“Naugle also called upon “responsible members of the homosexual community” to help the city put a stop to this public homosexual behavior. He stated that the county health department recently announced that Broward County is leading the nation in new HIV/AIDS cases in the MSM (men having sex with men) category and criticized the Tourist Board for inviting homosexuals to Broward County with the HIV/AIDS health crisis ongoing.”

Whats interesting is that these cases will need to be heard by a jury… to decide what is “reasonable”… just now CAIR will have to pay up after the fact…

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on July 27, 2007 at 3:44 PM

interesting stuff… read up on the case a bit, and you know it does NOT look like they bothered to ask the Framers of the Constitution what they meant? Can’t find any record of testimony… even though this was 1798 and some of them were still alive?

Talk about Judicial activism…. started a LOT earlier than I thought…

I still think the best answer is to form an organization that works with litigators ready to defend these cases pro bono, so that the John Does know they won’t have to front the money for their own defense.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on July 27, 2007 at 1:48 PM

I wonder if Jay Sekulow’s American Center for Law and Justice or Tom Fitton’s Judicial Watch would be appropriate organizations, as both have national security as one of their areas of interest. It might be easier to support them in this sort of focus rather than coming up with a whole new organization. Being in the (geographical) area, Atilla, do you have any idea whether or not this might be a feasible consideration?

Section. 9.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

That Civil law is not covered as a law??? Weird….

Guess they started down that “interpretation” path earlier than I thought….

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on July 27, 2007 at 3:09 PM

Actualy, most of the Civil Law is State law, and thus not covered by the prohibitions on Congress in the Constitution… they are covered by their State Constitutions.

Or is this like the 2nd Amendment… where the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed has been interpreted???

A law is anything signed into law by the President, Criminal or Civil IMO… its pretty darn clear.

Ex post facto laws are criminal in nature. This is civil. You can have retroactive effect in a statute governing civil cases, with some limitations.

Cooties?

Sheikh delays plane over seating

Section. 9.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Pretty clear to me… this is trying to create an Ex Post Facto law… if they attack this on Constitutional grounds they’ll win.

I have always been against punitive damages, but I do believe that people should be able to recover what they actually lost.It could make someone think twice before they file a suit.

Big pockets could break the average defendent on hidden costs alone. Take a look at the “Pants” lawsuit. Those people lost a lot of money and time because of some idiot thinking his pants were worth millions of dollars.

“Any person or authorized official found to be immune from civil liability under this section shall be entitled to recover from the plaintiff all reasonable costs and attorney fees.”

Beautiful!!

And if this fails in action I’m sure that we can improve it with another amendment.

“Any person or authorized official found to be immune from civil liability under this section shall be entitled to recover from the plaintiff all reasonable costs and attorney fees.”

Attorney’s fees are a distinct improvement from what we all thought was the entire provision yesterday.

But as much as that might possibly deter CAIR, et al., it still requires the John Doe to defend himself through litigation. I still think the best answer is to form an organization that works with litigators ready to defend these cases pro bono, so that the John Does know they won’t have to front the money for their own defense.

You cannot, under the Constitution

LOL, you had me there for a second. You can’t … Constitution! Haha, that still cracks me up.

Tell me the one about social security again.

You cannot, under the Constitution create Ex Post Facto law… CAIR will go after this on Constitutional grounds.

Dang yer kwick!!!!

It covers anyone, not just officials.

You’re welcome, Allah.

My mail server is down. See below.

Sec. 1206. Immunity for reports of suspected terrorist activity or suspicious behavior and response.

Document page 321