Bush unlike Reid and Pelosi shows courage under political fire (Sending others to fight in vain for his “legacy” hardly constitutes courage. If he had courage, rather than hubris, he would admit that he has been in error and show some concern for the U.S. Army and it’s soldiers.) Reid and Pelosi ad the rest of the thinned skin cry-babies fold and run at the first signs of political fighting by the nutroots.(Actually the “nutroots” mostly want them to cut funding and they are not doing that.) the lastest bill by Pelosi was only to cover Pelosi from Cindy. It’s all for show (I won’t agrue that too much.)while our men/women are killing and being killed these scum destroy morale (Who’s morale are they destroying? If our troops believed in “The mission” why would their morale be destroyed? Sounds like you do not think very well of the troops. So sad.)for VOTES(Those in power are suppose to respond to the voters, otherwise we would be living in a tyranny rather than a representative democracy. When I was in the Army I took an oath to defend the Constitution.).

“Well, thank you for giving the Hezbollah viewpoint on this.”

What are you talking about? There are other dangers besides physical danger that you can run from. The Congressman are running from their fear of not being relected. Which makes it even worse.

And yes I know who Murphy was. I also know he was a man of his word. If he gave his word to the soldiers to have their back he would keep it. Not like our “wimps/leaders” of today who stab our soldiers in the back at the first sign of hardship. We could play what/if all day.

Wimps are wimps. The Democratic controlled house and Senate are a bunch of wimps and traitors. They should be spit upon and tared and feathered if not worse.

Bush unlike Reid and Pelosi shows courage under political fire. Reid and Pelosi ad the rest of the thinned skin cry-babies fold and run at the first signs of political fighting by the nutroots. the lastest bill by Pelosi was only to cover Pelosi from Cindy. It’s all for show while our men/women are killing and being killed these scum destroy morale for VOTES.

Worth re-posting. I guess liberals can talk out of both ends.

Hmmm, I believe you may have just uncovered the origins of the phrase “Talking out your a$$”…

… but has anyone else noticed that the Democrats and the media are hyping this “Al Qaeda stronger today” noise, while spending the rest of their time attacking Bush for hyping terrorism as a scare tactic to play politics? So Bush is scaring us for politics because terrorism isn’t a big threat, but at the same time it’s a bigger threat than ever because Bush made it worse?

I’m interested to hear input from the resident libs.

RightWinged on July 13, 2007 at 6:10 AM

Worth re-posting. I guess liberals can talk out of both ends.

Let me run a “scenario” by you. Do you know who Audie Murphy was?

He was the most decorated U.S. Army soldier EVER!.

Cough* Colonel David H. Hackworth cough*

“You know, Ms. Thomas, plastic cosmetic surgery has come a long way…..I mean, really now.”

I’m interested to hear input from the resident libs.

Let me run a “scenario” by you. Do you know who Audie Murphy was?

He was the most decorated U.S. Army soldier EVER!. The Army itself has said “There will NEVER be another Audie Murphy”! If he were still alive and was a congressman he might well vote to end this war. I know a fair amount about him and think that he probably would. But at the VERY LEAST it is very plausible. Would you then call him a wimp? Would you think that it would be OK for Boehner to call him one? He would just have to say yes Sir Senator Boehner, I am a whimp? I am fleeing in terror. I am a coward. EVEN Audie Murphy in response could not call Boehner a “chickenhawk”? Your definition of courage and coward, seems to be based on how someone votes on keeping our troops there. By that “logic” you would have to consider Audie Murphy to be a coward.

None of these congressman is in the military in Iraq. None of them is in any physical danger. None of the yeas or the nays.

You certainly seem to be calling all congressmen, and non congressmen, who want to start ending this thing wimps and say that they are fleeing in terror, and you think that is all fine and dandy, but no one is suppose to even mention anything about “chickenhawks” This is the most one sided thing that I have ever heard of. Truly astounding.

The Senators and Congressmen who are fleeing in terror due to the polls are nothing but wimps.(They are not fleeing in terror. They are on the other side of the planet from Iraq. At some point with Bush’s wide open borders and large numbers of Visas to the ME, I suppose they could come under attack, but that is a different matter. Actually that would be a good test of who ran I suppose.) These men/women voted to go to war. They need to stand by their word and see the damn thing through.(Most of them did, but I don’t see how that obligates them to support it until Shiites and Sunnis kiss and make up and build a wonderful nation together or until hell freezes over, which ever comes first! They voted for it on the belief that pretty much everyone had, including myself, that Saddam had WMD, not on some goal of “Nation building”. Not even Bush thought back then that “we” would have anything like 160,000 troops there now. It was not open ended. They did not give up their right to ever vote again.) Those that run now (Nobody is running! They are voting!) should be defeated in NOV and the Congressional control be damned.

Let me run a “scenario” by you. Do you know who Audie Murphy was? He was the most decorated U.S. Army soldier EVER!. The Army itself has said “There will NEVER be another Audie Murphy”! If he were still alive and was a congressman he might well vote to end this war. I know a fair amount about him and think that he probably would. But at the VERY LEAST it is very plausible. Would you then call him a wimp? Would you think that it would be OK for Boehner to call him one? He would just have to say yes Senator Boehner I am a whimp? Your definition of courage and coward, seems to be how someone votes on keeping our troops there. By that “logic” you would have to consider Audie Murphy to be a coward.

Frankly this is getting a bit absurd. This should be a discussion about the issues, not me. I guess that I am just feeding it however. I will have to stop that now.

3 losses a day in a global war against Islamic imperialism is an incredibly minor casualty rate.

How the media and surrendercrats made this into a Cataclysmic Quagmire shows the Goebbels-esque power of the press and selective images.

The jihadis are not going away.

Unless we kill them.

We can do it in Iraq, at the moment.

Let’s use this opportunity.

They sure as hell deserve it.

He’s wrong, he’s wrong. It has absolutely not failed, and in fact, I’m finally willing to say it in public. I feel like it’s starting to succeed. And you know, I’m kind of stretching a little bit, because we haven’t gone too far into it, but I can see it from my travels around, for instance, in Anbar and out here in Diyala Province as well. Baghdad’s still very problematic. But there’s other areas where you can clearly see that there is a positive effect. And the first and foremost thing we have to do is knock down al Qaeda. And with them alienating so many Iraqis, I mean, they’re almost doing it for us. I mean, yeah, it takes military might to finally like wipe them out of Baquba, but it’s working. I mean, I sense that the surge is working. Reid is just wrong.

She makes me want to change my last name…..oh wait. My last name aint Thomas; but I’ll got-dam-gay-ron-tee that I will NEVER change my last name to Thomas unless it gets me power of attorney over her. If that happens, guess where she’s going! AT’S RIGHT! Press pass pasture.