csdeven on July 20, 2007 at 11:08 PM

Give it a break you friggin’ stalker.

You and I agree on many things, and we’ve had some interesting discussions and disagreements on this blog since it started – I believe we both registered in the first week or at least very early on. I’m not going to engage with you on this. It would be completely pointless, and could build unnecessary animosity between us.

Next on Black Entertainment TV, KKK hour, featuring a salute to the Exalted Cyclops, Robert Byrd.

AndrewsDad on July 20, 2007 at 4:43 PM

Hillarious.

This is the only clip of him I’ve seen where he didn’t make me want to punch my monitor.
deesine on July 21, 2007 at 12:14 PM

Heh. I suggest you not watch him then!

I like him because doesn’t insult my intelligence and he talks people right into displaying their hypocrisy, as opposed to yelling at them or whatnot. He watches politics like an insider but not with the continual drumming of talking points like a pundit. I like it, but I can sure see why he isn’t for everyone.

Personally, I’ll wear this as a badge of pride. When the opposition is trying to silence you, you know you’re on target.

Tucker is awesome, he always lets his guess hang themselves.

Umm, except when that guest is John Stewart. This is the only clip of him I’ve seen where he didn’t make me want to punch my monitor. He didn’t, but that other buffoon did.

“I believe all opinions need to be counter balanced by other opinions.” Apparently not his opinion though; the one he’s setting into law.

All free peoples appear glorious to themselves; but national pride does not manifest itself among all in the same manner.

Alexis De Tocqueville

These ‘progressives’ have no clue how close they are to Hugo Chavez and how regressive that really is to freedom.

Maurice is completely convinced in his naive idiocy.

Americans left, center and right must be very vigilant on this item. From here socialism, and then communism or other dictatorships, flow.

Obviously, we can summarily dismiss the views of anyone opposed to old-fashioned American values like fairness. I bring this to your attention, because, as obviously wrong headed as this anti-fairness coalition may be, they do make a point that we – th…

NewsBusters.org – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Apparently, MSNBC’s Tucker Carlson is getting fed up with hearing Democrats talk about the need for reinstitutiing the Fariness Doctrine.All those that agree say "aye."With this in mind, on Th…

Well it was MSNBC. So who knows what the people watching think?

PowWow on July 21, 2007 at 12:10 AM

We do know what the watchers nurses are saying….”Line up fools! Time for your Thorazine!”.

doriangrey on July 20, 2007 at 6:28 PM

Maybe we should make them go by covered wagon? If we have them do some work for us on the way, we might get some stuff done that benefits us for a change?

You know a man has to be good, when the people that hate him, are not the rational ones who comprise the majority, but the rare, obsessive, stalker-like crazies.

When Fred wins the election in 2008, the secret service will have to keep a look out just for csdeven. I’m beginning to think that csdeven has a candle-lit room in some shoddy apartment devoted to Fred, with the walls plastered with Fred photos, Fred movie and TV memorabilia, kind of like a shrine, except they are crossed out with red Xs, knives stabbed in each one, and lipstick scrawled on the dirty bathroom mirror, “FRED? MUST DIE!”

Laura on July 20, 2007 at 7:45 PM

Laura, this is O/T, but I have to take you to task for this video on your blog.

How long have you been following fred?? Did you happen to see his speech at the Lincoln Club in Orange County? Well, in that speech, fred? had the gall to take credit for part of a speech that Reagan gave many years ago. He said that RR asked him something backstage and he, RR, used freds? words in his speech! Now this is the epitome of using RR in the way your video derided EVERY OTHER CANDIDATE FOR! And to make matters worse, freds? claim CANNOT BE PROVEN! How damn stupid does he think we are anyway? At least the other candidates are clearly giving credit to Reagan and not trying to take it upon themselves. The pertinent part starts at 3:23 in.

So, please amend your blog to reflect the truth.

PS…He flogs his TV personality from the get go and continues throughout. He even trys to attach himself to John Wayne (in JW’s old stomping grounds). This was my first clue he was on his own agenda that was all about him.

In the 1930s Fascism was heralded by Wagnerian marches, military precision and fierce oratory. Now it’s delivered with smug condescension by a greaseball New York liberal.

And I dare say the Nazis were at least honest about their plans.

Plus, Life ain’t Fair.

profitsbeard on July 20, 2007 at 5:58 PM

Not to sound like Forrest Gump here, but it’s like my dad always says, “a fare is what you pay to ride the bus, kid.”

I don’t know how it would even be possible to present EVERY opposing viewpoint on EVERY issue and I agree with whoever said earlier in the thread that that would make it hard for anything to ever really be said. Wouldn’t everything just become circular? The Congressman didn’t say that there should be the same amount of liberal stations as conservative ones, but that the opposing viewpoints should take place on every broadcast no matter what kind of nutball thing any average joe has to say. Am I right on that?

The FD just seems to be another hypocritical stance taken to shove liberalism down everyone’s throat. B/c there is just no way they are going to start policing all the liberal media, which for the most part is every TV news program.

Tuari on July 20, 2007 at 8:20 PM

I agree, the most disturbing thing in that interview is two different times, after Tucker says what he thinks, this politician proceeds to tell him I don’t that is really what you think.

I’d love to see the multiple view points on whether the weather is in fact sunny out or rainy out while I have a flood going down my street.

The jettisoning of fact is what is so pathetic about postmodernism, multiculturism etc. There’s no agreed objective reality so anyone can come up with whatever bullshit suits their lifestyle. The Fairness Doctrine goes against everything America stands for. I can put up with The New York Times on its own terms, hell the Chicago Tribune was so anti-FDR they wouldn’t let up even during WWII. What I can’t stand is government interference in what is supposed to be a free press. Media insanity is one thing but government-regulated media insanity is an insult to free men and women.