<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian: Bush leaning towards military action on Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:53:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s About Freaking Time at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-564909</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s About Freaking Time at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-564909</guid>
		<description>[...] As well as how horrific an error it would be to follow Allahpundit&#8217;s advice and let Hillary handle it. Because we know how she&#8217;ll handle it: the same way her hubby &#8220;handled&#8221; national security threats - by appeasing them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As well as how horrific an error it would be to follow Allahpundit&#8217;s advice and let Hillary handle it. Because we know how she&#8217;ll handle it: the same way her hubby &#8220;handled&#8221; national security threats &#8211; by appeasing them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PierreLegrand</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-562376</link>
		<dc:creator>PierreLegrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-562376</guid>
		<description>Ok here is a question for you military folks out there to ponder...why can&#039;t we go in with Special Forces ally with the locals who don&#039;t like the mullahs and simply use the Afghanistan tactics of local help with US expertise...? That way everyones happy, we get rid of the nuclear weapons program and the Iranians get their freedom back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok here is a question for you military folks out there to ponder&#8230;why can&#8217;t we go in with Special Forces ally with the locals who don&#8217;t like the mullahs and simply use the Afghanistan tactics of local help with US expertise&#8230;? That way everyones happy, we get rid of the nuclear weapons program and the Iranians get their freedom back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Jihadist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-562322</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Jihadist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-562322</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The Air Force and Navy have been out of the heat for a long time. Let them fight some of our wars for a change. 
MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 1:40 AM&lt;/em&gt;

If by &quot;out of the heat&quot; you mean they aren&#039;t still flying CAS missions, I&#039;m willing to bet you&#039;re in error.  Likely, it&#039;s more Air Force than Navy, but I&#039;m sure the Army and Marines still call their brethren-in-blue on occasion (Navy-blue or Air Force-blue, whoever is flying cover for them that day).  The Marines are a top-notch, all around, kick-ass, forced-entry branch of the military; but they still require &quot;off-hull&quot; support (as us Navy pukes call it) to sustain themselves for any decent length of time.  The Army (kick-ass in their own right) cannot survive with just helicopter and limited A-10 CAS on a normal battlefield.  Neither ground pounder segments of our armed forces has the aerial resources that I&#039;d love to see them have.  So they rely on assistance from Air Force and Navy to this day.  And you know what?  It works.  Amazing as that may be.

The Air Force and Navy did their jobs.  They prepared the &quot;battlespace&quot; in advance of and in conjunction with the ground advance.  That&#039;s what they do.  Their job is not to win wars.  It never has been.  Nor will it ever be.  Win &quot;battles&quot;, yes; but win a war?  That takes boots on the ground.  It is an absolute must to actually win in real (not theoretical) war.  We can air-strike the crap out of any nation on earth, but winning a war against them would be impossible without the Marines and/or Army.



&lt;em&gt;TBinSTL - “Why can’t we stage an attack on Saudi Arabia and make it look like the Iranians did it?…….”
Astronomers report that a large meteor is headed toward Earth. They are currently computing the likely coordinates of impact on Earth.
Coordinates of large meteor impact announced as 21°25′N 39°49′E﻿ / ﻿21.417, 39.817 
MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 1:53 AM&lt;/em&gt;

If America had the only astronomers on earth, that might work.


&lt;em&gt;Why would all the Armor, much of which was “borrowed”, still be In Iraq? What would have been the point? You don’t need nearly as much armor for a police action/nation building/whatever as you do for an invasion.
MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 2:41 AM&lt;/em&gt;

On this, I&#039;ll agree.  I agree that the heavy armor is mostly just not there anymore.  I imagine there are still a few M-1s in-country, but nothing like the levels to fight during the invasion.  I&#039;m confused by your &quot;borrowed&quot; statement, though.  How does a nation who effectively declares war on another nation &quot;borrow&quot; the tools to wage said war from itself?  If you mean re-deployment of assets from Germany, that was on the horizon anyway.  The dipshit Euros think they can defend themselves against an increasingly hostile Russia, and if they have to trade a few of the newer entries to the EU to assure peace, they will fall all over themselves to do so.  That means they don&#039;t want us there anymore, so moving those garrison units to combat in the Middle East is not &quot;borrowing.&quot;  It&#039;s re-deployment.  Unlike Murtha&#039;s idea, it was re-deployment for effect.

I get that you don&#039;t seem to like the Iraq war, MB4.  Unlike others, I&#039;m not going to attack your service record.  I just want to point out that some of your arguments have holes.  My time in the Navy taught me to think strategically as well as tactically.  I&#039;m starting to wonder if OJT in the Army does the same.  Does the Army actually encourage &quot;what if&quot; thinking (which leads to the strategic level)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Air Force and Navy have been out of the heat for a long time. Let them fight some of our wars for a change.<br />
MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 1:40 AM</em></p>
<p>If by &#8220;out of the heat&#8221; you mean they aren&#8217;t still flying CAS missions, I&#8217;m willing to bet you&#8217;re in error.  Likely, it&#8217;s more Air Force than Navy, but I&#8217;m sure the Army and Marines still call their brethren-in-blue on occasion (Navy-blue or Air Force-blue, whoever is flying cover for them that day).  The Marines are a top-notch, all around, kick-ass, forced-entry branch of the military; but they still require &#8220;off-hull&#8221; support (as us Navy pukes call it) to sustain themselves for any decent length of time.  The Army (kick-ass in their own right) cannot survive with just helicopter and limited A-10 CAS on a normal battlefield.  Neither ground pounder segments of our armed forces has the aerial resources that I&#8217;d love to see them have.  So they rely on assistance from Air Force and Navy to this day.  And you know what?  It works.  Amazing as that may be.</p>
<p>The Air Force and Navy did their jobs.  They prepared the &#8220;battlespace&#8221; in advance of and in conjunction with the ground advance.  That&#8217;s what they do.  Their job is not to win wars.  It never has been.  Nor will it ever be.  Win &#8220;battles&#8221;, yes; but win a war?  That takes boots on the ground.  It is an absolute must to actually win in real (not theoretical) war.  We can air-strike the crap out of any nation on earth, but winning a war against them would be impossible without the Marines and/or Army.</p>
<p><em>TBinSTL &#8211; “Why can’t we stage an attack on Saudi Arabia and make it look like the Iranians did it?…….”<br />
Astronomers report that a large meteor is headed toward Earth. They are currently computing the likely coordinates of impact on Earth.<br />
Coordinates of large meteor impact announced as 21°25′N 39°49′E﻿ / ﻿21.417, 39.817<br />
MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 1:53 AM</em></p>
<p>If America had the only astronomers on earth, that might work.</p>
<p><em>Why would all the Armor, much of which was “borrowed”, still be In Iraq? What would have been the point? You don’t need nearly as much armor for a police action/nation building/whatever as you do for an invasion.<br />
MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 2:41 AM</em></p>
<p>On this, I&#8217;ll agree.  I agree that the heavy armor is mostly just not there anymore.  I imagine there are still a few M-1s in-country, but nothing like the levels to fight during the invasion.  I&#8217;m confused by your &#8220;borrowed&#8221; statement, though.  How does a nation who effectively declares war on another nation &#8220;borrow&#8221; the tools to wage said war from itself?  If you mean re-deployment of assets from Germany, that was on the horizon anyway.  The dipshit Euros think they can defend themselves against an increasingly hostile Russia, and if they have to trade a few of the newer entries to the EU to assure peace, they will fall all over themselves to do so.  That means they don&#8217;t want us there anymore, so moving those garrison units to combat in the Middle East is not &#8220;borrowing.&#8221;  It&#8217;s re-deployment.  Unlike Murtha&#8217;s idea, it was re-deployment for effect.</p>
<p>I get that you don&#8217;t seem to like the Iraq war, MB4.  Unlike others, I&#8217;m not going to attack your service record.  I just want to point out that some of your arguments have holes.  My time in the Navy taught me to think strategically as well as tactically.  I&#8217;m starting to wonder if OJT in the Army does the same.  Does the Army actually encourage &#8220;what if&#8221; thinking (which leads to the strategic level)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradky</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-562021</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-562021</guid>
		<description>For heavens sakes, let&#039;s just get the rulers out and measure one another......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For heavens sakes, let&#8217;s just get the rulers out and measure one another&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Legrand&#8217;s Pink Flamingo Bar &#187; The Problem Child Iran, thinking out of the box&#8230;yes we can!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-562000</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Legrand&#8217;s Pink Flamingo Bar &#187; The Problem Child Iran, thinking out of the box&#8230;yes we can!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-562000</guid>
		<description>[...] Jawa responds to the threat. So does Allah&#8230;and yes I agree with the thrust of most of them. The Bush administration is too weak to take on Iran without some out of the box thinking. Sadly there isn&#8217;t a lot of that going on inside of that dying Administration. Technorati tags: iran, iraq, bush, afghanistan, catholic &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jawa responds to the threat. So does Allah&#8230;and yes I agree with the thrust of most of them. The Bush administration is too weak to take on Iran without some out of the box thinking. Sadly there isn&#8217;t a lot of that going on inside of that dying Administration. Technorati tags: iran, iraq, bush, afghanistan, catholic &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561960</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561960</guid>
		<description>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 6:38 PM

OK so you have somebodies dd214, I&#039;m just not buying it being yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 6:38 PM</p>
<p>OK so you have somebodies dd214, I&#8217;m just not buying it being yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MNDavenotPC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561812</link>
		<dc:creator>MNDavenotPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561812</guid>
		<description>Well here is my info  while this blog is not the place,    you gave yours   I&#039;ll give mine   and that will be the vetting of both of us   and may the rest be quiet....
 Line 5a Sgt 5b E-5
Line 6 01/Jul/71
Line 16  23 Apr 75
Line 17b 05 17c 21Aug 67
Line 24 National Defense, Vietnam Service, Vietnam Campaign, Bronze Star w/device, Purple Heart, Good Conduct, Navy Commendation, PUC, Combat Action</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well here is my info  while this blog is not the place,    you gave yours   I&#8217;ll give mine   and that will be the vetting of both of us   and may the rest be quiet&#8230;.<br />
 Line 5a Sgt 5b E-5<br />
Line 6 01/Jul/71<br />
Line 16  23 Apr 75<br />
Line 17b 05 17c 21Aug 67<br />
Line 24 National Defense, Vietnam Service, Vietnam Campaign, Bronze Star w/device, Purple Heart, Good Conduct, Navy Commendation, PUC, Combat Action</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561741</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561741</guid>
		<description>BTW, MB4 was the name of &quot;the hill&quot; at Ft Sill that you had to run if you got x demerits. I am sure that I ran it a lot more than Tommy Franks did. I may have even set some kind of record!!! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, MB4 was the name of &#8220;the hill&#8221; at Ft Sill that you had to run if you got x demerits. I am sure that I ran it a lot more than Tommy Franks did. I may have even set some kind of record!!! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561728</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561728</guid>
		<description>Actually MNDavenotPC, I was not really in the Reserves, other than &quot;on paper&quot;. It was totally civilian &gt; active duty &gt; total civilian (technically in inactive reserves, but no meetings or anything like that). 

If you were in the top 10% (I think it was) of your OCS graduating class (like Tommy Franks I&#039;m pretty sure was) you were offered a commission in the Regular Army (which I think were limited by congress?), if you were NOT in the top 10% you got a commission in the Reserves, but there was really no difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually MNDavenotPC, I was not really in the Reserves, other than &#8220;on paper&#8221;. It was totally civilian &gt; active duty &gt; total civilian (technically in inactive reserves, but no meetings or anything like that). </p>
<p>If you were in the top 10% (I think it was) of your OCS graduating class (like Tommy Franks I&#8217;m pretty sure was) you were offered a commission in the Regular Army (which I think were limited by congress?), if you were NOT in the top 10% you got a commission in the Reserves, but there was really no difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MNDavenotPC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561707</link>
		<dc:creator>MNDavenotPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561707</guid>
		<description>OK you proved you were Reserves.... that says quite a bit   I understand the grade structure and everything. I will post my service as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK you proved you were Reserves&#8230;. that says quite a bit   I understand the grade structure and everything. I will post my service as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561689</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561689</guid>
		<description>doriangrey, are you the official keeper of the &quot;magic questions&quot;?

If I told you where I was born, would you have a &quot;magic question&quot; to check that?

If I told you that I once lived in the DC area of Northern Virginia, would you have a &quot;magic question&quot; to check that?

If I told you what profession I was in, would you have a &quot;magic question&quot; to check that?

I think that you are putting WAY too much faith in your &quot;magic questions&quot;.

If I was going to &quot;google&quot; anything right now it would be for the official terminology of the logical error that you are making.

&lt;i&gt;MNDavenotPC - &quot;I’ll copy my DD214 here if MB4 will….. I’m just a humble non com&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I do not have the set up to photo copy anything &quot;here&quot;. If I did you would probably just say that I got it from someone else.

BTW, few noncoms are humble, wouldn&#039;t be prudent.

You know, I have gotten into some pretty ridiculous &quot;discussions&quot; in my time, but this one is really taking the cake.

I dug out, God only knows why, my last dd form (1 jul 66) 214.

Sample lines (I am NOT going to key in the whole F###ing thing!):

line 4 ARMY - USAR - FA
line 5a Grade, rate or rank: CPT (see 30)
line 11a: Relieved from active duty.
line 11c: SectionXI &amp; XX Ch 3 AR 635-100 SPN 619 Vol Req &amp; DA Msg 281557z Jul 71
line 12: XXIV Corps USARPAC RVN
line 14:USAR CONTROL GROUP (REINFORCEMENT) USAAC St Louis MO 63132
line 20 Ft Sill OK
line 25:CIVIL AFFAIRS OFFICER CRS 5D-8105, 8 weeks, Ft Gordon GA &lt;i&gt;(I had a secondary MOS. Is that OK?)&lt;/i&gt;
line 30: Item 5a: Temp CPT AUS, aptd 30 jun 71; Perm 1LT USAR, apt 30 Jun 71

That&#039;s it for this ridiculousness!!!

PERIOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doriangrey, are you the official keeper of the &#8220;magic questions&#8221;?</p>
<p>If I told you where I was born, would you have a &#8220;magic question&#8221; to check that?</p>
<p>If I told you that I once lived in the DC area of Northern Virginia, would you have a &#8220;magic question&#8221; to check that?</p>
<p>If I told you what profession I was in, would you have a &#8220;magic question&#8221; to check that?</p>
<p>I think that you are putting WAY too much faith in your &#8220;magic questions&#8221;.</p>
<p>If I was going to &#8220;google&#8221; anything right now it would be for the official terminology of the logical error that you are making.</p>
<p><i>MNDavenotPC &#8211; &#8220;I’ll copy my DD214 here if MB4 will….. I’m just a humble non com&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I do not have the set up to photo copy anything &#8220;here&#8221;. If I did you would probably just say that I got it from someone else.</p>
<p>BTW, few noncoms are humble, wouldn&#8217;t be prudent.</p>
<p>You know, I have gotten into some pretty ridiculous &#8220;discussions&#8221; in my time, but this one is really taking the cake.</p>
<p>I dug out, God only knows why, my last dd form (1 jul 66) 214.</p>
<p>Sample lines (I am NOT going to key in the whole F###ing thing!):</p>
<p>line 4 ARMY &#8211; USAR &#8211; FA<br />
line 5a Grade, rate or rank: CPT (see 30)<br />
line 11a: Relieved from active duty.<br />
line 11c: SectionXI &amp; XX Ch 3 AR 635-100 SPN 619 Vol Req &amp; DA Msg 281557z Jul 71<br />
line 12: XXIV Corps USARPAC RVN<br />
line 14:USAR CONTROL GROUP (REINFORCEMENT) USAAC St Louis MO 63132<br />
line 20 Ft Sill OK<br />
line 25:CIVIL AFFAIRS OFFICER CRS 5D-8105, 8 weeks, Ft Gordon GA <i>(I had a secondary MOS. Is that OK?)</i><br />
line 30: Item 5a: Temp CPT AUS, aptd 30 jun 71; Perm 1LT USAR, apt 30 Jun 71</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for this ridiculousness!!!</p>
<p>PERIOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561676</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561676</guid>
		<description>MNDavenotPC on July 16, 2007 at 5:26 PM


MB4 seems to be AWOL...maybe one of his non com&#039;s saluted him on the battlefield...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MNDavenotPC on July 16, 2007 at 5:26 PM</p>
<p>MB4 seems to be AWOL&#8230;maybe one of his non com&#8217;s saluted him on the battlefield&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MNDavenotPC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561576</link>
		<dc:creator>MNDavenotPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561576</guid>
		<description>Oh sans social security number  , I&#039;m not stupid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh sans social security number  , I&#8217;m not stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561563</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561563</guid>
		<description>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 5:13 PM

Awe...whats the matter cant find it on google???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 5:13 PM</p>
<p>Awe&#8230;whats the matter cant find it on google???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MNDavenotPC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561552</link>
		<dc:creator>MNDavenotPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561552</guid>
		<description>Hmmm anyway   I still want Iran a sheet of glass....I&#039;ll copy my DD214 here if MB4 will..... I&#039;m just a humble non com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm anyway   I still want Iran a sheet of glass&#8230;.I&#8217;ll copy my DD214 here if MB4 will&#8230;.. I&#8217;m just a humble non com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561538</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561538</guid>
		<description>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 5:13 PM

Still wrong, strike two, keep swinging...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 5:13 PM</p>
<p>Still wrong, strike two, keep swinging&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561530</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561530</guid>
		<description>&quot;Official&quot; answer, he admits it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Official&#8221; answer, he admits it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561525</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561525</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;doriangrey - &quot;And you are just plain full of shit.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>doriangrey &#8211; &#8220;And you are just plain full of shit.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561508</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561508</guid>
		<description>doriangrey, do not give up your day job to become a logician or you will starve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doriangrey, do not give up your day job to become a logician or you will starve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561494</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561494</guid>
		<description>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 4:54 PM

Nope, you just claimed to be an officer, which you obviously never were, or just like knowing what a gig line is you would have known the correct answer to that. It&#039;s that basic to being an officer in the US Military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 4:54 PM</p>
<p>Nope, you just claimed to be an officer, which you obviously never were, or just like knowing what a gig line is you would have known the correct answer to that. It&#8217;s that basic to being an officer in the US Military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561485</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561485</guid>
		<description>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 4:52 PM

And you are just plain full of shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MB4 on July 16, 2007 at 4:52 PM</p>
<p>And you are just plain full of shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561484</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561484</guid>
		<description>Good God!

It&#039;s not like I said that I was a Starship commander!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good God!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like I said that I was a Starship commander!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561479</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561479</guid>
		<description>and 3200 mils out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and 3200 mils out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561477</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561477</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;doriangrey - &quot;Wrong answer, you were obviously never an officer in the United States Military.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Your logic is uncoordinated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>doriangrey &#8211; &#8220;Wrong answer, you were obviously never an officer in the United States Military.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Your logic is uncoordinated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/comment-page-2/#comment-561472</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/15/guardian-bush-leaning-towards-military-action-on-iran/#comment-561472</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;MNDavenotPC - &quot;I was in the Corps took me 4 years to make E-5 and that was including combat time sheesh.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Back during &quot;my time&quot;, in the Army one could go to basic (2 months), AIT (2 months) then to an NCO version (&quot;Shake and Bake&quot;, 3 months?) that they had of OCS and then become a hard stripper E-5. Total 7 months from &quot;E-0&quot; to E-5 hard stripper. There was some wait time between AIT and &quot;Shake and Bake&quot;, can&#039;t recall how long, but I don&#039;t think that it was very long, maybe just for the paper work to go though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>MNDavenotPC &#8211; &#8220;I was in the Corps took me 4 years to make E-5 and that was including combat time sheesh.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Back during &#8220;my time&#8221;, in the Army one could go to basic (2 months), AIT (2 months) then to an NCO version (&#8221;Shake and Bake&#8221;, 3 months?) that they had of OCS and then become a hard stripper E-5. Total 7 months from &#8220;E-0&#8243; to E-5 hard stripper. There was some wait time between AIT and &#8220;Shake and Bake&#8221;, can&#8217;t recall how long, but I don&#8217;t think that it was very long, maybe just for the paper work to go though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
