The “hot” summer
posted at 1:00 pm on July 23, 2007 by Bryan
Ahmadenijad promised a “hot” summer. Signs are pointing in that direction.
The Syrian military is notoriously weak and incompetent. Having a ring-side seat to the Israeli-Hezbollah war last summer has taught it some valuable lessons:
The Syrian Armed Forces number about 650,000 troops, including 354,000 reserves. They are equipped with fairly old Soviet-era tanks, artillery, armored cars and warplanes that would be no match for those of the Israel Defense Force in a conventional war.
Taqi said Syria took an important lesson from last summer’s war between Hizbollah and Israel: The Israeli rear is vulnerable to long-range artillery rockets. Hizbollah fired some 4,000 rockets in 33 days of intense fighting that battered the Israel Defense Force and damaged its ability to deter others.
One Syrian defense official said Syria would avoid a direct, classic war with Israel, seeking instead a guerrilla conflict on the front lines while firing rockets and ballistic missiles at strategic and civilian installations.
Syria has Soviet-made SS-21 missiles and has built a large arsenal of Scud ballistic missiles, the D variant with a 700-kilometer range. Syria also builds artillery rockets of various calibers ranging from 122mm to 240mm, and has bought other types from Russia and Iran with ranges up to 200 kilometers.
“The next possible Syrian-Israeli war will be more like a war of cities rather than battles on fronts or in the fields,” the Syrian defense official said. “It’ll be a war of attrition that Israelis are not good at.”
The Syrians have previously fought the Israelis using conventional tactics, and were roundly defeated. Syria can and will manufacture Kassam rockets and hammer at the Israeli rear during any coming war between the two, while the conventional IDF hunts for the increasingly unconventional Syrian army and its more unconventional, and more experienced Hezbollah allies. The strategic nub for the Syrians is that the Israelis would probably be able to march on and take Damascus quickly. They have probably factored that in; Assad and his top lieutenants would hide as Nasrallah did last summer, and conduct their guerilla war from bunkers buried somewhere outside the capital. An Israeli incursion into Syria would be fought according to an Iraqi template — let the enemies take the land and capital, and use the people to resist and attrit them. Such a war would leave Syria in ruins, but would also leave the Israelis devastated and divided, and vulnerable to attack from other enemies. Read the rest of the article to see that junior axis of evil member Syria is certainly preparing for this war.
But on the other side of the world, US ally Japan is re-arming.
Today, Japan is America’s biggest partner in developing and financing a missile defense shield in Asia. Some Japanese ground and air force commands are also moving inside American bases in Japan so that the two forces will become, in military jargon, “interoperable.”
—
Here in Guam, American and Japanese pilots simulated intercepts and air-to-air combat for two weeks. In the final days, each side took turns pummeling the tiny island with bombs.
Col. Tatsuya Arima, the commander of the Japanese squadron, said such bombing could protect Japanese grounds troops or vessels from encroaching enemies…
Japan’s military has become less shy in projecting its power away from home. Japan lacks the nuclear submarines, long-range missiles or large aircraft carriers that amount to real power projection.
But it is acquiring four Boeing 767 air tankers that will allow its planes to refuel in midair and travel farther, as well as two aircraft carriers that will transport helicopters and, with some adjustments, planes capable of taking off vertically. The United States has welcomed the changes while pressing for more.
Japan is very interested in buying the F-22, and has with the US jointly developed its first new fighter, the F-2. With its new aerial refueling capability, Japan could strike targets in North Korea without US assistance. As Japan’s military stands now, it’s larger than the UK’s in manpower and on the cusp of major power status. Japan is stepping up to become America’s strongest military ally.
But the question of the age is, are conventional militaries relevant? Western and Westernized militaries fight using conventional doctrines and restraints; the enemies of Western armies don’t. This summer may show us what the future of armed combat is going to look like.
(thanks to Chris)









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
By the time the Ohka went into service, there was no question about Japan going back on the offensive, let alone striking at the continental US in any conventional sense (there were still crazy notions like bio-weapon balloons and whatnot, and there was a strange but very real plan to attack the Panama Canal with custom-designed float planes concealed in submarines, though that never panned out). Neither the Ohka, the Betty bombers that carried them, or the combination had remotely the range to reach Midway, let alone the continental US.
Japan’s best bet was to leverage the defense of the home islands such that US military losses would prove so high it would negotiate a ceasefire, and in the late stages of the war by far Japan’s most successful weapon against the USN was the kamikaze. So the Ohka was designed to be the ultimate kamikaze anti-shipping weapon–essentially a bomber-deployed cruise missile too fast to shoot down, with a huge warhead and a human guidance system. So the only thing it was trying to reach was US ships closing in on Japan.
The Israelis fly several versions of the F-16 with lots of custom equipment and (apparently quite good) local avionics, but they’re still inherently F-16′s. The Japanese F-2 really isn’t. It definitely looks a lot like the F-16 at a glance, and the two planes do share some common parts, but the resemblance is superficial. It really is a substantially different airplane.
The differences between the F/A-18C/D and the F/A-18E/F might be a good parallel. They look quite a bit like the same thing until you put them side-by-side. Then the differences are a little more apparent.
Blacklake on July 24, 2007 at 12:54 AM
Well, I was talking airframe design. Avionics, engines, and maintainence are a whole different story. :)
The Indian Su-30MKI’s have a much more capable radar than Russian Su-27′s, though (albeit still Russian), and I believe the Indians are also investigating western radar alternatives, particularly for future MiG-29/35 purchases. As I understand, reliability problems and a generally low quality of technical support continue to be issues that plague Russian fighter exports.
Blacklake on July 24, 2007 at 1:12 AM
The US has the largest naval presence in the Pacific. If what I have read is correct Japan is #2–not China. I find it a bit hard to believe that China is not spending more of its money on a navy and that they would let the hated Japanese be #2 in their turf.
Way to go MSDF!
TwinkietheKid on July 24, 2007 at 8:48 AM
The E/F “Super Hornet” might be pure FBW, but the models up through the C/D variants are computer driven with mechanical linkage as backup. Navy fighter jocks prefer to have some concrete authority over where their birds end up.
But a lawn-dart is still a lawn-dart.
No worries. Well, it’s easy for a ground-based craft to have a lighter, sleeker, “sexier” airframe than one that takes the punishment of catapult launches and arrested recoveries. And yet, long before I was interested in the military, I thought the F-14 was the baddest looking plane I’d ever seen. To spend a large part of my Navy career with the Tomcats never diminished that opinion.
Back to the avionics, the F-14D radar (APG-71) is still, in spite of being in retirement, the longest-range system of any tactical aircraft (detection possible beyond 160nm, locks at over 135nm). Only the patrol birds had a longer or wider view of the airspace. Add Infrared Search/Track (IRST) with greater than 50nm of all-condition visual imagery, Television Camera (TCS) with multiple fields of view, and LANTIRN for precision bombing, and no fighter ever had (or has) a great sensor suite for keeping track of who/what is out there.
Here’s the last one Grumman built, BuNo 164604, which served its days at Point Mugu, CA
Freelancer on July 24, 2007 at 1:46 PM
So good I had to post it again.
This is not just for the enemy,but for our country and allies as well. The Pentagon has a plan to end ( or the beginning of the end) this islamist barbarism, I just hope we use it soon.
Thx Professor.
shooter on July 24, 2007 at 2:03 PM
>>>there was a strange but very real plan to attack the Panama Canal with custom-designed float planes concealed in submarines, though that never panned out).
WitchDoctor on July 24, 2007 at 2:19 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2