Excellent! Can you imagine someone like Margaret Thatcher using the word girl? No, she was busy being a competent, intelligent woman and she then and now always comes across as a lady.

INC on August 8, 2007 at 12:27 PM

Don’t tell the feminists that. They only time they think acting tough is feminine is if your’re “railing against the patriarchy” and in general emulating the absolute worst qualities men possess.

I like to sum up modern feminists this way: They have managed to emulate all the negative qualities of men while retaining none of the positive qualities of women.

The modern feminist is arrogant, pushy, unforgiving, cold, and emotionless (bar rage and anger, of course) while being fickle, snappy, cliquey, overly sensitive, and indignant.

Also doing their civic duty – BO is spending today with a healthcare working in California assisting with patient care and…. not to be outdone Ms. Edwards (not Elizabeth)
spent a day in a nursing home helping to care for the patients. (I assume trolling for clients is a more accurate description). Just when ya don’t think it can get any weirder!

That campaign played out in NY. I do think things will be different in a general election.

I’ve seen several articles by Rasmussen on polling and one thing that has been said repeatedly is that Hillary’s numbers are stable and show little variation. Most people decided what they think of her years ago. She’s going to have to reach for the so-called independents to get up over 50%. Playing to the nutroots won’t help in a general election. All the R’s have to do is put together clips of Hill’s speeches to take her on.

She has not shown the maturity to be called a women or the class to be called a lady.

Wil on August 8, 2007 at 10:51 AM

Excellent! Can you imagine someone like Margaret Thatcher using the word girl? No, she was busy being a competent, intelligent woman and she then and now always comes across as a lady.

But hope remains, because she will have to do battle with the Republican nominee eventually. If that nominee has a backbone and half an ounce of debating skills, he should have an opportunity to put Hillary’s feet to the fire, and expose her as a fraudulent wordsmith – in the mold of her tutor, Der Slickmiester.

Yes, but remember what happened the last time a scenario like this played out: Hillary played the girl card, and the MSM circled the wagons around her whilst decrying her opponent as a bully.

Anyone comes close to drawing blood on Hillary, there’ll be round the clock coverage of this cad as a mysogynist bully and back to back, well-coordinated smear pieces designed to tell the public that Rudy/Mitt/Fred is afraid of a powerful woman. All the while, our next commander in chief will be acting like a demure bride in the 19th century.

And when the smears begin, the public will absorb it like a sponge because the GOP will be too frightened to fight back, like the total pussies they are.

I hate to say it, but the we really needed to come up with a woman candidate of our own who could deflect all the bs that will be soon be heading our way.

Is it too late to recruit Secretary Rice?

I thought the feminists banned that word “girl” years ago.

right2bright on August 7, 2007 at 11:15 PM

Me too.

A couple of years ago I witnessed a male co-worker being admonished by our female boss for referring to a newly hired female colleague as “the new girl.” He was told “we don’t say ‘girl’ we say ‘young lady’.”

She has not shown the maturity to be called a women or the class to be called a lady.

JohnJ,
You got it right. Hillary knows that the entire left side is united against President Bush. Her comment in the clip about changing was directed to that audience. As long as she says “change” all will agree with her. She is avoiding saying change to what, because that would lose votes.

If America is really stupid enough to fall for “Vote fah CHANGE” twice in a row, we probably deserve to have our power in the world reduced until we wake the *&%^ up.

I wonder how long she rehearsed that line.
Nothing is impromptu that comes forth from her nasal voice.
desertdweller on August 8, 2007 at 12:33 AM

desertdweller,
That line was not only rehearsed it was trimmed, tuned, and nuanced, and selected from alternates by an expensive team of consultants. It was delivered better than she could have six years ago. You think Bonds has a machine? Hillary is heading a well funded experienced political machine that won’t be stopped by denying its power in the election process.

Frequent comment
When will she get a hard question?

It doesn’t matter; she will always revert to canned speeches however irrelevant.

You’re missing the point, I think. Hillary is relying on those people who want a united front against the Republicans. Republicans, in general, want Americans united against terrorists and rogue states. Democrats have a vastly different idea of who the enemy is.
JohnJ on August 8, 2007 at 9:08 AM

JohnJ,
You got it right. Hillary knows that the entire left side is united against President Bush. Her comment in the clip about changing was directed to that audience. As long as she says “change” all will agree with her. She is avoiding saying change to what, because that would lose votes.

Ah but don’t worry about her stated positions. She is just talking to get elected. Once POTUS she will act in her own best interest.

ABH, ABH,ABH.

Kensington on August 8, 2007 at 3:20 AM

I have to agree with you on the remote possibility of Hillary getting any “hard questions”. It is unlikely since the MSM is an effective flank of her campaign team. Who knows, maybe Fox could slip in a tough one if the Dem candidate gathers the courage to face a moderator from that network.

But hope remains, because she will have to do battle with the Republican nominee eventually. If that nominee has a backbone and half an ounce of debating skills, he should have an opportunity to put Hillary’s feet to the fire, and expose her as a fraudulent wordsmith – in the mold of her tutor, Der Slickmiester.

If we had an honest, unbiasd media, she wouldn’t stand a chance of winning. If we suffer another attack here at home before the elections, she most likely will take a huge hit in the polls. It is for that reason I don’t expect any attacks before the next election. The jihad terrorists are pulling for their allies ….. the Dems.

Isn’t that John Edwards’ campaign slogan?

Right wing machine?

We wish.

No, she can’t even get her own rubber-stamp rhetoric correct.

She meant to say the “Right-wing noise machine” like she always does.

Damn she is horrible…

Was she told when she was young
that pain would lead to pleasure…?

We wish.

Another Clinton straw man.