Insurgent leaders meet poolside in Syria to plan post-U.S. Iraq
posted at 9:00 pm on July 24, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Al Qaeda wasn’t invited, nearly everyone else was. We followed the “irresponsible and frankly naive” Barack Obama battle plan for once by meeting today with Iran and for our trouble we got a catered dinner for roadside bomb builders outside Damascus that Iran’s bosomest buddy initially had planned to sponsor himself.
As for their demands, they’re simple. Tear down the entire existing Iraqi state apparatus and hand the country over to them to govern.
Once the majority of American troops have left, the alliance plans to throw out the constitution, dissolve the parliament, cancel all resolutions issued from the Bremer era on, and disband the existing security forces and U.S.-trained Iraqi army divisions. The U.S. embassy in Baghdad, they said, would have to close — “as in Saigon. With helicopters on the roof” said Samarai — until Washington recognized a new, resistance-led Iraqi governing council, and offered compensation to all individuals and organizations affected by the war. Under the new leadership, all Iraqi citizens who worked for or cooperated with the current, coalition-backed government would be arrested. A “reconciliation council”, drawn in large part from the ranks of the armed insurgency, would then draw up plans for a permanent “technocratic” government — which would immediately seek criminal charges and file civil suits against the U.S. government and major American war supporters in international court.
The Guardian had the inside track on this last week. Read the blockquote again in the context of this post and ruminate on the prospects for Petraeus’s plan to reconcile Sunnis and Shia from the ground up. There’s not a whole lot of common ground between “join the political process” and “dissolve the constitution”; as such, all of these guys are going to have to be killed at some point. The only question is whether the U.S. military, the IA, or the JAM will do most of the killing.
You’re all waiting for it so here it is — enemy recognition that anti-war sentiment is its own salvation. I leave you with this:
“The American project in Iraq is now precarious,” said Nizar al-Samarai, a conference spokesman and former official in the Saddam Hussein regime. “We are sure of our victory now, so we decided to meet.”…
“America doesn’t leave a country by force,” said Samarai. “Bush has been in a hole, digging deeper. So every year, it has become more difficult for America to leave Iraq. But what the muqawimma [resistance] movement has done is more than America can bear. Now there is not only a military battle in Iraq, there is a political battle in the U.S.” That part of the battle, he said, was nearly over. As for their summit, the delegates insisted it was merely postponed not cancelled. It will eventually be held — though perhaps not in Damascus.
Exit question: If Time magazine managed to find its way to the meeting, do you suppose the CIA did too?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
I wish, but I’m less than optimistic…
BadgerHawk on July 24, 2007 at 9:04 PM
Well that says it all right there. Dividing up the spoils.
On side note, Clinton’s answer last night did make her look the professional among amateurs.
Spirit of 1776 on July 24, 2007 at 9:10 PM
Sounds like a good place for a JDAM to me.
I astounds me that these guys can lay out the whole plan and the left and the media ignore it completely.
conservnut on July 24, 2007 at 9:11 PM
A new grievance for the Obama or Hillary to appease once either of them becomes president.
Jimmy the Dhimmi on July 24, 2007 at 9:24 PM
So much for Syria’s claim that they’re not letting insurgents use their terroritory (which always was male bovine solid waste anyway).
Bigfoot on July 24, 2007 at 9:28 PM
I really hate the Democrats for working as hard as possible to surrender to these thugs and quite frankly, unless these guys have ‘car trouble’ on the way home, what’s left of my patience with this administration will be gone as well.
Drew on July 24, 2007 at 9:32 PM
It’ still too early to congratulate the Democrats.
Dork B. on July 24, 2007 at 9:38 PM
Confound these insurgent leaders!!! They’ve just let the Democrat plans for Iraq out of the bag!!!!
And Land Office Harry and the Burkha Boob wanted to announce it themselves….
ScottG on July 24, 2007 at 9:46 PM
Thanks, Nancy !
Blacksheep on July 24, 2007 at 9:49 PM
Nah, the CIA will believe whatever Time and AP’s stringers tell them to believe.
bdfaith on July 24, 2007 at 9:49 PM
AQ’s strong leadership has avoided terror attacks inside the U.S. to prevent uniting this country while the battle in Iraq was in doubt.
It looks like the bad guys no longer think the battle is in doubt. Neither does Harry. Neither does Nancy.
Katy bar the door.
TunaTalon on July 24, 2007 at 10:14 PM
The CIA was there, attacking the Bush Administration.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on July 24, 2007 at 10:20 PM
Who wants to bet those traitorous idiots the Democrats are just going to say something like: “That’s what those leaders WANT us to think. They’re really employing reverse psychology so that the feeble minded Americans won’t support a surrender, err, redeployment.” Followed by “The Iraqis aren’t ready for Democracy cause uh, uh, they’re inferior, or something!”
BKennedy on July 24, 2007 at 10:21 PM
No, I don’t trust them to find their a$$ with both hands.
xplodeit on July 24, 2007 at 10:28 PM
If I were a betting man, I’d wager a month’s salary that, yes, our guys were there, electronically, physically or otherwise.
Zorro on July 24, 2007 at 10:30 PM
If they did, it wasn’t because Time tipped them to it. There was a day in our history, decasdes ago, when the media supported the country. Now they are practically salivating at the prospect of our defeat. And I’m sure the ACLU will bring all of its resources to assist in the prosecution of the United States..after all, that is its highest and most lofty goal: to bring down our democratic government and replace it with socialism. And they’re executing the playbook, step by step.
JustTruth101 on July 24, 2007 at 10:36 PM
Follow up: If our CIA was there, they probably tipped off Time…and I’m sure whatever intel they got they will use against Bush…CIA no likey BushHitlerCo, so let a few GI’s die, sell out the country…they could get a democrat in the whitehouse! Yahoo! It’s worth it to them. Geez, who even knows what secrets they are giving the enemy? (And I mean both enemies – our press and the insurgency…)
JustTruth101 on July 24, 2007 at 10:40 PM
That’s more like it. How brave do you have to be right now if you’re an Iraqi helping the coalition?
kjspeedial on July 24, 2007 at 11:50 PM
Iraqi Papers Wed: Quarrels in Damascus
Iraqi Opposition Conference Fails to Materialize, Mahdi Army in the Crosshairs?
bnelson44 on July 25, 2007 at 1:52 AM
I have a counter offer to Iran and Syria: They cease their activities against us in Iraq or we nuke Damascus and Teheran.
georgej on July 25, 2007 at 2:43 AM
These guys are living in a fantasy world. They may be right that we’ll get run out, but since the Sunni ranks have been halved since 2003, to about 10% of the population, the best they’re going to end up “governing” if we leave is the craphole desert of Anbar province. These guys are the biggest troublemakers, but they simply have no long term future after what’s happened the last four years.
Dudley Smith on July 25, 2007 at 7:57 AM
I was going to say, I hope so!… but after that
comment, I’m not so sure.
4shoes on July 25, 2007 at 8:54 AM
I agree, the CIA has some still bruised egos still and probably think they can conduct covert activity better than BushCo. While there is still Plamer’s still around, the CIA serves no one but their own agenda.
Kini on July 25, 2007 at 1:04 PM
They plan to “arrest” those who worked with us and get compensation for anyone affected by our presence. If the dims don’t get the White House, this is just bullsh*t from a bunch of losers with no place to go. If they do, then 1000s will be “arrested” and billions will be lost for compensation, not to mention the loss of prestige that may never be regained.
volsense on July 25, 2007 at 1:08 PM
As Johnny Carson once put it:
(Touches sealed envelope to turbaned forhead and intones:)
What flies up, pops and is covered in hot oil?
Opens letter and reads the Answer:
The attendees of this conference on their return flights.
With a little help from a covert baggage-loader agent in Damascus.
What’s grease for the goose is brake fluid for the plummeting terrorists.
profitsbeard on July 25, 2007 at 5:28 PM
Duh. No kidding. That is the obvious response to everyone outside the Bush Administration, which is totally clueless — won’t quit, but sure as hell won’t fight to win it either!
Besides, we would have one less Time reporter to deal with! ;-)
sanantonian on July 25, 2007 at 8:30 PM
Comment pages: