<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul no longer responsible for having to follow complex questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:13:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Robinson&#8217;s Neighborhood II: CFRed and the Globalist Conspiracy at Blog P.I.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-583722</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Robinson&#8217;s Neighborhood II: CFRed and the Globalist Conspiracy at Blog P.I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-583722</guid>
		<description>[...] It may be worth pointing out &#8212; and I swear, I&#8217;ve avoided using this name for as long as I could &#8212; that Ron Paul is now a repeat guest on Jones&#8217; online radio show. And while the last time on he didn&#8217;t actually say that the U.S. government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks (a favorite theory of Jones&#8217;) he certainly did court the support of that theory&#8217;s most high-profile proponents. This connection between simultaneous support for Ron Paul, fear of globalism, hatred of neocons, and interest in the so-called 9/11 Truth movement, among other conspiracies (ice hockey and Alanis Morrisette (there&#8217;s that Canadian thing again&#8230;)) can be found on this YouTube account, and this one and this one. And this one. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It may be worth pointing out &#8212; and I swear, I&#8217;ve avoided using this name for as long as I could &#8212; that Ron Paul is now a repeat guest on Jones&#8217; online radio show. And while the last time on he didn&#8217;t actually say that the U.S. government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks (a favorite theory of Jones&#8217;) he certainly did court the support of that theory&#8217;s most high-profile proponents. This connection between simultaneous support for Ron Paul, fear of globalism, hatred of neocons, and interest in the so-called 9/11 Truth movement, among other conspiracies (ice hockey and Alanis Morrisette (there&#8217;s that Canadian thing again&#8230;)) can be found on this YouTube account, and this one and this one. And this one. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spacemonkey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-567081</link>
		<dc:creator>spacemonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-567081</guid>
		<description>I think the Ron Paul supporter(s) are/is good for some laughs.

We&#039;ve had a good run with them/him at IMAO anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Ron Paul supporter(s) are/is good for some laughs.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had a good run with them/him at IMAO anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John from WuzzaDem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-566349</link>
		<dc:creator>John from WuzzaDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-566349</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;His basic message is that he wants the government to leave us alone.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Exactly. Well, that, and to stop killing us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>His basic message is that he wants the government to leave us alone.</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly. Well, that, and to stop killing us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-565912</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-565912</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Lets see, Fort Sumter, Lincoln force the CSA hand and started a war.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Nonsense.

&lt;blockquote&gt;WWII, the US even admits that it provoked Japan into the Pearl Harbor attack.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
What?  Japan needed raw materials for it&#039;s war machine and calculated it&#039;s best opportunity to acquire them was to go to war with the US.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Spanish-American war was the product of government and the newspapers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Some validity here, perhaps, but the purpose of newspapers (and government in part) is to inform the public.  You can blame people getting &#039;stirred up&#039; on the newspapers, but that is their job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lets see, Fort Sumter, Lincoln force the CSA hand and started a war.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nonsense.</p>
<blockquote><p>WWII, the US even admits that it provoked Japan into the Pearl Harbor attack.</p></blockquote>
<p>What?  Japan needed raw materials for it&#8217;s war machine and calculated it&#8217;s best opportunity to acquire them was to go to war with the US.  </p>
<blockquote><p>The Spanish-American war was the product of government and the newspapers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some validity here, perhaps, but the purpose of newspapers (and government in part) is to inform the public.  You can blame people getting &#8217;stirred up&#8217; on the newspapers, but that is their job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidcaskey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-565781</link>
		<dc:creator>davidcaskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-565781</guid>
		<description>What is it that you people have with Ron Paul? You go out of your way to critize him. During the debate with Rudy, I thought his response to why we are attacked by Muslims was much better than Rudy&#039;s. His basic message is that he wants the government to leave us alone. No one else is saying that. As to the government manufacturing an incident. Like that has never happened. Lets see, Fort Sumter, Lincoln force the CSA hand and started a war. The Spanish-American war was the product of government and the newspapers. WWI the US was shipping munitions in passenger ship and appauled at the Germans sinking them. WWII, the US even admits that it provoked Japan into the Pearl Harbor attack. Korea was government idioticy as usual. And then we have the Gulf of Tonkin. But no, we have never manufactured an incident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it that you people have with Ron Paul? You go out of your way to critize him. During the debate with Rudy, I thought his response to why we are attacked by Muslims was much better than Rudy&#8217;s. His basic message is that he wants the government to leave us alone. No one else is saying that. As to the government manufacturing an incident. Like that has never happened. Lets see, Fort Sumter, Lincoln force the CSA hand and started a war. The Spanish-American war was the product of government and the newspapers. WWI the US was shipping munitions in passenger ship and appauled at the Germans sinking them. WWII, the US even admits that it provoked Japan into the Pearl Harbor attack. Korea was government idioticy as usual. And then we have the Gulf of Tonkin. But no, we have never manufactured an incident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace of Spades HQ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-565772</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace of Spades HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-565772</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can Ron Paul Place Second in Political Pseudo-Event?...&lt;/strong&gt;

The world waits to see if the Only Man Who Can Save America will be able to pull together the support he needs to place second in this glorified fund-raiser. If a second-tier, conspiracy-lovin&#039; candidate like Ron Paul wins second......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can Ron Paul Place Second in Political Pseudo-Event?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The world waits to see if the Only Man Who Can Save America will be able to pull together the support he needs to place second in this glorified fund-raiser. If a second-tier, conspiracy-lovin&#8217; candidate like Ron Paul wins second&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PowWow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564769</link>
		<dc:creator>PowWow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564769</guid>
		<description>I remember this guy when he ran as a Libertarian. That party probably wouldn&#039;t let him run again. He says the only reason he&#039;s running as a Repub, is for the airtime and publicity. I think he&#039;s not telling the truther.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Any criticism of Paul at all, boys? His haircut? Sense of fashion? Be as superficial as you want. I’m curious to see if we can wring even a shred of doubt from your creepy, messianic fascination with this turd. 

Allahpundit on July 17, 2007 at 2:55 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;I personally think he&#039;s trying out for a third party run as Krazy Kucinich&#039;s running mate. And I think he looks like a human Big Bird. That last bit was just for you AP. Hope you liked it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember this guy when he ran as a Libertarian. That party probably wouldn&#8217;t let him run again. He says the only reason he&#8217;s running as a Repub, is for the airtime and publicity. I think he&#8217;s not telling the truther.</p>
<blockquote><p>Any criticism of Paul at all, boys? His haircut? Sense of fashion? Be as superficial as you want. I’m curious to see if we can wring even a shred of doubt from your creepy, messianic fascination with this turd. </p>
<p>Allahpundit on July 17, 2007 at 2:55 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I personally think he&#8217;s trying out for a third party run as Krazy Kucinich&#8217;s running mate. And I think he looks like a human Big Bird. That last bit was just for you AP. Hope you liked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herikutsu</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564413</link>
		<dc:creator>Herikutsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564413</guid>
		<description>Wow, you guys are on fire over this Ron Paul thing!

As I write this, it is late afternoon, and I am sitting home reading this, and at the same time watching the absolutely stunning (pun intended) Michelle Yeoh rescue pandas from speeding trucks and generally kick-butt in Silverhawk, while you guys have your collective panties all twisted into knots over Ron Paul and his supporters. 

While both are entertaining, I think I&#039;m going to go back and chill with the Silverhawk and her motorcycle. She definitely has better legs,and a better set of wheels.

Ciao fellas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you guys are on fire over this Ron Paul thing!</p>
<p>As I write this, it is late afternoon, and I am sitting home reading this, and at the same time watching the absolutely stunning (pun intended) Michelle Yeoh rescue pandas from speeding trucks and generally kick-butt in Silverhawk, while you guys have your collective panties all twisted into knots over Ron Paul and his supporters. </p>
<p>While both are entertaining, I think I&#8217;m going to go back and chill with the Silverhawk and her motorcycle. She definitely has better legs,and a better set of wheels.</p>
<p>Ciao fellas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John from WuzzaDem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564290</link>
		<dc:creator>John from WuzzaDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564290</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;At least Perot was entertaining. Paul and the Paulnuts just aren’t doing it for me so far.

Jim Treacher on July 17, 2007 at 6:04 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now, see, that&#039;s just &lt;em&gt;sad&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>At least Perot was entertaining. Paul and the Paulnuts just aren’t doing it for me so far.</p>
<p>Jim Treacher on July 17, 2007 at 6:04 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, see, that&#8217;s just <em>sad</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SIJ6141</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564268</link>
		<dc:creator>SIJ6141</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564268</guid>
		<description>1. Is it that big a deal if Ron Paul is interview by Alex &lt;blockquote&gt;Jones? Granted, Jones is both retarded and annoying, but he’s a media outlet and politicians rarely turn down an opportunity to get their message out. Pat Buchanan has been on Jones’s show; are conservatives ready to throw Buchanan–who, by the way, also happens to share Paul’s views in regard to the Gulf of Tonkin incident–under the bus, as well?
tad on July 17, 2007 at 2:51 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You may add Rosie to the list of peaople that lump Gulf of Tonkin and and the current administration together. Does it make it more believable ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Is it that big a deal if Ron Paul is interview by Alex<br />
<blockquote>Jones? Granted, Jones is both retarded and annoying, but he’s a media outlet and politicians rarely turn down an opportunity to get their message out. Pat Buchanan has been on Jones’s show; are conservatives ready to throw Buchanan–who, by the way, also happens to share Paul’s views in regard to the Gulf of Tonkin incident–under the bus, as well?<br />
tad on July 17, 2007 at 2:51 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You may add Rosie to the list of peaople that lump Gulf of Tonkin and and the current administration together. Does it make it more believable ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SIJ6141</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564241</link>
		<dc:creator>SIJ6141</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564241</guid>
		<description>You do&#039;nt have to prove to me that Ron Paul is an idiot. I already know. How did this guy ever get elected ? As A republican ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do&#8217;nt have to prove to me that Ron Paul is an idiot. I already know. How did this guy ever get elected ? As A republican ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564179</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564179</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;tad on July 17, 2007 at 6:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You also missed the class on HA etiquette, it is the idea that is important, not the grammar.  Read all the blogs the last two or three weeks and you will find one statement regarding grammar...yours.

The other blogs diss people because they just don&#039;t know any grammer or speling.  We diss blogs on ideas...get it?  Now that was two classes you failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>tad on July 17, 2007 at 6:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You also missed the class on HA etiquette, it is the idea that is important, not the grammar.  Read all the blogs the last two or three weeks and you will find one statement regarding grammar&#8230;yours.</p>
<p>The other blogs diss people because they just don&#8217;t know any grammer or speling.  We diss blogs on ideas&#8230;get it?  Now that was two classes you failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564102</link>
		<dc:creator>tad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564102</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This is why logic should be taught in school. You shouldn’t have skipped class tad.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Apparently, you missed grammar class. In the English language, names in the form of a direct address are set off by the use of a comma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is why logic should be taught in school. You shouldn’t have skipped class tad.</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently, you missed grammar class. In the English language, names in the form of a direct address are set off by the use of a comma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564079</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564079</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Can you either quantify or qualify how Paul’s pandering to the truther or pseudo-truther base is any worse/different than many Republican’s pandering to the evangelical “left behind”, last days on earth crowd? 

tad on July 17, 2007 at 4:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
This is why logic should be taught in school.  You shouldn&#039;t have skipped class tad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Can you either quantify or qualify how Paul’s pandering to the truther or pseudo-truther base is any worse/different than many Republican’s pandering to the evangelical “left behind”, last days on earth crowd? </p>
<p>tad on July 17, 2007 at 4:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>This is why logic should be taught in school.  You shouldn&#8217;t have skipped class tad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564075</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564075</guid>
		<description>Why does every reporter now have to make a speech before asking a simple question.
Do you think there is validity in a &quot;Gulf of Tonkin&quot; action with the current administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does every reporter now have to make a speech before asking a simple question.<br />
Do you think there is validity in a &#8220;Gulf of Tonkin&#8221; action with the current administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-564068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-564068</guid>
		<description>At least Perot was entertaining. Paul and the Paulnuts just aren&#039;t doing it for me so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Perot was entertaining. Paul and the Paulnuts just aren&#8217;t doing it for me so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-563973</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-563973</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Keli on July 17, 2007 at 5:26 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

exactly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Keli on July 17, 2007 at 5:26 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>exactly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keli</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-563942</link>
		<dc:creator>Keli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-563942</guid>
		<description>my emotions about Ron Raul come not from the man himself but from the fact that troofers support him and he seems to openly welcome and endorse that support. 

Now troofers do make me emotional. They piss me off. They highly piss me off. Everytime they open their mouth they insult and belittle the memories of the over 3000 who died and the pain of their families. So yeah, to me Ron Paul getting support from those foul disgusting degenerates is much much different to me then say, republicans getting support from evangelicals. 

And the fact that Ron Paul refuses to denounce them makes him worthy of all ridicule and disgust, no matter what his stance on the &#039;issues&#039;. 
k i&#039;ll try to calm down now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my emotions about Ron Raul come not from the man himself but from the fact that troofers support him and he seems to openly welcome and endorse that support. </p>
<p>Now troofers do make me emotional. They piss me off. They highly piss me off. Everytime they open their mouth they insult and belittle the memories of the over 3000 who died and the pain of their families. So yeah, to me Ron Paul getting support from those foul disgusting degenerates is much much different to me then say, republicans getting support from evangelicals. </p>
<p>And the fact that Ron Paul refuses to denounce them makes him worthy of all ridicule and disgust, no matter what his stance on the &#8216;issues&#8217;.<br />
k i&#8217;ll try to calm down now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saiga</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-563932</link>
		<dc:creator>saiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-563932</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If he doesn’t drive you crazy maybe you should go see a psychologist, cause you may already be there, which would explain why he doesn’t drive you crazy. 

doriangrey on July 17, 2007 at 3:11 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No need.  I&#039;m a case hardened guy that has seen it all.  It would take more than Ron Paul to drive me crazy.  Maybe President Ron Paul would do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If he doesn’t drive you crazy maybe you should go see a psychologist, cause you may already be there, which would explain why he doesn’t drive you crazy. </p>
<p>doriangrey on July 17, 2007 at 3:11 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>No need.  I&#8217;m a case hardened guy that has seen it all.  It would take more than Ron Paul to drive me crazy.  Maybe President Ron Paul would do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-563922</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-563922</guid>
		<description>note on that site, &quot;*Note: These statistics include the contributions of employees who recorded or indicated their military branch. Contributions where no employer was specified were naturally not included.&quot;

when you look at donations were they did not indicate employer Paul recieved $100.  So many of his supporters are marking of &#039;military&#039;, i think we need some investigative journalism here.  I want a list of the &#039;military&#039; names giving money to ron paul.

absolute moral authority</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>note on that site, &#8220;*Note: These statistics include the contributions of employees who recorded or indicated their military branch. Contributions where no employer was specified were naturally not included.&#8221;</p>
<p>when you look at donations were they did not indicate employer Paul recieved $100.  So many of his supporters are marking of &#8216;military&#8217;, i think we need some investigative journalism here.  I want a list of the &#8216;military&#8217; names giving money to ron paul.</p>
<p>absolute moral authority</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John from WuzzaDem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-563908</link>
		<dc:creator>John from WuzzaDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-563908</guid>
		<description>I am not a Ron Paul groupie either, but then again I am not naive enough to deny the possibility, however remote, that should the Coyote accidentally miss a critical turn with his rocket-powered skates, there is a distinct possibility that he will skate off the edge of a cliff and, after remaining suspended in mid-air for a second or so, plummet to the ground, where, upon impact, his body will crate a coyote-shaped crater.

Cartoons are replete with such instances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a Ron Paul groupie either, but then again I am not naive enough to deny the possibility, however remote, that should the Coyote accidentally miss a critical turn with his rocket-powered skates, there is a distinct possibility that he will skate off the edge of a cliff and, after remaining suspended in mid-air for a second or so, plummet to the ground, where, upon impact, his body will crate a coyote-shaped crater.</p>
<p>Cartoons are replete with such instances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amerpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-563893</link>
		<dc:creator>amerpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-563893</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;tad on July 17, 2007 at 4:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let&#039;s see. One is a religious group who believes in the Bible, as well over a billion people do. The other believes the US Government was responsible for bringing down the World Trade Center and killing about 3,000 people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>tad on July 17, 2007 at 4:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s see. One is a religious group who believes in the Bible, as well over a billion people do. The other believes the US Government was responsible for bringing down the World Trade Center and killing about 3,000 people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amerpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-563888</link>
		<dc:creator>amerpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-563888</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I presume that most Hot Air commenters (and readers, for that matter) support the troops. Interesting, the troops seem to support, at least in terms of donations, Ron Paul’s presidential candidacy.
tad on July 17, 2007 at 4:39 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

1. I support the troops, but that doesn&#039;t mean I have to support their political decisions. If they decided to vote for Hillary, I wouldn&#039;t join Team Hillary. 

2. I can put down &quot;Nuclear Scientist&quot; on the donation form, as my occupation. That doesn&#039;t mean I am one. The candidate doesn&#039;t check up. We all know how much Paul supporters can be trusted to tell the truth 100% of the time. I mean, they vote in polls so honestly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I presume that most Hot Air commenters (and readers, for that matter) support the troops. Interesting, the troops seem to support, at least in terms of donations, Ron Paul’s presidential candidacy.<br />
tad on July 17, 2007 at 4:39 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>1. I support the troops, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I have to support their political decisions. If they decided to vote for Hillary, I wouldn&#8217;t join Team Hillary. </p>
<p>2. I can put down &#8220;Nuclear Scientist&#8221; on the donation form, as my occupation. That doesn&#8217;t mean I am one. The candidate doesn&#8217;t check up. We all know how much Paul supporters can be trusted to tell the truth 100% of the time. I mean, they vote in polls so honestly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Ron Paul - Ron Paul no longer responsible for having to follow complex questions</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-563867</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Ron Paul - Ron Paul no longer responsible for having to follow complex questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-563867</guid>
		<description>[...] Wesley Clark                       Link to Article                ron paul Ron Paul no longer responsible for having to follow complex questions &#187;  Posted at Hot Air  on Tuesday, July 17, 2007   Tragically, The Only Man Who Can Save America once again finds his patriotic words twisted beyond recognition. […] Read the rest »   View Entire Article &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wesley Clark                       Link to Article                ron paul Ron Paul no longer responsible for having to follow complex questions &#187;  Posted at Hot Air  on Tuesday, July 17, 2007   Tragically, The Only Man Who Can Save America once again finds his patriotic words twisted beyond recognition. […] Read the rest »   View Entire Article &#187; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-563859</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/17/ron-paul-no-longer-responsible-for-having-to-follow-complex-questions/#comment-563859</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Given the behavior of his supporters, it more likely it shows that Troofer Paul’s supporters are falsely putting down “military” as their occupation to create the impression that he has military support. 

Hollowpoint on July 17, 2007 at 4:45 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I doubt hardly any portion of the Federal Govt. is going to support someone who talks about drastically cutting their funding and in many cases completely wiping them out of existence.  This is why most people that work for the govt. are generally Dems, they promise them all sorts of stuff and provide protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Given the behavior of his supporters, it more likely it shows that Troofer Paul’s supporters are falsely putting down “military” as their occupation to create the impression that he has military support. </p>
<p>Hollowpoint on July 17, 2007 at 4:45 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>I doubt hardly any portion of the Federal Govt. is going to support someone who talks about drastically cutting their funding and in many cases completely wiping them out of existence.  This is why most people that work for the govt. are generally Dems, they promise them all sorts of stuff and provide protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
