Slowly but surely, Brits taking back southern Afghanistan from the Taliban
posted at 8:11 pm on August 4, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
“Southern Afghanistan” meaning Helmand province, in particular, site of yesterday’s airstrike on a congregation of the Taliban’s finest to witness a public execution. Net result: 100 jihadis dead and up to five senior commanders, including possibly the new operational honcho himself, Mansour Dadullah. Dadullah is the brother of the now-deceased “Taliban Zarqawi,” Mullah Dadullah, having taken the reins after NATO liquidated him in June just in time to preside over that dopey Taliban suicide bomber “graduation ceremony” that Brian Ross did so much heavy breathing over. I wonder how many graduates were at the hanging yesterday and didn’t make it out.
I understand Tammy Bruce’s point, especially in light of previous missed opportunities, but at this stage I’ll take good news wherever I can find it. Which brings us to the must-read of the day from an unlikely source. The airstrike is just the latest in a long series of victories in Helmand, the Times reports, giving NATO and the Brits in particular some desperately needed momentum:
As NATO forces have become better established and more numerous in southern Afghanistan, American forces have been able to deploy more troops in the east. There, they are also reporting gains in some border areas. All of this has helped NATO forces take the offensive against the Taliban, rather than fighting from their back foot, as they were forced to do last year, and gain local confidence…
What has made the difference here, the British say, is a shift in their tactics and a doubling of force numbers, to nearly 6,000 today, with more troops on the way…
The British have now been able to focus on their original counterinsurgency plan, which was to create “inkblots,” or secure zones around the main towns, and gradually expand security outward. In this way they are starting reconstruction projects in the provincial capital, Lashkar Gah, the town of Gereshk on the main road, and now Sangin…
“I think the big battle was for local support,” Colonel Carver said. “A proportion of the locals now think we are actually going to stay, and therefore they are prepared to throw their cards in with us. Before, they thought we were going to come in, kill a few Taliban and then leave.”
“It has gone from people too scared to even look at you or wave in case someone was watching, now they will talk,” he added. “It’s a step forward that they will talk to you, and it’s a real step forward that they talk to you as if you can solve their problems.”
Read all of it and pay special attention to what’s said about flagging “tier two” support. No wonder the Pakistanis are anxious for NATO to leave: the hotter it gets for the jihadis in Afghanistan, the more likely they are to turn inward on Musharraf instead.
Update: Which isn’t to say we’ll be declaring victory anytime soon.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Hoo-yah brits.
With the progress made in Iraq, although not so much as the increasingly wacko A.J. Strata would have you believe (note in that post where he says, “Save the Cheerleader, Save the World†”) this is excellent.
It looks like combat fatigue is not JUST something that applies to the West.
†AJ Strata never actually said that. I lied. What he actually said is funnier. See if you can find it.
Christoph on August 4, 2007 at 8:18 PM
I toast a cup of tea to one of our solid allies the British.
With the Canadians and Brits keeping the Taliban on their
toes,it allows the United States to unleash their high-tech
weapons and target these evil SOB’s.
canopfor on August 4, 2007 at 8:41 PM
A.J. Strata – “That is why I said, as goes Diyala so goes Iraq and the world.”
And I thought that an Iraqi centric view of the world was off the deep end.
IraqiDiyala-centric belief system:1) All roads start in
IraqiDiyala.2) All roads end in
IraqiDiyala.3) The Sun revolves around
IraqiDiyala.4) The moon revolves around
IraqiDiyala.5) The stars revolve around
IraqiDiyala.6) If the United States does not keep sufficient troop mass in Iraq, the orbital stability of the Earth will become unbalanced and all Muslim terrorists will slide into America.6) And if that (the local population rose up to kill and chase al-Qaeda [not the real Al Q, but Al Q in Iraq, a faux Al Q that took the name AlQ in Iraq to get "prestige"] out of their Province) happened we had the making of a domino effect that would not only sweep Iraq, but would sweep across the Middle East and the Muslim world. That is why I said, as goes Diyala so goes Iraq and the world.
A.J. Strata is certifiable.
MB4 on August 4, 2007 at 9:04 PM
It seems to me that the new and successful change in WOT strategy is in becoming “established” in the local communities.
Where once we waited for them to approach us, we now approach them.
Creating a Therapeutic Alliance as it were.
Randy
williars on August 4, 2007 at 9:15 PM
I hope we have another Deadullah Taliban leader. I have been watching Al Jazeera to see confirmation of this. They get their info from the insurgents. They only angle they are playing up is that it was civilians killed in the airraid. Which means it was a success and they need to emphasis something bad about it.
William Amos on August 4, 2007 at 9:16 PM
A.J. Strata is Coo Coo for Diyala Puffs!
MB4 on August 4, 2007 at 9:17 PM
New commander = dead commander?
Join the Taliban and enjoy the advantage of rapid advancement!
No need to wait till those above you die of old age!
MB4 on August 4, 2007 at 9:24 PM
You so nailed it, MB4, brilliant. And made me laugh, too.
BUT… not as much as A.J. Strata.
Christoph on August 4, 2007 at 9:44 PM
It’s Elvis.
bloggless on August 4, 2007 at 10:34 PM
I’m not sure about the chicken and the egg. Should I be bitter that the socialist governments failed to support this very worth effort in both Afghanistan and Iraq, with money and warm bodies, or should I be bitter that we lost so much credibility over the last three years that we can’t shame them into helping now.
Our military is perfectly capable of handling the retarded Talibanis and the Al Qaeda Death Cult, but the rebuilding and nannying needs to be done by someone … less expensive and crucial to the shooting part.
Jaibones on August 4, 2007 at 11:46 PM
What a bunch of nice guys them brits are, I mean to go to the trouble of getting all the little jehadis a graduation present….
72 virgins and a free trip straight to hell to meet Allah.
Isn’t that what they keep saying they really want .
Mojack420 on August 5, 2007 at 12:20 AM
The few original Talib that survived the 2001 rout have been getting killed off, and nobody following them seems to have enough appreciation for, or understanding of airpower. Wait a minute…I should say US airpower. They did a little better when it was MiGs, HINDs and SUs.
Guys flying A-10s out of BAF must have accounted for 350-400 guys crossing from Pakistan the first 6 weeks I was there…
May they never learn.
major john on August 5, 2007 at 12:37 AM
Airstrike … the grunt’s best friend.
GO AIR FORCE!
Tony737 on August 5, 2007 at 7:19 AM
Good news, and how many people, right here on this site, the other day were talking about how bad it was in Afganistan. Sounds like headway to me.
conservnut on August 5, 2007 at 8:28 AM
That guy in the picture was Mullah Dadullah’s brother who was released in a hostage deal. Smooth move, whoever did that.
PRCalDude on August 5, 2007 at 11:02 AM
Deut 32:35 “Vengeance is mine, and recompense,
At the time when their foot shall slide:
For the day of their calamity is at hand,
And the things that are to come upon them shall make haste.”
PRCalDude on August 5, 2007 at 11:06 AM
conservnut : “Good news, and how many people, right here on this site, the other day were talking about how bad it was in Afganistan. Sounds like headway to me.”
Never believe what you read in the MSM without a large helping of “confirmation from milbloggers” on the side.
It’s nice that the New York Times is *starting* to report accurately on the war in both Iraq and Afghanistan. But the rest of the MSM is not!
georgej on August 5, 2007 at 2:10 PM
Go Brits. A dead jihadist is a good jihadist.
Big problem indeed for the Dhems if America et al wins this war.
Mojave Mark on August 5, 2007 at 8:34 PM
Comment pages: