Christianity Rebounding in Europe
posted at 8:27 am on July 14, 2007 by see-dubya
Buried behind the WSJ’s subscription wall is a fascinating look at the resurgence of a particular type of Christianity within Europe, and especially within the cold grey socialist paradise of Sweden. There an outraged ACLU-type demanded a hotel chain remove the Bibles from its nightstand drawers, and they complied. Then something rather un-Swedish happened.
A national furor erupted. A conservative bishop announced a boycott. A leftist radical who became a devout Christian and talk-show host denounced the biblical purge in newspaper columns and on television. A young evangelical Christian organized an electronic letter-writing campaign, asking Scandic [the hotel chain]:Why are you removing Bibles but not pay-porn on your TVs?
Scandic, which had started keeping its Bibles behind the front desk, put the New Testament back in guest rooms.
“Sweden is not as secular as we thought,” says Christer Sturmark, head of Sweden’s Humanist Association, a noisy assembly of nonbelievers to which the Bible-protesting hotel guest belongs.
The WSJ reporter seems pretty confident that Christian religiosity is on the upswing, and spends most of the long article trying to explain why that might be. Some economists have an idea about how that could have happened:
As centuries-old churches long favored by the state lose their monopoly grip, Europe’s highly regulated market for religion is opening up to leaner, more-aggressive religious “firms.” The result, they say, is a supply-side stimulus to faith.
“Monopoly churches get lazy,” says Eva Hamberg, a professor at Lund University’s Centre for Theology and Religious Studies and co-author of academic articles that, based on Swedish data, suggest a correlation between an increase in religious competition and a rise in church-going. Europeans are deserting established churches, she says, “but this does not mean they are not religious.”
Upstarts are now plugging new spiritual services across Europe, from U.S.-influenced evangelical churches to a Christian sect that uses a hallucinogenic herbal brew as a stand-in for sacramental wine.
Well, that’s not the kind of “ascension” He meant, but it sounds to me like that church is the exception, whereas charismatic and evangelical churches are more the norm–and are growing rapidly just like they are in the United States. That fact isn’t lost on the free-market theorists:
The enemy of faith, say the supply-siders, is not modernity but state-regulated markets that shield big, established churches from competition. In America, where church and state stand apart, more than 50% of the population worships at least once a month. In Europe, where the state has often supported — but also controlled — the church with money and favors, the rate in many countries is 20% or less.
“The state undermined the church from within,” says Stefan Swärd, a leader of Sweden’s small but growing evangelical movement.
The state supported churches are banal, PC, and empty; they need not compete for parishioners because the state supports them no matter how wacky their ideas, how tepid their sermons, or how empty their church:
Consider the scene on a recent Sunday at Stockholm’s Hedvig Eleonara Church, a parish of the Church of Sweden, a Lutheran institution that until 2000 was an official organ of the Swedish state. Fewer than 40 people, nearly all elderly, gathered in pews beneath a magnificent 18th-century dome. Seven were church employees. The church seats over 1,000.
Hedvig Eleonara has three full-time salaried priests and gets over $2 million each year though a state levy. Annika Sandström, head of its governing board, says she doesn’t believe in God and took the post “on the one condition that no one expects me to go each Sunday.” The church scrapped Sunday school last fall because only five children attended.
Just a few blocks away, Passion Church, an eight-month-old evangelical outfit, fizzed with fervor.
Passion Church is, obviously, not state supported.
What struck me about this piece was that I had just finished reading almost the same argument by Lawrence Henry in the American Spectator Online–about subsidized versus unsubsidized talk radio in the United States. AM talk is competitive, and it’s brash, vibrant and entertaining as the talent struggles–and succeeds–to attract listeners. Meanwhile subsidized radio (ahem NPR ahem) is very professionally produced, but it is also bookish, snobbish, and trending toward irrelevant. If the state-sponsored churches of Sweden lack butts in their pews, the subsidized talkers of NPR lack ears on their frequency. But like the sinecures of the Swedish priesthood, NPR doesn’t care if you listen or not. They get paid either way.
_______________
As for the Christian renaissance in Europe, I witnessed it firsthand a while back while I lived in England. I attended one of the more Anglican of Anglican churches–though it may not have received money from the government it was very much the Established Church. It offered a beautiful, traditional service in a breathtaking building. And it was slowly dying off; the few who came were treated to well-intended, erudite, but PC sermons. Once over sherry after church the vicar told me that modern Anglicans no longer believed in the Virgin Birth–including himself in that tally.
One night I went with some friends to another church, only nominally Anglican, which was meeting in a school auditorium. It was packed with young people and college students, and the two-and-a half hour (!) service was mostly praise music with a modern band and the lyrics projected on a movie screen. The sermon was a striking admonition–the college students were about to be released on Christmas break, and they would go home and likely be subject to ridicule and abuse from their families and friends for their decisions to become Christians. They had to be strong in their faith to put up with that scorn, because that was exactly what Jesus had said they would endure.
I dislike praise-music services, so I didn’t go back–but the contrast couldn’t have been more striking. Nonetheless I loved the muddled, dying church I attended, where one of the priests introduced me to a poem by R.S. Thomas, called The Moon in Lleyn, about the apparent end of religion. As best as I can put it together, it goes like this, although I know I’m missing at least one line:
The last quarter of the moon
of Jesus gives way
to the dark; the serpent
digests the egg…the tide laps
at the Bible; the bell fetches
no people to the brittle miracle
of the bread.
Religion is over,
And what will emerge from the body of the new moon,
no one can say,But a voice sounds in my ear: Why so fast mortal?
These very seas
are baptized. The parish
has a saint’s name time cannot
unfrock. In cities that
have outgrown their promise people
are becoming pilgrims
again, if not to this place,
then to the recreation of it
in their own spirits.
You must remain
Kneeling. Even as this moon
making its way through earth’s
cumbersome shadow, prayer, too
has its phases.
Perhaps in Europe a new phase has begun.
_____
Sorry for the absurd length of this post, but let me add one last note on Sweden and religion. Although several sources claim their suicide rate isn’t quite as elevated as Americans like to claim it is, there was an increase as the welfare state took hold. A 1991 study* by a Wayne State professor
found that the fall in religiosity in Sweden was indeed associated with a rise in the suicide rates of the young.
The finding is a bit problematic, because the study couldn’t completely disentangle a simultaneous breakdown in the institution of marriage in Sweden, which may have been a contributing factor as well. But to whatever degree broken homes or a loss in religiosity were driving a rise in youth suicide, it stands as a rebuke to statist socialism and the abandonment of traditional institutions in the name of progress.
*Stack, Steven. The Effect of Religiosity on Suicide in Sweden: A Time-Series Analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 30, No.4., pp. 462-8.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

DOJ seized logs for five Fox News phones, possibly James Rosens’ parents’ house

Uber DC won one regulatory battle, but they still haven’t won the regulatory war

Ireland: Yes, we have sweet international tax incentives, sorry we’re not sorry





Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Monsieur Hollande, you have no earthly clue what real austerity is, merci beaucoup.
gryphon202 on May 4, 2013 at 11:36 AM
Government wine? (Facepalm.)
RoadRunner on May 4, 2013 at 11:40 AM
Is that really any more ridiculous than the government food commodities our own government purchases?
gryphon202 on May 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM
Do the French really want to tick the Germans off. Again. If so, one can only hope O’Dumbo stays the hell out of it.
GarandFan on May 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM
You want some government cheese to go with that government wine?
Flange on May 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Let them drink wine
BobMbx on May 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM
Like, oh, m’god!
HB3 on May 4, 2013 at 11:56 AM
Being English, I’m loving this!
OldEnglish on May 4, 2013 at 11:56 AM
Government Whine!
xdwall on May 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM
Coolest wine I ever consumed was a Chateau de la Chaize 1976 Beaujolais Tricentennial Edition Magnum. The sales rep of the winery I was working for at the time gave me and the winemaker the bottle. He estimated its worth at about 3500-5000.
It wasn’t the best wine I’ve ever tasted, but it was the best wine in context.
Beaujolais are generally composed of a majority of Gamay Noir grape. Gamay Noirs don’t hold up well over time, and when we opened it, we expected it to taste flat and boring. Not so. For a 35 year old Gamay Noir, the wine was incredible, maintained a ton of fruit, and still had amazing structure considering the scenario. A truly incredible winemaker did some great work in 1976.
blatantblue on May 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM
I’m sure blatantblue will disagree, but anymore French wines are at the bottom of my families list. For the money, domestic or even Aussie wines are better for the buck than their high-priced wines and are just as good IMHO. Buy your local regional wines also. (Unless you’re upstate NY)
hawkdriver on May 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM
HAH! BB.
hawkdriver on May 4, 2013 at 12:04 PM
Night Train, last Tuesday, #3.99
BobMbx on May 4, 2013 at 12:06 PM
I’ll see your Night Train and raise you a Mad Dog 20/20. Don’t make me go all in with Thunderbird.
CaptainNed on May 4, 2013 at 12:09 PM
Maybe Ed can pick up a nice Merlot for his patio time.
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on May 4, 2013 at 12:10 PM
I can understand. It is France after all. Don’t drink the water.
hawkeye54 on May 4, 2013 at 12:14 PM
I trump your wine selections with two words: Silver Satin. I rest my case.
Mason on May 4, 2013 at 12:17 PM
So in other words he’s lying to everyone.
JEM on May 4, 2013 at 12:32 PM
That was a good year for anti-freeze.
steebo77 on May 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM
What’s the word? Thunderbird! Worst headache I’ve ever had, by far, was from drinking that stuff. My head hurts just thinking about it.
Flange on May 4, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Maybe they could get a deal on some Boone’s Farm Strawberry Hill.
trigon on May 4, 2013 at 12:49 PM
Well, I don’t particularly want to make fun of the French.
But they do ask to be ridiculed, so it would be rude of me not to comply.
And I hope you voted UKIP…
JohnGalt23 on May 4, 2013 at 12:51 PM
Had I not escaped to OZ, I would have for sure!
OldEnglish on May 4, 2013 at 1:00 PM
I think the French still ship a lot of good mid-priced wines. I like the Aussies, too, but too much American wine is characterless and/or overpriced.
Why would they even bother cellaring a $20 bottle of wine? And what Palace guest has so little status that they’d be served it?
urban elitist on May 4, 2013 at 1:05 PM
Looks like a lot of folks did this time around – I would trade 100 Republicans for one Nigel Farage. Those of you who haven’t yet should behold some of the man’s youtube clips.
stout77 on May 4, 2013 at 1:16 PM
May the rest of the bottles turn to vinegar!
Spit, double spit.
can_con on May 4, 2013 at 2:10 PM
I wouldn’t completely agree. I’d say a lot of wines we’ve gotten from Virginia are what i would consider regional and in possession of a lot of character.
My family also buys a lot of the wines from the Biltmore Estate label that have a nice distinct taste. I concede it’s not a completely valid argument for them though because so much of the grape juice they start with is actually imported from other regions. What actually comes from their vineyards is very distinct.
I’d be interested to know what French label for mid-price you think is worth buying.
hawkdriver on May 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM
Perhaps we should send barge loads of Boonesfarm, Ripple, Wild Irish Rose… or Muscatel …as humanitarian aid. The wines of brown-bag-wrapped-bottle connoisseurs everywhere.
To be fair, though, Boonesfarm is more widely enjoyed by the wine spritzer crowd, as it has a very low alcohol content with a sort of kool-aid flavor point.
thatsafactjack on May 4, 2013 at 2:36 PM
I don’t know if I’m comfortable sending away crates of Strawberry Hill.
. . . trying to set your “Kool-Aid” snootery aside.
Axe on May 4, 2013 at 4:10 PM
…they’re French!…JugEars will buy it!
KOOLAID2 on May 4, 2013 at 4:20 PM
Sorry. Not ‘snootery’, though.
Check you Sketchbook mail. :)
thatsafactjack on May 4, 2013 at 5:11 PM
Sarc tags are for gurls. :)
k. But give me till the top of the hour; I’m about to update the site.
Axe on May 4, 2013 at 5:15 PM
Gotta have SOMETHING on hand if Obama pays a visit.
JamesS on May 4, 2013 at 7:34 PM
Nothing about huge Ukip surge in UK election? Shame on you, Hot Air
callingallcomets on May 5, 2013 at 5:17 AM
Nothing but the finest box of wine for Barack.
And put an extra straw in it for Big Mooch.
justltl on May 5, 2013 at 6:25 AM
No, and the French were warned about that over 150 years ago:
“Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.”
― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law
ebrown2 on May 5, 2013 at 9:25 AM