Comments on: Hillary: We must take nuclear weapons off the table — wait, Barack said what? Okay, then we shouldn’t

By: PowWow

PowWow — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:27:35 +0000

Who does she think she is, Silky?

By: leanright

leanright — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:27:30 +0000

Typing too fast, ment whore-able

By: leanright

leanright — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:24:23 +0000

Sorry, that came off as too preachy, but DAMN she is horrable!

By: leanright

leanright — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:15:01 +0000

All things to all people at all times. Not unlike the many faces of satan. Be aware!

By: SoulGlo

SoulGlo — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:37:54 +0000

Flip flopping on nukes is a pretty big deal. This should take a few points off her lead in the polls.

By: Highrise

Highrise — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:10:07 +0000

I truly do not think she has a chance to win…maybe a good run, but not POTUS. Doesn’t mean we should drop our guard though whatsoever and fight like hell to get people out to vote in 08.

She is flat scary and I have to believe in the end, American’s aren’t ready to become socialists.

By: Kowboy

Kowboy — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:59:14 +0000

And any position she has now is because she is just so wise—”Bow before the queen of filth, the queen of putrescence!”

Vanquisher on August 9, 2007 at 4:45 PM

Nah. Any position she has now is based on the first thing she asks every morning.

“What do the polls say?”

By: Bad Candy

Bad Candy — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:31:11 +0000

MT on August 9, 2007 at 4:59 PM

Yup. Seriously, things like that get used by Kossacks and other Nutroots to go after Michelle and others. So quit it already.

By: Zetterson

Zetterson — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:12:48 +0000

I have a prediction:

The press will refuse to call her out on this.

Yup I said it.

By: Do As I Say, v2.0 at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.

Do As I Say, v2.0 at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source. — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:11:21 +0000

[...] The naivete sweepstakes continue in the Democratic presidential primary campaign. Hillary Clinton rightly scolded Barack Obama for effectively negating our nuclear deterrent by proclaiming them “off the table” earlier this month. While the Hillary campaign used that to show how inept Obama is at foreign policy, Fox News did a little digging (via Hot Air): Her views expressed while she was gearing up for a presidential run stand in conflict with her comments this month regarding Obama, who faced heavy criticism from leaders of both parties, including Clinton, after saying it would be “a profound mistake” to deploy nuclear weapons in Afghanistan and Pakistan. [...]

By: MT

MT — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:59:56 +0000

OhEssYouCowboys on August 9, 2007 at 4:46 PM

That’s not helpful.

By: Mallard T. Drake

Mallard T. Drake — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:58:46 +0000

Hillary Clinton Campaign Strategy Playbook

Rule 1: Girl, say whatever you need to say to get elected.

Rule 2: See rule 1, girl.

Rule 3: Never, ever admit, girl, that there is a Rule 1.

By: Kini

Kini — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:58:11 +0000

Whatdaya think? It’s the summer of flip-flops!
It’ll be waffles in November, er or rather eggos.

By: Captain's Quarters

Captain's Quarters — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:58:08 +0000

Do As I Say, v2.0…

The naivete sweepstakes continue in the Democratic presidential primary campaign. Hillary Clinton rightly scolded Barack Obama for effectively negating our nuclear deterrent by proclaiming them “off the table” earlier this month. While the Hillary ca…

By: see-dubya

see-dubya — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:57:53 +0000

“I was for it before Obama was against it!”

By: Vanquisher

Vanquisher — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:45:43 +0000

Nothing to see here, folks. Any position she had then was only in response to the horrible Bush admin. And any position she has now is because she is just so wise—”Bow before the queen of filth, the queen of putrescence!”

By: Spirit of 1776

Spirit of 1776 — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:42:56 +0000

I think it was Tucker that said yesterday, seems in the last ‘forum’ all the shots were at Obama, and none at Hillary – perhaps accepting her lead and angling for a position in the next Clinton administration.

It’s hard to understand why, otherwise, the candidates wouldn’t want to take her on on this ‘nuances’. I guess it’s fine if we save it up for the general.