And while you are at it perhaps you could point out your man for the 2012 or 2016 race as well. I would expect that you would bear great anmomosity against any candidate for those races that has not already “officially declared”.

conservnut on August 3, 2007 at 9:02 AM

CS has made his support clear: “It’s probably somebody besides Ron Paul, so shut the Hell up about it!”

And CS has recently started to back off on his claim that he would love Fred Thompson like a non-platonic brother if only Fred would hurry up and declare tomorrow.

Now that the New York Times and the Boston Globe have provided two dozen (and counting) talking points, I think the moonbats have completely forgotten about the original reason they were all told to independantly believe that Fred Thompson is the new ReaganBushHitler.

I appreciate your passion in the matter of who our next leader should be. (although I believe it to be misdirected at times)

Who, pray tell is your candidate of choice at this very early hour of the 2008 presidential campaign? I ask so that I might do a little googling and a nexus lexis search and see what kind of liberal drivel, half truths and downright lies I might be able to produce to waylay them with. And while you are at it perhaps you could point out your man for the 2012 or 2016 race as well. I would expect that you would bear great anmomosity against any candidate for those races that has not already “officially declared”.

freds? inability to grow a pair of stones and be his own candidate is a clear indication of how he will execute ANY position he holds.

Sorry freddie boy, you’re a coward, and I’m not going to turn to the first lady for leadership when dealing with this country’s enemies. You lose.

Governors can’t veto court rulings.
BKennedy on August 2, 2007 at 10:44 PM

He was ordered to implement it by the Mass court. He could have 1) implemented a license that said “only good in Massachusetts” or 2) appealed to SCOTUS.

Now, when a couple “married” in Massachusetts comes to my State and is denied marriage benefits I’m going to have to pay for the costly litigation, and it won’t be directly to the SCOTUS. Same sex couples from other States are already going to Mass to get married (and have been granted marriage licenses) and then returning to their State of residence.

Unless you’re suggesting we ignore Article IV, Full Faith and Credit?

Don’t get me wrong. I think if the people of any State want to have same-sex marriage, or universal health care, or whatever, they should be entitled. But I don’t want them forcing it on my State. Romney’s actions have done that.

Other Candidates produce Ex-wives; Mitt Romney produces children. -In Mitt Romney Pajamas.

BKennedy on August 2, 2007 at 10:39 PM

Nah. Other candidates produce legislation, Mitt produces gay marriage by doing nothing.

Governors can’t veto court rulings. He did what he could with the powers he had, which basically meant he contained it to Massachusetts and made it so you had to reside here to get it.

He was elected Governor, not God. I’m sorry he isn’t like say Fred or Rudy, who we all know stand ardently is support of traditional marriage… serially, of course. What the hell did you want him to do? Liberals owned 2(now 3) branches of government. He’s only one man.

BKennedy on August 2, 2007 at 10:44 PM

You should be sorry.
Yeah, nice obfuscation. So the courts are above God? or on a par with him?
The courts ruled that unless legislation were passed, the gay marriage issue would go forward, and Mitt decided to do nothing.
As for other candidates, I guess I would be more concerned if they were leaving their spouses for someone of the same sex.

Romney had the chance to uphold the constitution of Mass. and he chose to do nothing. Contained it to Mass?
Uh huh. What rock are you hiding under?
It’s been spreading since.

I said I didn’t think so, considering his record on gay marriage in Massachusetts. She asked what I meant, and I said he allowed the judiciary there to run over him with it, and he did nothing to stop it.

Governors can’t veto court rulings. He did what he could with the powers he had, which basically meant he contained it to Massachusetts and made it so you had to reside here to get it.

He was elected Governor, not God. I’m sorry he isn’t like say Fred or Rudy, who we all know stand ardently is support of traditional marriage… serially, of course. What the hell did you want him to do? Liberals owned 2(now 3) branches of government. He’s only one man.

When Chuck Norris was in financial trouble, Mitt Romney turned his debt around in 10 seconds.

When Superman realized saving people for free wasn’t going to put food on the table, Mitt Romney got him a job at the daily planet.

Batman wears Mitt Romney pajamas.

Other Candidates produce Ex-wives; Mitt Romney produces children. -In Mitt Romney Pajamas.

Of course, Romney had already been in the race for months at that point and wasn’t riding a tsunami of goodwill from righties who were supposedly going to drown him in all the cash they’d saved up for when a real conservative finally jumped in.

I got a call tonight from the Romney campaign, wondering if I would like to consider a donation.

I said I didn’t think so, considering his record on gay marriage in Massachusetts. She asked what I meant, and I said he allowed the judiciary there to run over him with it, and he did nothing to stop it.
She got somewhat flustered, then went into her spiel of how tax cuts were important, and what Romney did with education.
She asked me if I considered tax cuts important, and I said not if my tax dollars are going to support benefits for those entering into same-sex marriages.

She got even more flustered (and a little PO’d) and I heard something about the call being paid for by the Romney campaign, which didn’t even complete, before she hung up.

Have a nice day Mitt!

If fred? is elected, he will be her puppet, and the public needs to know that.

csdeven on August 2, 2007 at 5:15 PM

He already is. And, please my e-love, don’t dispute your like position. You know it and you like it, or you’ve accepted it. As it always was, and always will be.

You say I don’t attack you. Why should I, besides in good spirit, now and then? There are 1001 reasons to love you because you’re a good guy:

- you raised two fine boys who serve our country, concurrently
- you cook, and share recipes/ideas with us
- you garden
- you do the loundry, maybe
- you wish the best for your country and your party
- you have convictions
- aside from this obsessive Gargantuan anti-Fred thing, you actually post some pretty good thoughts on other threads, though not too many

Your arguments are not always based in fact, are sometimes hilariously funny, mostly repetitive rants (in fact I think if I’d talk in my sleep, I could repeat them by now, but I don’t). I already know that you’ll happily pull that trigger for Fred, if he’s the nominee. Also, we’ll drink in San Diego (even though I don’t like to drink), no matter who it will be. It’s just a matter of whether you or I are buying.

Negating some myths:

- csdeven is not a troll, and doesn’t have boobs, at least not the kind Hillary/Nancy/Jeri have shown. Attack his comments, but not the man. Know, however, he’s on our side. He’s just having too much fun.
- Fred has balls, both the real and the matter-of-speech ones, the cojones type, contrary to csdeven’s rants on this topic.
- There’s nothing wrong with wishing to be the First Lady of this great country.
- Novak is a carmudgeon and for him to be complimentary to anyone is a big deal (must have a kernel of truth in his lines)
- A Jeri/Hillary line up will be devastating for the media – they and the liberals love looks, ra-ra to the contrary notwithstanding. Jeri is not Jackie but let’s face it, Hillary looks like a trapezoidal tub in expensive clothes, but still the outcome is a tub.

If Fred wins, will Jeri run for the junior senator seat from New York?

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on August 2, 2007 at 2:48 PM

No, she’ll then be the First Lady. The pictures will be precious, the articles endless, our joy beyond words.

And, today a colleague from New Jersy said to me “can you believe they wrote an article against Hillary showing cleavage?”, to which I retorted “did you know the NYT, and LAT wrote articles about Jeri T. being a trophy wife?” – - thoughtful looks, and silence…

You latch on to anything the MSM or the nutroots have to say that is derogatory about Fred and think of it as gospel to promote your argument.
conservnut on August 2, 2007 at 7:24 PM

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..And that’s just scratching the surface.
csdeven on August 2, 2007 at 7:44 PM

Every time the Daily Kos spews out another reason that Fred Thompson has replaced Ronald Reagan George Bush Newt Gingrich George Bush as the new Source Of All Evil In The World, the moonbats’ list just gets that much longer. And none of the bullet points will EVER go away.

They “know” that Fred Thompson is lazy the same way they knew that Reagan was lazy, and the same way they know that George Bush is stupid, does cocain, etc….

This is a religion of sorts, but “Gospel” doesn’t come anywhere near describing the way these people feel about their hatred. I’ve never heard a fundamentalist of any faith who felt the need to compulsively repeat a litany on the evils of the AntiChrist.

Liberals constantly brag about being devoutly Godless. But they believe in the Devil more fervently than any other cult does. The craziest Muslim extremist in the world believes that the rest of us are simply misguided fools who worship an evil God. But liberals don’t retain even that tiny thread back to sanity. To liberals, Republicans actually ARE evil in the flesh.

SouthernPride on August 2, 2007 at 6:46 PM

I was not writing about you…I am smart enough not to cross you.

Ribeye? My favorite…working with a spouse, do it all day…from the South, so am I…show my boobs……..naw, you would not like that.

That person (girl) knows who I am speaking of…

B) Fake:
1) Used a red pickup to fool supporters
August 2, 2007 at 7:44 PM

I tell you he is the devil incarnate…he use a red pickup to fool supporters. Is there no shame?

Take him out, drag him through the streets, hang’em high till his boots stop a twitchen.

“I thought you were hung…I am”

When Fred Thompson is elected President, he’ll be the tallest American President ever, beating Abraham Lincoln by an inch and Jimmy Carter with his fist.

In a Fred Thompson administration, there will always be room to disagree with him. That room is called the morgue.

conservnut on August 2, 2007 at 7:24 PM

You’re wrong. I’ve been studying freddie boy for months. Long before it was fashionable to expect that he be vetted along with REAL candidates.

fred? is a….
A) liar:
1) Claims he has ALWAYS been pro-life
2) Denied he lobbied for an abortion group

B) Fake:
1) Used a red pickup to fool supporters

C) Arm-twisting lobbyist:
1) Lobbied to deny asbestos victims their right to have an attorney represent them
2) Lobbied for a nuclear power plant that was cancelled after it cost the public a trillion dollars.
3) Lobbied for a dictator
4) Lobbied for an abortion rights group

Also….

He used $300,000+ from his senate campaign to start a PAC. His son ran the PAC and raised almost no money and he was paid more than what was used to help conservative causes.

He was a huge player in the McCain/Feingold law. A unconstitutional assault on the 1st amendment.

He has no executive experience.

He only repeats conservative ideas that others have already espoused.

He doesn’t understand Cuban immigration

He has no foreign policy experience

He went to London claiming he would get Margret Thatchers endorsement. He did not.

He only gives canned prepared speeches and only does softball interviews.

His Leno, Hoover, and London Q&A’s were dismal failures.

In all his interviews, he refuses to articulate a plan. The interviewer has to give fred? a scenario that he can agree with.

He said he will leave it to the whim of enlisted personnel to decide if we should stay or go in Iraq.

And that’s just scratching the surface.

You latch on to anything the MSM or the nutroots have to say that is derogatory about Fred and think of it as gospel to promote your argument. At least we can argue without relying on the style section of the NYT for our talking points.

SouthernPride on August 2, 2007 at 6:51 PM

Try looking up the meaning of the phrase “two dimensional thinking”. You are suffering from it.

freds? entire non-campaign is clear proof that he has no courage (or “balls” in man-speak). Any man who non-starts a non-campaign and lets his wife be the soul of the desire to faux-run, is a cowardly, ball-less, wimp. And like I said, that’s just the type of man you angry women types want for president. That’s why you defend him with your two dimensional argument.

And as far as “betting balls” goes, I certainly could bet them because I have balls.

fred? could not because he doesn’t have any. But that’s how you angry women type like your men ain’t it?

csdeven on August 2, 2007 at 6:37 PM

*Yawning right back at ya!

Fred doesn’t have balls? Did you read that on Rosie O’Dogs blog?? Did you unzip his britches and look? I’d enjoy it very much if you’d try doing that.

Me? Angry woman type? Nahhh….just the way I type.

One of our posters who claimed to be a man, has suddenly began taking on a bit of the female role.

Please do not feed the troll. She is hungry and only feeds on Fred.

right2bright on August 2, 2007 at 6:37 PM

If you are talking about me, you are mistaken. I would never claim to be a neandrathal.

I’ve got boobs and I’m proud of them! And yes, I do show my cleavage from time to time! A troll? Never been called that before. Interesting. I’ll see what my husband thinks. After all, we have a marriage to where we work together on ideas, projects, etc. Ever heard of doing that with your spouse?

She is hungry and only feeds on Fred.

Again…you are wrong. I’m hungry but am currently fixing Rib Eye Steaks for supper.

Battin’ 100 there, are ya?

You show me some kind of indication that SHE isn’t the one driving this whole thing and I’ll re-think whether she will drop the reins if he is elected.
csdeven on August 2, 2007 at 6:20 PM

Perhaps because HE is the one out there on the campaign trail. HE is the one who is going to be running for President. HE is the one being interviewed by everyone under the sun.
SouthernPride on August 2, 2007 at 6:30 PM

No, no. You’re missing the whole point. The psycho is demanding that you PROVE that Jeri Thompson isn’t the Most Evil Woman On Earth.

Simply pointing out that there was absolutely nothing even remotely like a rational reason for the moonbat to believe that in the first place is a complete waste of time.

Please do not feed the troll. She is hungry and only feeds on Fred.

SouthernPride on August 2, 2007 at 6:30 PM

*Yawn*

You fred?heads don’t even study your own candidate do you? It’s clear that fred? has a reputation for being lazy. It is also clear by reports from people who know him that his wife is the driving force behind his non-candidacy. So spare me your angry woman rants.

And as far as “betting balls” goes, I certainly could bet them because I have balls.

fred? could not because he doesn’t have any. But that’s how you angry women type like your men ain’t it?

You show me some kind of indication that SHE isn’t the one driving this whole thing and I’ll re-think whether she will drop the reins if he is elected.

csdeven on August 2, 2007 at 6:20 PM

Perhaps because HE is the one out there on the campaign trail. HE is the one who is going to be running for President. HE is the one being interviewed by everyone under the sun.

And, let me tell you something! If my husband were running for President, you can bet your little balls I’d be out there right beside him every step of the way, getting my little gal hands dirty within the traditionaly testosterone driven campaign heirarchy! There is not one single thing wrong with what she is doing and most of us gals who love our husbands would do the same damn thing, Mister Man!!!!

It’s often funny to me that all those with BDS claim Bush is responsible for everything. Now, that’s at least demigodhood.

Tennman on August 2, 2007 at 4:40 PM

And now all the moonbats have suddenly developed FDS – Fred Derangement Syndrome.

“His wife is too smart and too good looking!”

Wait a minute – what?

Seriously, the more insane and idiotic their insults are, the more adamant they become about them.

Of course none of us are in any kind of hurry. We have no problem with spending a few more months waiting to see whether someone better comes along. But the moonbats don’t ever waste time thinking anything through. Liberals are governed solely by instinct. They already sense in their marrow the threat posed by Fred Thompson, and they react in the only way they know how. To the hindbrain, hatred and fear have only one outlet: an inchoate and incessant antagonism.

The moonbats’ handlers probably wanted to wait a few months to officially sic them onto the new “Most Evil Man In The World.” But like a pack of overeager dogs, they’ve latched onto the scent of the leading Republican all on their own. And they won’t ever let it go.