness just a bit.  This is supposed to be, after all, a serious and classy TV program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>She *is* a beautiful woman, but this time her make-up did not do her justice. </p></blockquote>
<p>I think they&#8217;re trying to tone down the sexiness just a bit.  This is supposed to be, after all, a serious and classy TV program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631927</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631927</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;She *is* a beautiful woman, but this time her make-up did not do her justice. &lt;/blockquote&gt;I thought maybe too much light make-up around the eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>She *is* a beautiful woman, but this time her make-up did not do her justice. </p></blockquote>
<p>I thought maybe too much light make-up around the eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservnut</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631849</link>
		<dc:creator>conservnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631849</guid>
		<description>Thanks for putting up the &quot;talking points&quot; Bryan, I missed the first part of the show.  Please don&#039;t pull my racist bigot membership card MM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting up the &#8220;talking points&#8221; Bryan, I missed the first part of the show.  Please don&#8217;t pull my racist bigot membership card MM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631657</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631657</guid>
		<description>I really like it when Michelle subs for O&#039;Reilly.  She does an exemplary job.  One small issue here, though.  She *is* a beautiful woman, but this time her make-up did not do her justice. I&#039;m not a make-up artist, so I can&#039;t articulate what I didn&#039;t like about it.  It just seemed &quot;off&quot; a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like it when Michelle subs for O&#8217;Reilly.  She does an exemplary job.  One small issue here, though.  She *is* a beautiful woman, but this time her make-up did not do her justice. I&#8217;m not a make-up artist, so I can&#8217;t articulate what I didn&#8217;t like about it.  It just seemed &#8220;off&#8221; a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631558</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 08:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631558</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;FWIW, announced on H&amp;C: Hannity’s America will air a segment about it on Sunday. Guess it just wasn’t Rich Lowry’s story to “break”; looks like Hannity will do it himself, even if it means weekend billing.

RD on August 11, 2007 at 3:16 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not a huge fan of that program, but any little bit helps, especially considering the &lt;strike&gt;virtual&lt;/strike&gt; COMPLETE media blackout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>FWIW, announced on H&amp;C: Hannity’s America will air a segment about it on Sunday. Guess it just wasn’t Rich Lowry’s story to “break”; looks like Hannity will do it himself, even if it means weekend billing.</p>
<p>RD on August 11, 2007 at 3:16 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not a huge fan of that program, but any little bit helps, especially considering the <strike>virtual</strike> COMPLETE media blackout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omegaram</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631551</link>
		<dc:creator>omegaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631551</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Michelle is spectacular!  I hope she gets more and more air time&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle&#039;s points are so to the point, so relevant, and she is right on in her assessments that it seems almost inevitable that she will get more time on the air.  I hope so anyway ....

Her hair looked great too .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Michelle is spectacular!  I hope she gets more and more air time</strong></p>
<p>Michelle&#8217;s points are so to the point, so relevant, and she is right on in her assessments that it seems almost inevitable that she will get more time on the air.  I hope so anyway &#8230;.</p>
<p>Her hair looked great too &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631524</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631524</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Anyway, I’m not bashing Michelle for not covering this, again I know it’s not her show to decide on what to cover, I’m just venting because I’m furious about the lack of coverage of this major story, and I had at least hoped it might be brought up on H&amp;C and it’s not on there either!!!

RightWinged on August 10, 2007 at 9:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

FWIW, announced on H&amp;C: Hannity&#039;s America will air a segment about it on Sunday.  Guess it just wasn&#039;t Rich Lowry&#039;s story to &quot;break&quot;; looks like Hannity will do it himself, even if it means weekend billing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Anyway, I’m not bashing Michelle for not covering this, again I know it’s not her show to decide on what to cover, I’m just venting because I’m furious about the lack of coverage of this major story, and I had at least hoped it might be brought up on H&amp;C and it’s not on there either!!!</p>
<p>RightWinged on August 10, 2007 at 9:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>FWIW, announced on H&amp;C: Hannity&#8217;s America will air a segment about it on Sunday.  Guess it just wasn&#8217;t Rich Lowry&#8217;s story to &#8220;break&#8221;; looks like Hannity will do it himself, even if it means weekend billing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LegendHasIt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631506</link>
		<dc:creator>LegendHasIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631506</guid>
		<description>Dang, I missed it.  I usually record the whole show when Michelle hosts and I know it far enough in advance....  Is there any way to get more than the HotAir clips when I&#039;m too late (including for the Fox evening rerun)??

&lt;blockquote&gt;Notice how MM does not have to show the leg to be on air?
Dersu on August 10, 2007 at 8:33 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, but I&#039;d be willing to pay extra for that as an added bonus.

&lt;blockquote&gt;...Michelle has the finest head of hair I’ve ever seen on a woman. If she ever cuts it all off, I’m going to cry.
jaleach on August 10, 2007 at 11:10 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Ah, I&#039;ll bet Michelle would be hot with short hair too.

Just; God, Please, not bald and with tattoos ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, I missed it.  I usually record the whole show when Michelle hosts and I know it far enough in advance&#8230;.  Is there any way to get more than the HotAir clips when I&#8217;m too late (including for the Fox evening rerun)??</p>
<blockquote><p>Notice how MM does not have to show the leg to be on air?<br />
Dersu on August 10, 2007 at 8:33 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, but I&#8217;d be willing to pay extra for that as an added bonus.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;Michelle has the finest head of hair I’ve ever seen on a woman. If she ever cuts it all off, I’m going to cry.<br />
jaleach on August 10, 2007 at 11:10 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, I&#8217;ll bet Michelle would be hot with short hair too.</p>
<p>Just; God, Please, not bald and with tattoos ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631451</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 05:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631451</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It was on during the Britt Hume show(6:00est or 3:00pst) I think. It was not on during Shep, it was on before his second show.

xplodeit on August 11, 2007 at 12:26 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, so you&#039;re on the west coast I take it (because you said 3 earlier)?  Hmm... glad Hume mentioned it, but it was likely just a blurb during &quot;The Political Grapevine&quot; eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It was on during the Britt Hume show(6:00est or 3:00pst) I think. It was not on during Shep, it was on before his second show.</p>
<p>xplodeit on August 11, 2007 at 12:26 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, so you&#8217;re on the west coast I take it (because you said 3 earlier)?  Hmm&#8230; glad Hume mentioned it, but it was likely just a blurb during &#8220;The Political Grapevine&#8221; eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MirCat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631359</link>
		<dc:creator>MirCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 05:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631359</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Too, Michelle has the finest head of hair I’ve ever seen on a woman. If she ever cuts it all off, I’m going to cry. 

jaleach on August 10, 2007 at 11:10 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That would be as bad as the Felicity Fiasco.

- The Cat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Too, Michelle has the finest head of hair I’ve ever seen on a woman. If she ever cuts it all off, I’m going to cry. </p>
<p>jaleach on August 10, 2007 at 11:10 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>That would be as bad as the Felicity Fiasco.</p>
<p>- The Cat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xplodeit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631270</link>
		<dc:creator>xplodeit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631270</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;RightWinged on August 10, 2007 at 11:20 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It was on during the Britt Hume show(6:00est or 3:00pst) I think. It was not on during Shep, it was on before his second show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>RightWinged on August 10, 2007 at 11:20 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It was on during the Britt Hume show(6:00est or 3:00pst) I think. It was not on during Shep, it was on before his second show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmgraha</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631250</link>
		<dc:creator>rmgraha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631250</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve made my decision. I do not&lt;strong&gt; want MM to have her own talk show. I want her to run for president!
I think she would even be better than Fred! (and I&#039;m a Fred! supporter).

Come on, Michelle! You can do it!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made my decision. I do not<strong> want MM to have her own talk show. I want her to run for president!<br />
I think she would even be better than Fred! (and I&#8217;m a Fred! supporter).</p>
<p>Come on, Michelle! You can do it!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631239</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631239</guid>
		<description>MM looked very good tonight. She&#039;s getting better each time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MM looked very good tonight. She&#8217;s getting better each time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Zero</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631182</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631182</guid>
		<description>In other news... Flash Gordon sucked.  Darn it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other news&#8230; Flash Gordon sucked.  Darn it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigOldDog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631176</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigOldDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631176</guid>
		<description>Laura Schwartz looks like a cartoon shark with that &quot;smile.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura Schwartz looks like a cartoon shark with that &#8220;smile.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631171</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631171</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It was on Fox today, during the 3pm pst show I think.

xplodeit on August 10, 2007 at 10:19 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No way, Studio B with Shep &quot;The Science is In&quot; Smith!?  I can&#039;t believe it... you sure it wasn&#039;t with Gibson or Skinner?  Or was it Shep with some global warmist guest attempting to downplay the undownplayable?

&lt;blockquote&gt;RW, I’d be amazed if Gut doesn’t cover the Global Warming goof at some point. That seems to have become his pet issue, Michelle’s first two segments were immigration, which is reasonable, that’s her big issue.

Also keep in mind BOR is militant about Big Oil and seems to be big on environment and Global Warming, and Michelle has limits on how far she can push the show into her editorial viewpoint, remember, it is ultimately BORs show.

Bad Candy on August 10, 2007 at 10:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree, Gutfeld will most likely cover it (unless they break in with Utah mine stuff again, and we miss half the show), but he&#039;s so far from being MSM and the show format doesn&#039;t really give the opportunity to really bring the hammer down on this thing.

And I agree, as I said, I understand it&#039;s not totally up to Malkin what she&#039;s able to cover... I&#039;m just pissed I haven&#039;t heard about it anywhere yet (and as I said, no news search returns any mention outside of a few blogs)

As for O&#039;Reilly on global warming, he&#039;s a dumbass.  Granted, he&#039;s not way out there with the global warmists, but he doesn&#039;t understand the threat that this hoax poses, and he always boils down the few (very few) segments he has on the issue by saying stupid things like (this is a quote, pulled from a partial transcript on his own site, and I&#039;ve heard him say exactly this, numerous times)

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;We know is the world is getting warmer. Second, there&#039;s a lot of goop in the air and we&#039;d be better off without it. So let&#039;s get rid of all the goop we can without wrecking our economy.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well Billy boy, we know it&#039;s getting SLIGHTLY warmer... but not as warm as the 30s apparently!  And what else can it do after cooling for a few decades in the middle of the last century!  And &quot;goop&quot;!?  How about we look at the science and recognize that this entire global warming thing is agenda driven, has no scientific backing, and the mass belief in it is the true threat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It was on Fox today, during the 3pm pst show I think.</p>
<p>xplodeit on August 10, 2007 at 10:19 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>No way, Studio B with Shep &#8220;The Science is In&#8221; Smith!?  I can&#8217;t believe it&#8230; you sure it wasn&#8217;t with Gibson or Skinner?  Or was it Shep with some global warmist guest attempting to downplay the undownplayable?</p>
<blockquote><p>RW, I’d be amazed if Gut doesn’t cover the Global Warming goof at some point. That seems to have become his pet issue, Michelle’s first two segments were immigration, which is reasonable, that’s her big issue.</p>
<p>Also keep in mind BOR is militant about Big Oil and seems to be big on environment and Global Warming, and Michelle has limits on how far she can push the show into her editorial viewpoint, remember, it is ultimately BORs show.</p>
<p>Bad Candy on August 10, 2007 at 10:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree, Gutfeld will most likely cover it (unless they break in with Utah mine stuff again, and we miss half the show), but he&#8217;s so far from being MSM and the show format doesn&#8217;t really give the opportunity to really bring the hammer down on this thing.</p>
<p>And I agree, as I said, I understand it&#8217;s not totally up to Malkin what she&#8217;s able to cover&#8230; I&#8217;m just pissed I haven&#8217;t heard about it anywhere yet (and as I said, no news search returns any mention outside of a few blogs)</p>
<p>As for O&#8217;Reilly on global warming, he&#8217;s a dumbass.  Granted, he&#8217;s not way out there with the global warmists, but he doesn&#8217;t understand the threat that this hoax poses, and he always boils down the few (very few) segments he has on the issue by saying stupid things like (this is a quote, pulled from a partial transcript on his own site, and I&#8217;ve heard him say exactly this, numerous times)</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We know is the world is getting warmer. Second, there&#8217;s a lot of goop in the air and we&#8217;d be better off without it. So let&#8217;s get rid of all the goop we can without wrecking our economy.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well Billy boy, we know it&#8217;s getting SLIGHTLY warmer&#8230; but not as warm as the 30s apparently!  And what else can it do after cooling for a few decades in the middle of the last century!  And &#8220;goop&#8221;!?  How about we look at the science and recognize that this entire global warming thing is agenda driven, has no scientific backing, and the mass belief in it is the true threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaleach</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-631162</link>
		<dc:creator>jaleach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/10/open-thread-michelle-hosts-the-oreilly-factor/#comment-631162</guid>
		<description>Michelle&#039;s on so much anymore that I&#039;m expecting a name change to &quot;The Malkin Factor&quot; any day now. Frankly, I&#039;d welcome the change.

Too, Michelle has the finest head of hair I&#039;ve ever seen on a woman. If she ever cuts it all off, I&#039;m going to cry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle&#8217;s on so much anymore that I&#8217;m expecting a name change to &#8220;The Malkin Factor&#8221; any day now. Frankly, I&#8217;d welcome the change.</p>
<p>Too, Michelle has the finest head of hair I&#8217;ve ever seen on a woman. If she ever cuts it all off, I&#8217;m going to cry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
