Fred: Jeri was just following orders
posted at 2:23 pm on August 6, 2007 by Allahpundit
A strange piece. When I saw the headline, I thought it was going to be an ostentatious show of Fred’s chivalrous southern manners and innate alpha male gallantry via an impassioned plea to the press to lay off the missus. But no, it’s really more apologetic than anything. He takes a swipe in passing at the media for having its facts wrong on some things but the main part, oddly, seems directed at campaign staffers who might have been rubbed the wrong way by Jeri’s management style:
“We started literally from the kitchen table a few months ago,” he said. “While I did the things that I felt like I needed to do — I had a contract with NBC television, I had a contract with ABC radio, I was chairman of the advisory board on international security for the State Department, and a lot of other things — while I was disengaging from that and getting my thoughts together on issues and things of that nature, public comments I knew I would be called on to make, I asked her to do certain things for me. She did what I asked her to do.”
The former senator said his wife’s actions, however they have been interpreted in the press, have been at his behest. “She always looks out for my best interests, and when she sees something that she knows I would not approve of, or is not in my best interest, she voices that concern — in other words, just exactly the way I would want her to. Now, some people don’t like that, especially some people who have their own issue with regard to the campaign, shall we say, and they take advantage of putting out anonymous comments and so forth.”
Who cares about any of this? The only concrete allegation of Jeri having clashed with a top staffer was after former campaign manager Tom Collamore resigned. Bob Novak wrote an op-ed last week alleging that Collamore wasn’t ready for primetime anyway and had never intended to manage the campaign once it launched, so what’s the big deal? Or am I missing the point here insofar as what this is really about is reminding people that Fred wears the pants in his family, not Mrs. Thompson?
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Media tries to turn the ship back around to re-label Jeri a dumb mindless broad in 3…2…1…
Bad Candy on August 6, 2007 at 2:32 PM
>>Meh, non-issue.
It is interesting how all the Republican wives turn out to be bimbos, trophies or domineering harlots and all the Dem spouses are saints.
JackStraw on August 6, 2007 at 2:32 PM
Maybe he’s hinting at other, yet unproven, allegations that he’s basically admitting to.
Esthier on August 6, 2007 at 2:34 PM
I’m not worried. I mean Fred! is the best there is, he wakes up in the morning and pisses excellence. He’s just a big, hairy, winning machine.
saltydogg14 on August 6, 2007 at 2:40 PM
Who cares? I’ll bet CS Devin cares!!!!
As Republicans, those of us who want to win next year should care. The Enemy Press will do whatever they must do to damage Fred because they fear him.
I always hear how the Rs have to scramble to find someone who might be able to beat the Evil One. I think Fred is the one who can do it. Better than Rudy or Romney, but I think either of these three will win. Someone as openly evil as Clinton has no chance of winning without massive voter fraud.
With the defeat of shamnesty, one possible avenue for D cheating has been blocked. Now expect them to do anything to destroy the R candidate, including lying about wives.
ScottG on August 6, 2007 at 2:42 PM
In August all of Europe goes on vacation. In August America, especially the media, goes guano.
Entelechy on August 6, 2007 at 2:43 PM
Slow news week, maybe?
Apparently, some conservatives believe that EVERY liberal snipe has to be addressed – no matter how incredibly banal. The problem is that when you’re arguing with idiots and you take them seriously, you’ve already lost.
logis on August 6, 2007 at 2:46 PM
Har. The Fred backlash is officially in full swing.
Allahpundit on August 6, 2007 at 2:46 PM
Why is the liberal media so afraid of a strong, powerful woman?
JammieWearingFool on August 6, 2007 at 2:47 PM
They give the exact same explanation for both: It’s because Republicans don’t respect women.
logis on August 6, 2007 at 2:53 PM
They prefer weak, dominated women, like Silky.
fogw on August 6, 2007 at 2:53 PM
A veiled swipe at DS and HA for exposing the hiring of Spencer Abraham.
Yeah… he wears the pants. No regret for hiring Spencer.
We got that Fred.
Now.. will you (Fred) just get out of the way and let the
“real men” run for the primary.
Mcguyver on August 6, 2007 at 2:57 PM
Because women’s rights, success in race relations, any form of progress is only meant for liberals. Never mind that their track record is abysmal in all these categories.
Liberal spouse (i.e. Mrs. Heinz, Mrs. Clinton, Jackie, Mrs. Roosevelt) says/does something – she’s progressive, sensitive, stands for something in the world, has substance, is intelligent on her own, ra, ra, ra.
Conservative spouse (Mrs. Reagan, Mrs. Bush, the elder and the younger, Jeri) says/does something – she’s a trophy, a dictator, wears the pants in the house, is a bitch, is dumb but might have big breasts, dresses too fancy or not fancy enough, doesn’t know her place, doesn’t spend enough time with the children and charities, spends too much time socializing, bla, bla, bla.
Solution – ignore the source/s or slap them silly, like Michael Moore. No sense to be explanatory or nice. I’m disappointed in Fred’s response, or that he gave one altogether.
Entelechy on August 6, 2007 at 2:59 PM
You mean it’s not possible for a backlash, triple somersault, Howard Johnson, full gainer into the presidential pool? It’s not that bad…..yet.
captivated_dem on August 6, 2007 at 3:05 PM
Alpha Male? Strangest top dog I’ve ever seen, late to a fight, runs with his tail between his legs, has vague reasons for even wanting the Presidency… all bark and no bite.
Fred is a Beta Male at best. He should stand aside and let the actual candidates who aren’t running on pure charisma power take the job. Fred Thompson will never beat Hillary. He’s literally a rich, old, white Barack Obama. No relevant experience, running on Hollywood starpower, and an otherwise empty suit spouting platitudes for the base.
Fred Thompson is a Barack that can’t even use the Race Card. He’s finished before he starts.
BKennedy on August 6, 2007 at 3:12 PM
The only thing that I’ve heard about Fred so far that really troubles me is the appointment of Spencer Abraham. For obvious reasons, that appointment occurred at the same time as the shake up in his campaign, which was reported to have been caused by some friction with Jeri. In the last few days I’ve heard somebody assert that Fred has fallen a bit in the polls, although I don’t recall the source.
If it’s true that Fred has fallen a bit in some polls, perhaps he has misinterpreted the cause of his troubles and believes it to be a result of Jeri’s role in the shakeup rather than the appointment of Spencer Abraham, which at least in the blogosphere seems to be causing the most turbulence.
Personally I feel that if Jeri is capable, more power to her.
FloatingRock on August 6, 2007 at 3:20 PM
Fred? has bark. Jeri! has bite. ;-)
PS
Run Mitt! Run!
Darnell Clayton on August 6, 2007 at 3:25 PM
Thank you, csdeven Jr.
No relevant experience? Huh? A former one-term governor who lost a Senate race against a fat, drunken buffon or a former mayor have more experience in foriegn policy and national politics than someone who chaired an advisory committee on international security and served 8 years in national government? The FlipFlop Mitt supporters are becoming almost as irrational as the Ron Paul cultists.
And can’t beat Hillary? Check the polls- Bush Jr (FlipFlop Mitt) fares the worst in matchups against Hillary- worse than Rudy, worse than Fred, worse than even McCain. Anyone worried about electability should be running from Mitt at full speed.
We get it- Fred is hurting FlipFlop Mitt, and you hate him for it. However you can least pretend to be rational in your arguments, Junior.
Hollowpoint on August 6, 2007 at 3:41 PM
Lets see, Jeri is very good looking, very smart, an experienced political operative, has good looking kids and is very supportive of her husband. All of these seem to be very positive attributes. I guess that the MSM is really worried about Fred or we have had a bunch of “slow news days”.
Anyway, she will make an outstanding “first lady”.
duff65 on August 6, 2007 at 4:34 PM
I don’t believe the word “almost” can be applied to these people. Liberaltarians and the most flaming moonbats make their “arguments” in exactly the same way. I’m not sure exactly why, but some of the same personality types are now claiming to be Mitt supporters. A zealot is a zealot; they’re all the same. To them, facts aren’t a means of formulating conclusions; they’re only a way to keep re-justifying whatever happens to be stuck in their craw. They literally don’t understand the concept of objectivity; their hatred is absolutely without reason.
This topic is a perfect example. This is the most innocuous answer to the most banal criticism possible. Yet – somehow – they see this as an ideal excuse to launch into a yet another tirade. Downright bizarre.
Back when I cared what the leftist fringe was saying about Bush, I liked to play a game: Imagine if Bush had done the exact opposite of whatever they are criticizing. Would that change their level of vehemence in the slightest?
In this case, Thompson’s wife is charming, good looking and assertive. Well, that “obviously” means that Fred Thompson is a wimp who has no will or ambition of his own.
So, what if she were a frumpy wall flower instead? Would they consider that a GOOD thing? Of course not. That would just “prove” that Fred was so horribly embittered by his lack of self esteem that he needed a weak wife to make himself feel more like a man. And, although it’s not yet proven, that would probably mean he’s secretly an arrogant thug in his private life – possibly even a wife beater.
In their minds, Thompson has reared his (admittedly) ugly head as the newest ReganGingrichBushHitler. And no possible combination of what we call “facts” could ever change that. No matter what happens, the hate can only move in one direction.
logis on August 6, 2007 at 4:39 PM
Notice how the groupies ignore freds? lobbying, lying, and faking and fixate onto some nonsense about imaginary scenarios.
The more likely scenario can be predicted by his behavior with the funds donated to him for his last election. He decided not to run, after teasing everyone for quite a while. Then he takes the money, gives it to his own PAC and then pays his son the lions share of the money to do basically nothing.
freddie boys response? “That’s the way it’s done in Washington”.
That is the attitude of a scum bag Washington insider and it wont surprise me a bit if the people he has fleeced for this non-campaign will never see a dime of their money back when he drops out, and it will all end up in his family’s pockets.
csdeven on August 6, 2007 at 4:59 PM
Here we go with freddie boy nuancing the problems with having his wife involved in the campaign. I predicted this a month ago. Jeri will interject herself into freds? campaign and she will become a liability.
What is that now, 5 for 5 on predictions about fred? and his dishonest non-campaign?
csdeven on August 6, 2007 at 5:03 PM
I didn’t read the article at first because I figured it would be just another load of blathering BS from a lying non-candidate. Well, I was right. More claims of not being a candidate yet running like he is one.
fred? wants everything both ways.
He brags about his poll numbers but doesn’t want to be a candidate.
He says he’s always been pro-life, but he’s really a pro-choice federalist.
He’s not a Washington insider, but he is a arm-twisting lobbyist.
He wants to drive his limo all over town, but has his staff drive a fake red pickup to rallies.
The guy is a total empty suit.
csdeven on August 6, 2007 at 5:25 PM
Three frantic posts in a row by csdeven. Well CS, Fred may be an empty suit, but you are definitely a one trick pony.
speed911 on August 6, 2007 at 5:34 PM
That Fat, Drunken buffoon (Ted Kennedy) happens to be the most politically protected entity in history. I bet your macho man Fred, who hasn’t even worked for anything other than Washington or fantasyland, much less been a success at anything, could unseat him though, right? He’s just a fat drunken slob, one who wins every election by around 70%. Living in Massachusetts, I personally wish anyone would kick the swimmer out, but it’s apparent that Hollow points, like many of Fred’s groupies does not go past skin deep analysis.
But I bet Fred beats Teddy in Hollowpoint’s world of fantasy football. Why, he could come up from Tennesee and win with 70% of the vote.
And please, Senate Commitees have foreign policy experience? HA. Explain Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi then, whose idea of foreign policy is kowtowing to the enemy. “International Security” under Clinton was a joke, and that’s when Fred served, so I guess he was a bureaucrat in an unused function. Whoops.
Oh, and perhaps you forgot Romney has had to work with international leaders before. Something about the Olympics or something? You know, that which was bankrupted and destroyed by corruption restored by Romney’s immense private sector knowledge? What is Fred’s stance on corruption? He’ll eat at any trough that shows up to his lobby desk, funnel funds to his immediate family while doing dip for conservative causes, and sign off on CFR.
As to polls? This early, polls mean jack. And since Fred isn’t actually a candidate yet, any poll numbers he has are null and void. After all, he’s participated in no debates, all we’ll get from is website is 20-year old rhetoric with no action behind it. Fred’s greatest conservative achievement is providing a big fat check for his son’s consulting company. That’ll please those capitalism lovers the Democrats.
Hillary Clinton is poll guided and so apparently are Fredheads. Aren’t Fredites always saying the election is too far away as an excuse for Fred’s late entry? Well, apparently it isn’t too late to be projecting out poll results to 15 months of now. Good job Fredheads, so which is it? Too early because Fred hasn’t thrown his hat in the ring, or poll results from today are infallible predictions of November 2008? Pick one Fredheads, your on almost as much shaky ground as Fred!
BKennedy on August 6, 2007 at 5:36 PM
I’m disgusted by the abject hatred and condescention shown by certain people toward anyone who might support Fred. Aren’t we all looking for the same thing? Aren’t our goals similar? Once the insults and name-calling starts, these threads look more like a political chat room full of bored people who have nothing better to do than look for an argument. Tone it down, people.
And yes, I did call csdeven a one-trick pony, which is name-calling, so call me a hypocrit. I know it’s coming.
/rolling eyes
speed911 on August 6, 2007 at 5:48 PM
How about the sort of RINO ALERT ALL CYLYNDERS! That Fredheads engage in against any other candidate? For reference, see Hollowpoints latest screed.
Fred deserves what he gets: he’s all image no action, and that image has been crumbling slowly, surely, even here at HotAir, mostly because there are enough people wise enough to know a poser when they see one. I kind of want more proof when AP blogs about Fred’s “Alpha Male” status, when the only thing he has that indicates anything like that is his height. Well sorry, I don’t view being 6-foot-6 as a valid criterion for President. I’ve never seen Alpha anything out of Fred. I do not know why HotAir holds him is such esteem when its quite clear he has done nothing to deserve so much as our attention. If we posted half as much about Duncan Hunter as we do about Fred Thompson, maybe we’d have a shot at getting a real conservative who has taken real action to help conservative causes into the mainstream.
Instead, we’re focusing on a Hollyweird actor with a shameless lobbyist past who has done absolutely nothing for conservative causes in his entire life, other than perhaps make a speech or two. If we had to latch on to someone who needed a conservative site to help him move anywhere, it should have been someone like Duncan Hunter.
Everyone knows Fred was a Senator, which means in whatever limited capacity he had to deal with some manner of foreign policy. Foreign Policy is mostly the purview of the President, not Congress.
Thing is, Barack, Hillary, McCain, and Edwards were all Senators too. Hell, Hillary Clinton, much as I dispise the socialist, can certainly tote a better foreign policy experience record than Fred.
BKennedy on August 6, 2007 at 6:03 PM
Again, so many words, so few legitimate points. Serving on the silly Olympic Committee is working with “international leaders”??? Do you honestly believe your own absurdities? Can you name one “international leader” who was on the nearly meaningless Olympic Committee? I can’t. A governor certainly doesn’t qualify as an international leader- hell, not even as a national leader. If being on the Olympic Committee counts as foreign policy experience then so does my time in the Minneapolis International Airport waiting for a flight. Maybe I should run.
And while poll numbers can and will change in the next 6 months, Romney has been working on his campaign for a solid 2 years now, and announced 8 months ago… yet he’s still trailing badly with little improvement. If after 3 debates and plenty of exposure he can’t gain traction, he simply won’t. And given his “moderate” history and recent big government conservatism, he shouldn’t.
It says much that Romney supporters spend so little time explaining why he would be the best candidate, but so much time attacking those with more relevant experience and a much better chance of winning the general election. You reek of desperation.
All I’ve seen so far is “hey, I’m from Massachussetts, he was governor here, so I’m backing him no matter what and attacking all who oppose him!” Well, that and co-religionists desperate to get a Mormon in the White House, no matter what his many shortcomings.
Hollowpoint on August 6, 2007 at 6:30 PM
Jeri!
- The Cat
MirCat on August 6, 2007 at 6:52 PM
It says much that Fredheads point to a single Senate committee as proof of Fred’s experience. La dee freeking da, that still isn’t exucutive experience for the highest executive posiition in the land, its serving on a commitee with 8-10 other bureaucrats and getting nothing done.
Why would Fred be the best candidate again Hollowpoint? No seriously, you’ve never answered this. Time and time again you’ve pulled out “But Romney did this or but Rudy did that.” Why should I vote for Fred?
I know why I’m voting for Romney. Even if he didn’t serve on some faceless, meaningless committee with the words “international” and “security” in its name, he knows the tactics of our enemy and how they gain influence. He has had invaluable private and public sector executive experiences. He has worked magic in turning around budgets. I’ve explained this to you over and over again Hollowpoint, but you’re only interested in blindly supporting your shameless lobbyist-turned no-note Senator-turned Hollyweird actor.
One last thing: Maybe next time you make a comment on the swimmer and how easy he is to defeat, try selling that line to someone who doesn’t live in the state where he resides?
All I’ve seen from Fred is “I wanna be President cause I wanna do stuff, stuff only a Pres can do, yeah, thats it!”
As to Fredheads, all I’ve seen is “Fred is an infallible God of manhood. He is the most conservative out of all the candidates, despite having absolutely no record indicating so. None dare oppose his might!”
And its strange that you believe Romney is “trailing badly” when he’s at the top of the NH and Iowa polls. You know, the early primary states. There’s no such thing as a national election poll. New Hampshire doesn’t ask California for permission first before voting. Moreover, the general doesn’t have 20 candidates running, it has 2, 3 if Nader gets back in the game. Mitt could be running at 0% of the vote in California and New York and still win the election.
BKennedy on August 6, 2007 at 7:09 PM
Mitts! qualifications have been listed several times and you dang well know it. You don’t accept them and that’s fine. But the entire group is waiting for you to defend freddie boy on his lobbying past, his piss poor record in the senate, and point to some kind of executive experience.
You have yet to explain why his support for McCain/Feingold isn’t clear proof that his federalist mantra is BS. He assaulted the first amendment and now pretends it isn’t working the way he wanted. He bucked conservative causes in the senate and gave lip service to pro-life positions after running on a pro-choice platform.
He took all the money from his senate campaign and put it into his own PAC so he could funnel $170,000 to his own son. AND THEN he has the gall to justify it because thats the way things are done in Washington.
His wife has his balls. She is the one who is driven to a desire for the power of the presidency, and she has to drag freddie boy along just because he was a star on a TV show.
He lobbied against americans with asbestos poisoning in an attempt to deny them the right to be represented by council. He lobbied for a dictator. He lobbied for an abortion group and then LIED about it. He lobbied for a nuclear power plant that was scraped after it cost the public billions of dollars.
When fred? had the choice to work for conservative causes verses lining his pocket with cash from unscrupulous clients, he chose the cash.
You must be soooooo proud!
csdeven on August 6, 2007 at 7:17 PM
Bwahahahahahaha!!!!
freds? supporters think fred? just shows up on the lot and is himself for his TV show. They think his wife is a reason he is qualified to be president. They think 8 years as a do nothing senator is executive experience. They think that his lobbying will be well received by regular Joe voters.
Zealot!? Bwahahahahaha!! You obviously have no clue what that word means because freds? groupies are the epitome of zealot-dom!
csdeven on August 6, 2007 at 7:26 PM
hahaha
Run Jeri! Run!
csdeven on August 6, 2007 at 7:28 PM
Did you say something? I’ve gotten in the habit of checking the author of a post before reading and skipping yours completely, knowing they’ll be completely worthless anyways.
Hollowpoint on August 6, 2007 at 7:57 PM
I don’t guess I really have anything to add to this…
logis on August 6, 2007 at 7:58 PM
It’s really quite satisfying watching the fred? supporters ignore all freds? lies and fakeries. It’s almost as much fun as watching that cowardly liar fred? try to nuance his way out of being a ball less puppet whose strings are being pull by his power hungry wife.
csdeven on August 6, 2007 at 8:05 PM
Finally! Now we wont have to ignore your asinine fixation on little old me.
csdeven on August 6, 2007 at 8:06 PM
A single Senate committee? Um… there’s a bit more to it than that duder. A few of the highlights:
But yeah, Romney’s vast experience on the Olympic Committee definately trumps all that. Damn terrorist figure skaters- he sure kept them in line.
In the Senate, Fred had a record of backing conservative, federalist values, the anomoly of his ill advised support of campaign finance aside. He’s addressed the people repeatedly directly through his blog posts and radio shows, unafraid to take controversial positions he believes in (Scooter Libby). He hasn’t done a sudden 180 on the issues depending on what election he’s running for as has Romney. He’s not a gun-grabber, and not a Big Government Conservative as are Bush and Romney, both of whom have advocated big government health care and education. Fred didn’t run from the Republican party and the legacy of Ronald Reagan in one election, then embrace them the next.
Since electability does matter, it’s noteworthy that he went from rumor to frontrunner in a matter of a few months, where the likes of Mitt have stagnated despite a campaign that’s been in the works for 2 years, with a previous election average of .500. In his first Senate race, he went from being way behind to trouncing his opponent.
Is it worth considering that he’s not had the executive experience of being a governor or such? Sure, that’s a valid concern. Fortunately, the likely Dem nominees don’t have such experience either. Personally, I’ll take the conservative without a governorship under his belt over a political cameleon with a single term of a liberal state to his credit.
If you’re a Bushesque “Compassionate Conservative” who wants more gun control and a government mandated health care program, then yeah- Romney should be your guy. Me, I’ll pass.
Hollowpoint on August 6, 2007 at 8:24 PM
Who said this?
Replace RINO with Mitt, Fred, Rudy and you’re looking at potentially the same result.
Entelechy on August 6, 2007 at 9:11 PM
Let’s put Fred in the White House just so we’ll have 8 years of Jeri eye candy. Imagine that dowdy socialist Hitlery for just as long.
Mojave Mark on August 6, 2007 at 10:28 PM
Hey, welcome to the club!
FloatingRock on August 6, 2007 at 10:32 PM
Seriously though, I don’t skip all of Csdeven’s posts, only on certain topics like this one where it’s about Fred yet not very interesting.
FloatingRock on August 6, 2007 at 10:36 PM
“Never argue with an idiot. They just drag you down to their level and beat you with expirience.” – Dilbert
Texas Nick 77 on August 7, 2007 at 1:11 AM
I’ve accidentally read his posts on other subjects, and found I’m not missing anything by ignoring him. The man is a simpleton with nothing to offer on any subject; mostly he makes obvious points and unfunny jokes when not discussing Fred, then he goes into full troll mode. Meh, maybe I just don’t get Mormon humor.
Hollowpoint on August 7, 2007 at 2:01 AM
“Interesting” is a relative term.
Somebody out there has cut, pasted, cross-indexed and archived this story so he will be able to reference it two dozen times a day for the next eight years. And, just to be on the safe side, he also had it tattooed to the inside of his eyelids lest he forget while he sleeps.
And that’s not even the craziest part. The craziest part is that the psycho actually thinks YOU are the one who has the “fixation.”
logis on August 7, 2007 at 2:06 AM
My biggest fear with Mitt was that the liberal media would wait until after the Primaries, and then take advantage of the public’s lack of knowledge about the Mormon faith – by portraying its practitioners as a bunch of hyper-zealous nutjobs.
But it looks like somebody’s trying to beat them to the punch.
logis on August 7, 2007 at 2:12 AM
As we all know, fred? the lying fake revels in the accolades he gets when he doesn’t deserve them.
He brags about his poll numbers like a AA ballplayer who brags that he has more homers than a major leaguer.
He fools his blind ignorant supporters to believe he is a good old boy because he has a fake red pickup.
His groupies believe he doesn’t act when he is on TV. He just shows up and acts natural.
Well, it appears that this just doesn’t extend to fred?. They have allowed several news organizations, and his supporters to heap praise on Jeri as being smart because she has a law degree. It is being reported by the Washington Post that Jeri Thompson, is not, and never has been a lawyer. Oh course this cannot be true because the screaming and crying hair renting groupies will tell us all we have to consider the source.
Well, I guess we’ll just wait and see, but judging by freds? propensity to lie and fake out his supporters, I’m leaning towards this story being true.
I hope freds? supporters can get their donations back. I think fred? is going to eventually drop out of the race, take all the contributions to his non-campaign and do “what is done in Washington” with them. Namely, get it into the pockets of his relatives and do little to nothing for conservative causes.
csdeven on August 7, 2007 at 8:08 AM
saltydogg14 on August 7, 2007 at 8:59 AM
Because he leased it to create the image that he was a good old boy. He also had his staffers drive it to within a few blocks of his rallies where fred? would meet them in his Washington insider-type high end luxury car. He would then drive the truck to the rally site. They would reverse the process after the rally.
csdeven on August 7, 2007 at 10:00 AM