<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Bold refusal to read moronic celebrity news &#8212; or technical glitch?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PowWow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-586434</link>
		<dc:creator>PowWow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-586434</guid>
		<description>Cafferty wouldn&#039;t take a chance at losing his job, in my opinion. So I vote for glitch. After CNN, there&#039;s either MSNBC or Rather&#039;s lackey up on HDnet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cafferty wouldn&#8217;t take a chance at losing his job, in my opinion. So I vote for glitch. After CNN, there&#8217;s either MSNBC or Rather&#8217;s lackey up on HDnet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-585478</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-585478</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It looks to me like he wrote a script and they put in the Lindsey thing because it’s so important. He didn’t want to read it. He wanted to read what he wrote. 

Rightwingsparkle on July 25, 2007 at 10:26 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

While the on-air talent does review/edit the scripts, that&#039;s not what he means when he says &quot;my script&quot;. From my experience, the Lohan story was probably someone else&#039;s to read, or else his but at a different time slot, and he simply meant &quot;get the teleprompter on the piece that&#039;s up next, matching what I have in my hands&quot;.

The sardonic &quot;Apparently it&#039;s not&quot; comment should ensure that this happens to him again, real soon, and intentionally. Don&#039;t call out the guy who runs a teleprompter, you never know what you&#039;ll say next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It looks to me like he wrote a script and they put in the Lindsey thing because it’s so important. He didn’t want to read it. He wanted to read what he wrote. </p>
<p>Rightwingsparkle on July 25, 2007 at 10:26 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>While the on-air talent does review/edit the scripts, that&#8217;s not what he means when he says &#8220;my script&#8221;. From my experience, the Lohan story was probably someone else&#8217;s to read, or else his but at a different time slot, and he simply meant &#8220;get the teleprompter on the piece that&#8217;s up next, matching what I have in my hands&#8221;.</p>
<p>The sardonic &#8220;Apparently it&#8217;s not&#8221; comment should ensure that this happens to him again, real soon, and intentionally. Don&#8217;t call out the guy who runs a teleprompter, you never know what you&#8217;ll say next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: congsan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-585329</link>
		<dc:creator>congsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-585329</guid>
		<description>Glitch.  He&#039;s just a crabby old guy who has lost his marbles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glitch.  He&#8217;s just a crabby old guy who has lost his marbles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightwingsparkle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-585044</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightwingsparkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-585044</guid>
		<description>It looks to me like he wrote a script and they put in the Lindsey thing because &lt;em&gt;it&#039;s so important&lt;/em&gt;. He didn&#039;t want to read it. He wanted to read what he wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks to me like he wrote a script and they put in the Lindsey thing because <em>it&#8217;s so important</em>. He didn&#8217;t want to read it. He wanted to read what he wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Always Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584990</link>
		<dc:creator>Always Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584990</guid>
		<description>Cafferty rants so much to the ultra-left looonies from Kos and moveon that he sometimes makes Olbermahnnn sound like the Chairman of the PTA Bake Sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cafferty rants so much to the ultra-left looonies from Kos and moveon that he sometimes makes Olbermahnnn sound like the Chairman of the PTA Bake Sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radjah shelduck</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584973</link>
		<dc:creator>radjah shelduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584973</guid>
		<description>No, I don&#039;t think it was simply a technical glitch.  If it was, Cafferty could have simply said &quot;The story on the teleprompter doesn&#039;t match what I&#039;m doing; could the technicians in the control room please replace it with the correct piece?&quot;  In other words, he didn&#039;t need to mention what the other story was about.  It appears to me he went out of his way to say &quot;Lindsay Lohan&quot; with a sneer in his voice.  Or does he just have a sneer in his voice when he says anything?

Man, Jack patronizes an incompetent dry cleaner, doesn&#039;t he?  I mean, he&#039;s been waiting about five years now for them to deliver his jacket!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t think it was simply a technical glitch.  If it was, Cafferty could have simply said &#8220;The story on the teleprompter doesn&#8217;t match what I&#8217;m doing; could the technicians in the control room please replace it with the correct piece?&#8221;  In other words, he didn&#8217;t need to mention what the other story was about.  It appears to me he went out of his way to say &#8220;Lindsay Lohan&#8221; with a sneer in his voice.  Or does he just have a sneer in his voice when he says anything?</p>
<p>Man, Jack patronizes an incompetent dry cleaner, doesn&#8217;t he?  I mean, he&#8217;s been waiting about five years now for them to deliver his jacket!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malpaso</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584965</link>
		<dc:creator>Malpaso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584965</guid>
		<description>Hey, way to call out your co-workers. I&#039;m sure Jack is just &lt;em&gt;loved&lt;/em&gt; in the newsroom. 

And CNN still provides hard scripts (paper copies) to the anchors. What is it Jack? Too difficult to read from a printed page like a true professional would in that situation? Seriously, a &lt;strong&gt;BIG TIME &lt;/strong&gt;jerk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, way to call out your co-workers. I&#8217;m sure Jack is just <em>loved</em> in the newsroom. </p>
<p>And CNN still provides hard scripts (paper copies) to the anchors. What is it Jack? Too difficult to read from a printed page like a true professional would in that situation? Seriously, a <strong>BIG TIME </strong>jerk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RushBaby</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584951</link>
		<dc:creator>RushBaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584951</guid>
		<description>Glitch + bold refusal to disguise his irritation because he had expected to stir his little spoonful of worry over suicide-bombing into the MSM cauldron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glitch + bold refusal to disguise his irritation because he had expected to stir his little spoonful of worry over suicide-bombing into the MSM cauldron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: progressoverpeace</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584932</link>
		<dc:creator>progressoverpeace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584932</guid>
		<description>Itr certainly seems like a technical glitch.  He said &quot;put my script&quot;, which seems to imply that that was what he was expecting (although it&#039;s tough to tell without the preamble).  If he had just wanted to skip the story he probably would have said, &quot;put the XYZ story up, instead of ...&quot;.  That&#039;s the impression from this clip.

Of course, depending on an accurate use of English to discern ones intention is very difficult when dealing with CNN, where the English tends to be pretty sloppy on a regular basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Itr certainly seems like a technical glitch.  He said &#8220;put my script&#8221;, which seems to imply that that was what he was expecting (although it&#8217;s tough to tell without the preamble).  If he had just wanted to skip the story he probably would have said, &#8220;put the XYZ story up, instead of &#8230;&#8221;.  That&#8217;s the impression from this clip.</p>
<p>Of course, depending on an accurate use of English to discern ones intention is very difficult when dealing with CNN, where the English tends to be pretty sloppy on a regular basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HockeyTemper</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584920</link>
		<dc:creator>HockeyTemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584920</guid>
		<description>But, Jack Caffery is a &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; journalist...he&#039;s got bags under his eyes and he sleeves are rolled up. He&#039;s what they used to call &quot;a newsman.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, Jack Caffery is a <em>real</em> journalist&#8230;he&#8217;s got bags under his eyes and he sleeves are rolled up. He&#8217;s what they used to call &#8220;a newsman.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSitRep</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584916</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSitRep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584916</guid>
		<description>He is the crotch in crotchety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is the crotch in crotchety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JetBoy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584899</link>
		<dc:creator>JetBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584899</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;JiangxiDad on July 25, 2007 at 8:30 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I remember that too...I believe Sue Simmons is still on channel 4.  

As for the clip, it certainly does look like a glitch, but we&#039;d need to see a bit more to keep it in context.  

Jack seems to be just that...the CNN morning grouch.  He&#039;s got a ways to go to match the vitriol of, say, our friend Olby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>JiangxiDad on July 25, 2007 at 8:30 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I remember that too&#8230;I believe Sue Simmons is still on channel 4.  </p>
<p>As for the clip, it certainly does look like a glitch, but we&#8217;d need to see a bit more to keep it in context.  </p>
<p>Jack seems to be just that&#8230;the CNN morning grouch.  He&#8217;s got a ways to go to match the vitriol of, say, our friend Olby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiangxiDad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584882</link>
		<dc:creator>JiangxiDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584882</guid>
		<description>Wow. Jack Cafferty.  When I was a boy, he was the local NBC happy-news anchor here in NY.  He paired with a lady called Sue Simmons.  I don&#039;t watch TV now so I didn&#039;t know he was on CNN.  But I can assure you, Jack is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt;a serious newsman and this was a glitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Jack Cafferty.  When I was a boy, he was the local NBC happy-news anchor here in NY.  He paired with a lady called Sue Simmons.  I don&#8217;t watch TV now so I didn&#8217;t know he was on CNN.  But I can assure you, Jack is <em>not</em>a serious newsman and this was a glitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigOldDog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584875</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigOldDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584875</guid>
		<description>Jack, &quot;I&#039;m lucky to be working&quot; Cafferty would read &lt;em&gt;Green Eggs &amp; Ham&lt;/em&gt; on the air if so instructed. It&#039;s not like he as other employment options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, &#8220;I&#8217;m lucky to be working&#8221; Cafferty would read <em>Green Eggs &amp; Ham</em> on the air if so instructed. It&#8217;s not like he as other employment options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captivated_dem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/comment-page-1/#comment-584871</link>
		<dc:creator>captivated_dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/25/video-bold-refusal-to-read-moronic-celebrity-news-or-technical-glitch/#comment-584871</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;glitch&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>glitch</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
